Of course, I’m frequently frustrated. Teaching conservatives anything intellectual and libertarians anything scientific is like trying to teach pigs to sing (or casting pearls before swine). Ergo policy(bribery) to achieve our ends is more important than achieving understanding.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-30 20:01:51 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105470919411821544
THE SUMMARY AND REMEDY conflict between masculine and feminine men physical and political super predators, and females verbal, emotional, and social super-predators. resolved in marriage resolved by church vs market let loose by the enfranchisement of women, destroying marriage and market driving all to politics and competition between interests in politics rather than maintaining equalitarian and egalitarian compromise within the family. We are the only civilization with alien hostile elites, with the Europeans practicing the masculine strategy and the jews practicing the feminine strategy. This would have been tolerable and possibly beneficial had we constructed our institutions for competing interests rather than for the married family, and we had adapted our laws to suppress female warfare as thoroughly as we had adapted it for suppression of male warfare. and instead of providing separate houses for men and women of opposing interest relied on majoritarianism between men of common interests therefore ending the use of the government as a market between competing interests. The obvious solution is to restore the division between the houses of the classes and to separate male and female votes as we do the classes. This restores the market for exchanges between the classes. The alternative is to limit the voting population to property-owning males or create an additional house for females. But regardless of the method of selecting the production of commons, the central problem of equally suppressing the female means of circumventing meritocratic markets by informational, psychological, and social superpredation must be as equally suppressed as male physical, political, and military superpredation. And to do this requires that we understand the female and semitic method of warfare; how it has been used in the roman ancient, and the modern european worlds to destroy our civilization from within – whether intentionally in some cases, out of common interest in other, and even instinctually in other. Explaining both the european masculine evolutionary and Jewish-semitic feminine devolutionary group strategies will help us avoid a bloody civil war in the west, it will end the destruction of the west by the use of minorities and females against european people and our civilization by the jews, and end both the second destruction of the west, and the dark ages that have already begun due to jewish expertise in the female method of undermining, and the strength of the western openness to ideas, but our failure to defend against the false promises of the abrahamic method of the jews. so we must both reform our laws, and demand reform from the jews, and muslims as well if they wish to live among us.
THE SUMMARY AND REMEDY conflict between masculine and feminine men physical and political super predators, and females verbal, emotional, and social super-predators. resolved in marriage resolved by church vs market let loose by the enfranchisement of women, destroying marriage and market driving all to politics and competition between interests in politics rather than maintaining equalitarian and egalitarian compromise within the family. We are the only civilization with alien hostile elites, with the Europeans practicing the masculine strategy and the jews practicing the feminine strategy. This would have been tolerable and possibly beneficial had we constructed our institutions for competing interests rather than for the married family, and we had adapted our laws to suppress female warfare as thoroughly as we had adapted it for suppression of male warfare. and instead of providing separate houses for men and women of opposing interest relied on majoritarianism between men of common interests therefore ending the use of the government as a market between competing interests. The obvious solution is to restore the division between the houses of the classes and to separate male and female votes as we do the classes. This restores the market for exchanges between the classes. The alternative is to limit the voting population to property-owning males or create an additional house for females. But regardless of the method of selecting the production of commons, the central problem of equally suppressing the female means of circumventing meritocratic markets by informational, psychological, and social superpredation must be as equally suppressed as male physical, political, and military superpredation. And to do this requires that we understand the female and semitic method of warfare; how it has been used in the roman ancient, and the modern european worlds to destroy our civilization from within – whether intentionally in some cases, out of common interest in other, and even instinctually in other. Explaining both the european masculine evolutionary and Jewish-semitic feminine devolutionary group strategies will help us avoid a bloody civil war in the west, it will end the destruction of the west by the use of minorities and females against european people and our civilization by the jews, and end both the second destruction of the west, and the dark ages that have already begun due to jewish expertise in the female method of undermining, and the strength of the western openness to ideas, but our failure to defend against the false promises of the abrahamic method of the jews. so we must both reform our laws, and demand reform from the jews, and muslims as well if they wish to live among us.
