[I]f Hadrian can build a wall to keep out the Scots there is no reason that Trump cannot build a wall to keep our the Mexicans. If Obama can push through worldwide regulation of bank accounts for tax evasion, Trump can push through national regulation of wire transfers to Mexico, or even shut down the service entirely. If we can remove islam from Spain – despite the terrible damage,and if we can implement nationalism in Europe once, we can remove islam from the west and restore nationalism again. If we reverse hispanic immigration we end the future white minority problem. If we reverse muslim immigration we end the future civil war problem. What is the price of the loss of white america? What is the price of a wall, regulation of wire transfers, and large scale deportation? Don’t let them lie to you. This is trivial work.
Source: Original Site Post
-
The Public and Specialists
[B]ecause specialized knowledge is often counter-intuitive, professionals in a discipline overestimate their understanding. This is why economists can only give opinions on very narrow specializations within their craft. Because of the inescapable effect of anchoring, specialists rapidly decline in predictive ability over random surveys of the general population on matters of public behavior. The general public is a constant victim of overestimating their understanding, and display pervasive dunning-kruger effects. Meanwhile specialists underestimate their understanding for the same reason. While each individual in the general public is demonstrably an idiot about almost everything, enough of the general public grasps his state of affairs well enough to bias the survey of the public opinion toward a more accurate prediction than that of specialists. In other words, a lot of people tend to be more right than a few people when it comes to general things, and specialists tend to be right about very specific things, and everyone in between is pretty much useless.
-
The Public and Specialists
[B]ecause specialized knowledge is often counter-intuitive, professionals in a discipline overestimate their understanding. This is why economists can only give opinions on very narrow specializations within their craft. Because of the inescapable effect of anchoring, specialists rapidly decline in predictive ability over random surveys of the general population on matters of public behavior. The general public is a constant victim of overestimating their understanding, and display pervasive dunning-kruger effects. Meanwhile specialists underestimate their understanding for the same reason. While each individual in the general public is demonstrably an idiot about almost everything, enough of the general public grasps his state of affairs well enough to bias the survey of the public opinion toward a more accurate prediction than that of specialists. In other words, a lot of people tend to be more right than a few people when it comes to general things, and specialists tend to be right about very specific things, and everyone in between is pretty much useless.
-
Confidence in Ignorance
CONFIDENCE IN THEIR IGNORANCE (you see this kind of stupidity from the left and their followers, the muslims)
—If socialism is the next stage of human society, why bother fighting for it?—
Socialism is impossible. It cannot be the next stage of human society. So the question is not meaningful.
–But look at this quote: “…….”—- (moronic sophist drivel that conflates economic and political models, ie: verbalisms.)
Definitions: Socialism: the involuntary organization of investment, production, distribution, and trade and the absence of rational incentives. Capitalism: the voluntary organization of investment, production,m distribution and trade, and the presence of rational incentives. “Mixed Economy“: the voluntary organization of production distribution and trade, and a ‘fee’ collected by the government for use in the production of commons by legislative means. Rule of Law: the market economy in which all actions must be voluntary, fully informed, productive, and free of negative externality Democracy: (economic or unitary) the selection of legislation by majority rule. Republic: the selection of representatives who determine legislative outputs by majority rule as proxy for citizens. Totalitarianism: the choice of commands at the discretion of some elite. So whomever is writing what you quote is a very ignorant person. I have another question: Why do you think you are either smart enough or knowledgeable enough to discuss these topics, and hold an opinion on these topics? This is the interesting question.
-
Confidence in Ignorance
CONFIDENCE IN THEIR IGNORANCE (you see this kind of stupidity from the left and their followers, the muslims)
—If socialism is the next stage of human society, why bother fighting for it?—
Socialism is impossible. It cannot be the next stage of human society. So the question is not meaningful.
–But look at this quote: “…….”—- (moronic sophist drivel that conflates economic and political models, ie: verbalisms.)
