Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • The Non-obvious Benefits Of Market Government

    (important topic) William Butchman just indirectly reminded me that when I say ‘market government’ is the most likely candidate for creating a beneficial form of ‘post majoritarian rule’ while retaining the benefit of creating non-monopolistic commons:
    a) that groups are not prevented from creating what we call anarchic (private contractual) commons, simply by setting conditions of use for the semi-private property. In other words, the Hoppeian contractual model of commons still exists. b) however, by creating a market for the EXCHANGE of commons, we can conduct trades between classes for the construction of commons, thereby obtaining through the exchange of commons what we cannot obtain through either the market, or by the private production of commons. c) the importance of this insight is that we are all compelled to think of what commons we can offer to others just as we are compelled to think of what private goods and services we can offer to others. The most common exchange will be behavior and norms for material goods, services, access and various forms of insurance. d) and that we can create competing commons (monorail vs trains) where before – only monopoly existed. If you can create a commons by wholly private construction, public non-prohibition of private construction, public competition with other common projects, or shared consent via exchange, or shared consent by mutual interest, then you are able to construct commons in every possible means rather than by the one means of majority rule – and that the most effective method of constructing commons is to trade with other classes what you have to supply: labor and good normative public behavior, for knowledge, organization, and wealth. While at the same time, no one can create parasitic commons because no such contract can survive the test of natural law that all contracts must survive. Furthermore, without monopoly production of commons there is no reason for politicals to pass legislation or regulation, only facilitate the market for the production of commons – which is in all our interests, and requires very little that we ask of man’s character to work other than by natural incentives. Again, a legal system that takes its decidability from the natural law and evolves by empirical experimentation via the common law, with universal standing and universal applicability, combined with a market for reproduction (family), a market for production of goods and services (the economy), and a market for the production of commons (government in the loosest sense), is the most empirical and truthful non-parasitic order that we can construct. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • June – July – August Quotes

