Source: Original Site Post

  • Natural Law on Gender

    NATURAL LAW ON GENDER Whereas There exist but two genders. Male and Female. These genders are compatible. Both genders provide necessary reciprocity to one another in the production of family and offspring.  Both genders develop traits for each gender, and each gender divides the labor of transcendence with different traits, but with greater or lesser intensity of either. Individuals are born with determining genitalia and genetics. Individuals are born with in utero successes and in utero failures. Individuals mature with developmental successes and developmental failures. Individuals develop psychological successes and failures, primarily due to insufficient training by socialization, shocks or trauma that disrupt the psychological training. Whereas Defects of birth that cannot be changed or that individuals desire to preserve, must be either tolerated or not. Defects of development must be tolerated or not. But defects of training of one’s psychology need not be tolerated. And the export of the costs of one’s defects in utero, development, or training may not be imposed by any means onto the body of the people for whom the transcendence of man by the transcendence of their family is of necessity, and the accommodation and tolerance of failures in that transcendence a cost they may choose to bear or not. As such homosexuality may not be punished, nor accommodated. And all other deviations of gender need not be tolerated if they are perceivable in the commons. And deviations that threaten the young or less able, need be cured or the individual terminated. Therefore The Natural Law recognizes only two genders male and female, defects of birth, defects of training, and defects of choice. And therefore no imposition shall be forced upon those with defects other than that of birth defect, fraud of weights and measures,  or imposition of costs upon the commons. Therefore All public word, deed, and display shall conform to one’s gender such that none impose his defects upon others in the commons. And none shall impose upon private word, deed and display, unless it imposes costs upon those external to the voluntary exchange of word, deed, and display.CounselKnowledge of a thing’s existence is not the same as sense of its existence. It is only sense and cost of existence that the Law prohibits.

  • Natural Law on Gender

    NATURAL LAW ON GENDER Whereas There exist but two genders. Male and Female. These genders are compatible. Both genders provide necessary reciprocity to one another in the production of family and offspring.  Both genders develop traits for each gender, and each gender divides the labor of transcendence with different traits, but with greater or lesser intensity of either. Individuals are born with determining genitalia and genetics. Individuals are born with in utero successes and in utero failures. Individuals mature with developmental successes and developmental failures. Individuals develop psychological successes and failures, primarily due to insufficient training by socialization, shocks or trauma that disrupt the psychological training. Whereas Defects of birth that cannot be changed or that individuals desire to preserve, must be either tolerated or not. Defects of development must be tolerated or not. But defects of training of one’s psychology need not be tolerated. And the export of the costs of one’s defects in utero, development, or training may not be imposed by any means onto the body of the people for whom the transcendence of man by the transcendence of their family is of necessity, and the accommodation and tolerance of failures in that transcendence a cost they may choose to bear or not. As such homosexuality may not be punished, nor accommodated. And all other deviations of gender need not be tolerated if they are perceivable in the commons. And deviations that threaten the young or less able, need be cured or the individual terminated. Therefore The Natural Law recognizes only two genders male and female, defects of birth, defects of training, and defects of choice. And therefore no imposition shall be forced upon those with defects other than that of birth defect, fraud of weights and measures,  or imposition of costs upon the commons. Therefore All public word, deed, and display shall conform to one’s gender such that none impose his defects upon others in the commons. And none shall impose upon private word, deed and display, unless it imposes costs upon those external to the voluntary exchange of word, deed, and display.CounselKnowledge of a thing’s existence is not the same as sense of its existence. It is only sense and cost of existence that the Law prohibits.

  • Abrahamism as the Manufacture of Ignorance: Informational Dysgenia

    ABRAHAMISM AS THE MANUFACTURE OF IGNORANCE
    (ending freedom of false religion, along with ending false speech, of which religious dogma is a member.)
     
    We tend to look at the demonstrated verbal superiority of the Ashkenazi, their long history of literacy, writing, law, hermeneutic interpretation, persuasion, and consequent success in occupations that require a combination of the estimation of others ability, the accumulation of textual information, and the exercise of persuasion (or coercion).
     
    But we forget that their group success is dependent almost entirely on eugenic reproduction, in which the community contributes money to the Professor (Rabbi) so that he may bear extra children, and that the community outcasts members who cannot perform to standard, and reduces the rates of reproduction through poverty of those that cannot perform to standard. So just as the european nobility redistributed to the middle and upper classes, the production of the underclasses, the Ashkenazi, redistributed the production of the host peoples to their upper genetic classes. And both the Ashkenazi and Europeans then specialized in self transcendence by (beneficial) suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses, and the redirection of energies to the upper classes.
     
