Source: Original Site Post

  • How To Keep Books For Management First Rather Than For Government First.

    You cannot get a CPA to keep good books no matter what you do. Best advice is to hire an MBA as your CFO. Then strong director or CPA to work for him. CPA’s worry about compliance first and business second, and MBA’s about information for the business first, and compliance as a sunk cost. MBA’s are right. — ACCOUNTING PERIODS– 13, four-week accounting periods “(months)” no matter how much work it is for accounting. Payroll periods, within those accounting periods, preferably every one or two weeks.

    — MANAGERIAL INCOME STATEMENT – Presented in tabular form in the context of rolling 12 months. FOR MANAGEMENT TEAM Subtotals for Cash On Hand. Cash Flow History and Forecast.

    [details]

    Subtotals for EBITDA: profit and loss from operations (cogs) A List of cash related Action Items FOR C-SUITE, BOARD, AND INVESTORS (“stuff that obscures operational excellence or failure”) (!!!includes book value, AND current liquidation value!!!) Subtotals for asset transformation (portfolio) Subtotals for Interest (money costs) FOR CFO, CREDIT(banking) AND TAXES(government) (What I call “Cost of government interference in the business”) Subtotals for regulatory costs (staff, fees, etc) Subtotals for depreciation, and amortization. (regulation) Subtotals for the above: “Net” Subtotals for taxes (taxes) AT THIS POINT ITS NONSENSE Totals of above: “Net/Net” (which is by now a total fabrication in most cases) —FINANCIAL INCOME STATEMENT- (for third parties) Standard income statement for the month/period in question.

  • Differences in Families, Clans, Tribes, Nations, Races

    Working theory: PROBLEM Constant regression toward the mean creates the need for persistent pressures to maintain a genetic advantage in the group. Meaning that groups can regress easily at any point through admixture, or shifting of rates of reproduction within the group. VALUE Man can adapt to any circumstance without requiring evolutionary mutation, but due simply to the frequency of expression of traits in a population as they are needed. This produces an extremely adaptive organism. We adapt by learning, by social norms, and by rates of reproduction between the classes. Because classes are, and always have been, superior and inferior genetic expressions. SPECIATION Yes, it appears that we have been in the process of first eradicating all competitors to homo sapiens sapiens, then through our races beginning to speciate. There are four major races: negroid, mongoloid, Caucasoid: European (northern/forest/plain) Caucasoid, Iranian (southern/desert/steppe) Caucasoid, and many sub-races within them such as Semitic(african/iranian-caucusoid), all of which had begun to speciate. But these differences are explicable as endocrinal, since humans are ‘grown’ and modifying endocrinal expressions produces the differences in the behavior (and look) of the races. THEREFORE1) Most evolutionary differences in the races of homo sapiens are endocrinal. …a) Greater or less sexual dimorphism …b) Greater or less sexual maturity (aggression / impulsivity) …c) Faster or slower sexual maturity (aggression / impulsivity) (Asians low sexual maturity, longer lifespans, low testosterone, followed by whites in the middle, and people of color much higher)) (jewish sexual reversal, African exaggerated masculinity, Asian sexual immaturity, white high sexual dimorphism and delayed maturity) …d) Bigger(more expensive/hotter) or smaller(less expensive/cooler) bodies and brains. …e) Female verbal/empathic and male spatial/operational tendencies are ‘grown’ and largely the result of in-utero development. A male brain is essentially ‘damaged’ by testosterone, and then the remaining brain ‘grows’ by exaggerating a minority of characteristics. Egro endocrinal differences in utero in families can produce wide variations in human traits) 2) Next, some groups have used upward redistribution of reproduction by the upward distribution of food, care, and shelter, and the downward distribution of stresses. …a) Assortative (voluntary) mate selection (good) vs arranged marriages (bad) …b) the prohibition (good) on close cousin marriage (very bad). …c) late marriage (good) vs early marriage (bad) …d) property requirement before marriage (good) or not (bad) …e) ‘taxing’ the underclass so that they bear the brunt of starvation, illness, hard physical labor, and accumulated cellular damage. …f) Manorialism – particularly in Europe and china/japan. (or anywhere there was slavery or serfdom) combines all these features. …g) (and underrated:) high rates of child and infant mortality dependent largely on caloric intake and stresses. 3) The remaining differences are in culling the bottom of the distribution. …a) cold climates where long time preference is required are unforgiving to the impulsive. …b) exposure (killing) of unwanted children …a) Sacrificing the undesirable. …b) Hanging/burning/strangling, the undesirable, criminal. …c) Ostracizing the undesirable under agrarianism (a death sentence) …b) War in all its historical versions. This is a pretty simple set of rules that does not require any material genetic experimentation (mutation) in order to evolve differences between groups other than by the expression of traits. THE SECRET OF WESTERN MAN? We’re the most eugenic peoples ever. We aren’t better per se. We’ve just successfully killed off all the worst for so long that far more good families, clans, and tribes survive than bad families. THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION CHANGED ALL THAT because we could now profit from organizing production and selling to the underclasses, rather than profiting from upward redistribution away from the underclasses. UNIVERSAL DEMOCRACY CHANGED ALL THAT Democracy changed this ancient culture strategy because we changed from one productive family (not one man) one vote, to equal votes for all – and since women are reproductively irresponsible (dysgenic), and the lower classes reproductively damaging(dysgenic), and together are more numerous, they implemented policies that reversed western genetic exceptionalism. We have experienced a temporary ‘burst’ (Flynn effect) which appears to me (statistically) to be an artifact of improving the nutrition of the bottom, and the distribution of scientific (a few general rules) rather than recipes (many specific rules). But this effect will be neutralized (reversed), as the rates of reproduction of the underclasses continue to expand. (There is some promise that all the underclasses will slow reproduction, but this appears to be an artifact of the right-distribution of prior generations, and it’s going to disappear also). IT’S REALLY THAT SIMPLE. You cannot have liberty and prosperity unless you have eugenic civilization.

