Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Where Are The Us Political Party Manifestos?

    THE MOST ACCURATE AND COMPLETE STATEMENT YOU WILL NEED.

    The left’s manifesto has been public for over a century, and is represented in the ten planks. And the left has been successful and (a) a complete canon of pseudoscience in the social sciences (b) conquest of the primary education and secondary education systems, (c) conquest of the media, and entertainment businesses (d) invasive immigration of the underclasses, (e) financialization of the economy (f) systematic intentional destriction of our constitution of natural law, by selective advocacy of cases that expose the weakensses in created by the initial draft’s compromise with the southern states, and the violations of natural law added to the constitution after the conquest and defeat of the southern states.

    The right’s manifesto CANNOT be made public under majoritarian democracy since the right’s program is entirely EUGENIC. There is a reason the right speaks metaphorically and morally – if they spoke scientifically it would be challenging.

    Now, the right (as usual) is ‘right’. But its unacceptable under democracy to state that the entire reason we lifted Europe out of ignorance and poverty was that northern Europe like greco-roman civilization was terribly meritocratic, and northern Europe additionally heavily eugenic.

    The puritans who founded the USA were pursuing a eugenic strategy.

    https://www.quora.com/Where-are-the-US-political-party-manifestos

  • How Would An Anarcho Capitalist Society Look Like, In The Long Run?

    (a) Libertines (anarcho capitalists) differ from libertarians (jeffersonian contractualists), where Contractualist Libertarian = do no harm to the commons, and anarchist libertine = do no good to the commons. This is the underlying principle of decidability in libertinism (anarcho capitalism): avoid costs of physical, normative, an cultural commons, where the principle of decidability in libertarianism is merely the prohibition on the imposition of costs that would cause retaliation.

    (b) no anarcho capitalist polity can form out of rational economic incentives because without commons and territory on low cost trading routes, any such polity must be endogenously parasitic.

    (c) no anarcho capitalist can retain desirable, productive individuals in competition with other societies that do produce commons that add multipliers to the market for reproduction and production.

    (d) any anarcho capitalist polity that did survive would be limited to endogenously parasitic members, and those polities that bore the parasitism would eventually, when in a period of stress, colonize, conquer, or destroy such a polity (pirates, drug dealers, money launderers etc).

    (e) Ergo no anarcho capitalist society is possible -and its arguable whether one was desirable. If you need a nearly lawless borderland and will bear the costs to consumption of living there, then go. Antartica, Siberia, and canada contain vast areas of unused territory because it has not economic value higher than it’s costs of survival in harsh conditions.

    The only possible liberty is that of the anglo saxons: contractualism. And the only means of achieving it is to eliminate demand for the state as a suppressor of aggression and retaliation by the use of the common law to prohibit the imposition of costs on life, kin, relations, things, built capital, norms, traditions, and institutions.

    There is only one possible form of liberty then: the only social science man has discovered: rule of law, natural law, common judge discovered law, universal enfranchisement, and universal accountability, and universal reciprocal insurance.

    Curt

    https://www.quora.com/How-would-an-Anarcho-Capitalist-society-look-like-in-the-long-run

  • Do Scientists Actively Believe That Everything Has An Explanation?

    Of course everything CAN BE EXPLAINED. The problem is in observing it.
    Much of the universe is open to electromagnetic inspection, but not enough of it. Until we can inspect something it is very hard to do anything other than deduce that explanation from the events that surround it.

    BUT THATS NOT THE POINT.
    The point you’re probably getting at, and the one science exists to expose, is the use of comforting or appealing, or satisfying LIES to fool people.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-scientists-actively-believe-that-everything-has-an-explanation

  • If You Could Posses A Super Power, What Would It Be?

    Sending people to Hell.

    https://www.quora.com/If-you-could-posses-a-super-power-what-would-it-be

  • What Is The Most Powerful Position In Government?

    The Chairman of the Central Bank. There is no question about it.

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-most-powerful-position-in-government

  • What Is The True Intelligence Of Someone Who Seeks Petty Conflict On The Internet For Its Own Sake Or Rather As Something To Self-aggrandize Himself?

    What is the comparative intelligence of people who get paid to make up these questions so that quora can fake its statistics?

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-true-intelligence-of-someone-who-seeks-petty-conflict-on-the-internet-for-its-own-sake-or-rather-as-something-to-self-aggrandize-himself

  • Why Is Neo-progressivism So Reliant Upon The Re-appropriation Of Marxist Doctrine And Critical Theory?

    1) Conservatism must speak in historical, moral, allegorical, and religious language because if stated ratio-scientifically it’s reducible to ‘eugenics in everything’, just as all of western civilization has been since the Kurgan invasions. So conservatives do not lie they just do not speak the truth.

    2) Neo-Liberalism is just an attempt to turn america into the levant or south america so that an upper managerial caste can form and profit from administration of a vast underclass, just as the cosmopolitans did in eastern Europe before migrating to the states. They cannot say this. And there is no way to speak truthfully. Since they failed at pseudo-rational marxist religion, pseudoscientific economics and social science, and just gave up advocacy and started attacking western civilization at every level (cultural marxism / postmodernism / the frankfurt school).

    Democracy creates incentives to lie. Rule of law (constitutionalism) creates incentives to tell the truth. But conservatives don’t tell the truth, and neo-liberals just lie.

    Humans are vastly unequal and our evolution has been 5x that of the difference between humans and chimpanzees over the past 30k years alone. These differences are largely visible as differences in rates of maturity, depth of maturity, and sexual dimorphism, and the relative sizes of the lower and upper classes.

    This means that conservatism is true but a large domestic empire is impossible. It means that progressivism is false, and that a large domestic empire will produced colored casts very much like india with little or no rotation.

    Everyone lies.

    The only solution is to break up the empire and continue the BIG SORT.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-is-neo-progressivism-so-reliant-upon-the-re-appropriation-of-Marxist-doctrine-and-Critical-Theory

  • Why Do We Have Laws If Criminals Are Going To Ignore Them?

    You don’t understand. Laws are the terms of the insurance policy that we demand of the state in order for not using violence ourselves.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-we-have-laws-if-criminals-are-going-to-ignore-them

  • How Large Is The Alternative Right? How Fast Is It Growing?

    I am personally, within my lifetime, going to convert the (rather large) Alt Right into the New Right. The reasons why this is easy, has almost everything to do with geographic distribution and demographics.

    https://www.quora.com/How-large-is-the-alternative-right-How-fast-is-it-growing

  • Who Pees Outside More: Conservative Or Liberal Women?

    Conservative women at campsites.

    Liberal women drunk on the street.

    https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Who-pees-outside-more-conservative-or-liberal-women