    I’m probably not that much smarter than you are. I’m just dumb about different things.
    You’re not “Conservative” or “Liberal” anymore. You’re either a Globalist or you’re an American.
    —i hope rothbard comes back from the grave to voluntarily slice your neck off —ancap_venetaz Then I’d just make him my bitch in person as well. 😉
    On Intelligence Gathering: Hacking People. Where does the world get the idea that our CIA so powerful? Movies? Novels? They clearly don’t understand – it’s a nerd army. Ridiculous.
    How could you walk away from the Manning and Snowden releases thinking that our state and intel groups could even organize a dinner party?
    Intelligence is more like a matchmaking service. Watch millionaire matchmaker. It’s not all that different. People are just a lot smarter.
    Intel people practice being paranoid for a living. They aren’t aggressive.They certainly aren’t scary. That’s the military. They’re curious.
    There are people everywhere in this world who want to create political change that just want a bit of unexpected help or info.You help them.
    It doesn’t take a vast cunning conspiracy to help people form relationships or to assist them in getting information. Just be likeable.
    The hard part of the intel business is getting ‘the state of mind’ of the world’s most influential decision makers. That’s an art form.
    I mean, I know ‘spying’ on communications is supposed to be sexy but. I mean. Seriously. Can you imagine the tedium? You know, it wasn’t rocket science to spread those cunning little bits of software around the world. Trivial really: Patience. Likeability.
    Any hacker will tell you the same thing: you hack people. Intel hacks people. There’s no difference.
    On Intelligence Maybe the correct way to describe the intelligence spectrum is this:
    At 100-110 you start to be able to construct physical models. You can repair machines. And learn by being taught. At 110 to 120 you start to be able to construct non physical models and learn independently. ( calculate ) At 120 to 130 you start to be able to model new machines (design machines. ) At 130 to 140 synthesize and communicate abstract ideas. 140 + model ( invent ) new ideas
    It’s not pathological altruism. It’s hight trust and Aryanism. The same thing that gave us fertile ground for Christianity and white man’s burden, and progressivism, and the same thing that gave the Russians their urge for conquest and empire.
    LET’S REVISIT THIS: If your religion is incompatible with natural law then it’s not a religion but a political system for the conduct of warfare by other means. PERIOD. END OF ARGUMENT. YOU’RE GONE.  Intelligence is like happy families and domesticatable animals: a lot of things have to go right, and a lot of things can’t go wrong. That’s why intelligence is a difficult property to breed for.
    Testimonialism and propertarianism don’t make you right. They just make it a lot, lot, lot harder to get it wrong.
    Morals and Beliefs demand the same goals of us. Property and Laws tolerate differences in goals. Markets arrange shared means despite different ends.
    The fact that the analytic movement in philosophy was a dead end, and that I’m criticizing mathematics on constructivist grounds is really the same criticism: there isn’t enough information there to say what you are saying about it.
    The analytic movement in philosophy will look like nothing compared tot he operational movement in philosophy. And testimonialism will change the world for hundreds of years.
    Propertarian and Testimonial arguments are a bit like math or programming in that it’s really helpful to have pencil and paper (or keyboard and screen) because youre really trying to construct a proof, and it’s pretty hard to do off the top of your head. Proofs are symbolically wordy things. Programs are wordy things, propertarian and testimonial arguments are wordy things, and contracts are wordy things. All for the same reason: testability and operation construction. So if it’s hard, its understandable.
    Natural Law is God’s Law. Not because men claim so, not because a prophets claim so, but because it is necessary for our prosperity, regardless of whether men or prophets claim so.
    We still have a lot of people practicing the justificationism of saying “Can I get away with saying this without a contradiction?” and too few of us saying “What information was present and where did it go or come from?” It is as antique to use justificationism as it is to use mysticism. And by antique I mean ‘false’.
    —“In a sense science is a political agenda, since it is a set of norms that guide human cooperation in an effort to implement an adaptive strategy that is basedupon the expansion of knowledge.”— Adam Voight
    **Specialization Leads To Justification.**
    Children speak of morals and beliefs. Adults speak of incentives and institutions. It’s not hard to separate argumentative boys from men.
    Plato wants to restore the past. Why? Because he doesn’t have a solution. So he’s analogous to 20th/c conservatives.
    The fact that the analytic movement in philosophy was a dead end, and that I’m criticizing mathematics on constructivist grounds is really the same criticism: there isn’t enough information there to say what you are saying about it.
    The analytic movement in philosophy will look like nothing compared tot he operational movement in philosophy. And testimonialism will change the world for hundreds of years.
    Propertarian and Testimonial arguments are a bit like math or programming in that it’s really helpful to have pencil and paper (or keyboard and screen) because you’re really trying to construct a proof, and it’s pretty hard to do off the top of your head. Proofs are symbolically wordy things. Programs are wordy things, propertarian and testimonial arguments are wordy things, and contracts are wordy things. All for the same reason: testability and operation construction. So if it’s hard, its understandable. I never know I am right. I just make the best argument I can and see if it survives, and I explore the other fellow’s argument until I realize it does or doesn’t. By this rather burdensome but simple technique, I seem to have done pretty well at increasing human explanatory power and its parsimonious expression. But maybe someone will come along and do better…. seems like the trend. – although I am left wondering now what the next dimension of reality is that we can explain with words and mathematics that it still vaguely comprehensible to the human mind. Although I must say, that humility is a luxury good, since most people pursue political ideas for the purpose of constructing self and interpersonal status that they cannot achieve in reproductive, artistic, entrepreneurial, or craftsmanly pursuits. So that when you tell a man he is wrong, you are telling him not to abandon a neutral theory, but to abandon his concept of self-worth. You don’t think we are done paying the high cost of domesticating man, do you? The evidence is out there. To domesticate, we must rule. To rule we must bear the costs of rule. The battle (Athens-Rome / London-Germany / New-England-Virginia) VS (Jerusalem-Babylon-Memphis / Ukraine-Frankfurt-Moscow-Paris) tips again. The great lies were invented in the ancient and modern world for the underclasses who were domesticated out of barbarism – not oppressed. In this revolution, our people don’t know the words to use yet. We must give them the language to restore western aristocratic culture.The revolution against the great lie of cosmopolitan pseudoscience, cultural marxism, political correctness, and universalism has come. Christian (caretaking) Universalism is merely a mask over Aryan (domesticating) Universalism. To the aristocracy, Christianity is an excuse and nothing more. To the common man it is insurance that the aristocracy continue to take care and evolve, rather than prey upon and merely exploit them. The Russian Needs (emotional)Orthodoxy the way the American Needs (analytic)Constitutionalism. But underneath those masks is the same face: Aryanism: saving mankind through domestication of the barbarians. Today’s social ills are the intentional product of the marxist socialists and their claim that a utopia is possible, rather than the evidence that natural law in fact has made extant relative utopias in every era. (What classifies you as an Aryan may be in your genes, or it may not be, but it is reducible to the domestication of Man by productive, eugenic, means, that raise him out of ignorance, disease, and poverty.) They specialize in lying you know. They have been specializing in it for all of recorded history. We must add but a few paragraphs to a constitution to render them silent. In most cases, you have power because people want you to have it. (Power) “The feminine and the effeminate fear being left behind while the masculine are driven to get ahead.” – Curt Doolittle —“… ethical theory is also a subfield of evolutionary theory, since it deals with the rules of cooperation possible for social networks of rational agents.”—Adam Voight (bingo.) Australia: The most privileged white people, wallow in the resource-curse and like Canada,produce virtue-signaling as their primary export. We must achieve by force what they have achieved in both the ancient and modern world by deceits. Crossing my fingers that we will soon depart the STATISTICALLY CORRELATIVE era of policy, and enter the OPERATIONALLY EXISTENTIAL era of policy. Will science defeat the era of pseudoscience?