  • Differences in Families, Clans, Tribes, Nations, Races

    Working theory: PROBLEM Constant regression toward the mean creates the need for persistent pressures to maintain a genetic advantage in the group. Meaning that groups can regress easily at any point through admixture, or shifting of rates of reproduction within the group. VALUE Man can adapt to any circumstance without requiring evolutionary mutation, but due simply to the frequency of expression of traits in a population as they are needed. This produces an extremely adaptive organism. We adapt by learning, by social norms, and by rates of reproduction between the classes. Because classes are, and always have been, superior and inferior genetic expressions. SPECIATION Yes, it appears that we have been in the process of first eradicating all competitors to homo sapiens sapiens, then through our races beginning to speciate. There are four major races: negroid, mongoloid, Caucasoid: European (northern/forest/plain) Caucasoid, Iranian (southern/desert/steppe) Caucasoid, and many sub-races within them such as Semitic(african/iranian-caucusoid), all of which had begun to speciate. But these differences are explicable as endocrinal, since humans are ‘grown’ and modifying endocrinal expressions produces the differences in the behavior (and look) of the races. THEREFORE1) Most evolutionary differences in the races of homo sapiens are endocrinal. …a) Greater or less sexual dimorphism …b) Greater or less sexual maturity (aggression / impulsivity) …c) Faster or slower sexual maturity (aggression / impulsivity) (Asians low sexual maturity, longer lifespans, low testosterone, followed by whites in the middle, and people of color much higher)) (jewish sexual reversal, African exaggerated masculinity, Asian sexual immaturity, white high sexual dimorphism and delayed maturity) …d) Bigger(more expensive/hotter) or smaller(less expensive/cooler) bodies and brains. …e) Female verbal/empathic and male spatial/operational tendencies are ‘grown’ and largely the result of in-utero development. A male brain is essentially ‘damaged’ by testosterone, and then the remaining brain ‘grows’ by exaggerating a minority of characteristics. Egro endocrinal differences in utero in families can produce wide variations in human traits) 2) Next, some groups have used upward redistribution of reproduction by the upward distribution of food, care, and shelter, and the downward distribution of stresses. …a) Assortative (voluntary) mate selection (good) vs arranged marriages (bad) …b) the prohibition (good) on close cousin marriage (very bad). …c) late marriage (good) vs early marriage (bad) …d) property requirement before marriage (good) or not (bad) …e) ‘taxing’ the underclass so that they bear the brunt of starvation, illness, hard physical labor, and accumulated cellular damage. …f) Manorialism – particularly in Europe and china/japan. (or anywhere there was slavery or serfdom) combines all these features. …g) (and underrated:) high rates of child and infant mortality dependent largely on caloric intake and stresses. 3) The remaining differences are in culling the bottom of the distribution. …a) cold climates where long time preference is required are unforgiving to the impulsive. …b) exposure (killing) of unwanted children …a) Sacrificing the undesirable. …b) Hanging/burning/strangling, the undesirable, criminal. …c) Ostracizing the undesirable under agrarianism (a death sentence) …b) War in all its historical versions. This is a pretty simple set of rules that does not require any material genetic experimentation (mutation) in order to evolve differences between groups other than by the expression of traits. THE SECRET OF WESTERN MAN? We’re the most eugenic peoples ever. We aren’t better per se. We’ve just successfully killed off all the worst for so long that far more good families, clans, and tribes survive than bad families. THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION CHANGED ALL THAT because we could now profit from organizing production and selling to the underclasses, rather than profiting from upward redistribution away from the underclasses. UNIVERSAL DEMOCRACY CHANGED ALL THAT Democracy changed this ancient culture strategy because we changed from one productive family (not one man) one vote, to equal votes for all – and since women are reproductively irresponsible (dysgenic), and the lower classes reproductively damaging(dysgenic), and together are more numerous, they implemented policies that reversed western genetic exceptionalism. We have experienced a temporary ‘burst’ (Flynn effect) which appears to me (statistically) to be an artifact of improving the nutrition of the bottom, and the distribution of scientific (a few general rules) rather than recipes (many specific rules). But this effect will be neutralized (reversed), as the rates of reproduction of the underclasses continue to expand. (There is some promise that all the underclasses will slow reproduction, but this appears to be an artifact of the right-distribution of prior generations, and it’s going to disappear also). IT’S REALLY THAT SIMPLE. You cannot have liberty and prosperity unless you have eugenic civilization.

