THE DISTILLATION OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION If you would be sovereign, you must fight. If you would be sovereign and win, you must equally confederate. If you would be sovereign and confederate, you must equally compromise. If you would be sovereign and equally compromise, you must equally forgo opportunities for gain at another’s loss. If you would be sovereign and equally forgo equal opportunities to gain at another’s loss, your actions are limited to those that are productive, fully informed, warrantied, and voluntary, and limited to productive externalities. If you limit your actions to those, then the ONLY possible rule is rule by Common, judge-discovered, Natural Law of Non Imposition of Costs, and therefore, voluntary markets in everything: association, cooperation, reproduction, production, production of commons, production of dispute resolution, production of institutions, productions of monuments, production of war, productions of generations, This is Western Civilization: the choice of Sovereignty once made produces all that we have done. Small things in large numbers have vast consequences. If you would be Sovereign, and reap the benefits of Sovereignty, you must fight – fight to deny others all possible alternatives. If you will not fight you cannot be sovereign. You may beg the Sovereigns for commercial liberty, or physical freedom, or charity, in exchange for compensation. But you may never be in fact sovereign. by William Butchman, Eli Harman, and Curt Doolittle
Source: Original Site Post
-
As I Understand It This Is the Current Understanding of Regional and Now Tribal, Group Genetics.
As far as I know all human variation is demonstrably caused by little more than the intensity of expression of possibilities extant already in the genome. Despite partial speciation, we did did not complete sufficient physical speciation for typical classification because our primary means of speciation migrated from the physical to the conceptual, and the conceptual is highly affected by the distribution (norm) and therefore physical expression required little physical mutation in the genome, only substantial modification of the mind post birth. These changes have been consistently selected for whenever possible and they universally favor selection for youthfulness (fertility), which is achieved by delaying the intensity of maturity. A point which asians have unfortunately probably exceeded and whites have approached with dangerous proximity.
-
As I Understand It This Is the Current Understanding of Regional and Now Tribal, Group Genetics.
As far as I know all human variation is demonstrably caused by little more than the intensity of expression of possibilities extant already in the genome. Despite partial speciation, we did did not complete sufficient physical speciation for typical classification because our primary means of speciation migrated from the physical to the conceptual, and the conceptual is highly affected by the distribution (norm) and therefore physical expression required little physical mutation in the genome, only substantial modification of the mind post birth. These changes have been consistently selected for whenever possible and they universally favor selection for youthfulness (fertility), which is achieved by delaying the intensity of maturity. A point which asians have unfortunately probably exceeded and whites have approached with dangerous proximity.
-
Europe and East Asia ‘have Done Better’ Because of Territorial Advantage Within Geographic Fortresses
Fortress Europa obtained non-territorial advantage by: A COLLECTION of hypotheses that include: a) europeans have higher neuroticism (creativity) b) europeans have lower clannishness (dislike of outsiders) c) europeans have dramatically reduced the size of the underclass ( produced a higher distribution of Iq, and lower distribution of testosterone) d) there seems to be a longstanding IQ advantage in the north and an intellectual tradition into pre-history in the british isles (the ‘athens’ of pre-literate europe). e) the yamnaya brought aryanism (realism, sovereignty, martial rule, hierarchical organization, testimony, jury, common law ) to europe. And that this has been our most meaningful competitive advantage. f) that each wave of europeans out of Ukraine has been as much an ‘improvement’ over the prior as each wave out of Africa was an ‘improvement’ over the prior – for the same reason; africa and the steppe are brutal evolutionary furnaces. As far as I know all these hypotheses survive all possible scrutiny without requiring a particular genetic advantage other than perhaps reduced clannishness common among circumpolar peoples. This is why I adhere to this solution. Because it does not depend upon ‘magical’ genetics evolving by accidental mutation in the european genome, but merely adaptation to local conditions from a marginally indifferent set of homo sapiens in the past. As far as I know all human variation is in intensity of expression of possibilities extant already in the genome.