    You can be both a libertarian and a redistributionist as long as youre also a eugenicist. 😉 The problem is eugenics. Our ancestors knew that.
    We have had enough liars between priests, philosophers, politicians and the artists to last humanity for eternity.
    Proles. We are supposed to conquer, disempower, civilise, and if necessary enslave these people. And for the good of humanity limit their ability to reproduce. Aren’t we? Why do we give them political power over us rather than place political power over them?
    Every attempt at a eugenic state has failed for the same reason: insufficient violence to preserve it, and insufficient honesty in its constitution.
    —” Women don’t do bell curves. “—  That really says it all. It’s the best meme I’ve run into. It’s not just that they can’t. It’s that THEY’RE AFRAID TO. Women are as afraid of bell curves as little girls are afraid of spiders. The bell curve is helpful to the bull, and fearful for the doe.
    The family domesticated the evil in women just as much as it domesticate the evil in men.
    “Truth is Enough”? In this era it seems too subtle a solution to the restoration of the West. But passions fade. And law transforms and endures.
    “Poverty is a disease parents pass to their children.”—Ayelam Valentine Agaliba
    Let me explain how to propose a criticism: explain how something can’t be true because the incentives don’t exist for the individual.
    Western Testimonial Truth for aristocracy, and Eastern Mysticism of Lies for slaves,evolved for rule between peers, and over slaves. Choose.
    Man is rational, not moral. It is just that it is rational to act morally. And over the eons we have developed instincts that encourage us to act morally whenever it is rational.
    The value of cooperation must always outweigh the value of predation. Thankfully it usually does – because we raise the cost of predation so high that the meager returns on cooperation outweigh the costs of ever-enticing predation.
    We do not need christianity in order to have the virtues of a christian ethos. We need only history, heroes, rituals, and ceremonies.
    Would you not be willing to sacrifice the comforting lie of Christianity in return for killing all the great lies mystic and pseudoscientic?
    If we can suppress violence to prevent harm, why cannot we suppress mysticism, pseudoscience, propaganda, gossip and lies to prevent harm?
    Men have had 50K years to develop methods of converting violence to production. Yet women still gossip, rally and shame to preserve lies.
    Why is it that men must suppress our urges for violence, while women are not required to suppress their urges for lies denying reality?
     We must encourage truthful speech, but why do we not punish untruthful speech? Including our comforting ancient and modern lies?
    There is no difference between the fertile crescent lies, and Marx/Boaz/Freud/Frankfurt, except mysticism vs pseudoscience. We teach lies.
    Didn’t we invent truth, testimony, jury, reason, logic, science, so that we could teach the truth? Why must we teach lies made for slaves?
    Didn’t the Greeks,Romans,Germanics tell us how to rule free men? With the Oath, Truthful Testimony, Jury of Peers, and Rule of Natural law?
    We have created a secular church that teaches the ancient egyptian, babylonian, jewish, byzantine lies invented to rule flood plain slaves?
    Isn’t it true that the longer a country has been Christian, the more corrupt is its government and the more untrusting their people?
    Isn’t the word separatable into the Aristotelian (true) and the magical (lies?) Isn’t the Aristotelian liberty and the Semitic despotism?
    Why must we be indoctrinated into a series of lies from the postmodern to marxist to christianjudaism, to abrahamicjudaism, to egyptian?
    Why can’t we produce a new religion with fitness, education, banking, history, the sacredness of nature, and community ritual? No more lies.
    Why can’t we go to church every day, trained in fitness, educated in the basics, and in life skills rather than lies and political doctrine?
    Nature, History, and Rituals that treat Nature, Nation, Family, and Individual as sacred, produce the goods of religious lies without lying.
    All groups need myth and ritual. But why do we need lies? Familiar, Comforting Lies, fables, and pseudosciences are still all lies, right?
    Marx/Boaz/Freud/Frankfurt Lies > Keynesian Pseudoscience > Literary Postmodernism, the myth of oppression: They’re great lies, right?
    Egyptian Monotheism > Jewish Monotheism > Eastern Christian Jewish Monotheism > Marxist/Freud/Boaz/Frankfurt: They’re all GREAT lies, right?
    –Truths seem to require extraordinary investments. Not only in discovery, but in maintenance.  Not every society is up to it, and those who are will likely not be for ever. Fable, myth, allegory and white lie might be cheaper and more resilient vessels for information. —Steve Lacasse 
    We are the greatest super predators that exist. Revel in it. Seize your day. Reap the glory. Be what you were born to be. Kill them all.
    How can man die better, than facing fearful odds, for the labors of his fathers, and the glory of his gods.
    We are born with a wealth of violence that we lend to the state to create liberty on our behalf. Repossess your investment. Use it yourself.
    How can a man feel more free than the punishment, hanging, impaling, and burning of those who would destroy the efforts of his ancestors? There is but one way to preserve your inheritance from parasites and invaders – that is with the organize application of violence.
    What possible action is more moral than the preservation of Kin, Kith, Culture, and History – the inheritance you would transfer to young?
    We do not need to make all people fear.We need only make the invaders to fear – for generations.Revolution has never been easier to achieve.
    The most ‘sovereign’ action you can perform is to judge the actions of yourself and others, and act the Sheriff of yourself and others.
    Never has infrastructure, society, state, and biomass, been so fragile. Remove the economic foundation and it will collapse of own accord.
    Never in history has the Parasitic Leviathan been so vulnerable. Keyensian credit and feminist indiscipline has created profound fragility.
    We create liberty by removing the parasites, so that only liberty remains. We do not advocate liberty. We CREATE it with organized violence. Liberty exists only when every man’s a sheriff: speak the truth, impose no cost, pay the cost of suppressing the parasitism of others.
    Liberty is an expensive, demanding, and subtractive process: inform, remove, punish, or kill parasites, and burn and bury all their filth.
    You can’t create liberty by shaming and rallying.You create liberty when every man acts a sheriff and informs, punishes, or kills parasites. You don’t create a clean environment by convincing people of the virtues of cleanliness any more than you create liberty by convincing them of the virtues of liberty.
    Civil war is the natural and necessary outcome of the inability to find institutional solutions the problem of cooperation among peoples with heterogeneous interests. Our interests are heterogeneous. And western wealth is no longer sufficient to obscure that fact. We are destined, in the near future for another civil war which can be even more terrible and destructive than the last.
    “People talk about reactionaries as if they’re the pest, rather than the pest control.”–Carlos Clark
    Quibble if you want. But roughly 20% of the active population is dead weight negative and about 33% useless.Sorry. You can’t educate stupid. Like carving a sculpture from stone, liberty is a subtractive process: revealed by the patient labor of eliminating the illiberal. Those occupations we perform are measures of our gifts. Those commons we produce measures of our character. While we are unequal in the potential use of our gifts, we are equal in our potential construction of our character. Because while production consists of chat we choose to do, character and commons consist of what we choose not to do. Doing costs resources. Not doing costs will.  