  • Individualism = Statism?

    (Profoundly Important Concept) The Westphalian peace was a unique western invention making STATES accountable for their members. Individualism = Statism. States created individualism. Throughout all history groups have been accountable for the actions of their members. Families, clans, tribes, nations.

    To do otherwise is to force the host population to bear the cost of domesticating a culture. One cannot advocate individualism without advocating statism, and the export of costs onto host communities. There is a reason authors of libertarianism were from disaporic tribes not land holders that had to pay the high cost of holding territory against invaders.
  • Individualism = Statism?

    (Profoundly Important Concept) The Westphalian peace was a unique western invention making STATES accountable for their members. Individualism = Statism. States created individualism. Throughout all history groups have been accountable for the actions of their members. Families, clans, tribes, nations.

    To do otherwise is to force the host population to bear the cost of domesticating a culture. One cannot advocate individualism without advocating statism, and the export of costs onto host communities. There is a reason authors of libertarianism were from disaporic tribes not land holders that had to pay the high cost of holding territory against invaders.
  • How Humans Adapt More Than Evolve

    In my work, I assume that very little genetic ‘evolution’ occurs at all. And that instead, humans possess an extraordinary ability to express multiple evolutionary strategies in response to changes, pressures, and shocks. We can call upon an amazing wealth of genetic expression of ability if we need to. And it can occur rapidly by institutional and status shifts, or slowly over centuries. So I see our genes as an inventory of expressible biases that in combinations produce very different divisions of perception, cognition, knowledge and labor. From the effeminate Ashkenazi gender reversal, to the physical immaturity of Asians, to the masculine African and Muslim, and to everything in between. It’s not clear that we haven’t already passed ‘peak human’ and that once we stopped speciation with the development of large populations, long range trade, and cities. In other words, it’s adaptively preferable to have a large dumb aggressive, highly reproductive, consumptive, expansionary society rather than the benevolent and advanced worlds of star trek we imagine. If anything history shows that civilizations grow to the point where they have funded the evolution of competitors who then conquer them. But we have this wonderful adaptive hierarchy available to us. 1) LEVEL ONE (gender bias) {Paternal, Sovereign, Meritocratic, Eugenic, Packs (K)} + {Maternal, Collective, Equalitarian, Dysgenic, Herds (R)} = Adaptive flexibility. 2) LEVEL TWO (dimorphism) {Increased sexual dimorphism, Decreased sexual Dimorphism} + {Increased sexual maturity, Decreased Sexual Maturity} = Adaptive Flexibility 3) LEVEL THREE (redistribution) Normative and Institutional Redistribution of reproduction (shift) + Normative and Institutional Suppression of class reproduction (shift) = Adaptive Flexibility 4) LEVEL FOUR (mating) Assortative mating and Late Marriage vs Arranged Mating and early marriage. = Adaptive Flexibility 5) LEVEL FIVE (signals) Status Signals => Behavioral Expression of Gene Expression = Adaptive Flexibility 6) LEVEL SIX (design) Education, Training, and Genetic Manipulation. = Adaptive Flexibility With these various methods we can produce a population for almost any purpose within a generation or two.