    However, lets have a look at what Europeans (Aryans) achieved when they were literate, and what the Ashkenazi (and jews) accomplished when they were literate. Or lets ask it differently: what did Aryans and Jews accomplish when they practiced Abrahamism, versus before adoption and after departure from Abrahamism.
     
    Or put another way, what have the Aryans and Jews accomplished under Aristotelianism (European Aryanism), versus what have they achieved under Abrahamism.
     
    Moreover, what had the north africans, the Levantines, the Byzantines, and the Persians accomplished before Abrahamism? What did they accomplish under the long term effects of Abrahamism?
     
    Lets bring in the Indians. What did the Dravidians (Hrappans) achieve before Supernatural Aryanism. What did they achieve after Supernatural Aryanism? What have they achieve since the introduction of Aristotelian Aryanism?
     
    What did the Chinese achieve having never encountered Supernatural Aryanism, or Jewish Abrahamism?
     
    What occurred when the Chinese resisted Aristotelian Aryanism? What occurred now that the Chinese finally adopted Aristotelian Aryanism?
     
    Jews accomplished literally nothing despite being the most literate people in europe. Islamists accomplished nothing except the selective import of classical, persian, and indian thought, and upon consumption of those parts of those civilizations that they could consume, declined rapidly into even lower trust, even greater ignorance after 1200, even while invading europe for centuries to come, and spreading islamic ignorance from which spain and the southeast of europe seem challenged to recover from due to both cultural and genetic devolution.
     
    We tend to make excuses by justifying intentions. But if we look at the historical record, Supernatural Aryanism was used to educate if not subjugate the ignorant, and let to the eradication of the Supernatural (Iranian) Aryans.
     
    There is no greater crime than Abrahamism in human history. There is no greater source of ignorance and deceit than Abrahamism. No greater source of poverty. No more severe limitation transcendence.
     
    There has been no greater source of murder, death, starvation, than the combination of Third Generation Judaism in the form of Marxism, Socialism and the first jewish empire: the Soviet Union, and the French reformation of it into Postmodernism and the necessary reactions to it including Fascism; Nor and the Second Generation of Arab Abrahamism(islam), in which the tactics of Arab expansion of Arabic Abrahamism (Islam) which relies on intellectual seduction of the underclasses and women, raiding of capital and trade, and decentralized warfare, to obtain sufficient power to conduct conventional warfare internally and externally, to impose Abrahamic Ignorance upon people, and devolve them into increasingly ignorant, and unintelligent peoples.
     
    Just as freedom of speech must end, and be replaced by freedom of truthful speech. Freedom of religion must end, and be replaced by freedom of truthful religion.
     
    That is the less on of history.
     
    And all that prevents us from it, is abandoning our malinvestment in that branch of Abrahamism that perpetuated our dark age: Christianity, and its lies.
     
    The only value of christian teaching is the extension of kinship love to non kin thereby increasing the investment cooperation by which we train ‘cheaters’ that it is better to cooperate morally than ‘cheat’.
     
    A lesson we must understand, is not present in Judaism or Islam since both explicitly advocate asymmetrical polylogical ethics. (Lying, cheating, against non-members).
     
    Truth is enough. Save the West. Save mankind.
    End the unlimited, require limits.
    Require the limit of truthfulness.
    Require the limit of reciprocity
    Require the limit of full accounting.
     
    Deny the devolution of Abrahamism to our people, and man.
     
    END IT FOREVER.
     
    It’s quite simple you know. We already prohibit false speech in commerce, regarding products, services, and information. We Need only extend that demand from the MORE immediate goods, of products, services, and information, to that of the less immediate goods, services, and especially information.
     
    Especially that information that while perhaps imaginable and preferable, purports to be possible, “good” or True that is neither possible, nor good, nor true.
     
    HOW? INVOLUNTARY WARRANTY OF TESTS OF DUE DILIGENCE
     
    1 – Categorical consistency
    2 – Logical consistency
    3 – Empirical consistency
    4 – Operational consistency
    5 – Rational consistency (incentives of a rational actor)
    6 – Moral consistency (perfect reciprocity)
    7 – Scope Consistency (Limits.)
    8 – Full accounting of consequences within those limits.
     