  • June – July – August Quotes

    I’m probably not that much smarter than you are. I’m just dumb about different things.
    You’re not “Conservative” or “Liberal” anymore. You’re either a Globalist or you’re an American.
    —i hope rothbard comes back from the grave to voluntarily slice your neck off —ancap_venetaz Then I’d just make him my bitch in person as well. 😉
    On Intelligence Gathering: Hacking People. Where does the world get the idea that our CIA so powerful? Movies? Novels? They clearly don’t understand – it’s a nerd army. Ridiculous.
    How could you walk away from the Manning and Snowden releases thinking that our state and intel groups could even organize a dinner party?
    Intelligence is more like a matchmaking service. Watch millionaire matchmaker. It’s not all that different. People are just a lot smarter.
    Intel people practice being paranoid for a living. They aren’t aggressive.They certainly aren’t scary. That’s the military. They’re curious.
    There are people everywhere in this world who want to create political change that just want a bit of unexpected help or info.You help them.
    It doesn’t take a vast cunning conspiracy to help people form relationships or to assist them in getting information. Just be likeable.
    The hard part of the intel business is getting ‘the state of mind’ of the world’s most influential decision makers. That’s an art form.
    I mean, I know ‘spying’ on communications is supposed to be sexy but. I mean. Seriously. Can you imagine the tedium? You know, it wasn’t rocket science to spread those cunning little bits of software around the world. Trivial really: Patience. Likeability.
    Any hacker will tell you the same thing: you hack people. Intel hacks people. There’s no difference.
    On Intelligence Maybe the correct way to describe the intelligence spectrum is this:
    At 100-110 you start to be able to construct physical models. You can repair machines. And learn by being taught. At 110 to 120 you start to be able to construct non physical models and learn independently. ( calculate ) At 120 to 130 you start to be able to model new machines (design machines. ) At 130 to 140 synthesize and communicate abstract ideas. 140 + model ( invent ) new ideas
    It’s not pathological altruism. It’s hight trust and Aryanism. The same thing that gave us fertile ground for Christianity and white man’s burden, and progressivism, and the same thing that gave the Russians their urge for conquest and empire.
    LET’S REVISIT THIS: If your religion is incompatible with natural law then it’s not a religion but a political system for the conduct of warfare by other means. PERIOD. END OF ARGUMENT. YOU’RE GONE.  Intelligence is like happy families and domesticatable animals: a lot of things have to go right, and a lot of things can’t go wrong. That’s why intelligence is a difficult property to breed for.
    Testimonialism and propertarianism don’t make you right. They just make it a lot, lot, lot harder to get it wrong.
    Morals and Beliefs demand the same goals of us. Property and Laws tolerate differences in goals. Markets arrange shared means despite different ends.
    The fact that the analytic movement in philosophy was a dead end, and that I’m criticizing mathematics on constructivist grounds is really the same criticism: there isn’t enough information there to say what you are saying about it.
    The analytic movement in philosophy will look like nothing compared tot he operational movement in philosophy. And testimonialism will change the world for hundreds of years.
    Propertarian and Testimonial arguments are a bit like math or programming in that it’s really helpful to have pencil and paper (or keyboard and screen) because youre really trying to construct a proof, and it’s pretty hard to do off the top of your head. Proofs are symbolically wordy things. Programs are wordy things, propertarian and testimonial arguments are wordy things, and contracts are wordy things. All for the same reason: testability and operation construction. So if it’s hard, its understandable.
    Natural Law is God’s Law. Not because men claim so, not because a prophets claim so, but because it is necessary for our prosperity, regardless of whether men or prophets claim so.
    We still have a lot of people practicing the justificationism of saying “Can I get away with saying this without a contradiction?” and too few of us saying “What information was present and where did it go or come from?” It is as antique to use justificationism as it is to use mysticism. And by antique I mean ‘false’.
    —“In a sense science is a political agenda, since it is a set of norms that guide human cooperation in an effort to implement an adaptive strategy that is basedupon the expansion of knowledge.”— Adam Voight
    **Specialization Leads To Justification.**
    Children speak of morals and beliefs. Adults speak of incentives and institutions. It’s not hard to separate argumentative boys from men.
    Plato wants to restore the past. Why? Because he doesn’t have a solution. So he’s analogous to 20th/c conservatives.
    The fact that the analytic movement in philosophy was a dead end, and that I’m criticizing mathematics on constructivist grounds is really the same criticism: there isn’t enough information there to say what you are saying about it.
    The analytic movement in philosophy will look like nothing compared tot he operational movement in philosophy. And testimonialism will change the world for hundreds of years.