  • How Humans Adapt More Than Evolve

    In my work, I assume that very little genetic ‘evolution’ occurs at all. And that instead, humans possess an extraordinary ability to express multiple evolutionary strategies in response to changes, pressures, and shocks. We can call upon an amazing wealth of genetic expression of ability if we need to. And it can occur rapidly by institutional and status shifts, or slowly over centuries. So I see our genes as an inventory of expressible biases that in combinations produce very different divisions of perception, cognition, knowledge and labor. From the effeminate Ashkenazi gender reversal, to the physical immaturity of Asians, to the masculine African and Muslim, and to everything in between. It’s not clear that we haven’t already passed ‘peak human’ and that once we stopped speciation with the development of large populations, long range trade, and cities. In other words, it’s adaptively preferable to have a large dumb aggressive, highly reproductive, consumptive, expansionary society rather than the benevolent and advanced worlds of star trek we imagine. If anything history shows that civilizations grow to the point where they have funded the evolution of competitors who then conquer them. But we have this wonderful adaptive hierarchy available to us. 1) LEVEL ONE (gender bias) {Paternal, Sovereign, Meritocratic, Eugenic, Packs (K)} + {Maternal, Collective, Equalitarian, Dysgenic, Herds (R)} = Adaptive flexibility. 2) LEVEL TWO (dimorphism) {Increased sexual dimorphism, Decreased sexual Dimorphism} + {Increased sexual maturity, Decreased Sexual Maturity} = Adaptive Flexibility 3) LEVEL THREE (redistribution) Normative and Institutional Redistribution of reproduction (shift) + Normative and Institutional Suppression of class reproduction (shift) = Adaptive Flexibility 4) LEVEL FOUR (mating) Assortative mating and Late Marriage vs Arranged Mating and early marriage. = Adaptive Flexibility 5) LEVEL FIVE (signals) Status Signals => Behavioral Expression of Gene Expression = Adaptive Flexibility 6) LEVEL SIX (design) Education, Training, and Genetic Manipulation. = Adaptive Flexibility With these various methods we can produce a population for almost any purpose within a generation or two.

  • Los bienes por medio de enseñar lo sagrado

    Texto original de Curt Doolittle Traducido al castellano por Alberto R. Zambrano U. [L]os rituales sagrados (del templo y la iglesia en particular) nos recompensan de la espiritualidad y demás señales influyentes a cambio de aprender la habilidad de suprimir nuestros impulsos. Los rituales más agresivos y exigentes son aquellos que el Islam impone, una multitud de exigencias y repeticiones diarias, el judaísmo impone exigencias intelectuales, el cristianismo lo hace de una forma muy poco exigente y desorganizada, el budismo lo hace de forma espiritual, la forma más ritual son las religiones japonesas del shinto y el budismo, y la forma más difícil y beneficiosa es el estoicismo combinado con el empírico aristotélico de la las leyes y la ciencia. Estos rituales son necesarios en todas las sociedad por ninguna otra razón más que entrenarnos para mostrar piedad (respeto) por nuestros bienes. Los occidentals fueron capaces de desarrollar bienes en algún sentido porque la iglesia suprimió sus impulsos por medio de sus rituales. Lo sagrado es igual a aquello que yo no debo imponer a nadie sin importar el costo.

  • Los bienes por medio de enseñar lo sagrado

    Texto original de Curt Doolittle Traducido al castellano por Alberto R. Zambrano U. [L]os rituales sagrados (del templo y la iglesia en particular) nos recompensan de la espiritualidad y demás señales influyentes a cambio de aprender la habilidad de suprimir nuestros impulsos. Los rituales más agresivos y exigentes son aquellos que el Islam impone, una multitud de exigencias y repeticiones diarias, el judaísmo impone exigencias intelectuales, el cristianismo lo hace de una forma muy poco exigente y desorganizada, el budismo lo hace de forma espiritual, la forma más ritual son las religiones japonesas del shinto y el budismo, y la forma más difícil y beneficiosa es el estoicismo combinado con el empírico aristotélico de la las leyes y la ciencia. Estos rituales son necesarios en todas las sociedad por ninguna otra razón más que entrenarnos para mostrar piedad (respeto) por nuestros bienes. Los occidentals fueron capaces de desarrollar bienes en algún sentido porque la iglesia suprimió sus impulsos por medio de sus rituales. Lo sagrado es igual a aquello que yo no debo imponer a nadie sin importar el costo.

  • Tres niveles de poder

    [U]no puede hacer uso de tres ejes de coerción de esta forma:

    1. Influencia – Informar a otros en sus intereses
    2. Coerción – Usar la coerción para que sigan tus intereses
    3. Poder – Organizar la coerción de otros para que sigan tus intereses o un interés colectivo.