“Conspiracy Theorist” is an accusation of imaginary goals, attributing intention to externalities, common converging incentives, or common interests instead of common intent. And a psychological expression of insecurity by those lacking domain knowledge and control in daily life.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-29 23:40:52 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105466118322692278
@RadioFreeNorthwest The one with the largest skull piles.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-29 22:32:53 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105465850988623472
The average imbecile regardless of political preference, bias, and instinct, seeks an authoritarian government, whether marxist or fascist anything in between under the presumption that ‘it hasn’t been tried enough’ as a proxy for ‘I would do it better my way’. …
But No. Organizations require systemic rules for making decisions regardless of the temperaments, preferences, biases,and instincts of their members from the most competent to the least – and those rules mustn’t conflict with incentives – they must be possible and enforceable.
The purpose of a parliament (parley, negotiate) is to serve as a jury for the initiatives of the state (monarchy, cabinet, bureaucracy). The division of labor between competency (the state) and market (parliament). It is not to operate the state – they lack competence.
There is no reason any longer for any model other than rule of law under Natural Law by P-Law, monarchy, cabinet, and direct democratic assent or dissent for policies, and contracted services instead of bureaucracies. There is no reason for it at all. Why do we need politicians?
Setting aside for the moment the criteria for voting, and presuming for a moment that representatives are more valuable than direct democracy (admittedly false) if representatives (jurors) in parliaments were to exist, what would we require for criteria for office?
For all his understanding of political history, Francis Fukuyama has a very poor understanding of economics and he has an unhealthy obsession with democracy. An empowered government is proven more effective, yes, but when limited by monarchy and natural law – not by votes.
Again, this is simply a problem of scale. Democracy functions as the means of selecting priorities among people with common interests. That means it’s for small heterogeneous polities.
one can say that monarchies select better priorities and likely be correct. that does not distinguish the difference between monopoly, majority, and markets.
Argue the right problem: we are heterogeneous and large and have no common interest
Yes. My recommendation is to return to our original design as a continuation of the HRE, as a loose federation of states under a weak judicial government, that licenses ‘free cities’ within constraints.
This requires educating the public for whom the present model is a religion
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-29 21:16:16 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105465549651238841
COUNTRY, STATE, CITY COMPARISONS:
Canada= California = Poland = Tokyo Metro Area
Australia = Netherlands = Texas = NY Metro Area
Scotland = South Carolina = Phoenix Metro Area
Sweden = Georgia = Chicago Metro Area
Switzerland = Virginia = Dallas Metro Area
Why? Power distance.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-29 21:11:45 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105465531949306313
We took people off the farm, and subsistence farming, and natural communal incentives, without giving them a fallback position, of subsistence redistribution in exchange for demonstrating natural communal behavior. Employment is the worst economic target.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-29 21:11:25 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105465530611114253
The next president will see the collapse of the global economy, then of world trade, the fragmentation of the EU, the military expansion of Turkey, Iran, Russia, China, and France to fill the void, and the return to historical norm: nationalism and the conflict of civilizations.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-29 21:10:36 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105465527419308383
THE COMING REFORMS
NYC survives by credit expansion paid for by DC debt expansion and liquidity provision. in NYC 11 of the top 25 companies would vaporize with finance reform. SF would vaporize with labor reform. LA with immigration reform. DC with decentralization. (an Insight on US fragility)
This merely states that the tax revenues of NYC are disproportionately dependent on the financial sector which is disproportionately dependent on DC, and that in the next severe correction, we will likely see financial reformation and a substantive impact on NYC.
In other words, credit and consumption based growth in the financial sector is facing a difficult future, necessitating the search for more capital intensive longer-term returns, and minimizing capital from credit cards, mortgages, education loans, and all fields of insurance and especially pensions.
So drastic reduction in institutional capital accumulated from consumer ‘rents’, combined with next year’s beginning drawdown on baby boomer investments, will reverse seventy years of trend.
Source date (UTC): 2020-12-29 20:55:25 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105465467685887076