    Propertarian and Testimonial arguments are a bit like math or programming in that it’s really helpful to have pencil and paper (or keyboard and screen) because you’re really trying to construct a proof, and it’s pretty hard to do off the top of your head. Proofs are symbolically wordy things. Programs are wordy things, propertarian and testimonial arguments are wordy things, and contracts are wordy things. All for the same reason: testability and operation construction. So if it’s hard, its understandable. I never know I am right. I just make the best argument I can and see if it survives, and I explore the other fellow’s argument until I realize it does or doesn’t. By this rather burdensome but simple technique, I seem to have done pretty well at increasing human explanatory power and its parsimonious expression. But maybe someone will come along and do better…. seems like the trend. – although I am left wondering now what the next dimension of reality is that we can explain with words and mathematics that it still vaguely comprehensible to the human mind. Although I must say, that humility is a luxury good, since most people pursue political ideas for the purpose of constructing self and interpersonal status that they cannot achieve in reproductive, artistic, entrepreneurial, or craftsmanly pursuits. So that when you tell a man he is wrong, you are telling him not to abandon a neutral theory, but to abandon his concept of self-worth. You don’t think we are done paying the high cost of domesticating man, do you? The evidence is out there. To domesticate, we must rule. To rule we must bear the costs of rule. The battle (Athens-Rome / London-Germany / New-England-Virginia) VS (Jerusalem-Babylon-Memphis / Ukraine-Frankfurt-Moscow-Paris) tips again. The great lies were invented in the ancient and modern world for the underclasses who were domesticated out of barbarism – not oppressed. In this revolution, our people don’t know the words to use yet. We must give them the language to restore western aristocratic culture.The revolution against the great lie of cosmopolitan pseudoscience, cultural marxism, political correctness, and universalism has come. Christian (caretaking) Universalism is merely a mask over Aryan (domesticating) Universalism. To the aristocracy, Christianity is an excuse and nothing more. To the common man it is insurance that the aristocracy continue to take care and evolve, rather than prey upon and merely exploit them. The Russian Needs (emotional)Orthodoxy the way the American Needs (analytic)Constitutionalism. But underneath those masks is the same face: Aryanism: saving mankind through domestication of the barbarians. Today’s social ills are the intentional product of the marxist socialists and their claim that a utopia is possible, rather than the evidence that natural law in fact has made extant relative utopias in every era. (What classifies you as an Aryan may be in your genes, or it may not be, but it is reducible to the domestication of Man by productive, eugenic, means, that raise him out of ignorance, disease, and poverty.) They specialize in lying you know. They have been specializing in it for all of recorded history. We must add but a few paragraphs to a constitution to render them silent. In most cases, you have power because people want you to have it. (Power) “The feminine and the effeminate fear being left behind while the masculine are driven to get ahead.” – Curt Doolittle —“… ethical theory is also a subfield of evolutionary theory, since it deals with the rules of cooperation possible for social networks of rational agents.”—Adam Voight (bingo.) Australia: The most privileged white people, wallow in the resource-curse and like Canada,produce virtue-signaling as their primary export. We must achieve by force what they have achieved in both the ancient and modern world by deceits. Crossing my fingers that we will soon depart the STATISTICALLY CORRELATIVE era of policy, and enter the OPERATIONALLY EXISTENTIAL era of policy. Will science defeat the era of pseudoscience?
    You can be both a libertarian and a redistributionist as long as youre also a eugenicist. 😉 The problem is eugenics. Our ancestors knew that.
    We have had enough liars between priests, philosophers, politicians and the artists to last humanity for eternity.
    Proles. We are supposed to conquer, disempower, civilise, and if necessary enslave these people. And for the good of humanity limit their ability to reproduce. Aren’t we? Why do we give them political power over us rather than place political power over them?
    Every attempt at a eugenic state has failed for the same reason: insufficient violence to preserve it, and insufficient honesty in its constitution.
    —” Women don’t do bell curves. “—  That really says it all. It’s the best meme I’ve run into. It’s not just that they can’t. It’s that THEY’RE AFRAID TO. Women are as afraid of bell curves as little girls are afraid of spiders. The bell curve is helpful to the bull, and fearful for the doe.
    The family domesticated the evil in women just as much as it domesticate the evil in men.
    “Truth is Enough”? In this era it seems too subtle a solution to the restoration of the West. But passions fade. And law transforms and endures.
    “Poverty is a disease parents pass to their children.”—Ayelam Valentine Agaliba
    Let me explain how to propose a criticism: explain how something can’t be true because the incentives don’t exist for the individual.
    Western Testimonial Truth for aristocracy, and Eastern Mysticism of Lies for slaves,evolved for rule between peers, and over slaves. Choose.
    Man is rational, not moral. It is just that it is rational to act morally. And over the eons we have developed instincts that encourage us to act morally whenever it is rational.
    The value of cooperation must always outweigh the value of predation. Thankfully it usually does – because we raise the cost of predation so high that the meager returns on cooperation outweigh the costs of ever-enticing predation.
    We do not need christianity in order to have the virtues of a christian ethos. We need only history, heroes, rituals, and ceremonies.
    Would you not be willing to sacrifice the comforting lie of Christianity in return for killing all the great lies mystic and pseudoscientic?