    White this might seem difficult to you at first blush, it is not something that courts will have difficulty with, and within a decade and certainly a generation, the body of law will evolve into common practice.
     
    And all the culture along with it.
    And all of mankind as a consequence.
     
    End the invention of lying.
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
  • Abrahamism as the Manufacture of Ignorance: Informational Dysgenia

    ABRAHAMISM AS THE MANUFACTURE OF IGNORANCE
    (ending freedom of false religion, along with ending false speech, of which religious dogma is a member.)
     
    We tend to look at the demonstrated verbal superiority of the Ashkenazi, their long history of literacy, writing, law, hermeneutic interpretation, persuasion, and consequent success in occupations that require a combination of the estimation of others ability, the accumulation of textual information, and the exercise of persuasion (or coercion).
     
    But we forget that their group success is dependent almost entirely on eugenic reproduction, in which the community contributes money to the Professor (Rabbi) so that he may bear extra children, and that the community outcasts members who cannot perform to standard, and reduces the rates of reproduction through poverty of those that cannot perform to standard. So just as the european nobility redistributed to the middle and upper classes, the production of the underclasses, the Ashkenazi, redistributed the production of the host peoples to their upper genetic classes. And both the Ashkenazi and Europeans then specialized in self transcendence by (beneficial) suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses, and the redirection of energies to the upper classes.
     
    However, lets have a look at what Europeans (Aryans) achieved when they were literate, and what the Ashkenazi (and jews) accomplished when they were literate. Or lets ask it differently: what did Aryans and Jews accomplish when they practiced Abrahamism, versus before adoption and after departure from Abrahamism.
     
    Or put another way, what have the Aryans and Jews accomplished under Aristotelianism (European Aryanism), versus what have they achieved under Abrahamism.
     
    Moreover, what had the north africans, the Levantines, the Byzantines, and the Persians accomplished before Abrahamism? What did they accomplish under the long term effects of Abrahamism?
     
    Lets bring in the Indians. What did the Dravidians (Hrappans) achieve before Supernatural Aryanism. What did they achieve after Supernatural Aryanism? What have they achieve since the introduction of Aristotelian Aryanism?
     
    What did the Chinese achieve having never encountered Supernatural Aryanism, or Jewish Abrahamism?
     
    What occurred when the Chinese resisted Aristotelian Aryanism? What occurred now that the Chinese finally adopted Aristotelian Aryanism?
     
    Jews accomplished literally nothing despite being the most literate people in europe. Islamists accomplished nothing except the selective import of classical, persian, and indian thought, and upon consumption of those parts of those civilizations that they could consume, declined rapidly into even lower trust, even greater ignorance after 1200, even while invading europe for centuries to come, and spreading islamic ignorance from which spain and the southeast of europe seem challenged to recover from due to both cultural and genetic devolution.
     
    We tend to make excuses by justifying intentions. But if we look at the historical record, Supernatural Aryanism was used to educate if not subjugate the ignorant, and let to the eradication of the Supernatural (Iranian) Aryans.
     
    There is no greater crime than Abrahamism in human history. There is no greater source of ignorance and deceit than Abrahamism. No greater source of poverty. No more severe limitation transcendence.
     
    There has been no greater source of murder, death, starvation, than the combination of Third Generation Judaism in the form of Marxism, Socialism and the first jewish empire: the Soviet Union, and the French reformation of it into Postmodernism and the necessary reactions to it including Fascism; Nor and the Second Generation of Arab Abrahamism(islam), in which the tactics of Arab expansion of Arabic Abrahamism (Islam) which relies on intellectual seduction of the underclasses and women, raiding of capital and trade, and decentralized warfare, to obtain sufficient power to conduct conventional warfare internally and externally, to impose Abrahamic Ignorance upon people, and devolve them into increasingly ignorant, and unintelligent peoples.
     
    Just as freedom of speech must end, and be replaced by freedom of truthful speech. Freedom of religion must end, and be replaced by freedom of truthful religion.
     
    That is the less on of history.
     
    And all that prevents us from it, is abandoning our malinvestment in that branch of Abrahamism that perpetuated our dark age: Christianity, and its lies.
     
    The only value of christian teaching is the extension of kinship love to non kin thereby increasing the investment cooperation by which we train ‘cheaters’ that it is better to cooperate morally than ‘cheat’.
     
    A lesson we must understand, is not present in Judaism or Islam since both explicitly advocate asymmetrical polylogical ethics. (Lying, cheating, against non-members).
     