-
Europe and East Asia ‘have Done Better’ Because of Territorial Advantage Within Geographic Fortresses
Fortress Europa obtained non-territorial advantage by: A COLLECTION of hypotheses that include: a) europeans have higher neuroticism (creativity) b) europeans have lower clannishness (dislike of outsiders) c) europeans have dramatically reduced the size of the underclass ( produced a higher distribution of Iq, and lower distribution of testosterone) d) there seems to be a longstanding IQ advantage in the north and an intellectual tradition into pre-history in the british isles (the ‘athens’ of pre-literate europe). e) the yamnaya brought aryanism (realism, sovereignty, martial rule, hierarchical organization, testimony, jury, common law ) to europe. And that this has been our most meaningful competitive advantage. f) that each wave of europeans out of Ukraine has been as much an ‘improvement’ over the prior as each wave out of Africa was an ‘improvement’ over the prior – for the same reason; africa and the steppe are brutal evolutionary furnaces. As far as I know all these hypotheses survive all possible scrutiny without requiring a particular genetic advantage other than perhaps reduced clannishness common among circumpolar peoples. This is why I adhere to this solution. Because it does not depend upon ‘magical’ genetics evolving by accidental mutation in the european genome, but merely adaptation to local conditions from a marginally indifferent set of homo sapiens in the past. As far as I know all human variation is in intensity of expression of possibilities extant already in the genome.
-
Q&A: “What’s Your ‘Official’ Opinion on Trump?”
‘OFFICIAL’ OPINION ON TRUMP: AGREE WITH CRITICISMS? —“Do these opinions of trump resonate with any opinion at the Propertarian Institute?”— No. because I know from close personal experience what kind of shitty assholes the financial capitalist class is, what kind of shitty assholes the legal capitalist class is, how shitty and corrupt the regulatory politicians are, how dishonest, and corrupt, the construction and maintenance organizations are, how shitty and corrupt and criminal the union organizations are. And I know how hard it is to employ ‘low level workers’ in a ‘high precision customer service environment’. And Trump grew up negotiation between people who are shitty lying scumbags for a living, while employing large numbers of low level workers in high precision customer service environments and then selling that stuff to people who have enough money to pay for it – usually the upper middle class around the world. Trump is doing what he has done his whole life. He is just letting the public see what that game is really all about: We are surrounded by lying thieving scumbags that prey on the middle and working classes, who are the only morally naive people moral enough in the world to fall for such criminality. Yeah and that’s my professional opinion. I have interacted with a large number of people in one capacity or another, usually as analyst giving an opinion on some sort of technical or marketing strategy given the financial resources available. My experience is that people outside of the middle and working classes are pretty much shit human beings burning down the western commons in the equivalent of a crash and grab that has lasted a century.
-
Q&A: “What’s Your ‘Official’ Opinion on Trump?”
‘OFFICIAL’ OPINION ON TRUMP: AGREE WITH CRITICISMS? —“Do these opinions of trump resonate with any opinion at the Propertarian Institute?”— No. because I know from close personal experience what kind of shitty assholes the financial capitalist class is, what kind of shitty assholes the legal capitalist class is, how shitty and corrupt the regulatory politicians are, how dishonest, and corrupt, the construction and maintenance organizations are, how shitty and corrupt and criminal the union organizations are. And I know how hard it is to employ ‘low level workers’ in a ‘high precision customer service environment’. And Trump grew up negotiation between people who are shitty lying scumbags for a living, while employing large numbers of low level workers in high precision customer service environments and then selling that stuff to people who have enough money to pay for it – usually the upper middle class around the world. Trump is doing what he has done his whole life. He is just letting the public see what that game is really all about: We are surrounded by lying thieving scumbags that prey on the middle and working classes, who are the only morally naive people moral enough in the world to fall for such criminality. Yeah and that’s my professional opinion. I have interacted with a large number of people in one capacity or another, usually as analyst giving an opinion on some sort of technical or marketing strategy given the financial resources available. My experience is that people outside of the middle and working classes are pretty much shit human beings burning down the western commons in the equivalent of a crash and grab that has lasted a century.
-
Understanding Accounting and Finance? Get Back To Lender Beware.
Mar 01, 2017 2:40pm UNDERSTANDING ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE I’ve been told all my life by some asshole or other that I don’t understand accounting or finance. And I always found that humorous. I took the same classes as everyone else. I just learned something very different from them: most of it is used to lie under pseudoscientific pretense caused entirely by the necessity of limiting profitability in order to reduce taxation, complying with government regulation that obscures real costs of doing business, and complying with bank lending requirements that force you to claim regularity to your income that does not exist, forcing you to keep Operational P&L to run a business, Credit P&L to borrow money, Tax P&L to pay taxes, and Investor P&L to estimate upside. But given the archaic and pseudoscientific nature of accounting and finance and that super-pseudoscience we call mainstream macro economics, all of these things are falsehoods that address special cases. The value of a business is one of three things: the current liquidation value in the event of closure, the value of the business as a going concern to a competitor in the market, and the value to some sucker you can find who will pay you more than either of those numbers. What it is expressly NOT is whatever nonsense your bank, or the government says that it is. Every time I hear the value of a company is expressed in market cap I wanna put irons on someone and stick them in a cell. Suckers exist in america in large numbers principally because we just create so many of them, and we hold so few punishments for them, that the legal and financial industry largely seems to exist in order to allow and profit from, sucker- plays. Now sure, you might be lucky and get a Peter Theil or one of the other Paypal Mafia to invest in your company. These are entrepreneurs who happen to have turned to entrepreneurship at scale. They are not engaged in financialization which provides them with gains whether you win or lose. But that is exactly how most of the capitalist class functions. We need to get back to lender beware.