    If we can suppress violence to prevent harm, why cannot we suppress mysticism, pseudoscience, propaganda, gossip and lies to prevent harm?
    Men have had 50K years to develop methods of converting violence to production. Yet women still gossip, rally and shame to preserve lies.
    Why is it that men must suppress our urges for violence, while women are not required to suppress their urges for lies denying reality?
     We must encourage truthful speech, but why do we not punish untruthful speech? Including our comforting ancient and modern lies?
    There is no difference between the fertile crescent lies, and Marx/Boaz/Freud/Frankfurt, except mysticism vs pseudoscience. We teach lies.
    Didn’t we invent truth, testimony, jury, reason, logic, science, so that we could teach the truth? Why must we teach lies made for slaves?
    Didn’t the Greeks,Romans,Germanics tell us how to rule free men? With the Oath, Truthful Testimony, Jury of Peers, and Rule of Natural law?
    We have created a secular church that teaches the ancient egyptian, babylonian, jewish, byzantine lies invented to rule flood plain slaves?
    Isn’t it true that the longer a country has been Christian, the more corrupt is its government and the more untrusting their people?
    Isn’t the word separatable into the Aristotelian (true) and the magical (lies?) Isn’t the Aristotelian liberty and the Semitic despotism?
    Why must we be indoctrinated into a series of lies from the postmodern to marxist to christianjudaism, to abrahamicjudaism, to egyptian?
    Why can’t we produce a new religion with fitness, education, banking, history, the sacredness of nature, and community ritual? No more lies.
    Why can’t we go to church every day, trained in fitness, educated in the basics, and in life skills rather than lies and political doctrine?
    Nature, History, and Rituals that treat Nature, Nation, Family, and Individual as sacred, produce the goods of religious lies without lying.
    All groups need myth and ritual. But why do we need lies? Familiar, Comforting Lies, fables, and pseudosciences are still all lies, right?
    Marx/Boaz/Freud/Frankfurt Lies > Keynesian Pseudoscience > Literary Postmodernism, the myth of oppression: They’re great lies, right?
    Egyptian Monotheism > Jewish Monotheism > Eastern Christian Jewish Monotheism > Marxist/Freud/Boaz/Frankfurt: They’re all GREAT lies, right?
    –Truths seem to require extraordinary investments. Not only in discovery, but in maintenance.  Not every society is up to it, and those who are will likely not be for ever. Fable, myth, allegory and white lie might be cheaper and more resilient vessels for information. —Steve Lacasse 
    We are the greatest super predators that exist. Revel in it. Seize your day. Reap the glory. Be what you were born to be. Kill them all.
    How can man die better, than facing fearful odds, for the labors of his fathers, and the glory of his gods.
    We are born with a wealth of violence that we lend to the state to create liberty on our behalf. Repossess your investment. Use it yourself.
    How can a man feel more free than the punishment, hanging, impaling, and burning of those who would destroy the efforts of his ancestors? There is but one way to preserve your inheritance from parasites and invaders – that is with the organize application of violence.
    What possible action is more moral than the preservation of Kin, Kith, Culture, and History – the inheritance you would transfer to young?
    We do not need to make all people fear.We need only make the invaders to fear – for generations.Revolution has never been easier to achieve.
    The most ‘sovereign’ action you can perform is to judge the actions of yourself and others, and act the Sheriff of yourself and others.
    Never has infrastructure, society, state, and biomass, been so fragile. Remove the economic foundation and it will collapse of own accord.
    Never in history has the Parasitic Leviathan been so vulnerable. Keyensian credit and feminist indiscipline has created profound fragility.
    We create liberty by removing the parasites, so that only liberty remains. We do not advocate liberty. We CREATE it with organized violence. Liberty exists only when every man’s a sheriff: speak the truth, impose no cost, pay the cost of suppressing the parasitism of others.
    Liberty is an expensive, demanding, and subtractive process: inform, remove, punish, or kill parasites, and burn and bury all their filth.
    You can’t create liberty by shaming and rallying.You create liberty when every man acts a sheriff and informs, punishes, or kills parasites. You don’t create a clean environment by convincing people of the virtues of cleanliness any more than you create liberty by convincing them of the virtues of liberty.
    Civil war is the natural and necessary outcome of the inability to find institutional solutions the problem of cooperation among peoples with heterogeneous interests. Our interests are heterogeneous. And western wealth is no longer sufficient to obscure that fact. We are destined, in the near future for another civil war which can be even more terrible and destructive than the last.
    “People talk about reactionaries as if they’re the pest, rather than the pest control.”–Carlos Clark
    Quibble if you want. But roughly 20% of the active population is dead weight negative and about 33% useless.Sorry. You can’t educate stupid. Like carving a sculpture from stone, liberty is a subtractive process: revealed by the patient labor of eliminating the illiberal. Those occupations we perform are measures of our gifts. Those commons we produce measures of our character. While we are unequal in the potential use of our gifts, we are equal in our potential construction of our character. Because while production consists of chat we choose to do, character and commons consist of what we choose not to do. Doing costs resources. Not doing costs will.  