Definitions: Socialism: the involuntary organization of investment, production, distribution, and trade and the absence of rational incentives. Capitalism: the voluntary organization of investment, production,m distribution and trade, and the presence of rational incentives. “Mixed Economy“: the voluntary organization of production distribution and trade, and a ‘fee’ collected by the government for use in the production of commons by legislative means. Rule of Law: the market economy in which all actions must be voluntary, fully informed, productive, and free of negative externality Democracy: (economic or unitary) the selection of legislation by majority rule. Republic: the selection of representatives who determine legislative outputs by majority rule as proxy for citizens. Totalitarianism: the choice of commands at the discretion of some elite. So whomever is writing what you quote is a very ignorant person. I have another question: Why do you think you are either smart enough or knowledgeable enough to discuss these topics, and hold an opinion on these topics? This is the interesting question.
-
Philosophers Must Ply A Trade
( [I]’m a technologist just like Da Vinci was a siege engine designer, Plato administrator of a school, Bacon a Lawyer, Descartes a Soldier, Montaigne a bureaucrat, and Spinoza a lens grinder. A man must have a trade if he is not to become a parasite. Most men practice both vocations and avocations. For some they are the same. For others they are different. For Philosophers, unlike scientists, it remains an open question whether we do more harm or good. If we ply a trade we at least tip the balance in favor of good. )
-
Philosophers Must Ply A Trade
( [I]’m a technologist just like Da Vinci was a siege engine designer, Plato administrator of a school, Bacon a Lawyer, Descartes a Soldier, Montaigne a bureaucrat, and Spinoza a lens grinder. A man must have a trade if he is not to become a parasite. Most men practice both vocations and avocations. For some they are the same. For others they are different. For Philosophers, unlike scientists, it remains an open question whether we do more harm or good. If we ply a trade we at least tip the balance in favor of good. )
-
American Fools and Russian Fools. We Need To Fix Each Other.
[A]merica is a well intentioned fool. And Russia is a paranoid fool. They are both fools. The solution for the northern hemisphere is to unite anglo law, german engineering, and Russian resources and to diminish the role of america in european affairs. Russians must have an external enemy or the will be forced to confront the reality that they need none: they are their own worst enemies. Americans must learn that Russians are right in their emphasis on the family nation and culture OVER consumption. And that the american emphasis on CORPORATE state, and CONSUMPTION are antithetical to the preservation of Family,Tribe, and Nation. And Russians must wean themselves off of mistrust and ever present corruption by aggressively expanding the rule of law. The Americans must learn that all attempts to spread democracy have failed. And that democracy is a luxury good that results from the universal nuclear family, the civic society, the rule of natural law, the total suppression of parasitism, and the resulting high trust society – and not in itself a good, or the producers of goods. Americans AND Russians must learn that it is not governments and legislatures that create goods, but truth telling in the populace enforced by unforgiving rule of law that punishes violations of natural law. The British the americans, the Canadians, the Australians the french, the Nordics must learn that they are genetically and culturally the results of thousands of years of eugenic evolution and not the products of self- congratulatory high mindedness. So everyone (as usual) is half right. DEAR PUTIN: if you’re right just speak the truth. You’re right. But when you poison people in Ukraine and UK and you rig elections in Ukraine, and you invade Ukraine, instead of BUYING what you want with rich natural resources, you deserve what you get. When you are unclear with Naive idealistic american Bureaucrats and expect them to understand Russian ‘hinting’ it’s your own fault. When you don’t give them a plan for the integration of the circumpolar people into a united military and economic block you deserve what you get. When you let the worlds chief advocates of human rights into Georgia and you don’t fix corruption, then you deserve what you get. When you cannot clean up your own house which is so pervasively corrupt then you deserve what you get. DEAR AMERICANS: Your time is done. America is the end of the proletarian experiment. Now adults must take charge again in both america and europe. There will be no more democracies. There will be oligarchies and aristocracies, and various degrees of rule of law, becuase men are vastly unequal in their merit to one another. And women have demonstrated once again that they have no place in politics. Because politics is just war by other means. America is just as corrupt if not more so than Russia, China and Ukraine. What kind of corruption allows the degradation of the civic society, the nuclear family, anglo saxon rule of law, the constitution, in order to sustain the power of a central state that all of us despise? RUSSIANS ARE RIGHT ABOUT FAMILY AND CULTURE AND AMERICANS ARE RIGHT ABOUT TRUTH, RULE OF LAW AND CORRUPTION. WE NEED TO FIX EACH OTHER. NEITHER CAN OR SHOULD OR NEEDS TO WIN.