-
Understanding Accounting and Finance? Get Back To Lender Beware.
Mar 01, 2017 2:40pm UNDERSTANDING ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE I’ve been told all my life by some asshole or other that I don’t understand accounting or finance. And I always found that humorous. I took the same classes as everyone else. I just learned something very different from them: most of it is used to lie under pseudoscientific pretense caused entirely by the necessity of limiting profitability in order to reduce taxation, complying with government regulation that obscures real costs of doing business, and complying with bank lending requirements that force you to claim regularity to your income that does not exist, forcing you to keep Operational P&L to run a business, Credit P&L to borrow money, Tax P&L to pay taxes, and Investor P&L to estimate upside. But given the archaic and pseudoscientific nature of accounting and finance and that super-pseudoscience we call mainstream macro economics, all of these things are falsehoods that address special cases. The value of a business is one of three things: the current liquidation value in the event of closure, the value of the business as a going concern to a competitor in the market, and the value to some sucker you can find who will pay you more than either of those numbers. What it is expressly NOT is whatever nonsense your bank, or the government says that it is. Every time I hear the value of a company is expressed in market cap I wanna put irons on someone and stick them in a cell. Suckers exist in america in large numbers principally because we just create so many of them, and we hold so few punishments for them, that the legal and financial industry largely seems to exist in order to allow and profit from, sucker- plays. Now sure, you might be lucky and get a Peter Theil or one of the other Paypal Mafia to invest in your company. These are entrepreneurs who happen to have turned to entrepreneurship at scale. They are not engaged in financialization which provides them with gains whether you win or lose. But that is exactly how most of the capitalist class functions. We need to get back to lender beware.
-
The Foundations of Mathematics Are Simple. (really)
The foundations of mathematics are so simple. Seriously. The fact that they even phrase the question as such is hysterical. The reason mathematics is so powerful a tool is precisely because its foundations are so trivial. Like discourse on property in ethics and law it is a word game because no one establishes sufficient limits under which the general term obscures a change in state. Math very simple. Correspondence (what remains and what does not), Types, operations, grammar, syntax. Generally we use mathematics for the purpose of scale independence. in other words, we remove the property of scale from the set of correspondences. But we might also pass from physical dimensions to logical dimensions (there are only so many possible physical dimensions). So now we leave dimensional correspondence. In mathematics we remove time correspondence by default, and only add it in when we specifically want to make use of it. In sets we remove temporal and causal correspondence … at least in most cases. So we can add and remove many different correspondences, and work only with reciprocal (self referencing) correspondence (constant relations). But there is nothing magic here at all except for the fields (results) that can be produced by these different definitions as we use them to describe the consequences of using different values in different orders. But if you say “I want to study the parsimony, limits, and full accounting, of this set of types using this set of operations, with the common grammar and syntax” that is pretty much what someone means when they say ‘foundations’. Most of the time. Sometimes they have no clue. There is nothing much more difficult here in the ‘foundations’ so to speak. What’s hard in mathematics is holding operations, grammar and syntax constant, what happens as we use different correspondences (dimensions), types, and values in combination with others and yet others, to produce these various kinds of patterns that represent phenomenon that we want to describe. And what mathematicians find beautiful is that there is a bizaare set of regularities (that they call symmetries or some variation thereof), that emerge once you becomes skilled in these models, just like some games become predictable if you see a certain pattern. But really, math is interesting because by describing regular patterns that produce complex phenomenon, we are able to describe things very accurately that we cannot ‘see’ without math to help us find it. Its seems mystical. It isn’t. Its just the adult version of mommy saying ‘boo’ to the toddler and the joy he gets from the stimulation. There is nothing magical here. it’s creative, and interesting, but it’s just engineering with cheaper tools at lower risk: paper, pencil, and time.