  • Strictly Constructed Law And Contract

    It’s not that different from programming, which any reasonably intelligent lawyer that can program a bit will readily observe. The Structure of a Program or Contract ———————————————————— Purpose (Whereas these conditions exist) Return Value (and whereas we wish to produce these ends) Constants and Variables (definitions constructed) Objects (constructions from base types / “first principles”) Libraries and Includes ( we refer to these libraries, objects, definitions) Functions (clauses that can be performed) Event Listeners ( criteria that invokes clauses) Operations (assignments of value, comparisons of value) Termination (termination conditions – no infinite loops)
    The only thing preventing law from strict construction was the definition of the first principle from which all constants, variables, objects, operations, and functions are derived: 1 – Productive 2 – Fully informed 3 – Warrantied 4 – Voluntary Exchange 5 – Constrained to externality of the same criteria. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Strictly Constructed Law And Contract

    It’s not that different from programming, which any reasonably intelligent lawyer that can program a bit will readily observe. The Structure of a Program or Contract ———————————————————— Purpose (Whereas these conditions exist) Return Value (and whereas we wish to produce these ends) Constants and Variables (definitions constructed) Objects (constructions from base types / “first principles”) Libraries and Includes ( we refer to these libraries, objects, definitions) Functions (clauses that can be performed) Event Listeners ( criteria that invokes clauses) Operations (assignments of value, comparisons of value) Termination (termination conditions – no infinite loops)
    The only thing preventing law from strict construction was the definition of the first principle from which all constants, variables, objects, operations, and functions are derived: 1 – Productive 2 – Fully informed 3 – Warrantied 4 – Voluntary Exchange 5 – Constrained to externality of the same criteria. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Decidability And Morality

    While explanatory power is useful – it isn’t necessarily a test of truth. Whereas testimonial decidability does serve as a test of truth. We tend to confuse platonic truth (that arrangement of ideas we might possess if we possessed more information than we currently do) where our model is infinitely intertemporal(extends into the future regardless of problem set, with decidable truth, where our model is a problem we seek to solve with the knowledge available, with analytic truth, where we possess all possible knowledge because our model is axiomatic. But this is a confusion of the information present at different points of the present

    The problem for these philosophers of empty verbalism, is that once a theory provides perfect decidability, it’s true by all possible measures. So natural law is ‘true’ even if you don’t like it. Now if you don’t like it, then I (we) can certainly understand why – you lose all opportunity for parasitism. Now you might make claims that reciprocal insurance in which you or others become beneficiaries isn’t parasitism. But then we would have to distinguish between accident and choice. And in that analysis, there are very few acts of god other than catastrophic illness and natural disasters that are not your choice. Even those are largely avoidable if you haven’t chosen poorly. This is why so many people prefer to hang on pseudo-moral arguments, and pseudo-moral religious arguments: in order to preserve their parasitism. When instead, they could simply offer to be better people in exchange for that which they seek> And that is the real issue, isn’t it? Self-discipline is a high cost and one that many of us seek to avoid paying by making false moral and religious claims in order to obtain benefits by acts of deception using appeals to our signals of status and self-worth, charity, and altruism.. Whereas the moral folk, who build good families, object to the vast difference in payments of self-discipline that they contribute to the commons, as well as the material payments they make to those who fail to exercise that discipline. Why? Because they pay double. whereas they would gladly pay money in return for behavior.

  • Decidability And Morality

    While explanatory power is useful – it isn’t necessarily a test of truth. Whereas testimonial decidability does serve as a test of truth. We tend to confuse platonic truth (that arrangement of ideas we might possess if we possessed more information than we currently do) where our model is infinitely intertemporal(extends into the future regardless of problem set, with decidable truth, where our model is a problem we seek to solve with the knowledge available, with analytic truth, where we possess all possible knowledge because our model is axiomatic. But this is a confusion of the information present at different points of the present

    The problem for these philosophers of empty verbalism, is that once a theory provides perfect decidability, it’s true by all possible measures. So natural law is ‘true’ even if you don’t like it. Now if you don’t like it, then I (we) can certainly understand why – you lose all opportunity for parasitism. Now you might make claims that reciprocal insurance in which you or others become beneficiaries isn’t parasitism. But then we would have to distinguish between accident and choice. And in that analysis, there are very few acts of god other than catastrophic illness and natural disasters that are not your choice. Even those are largely avoidable if you haven’t chosen poorly. This is why so many people prefer to hang on pseudo-moral arguments, and pseudo-moral religious arguments: in order to preserve their parasitism. When instead, they could simply offer to be better people in exchange for that which they seek> And that is the real issue, isn’t it? Self-discipline is a high cost and one that many of us seek to avoid paying by making false moral and religious claims in order to obtain benefits by acts of deception using appeals to our signals of status and self-worth, charity, and altruism.. Whereas the moral folk, who build good families, object to the vast difference in payments of self-discipline that they contribute to the commons, as well as the material payments they make to those who fail to exercise that discipline. Why? Because they pay double. whereas they would gladly pay money in return for behavior.

  • Fascism In The Great Game Of Rock Paper Scissors

    –Liberty/Market, Fascism/Mar, Law/Culture– The Communist threat was enormous.

    Given the asymmetric value of oppy.costs, NOT ACTING in era of change is expensive. So taking early initiative or waiting is a question of forecast costs. And fascism was an answer to acting early. A condition of liberty is the consequence of the nearly universal suppression of parasitism. But just as soldiers compete, norms compete, and markets compete: *Rock-Paper-Scissors applies*. One cannot fight soldiers with markets:Rock-Paper-Scissors. There is no steady state in econ or out. There is no permanent condition of liberty possible any more than is a permanent condition of war. Rock paper scissors: Liberty/Market, Fascism/War, Law/Culture. Simple people use simple models. But while simple people use simple models it is up to us to explain the much more complicated world. And that most complicated world consists not of steady states,but of supply,demand,rents,and shocks. Facism is not a model, it is a tool with which we seek the optimum state of liberty, law, peace. Monopoly institutions are not a steady state but a means of paying for the suppression of local rent. Rule of law is not a steady state but a tool for the suppression of innovations in parasitism. That we have yet failed to create an institution for suppressing centralized rents is just a failure. Anarchism cannot do this, so the alternative is market production of commons. Because commons are necessary even for the production of property rights, rule of law and territory. And surprisingly, it turns out that commons free of privatization, are devastatingly competitive.

  • Fascism In The Great Game Of Rock Paper Scissors

    –Liberty/Market, Fascism/Mar, Law/Culture– The Communist threat was enormous.

    Given the asymmetric value of oppy.costs, NOT ACTING in era of change is expensive. So taking early initiative or waiting is a question of forecast costs. And fascism was an answer to acting early. A condition of liberty is the consequence of the nearly universal suppression of parasitism. But just as soldiers compete, norms compete, and markets compete: *Rock-Paper-Scissors applies*. One cannot fight soldiers with markets:Rock-Paper-Scissors. There is no steady state in econ or out. There is no permanent condition of liberty possible any more than is a permanent condition of war. Rock paper scissors: Liberty/Market, Fascism/War, Law/Culture. Simple people use simple models. But while simple people use simple models it is up to us to explain the much more complicated world. And that most complicated world consists not of steady states,but of supply,demand,rents,and shocks. Facism is not a model, it is a tool with which we seek the optimum state of liberty, law, peace. Monopoly institutions are not a steady state but a means of paying for the suppression of local rent. Rule of law is not a steady state but a tool for the suppression of innovations in parasitism. That we have yet failed to create an institution for suppressing centralized rents is just a failure. Anarchism cannot do this, so the alternative is market production of commons. Because commons are necessary even for the production of property rights, rule of law and territory. And surprisingly, it turns out that commons free of privatization, are devastatingly competitive.

  • Stuck on Malinvestments.

    ADHERENCE TO FALSIFIED THEORIES ISN”T DEMONSTRATING INTELLIGENCE – JUST LOSS AVOIDANCE GIVEN ONE’S OVERINVESTMENT IN MALINVESTMENT Sure I spent a lot of time at LvMI. But you know, once you know your theory is bullshit it’s time to seek another. There is only one source of liberty: the organized application of violence to suppress parasitism by all means in every area of life.

    The organization of acquisition, inventory, transformation, and consumption, the organization of reproduction, the organization of production, distribution and trade, the organization of commons production and the organization of territorial limits. It is by the suppression of parasitism that we create the Liberty we seek.