    Truth is enough. Save the West. Save mankind.
    End the unlimited, require limits.
    Require the limit of truthfulness.
    Require the limit of reciprocity
    Require the limit of full accounting.
     
    Deny the devolution of Abrahamism to our people, and man.
     
    END IT FOREVER.
     
    It’s quite simple you know. We already prohibit false speech in commerce, regarding products, services, and information. We Need only extend that demand from the MORE immediate goods, of products, services, and information, to that of the less immediate goods, services, and especially information.
     
    Especially that information that while perhaps imaginable and preferable, purports to be possible, “good” or True that is neither possible, nor good, nor true.
     
    HOW? INVOLUNTARY WARRANTY OF TESTS OF DUE DILIGENCE
     
    1 – Categorical consistency
    2 – Logical consistency
    3 – Empirical consistency
    4 – Operational consistency
    5 – Rational consistency (incentives of a rational actor)
    6 – Moral consistency (perfect reciprocity)
    7 – Scope Consistency (Limits.)
    8 – Full accounting of consequences within those limits.
     
    White this might seem difficult to you at first blush, it is not something that courts will have difficulty with, and within a decade and certainly a generation, the body of law will evolve into common practice.
     
    And all the culture along with it.
    And all of mankind as a consequence.
     
    End the invention of lying.
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
  • Are People Outside Of The Us Amazed That Americans Can Vocally Dislike The President?

    Well, I have no idea. We all gossip and complain about our politicians. Some countries punish it. Some countries like the USA encourage it. It’s part of american nature to complain about government. I find chinese people of a certain character think it’s odd. Russians understand that they must be respectfully cautious. But I think for most Westerners it’s just part of life in a Democracy. In Ukraine people complain constantly about ALL politicians and bureaucrats – and they should.

    https://www.quora.com/Are-people-outside-of-the-US-amazed-that-Americans-can-vocally-dislike-the-president

  • What If All At Once, Every Nation On Earth Began To Embargo All Trade, Travel, And Financial Transactions To And From The Usa?

    It would be suicidal, the USA would retaliate (FWIW the USA can survive autark-ically for extended periods albeit with consequences). The world economy would come nearly to a halt, and there would, outside of the second and third world, utter economic collapse – ergo, no one is that crazy. Prices, particularly of petroleum would skyrocket, markets would collapse, central banks wouldn’t be able to clear, and ….

    It would be really, really, really bad. If the USA shut off the world financial system alone, or the internet, that would pretty much end all opposition. $14T flows through the USA’s financial system every day. EVERY SINGLE DAY. That’s what, seven times Russia’s annual Economy? That’s the entire Chinese annual economy every two days?

    The problem very different from business or personal finances. If you or your family or your small business stop ‘spending’ the world goes on without you. But if your whole country stops spending, monetary velocity stops and everybody starts starving really,really fast. The same is true of the world. Wanna see a great depression when there are too many humans for us to go back to villages and farms to survive? Well, it will make the great depression look like an overnight flu.

    Nobody both gets to be in charge of a government, and be that stupid at the same time, because – believe it or not – there are guys like me that run the world system of production, finance, distribution, and trade, and we all understand just fine what would happen…

    https://www.quora.com/What-if-all-at-once-every-nation-on-Earth-began-to-embargo-all-trade-travel-and-financial-transactions-to-and-from-the-USA

  • Are People Outside Of The Us Amazed That Americans Can Vocally Dislike The President?

    Well, I have no idea. We all gossip and complain about our politicians. Some countries punish it. Some countries like the USA encourage it. It’s part of american nature to complain about government. I find chinese people of a certain character think it’s odd. Russians understand that they must be respectfully cautious. But I think for most Westerners it’s just part of life in a Democracy. In Ukraine people complain constantly about ALL politicians and bureaucrats – and they should.

    https://www.quora.com/Are-people-outside-of-the-US-amazed-that-Americans-can-vocally-dislike-the-president

  • What If All At Once, Every Nation On Earth Began To Embargo All Trade, Travel, And Financial Transactions To And From The Usa?

    It would be suicidal, the USA would retaliate (FWIW the USA can survive autark-ically for extended periods albeit with consequences). The world economy would come nearly to a halt, and there would, outside of the second and third world, utter economic collapse – ergo, no one is that crazy. Prices, particularly of petroleum would skyrocket, markets would collapse, central banks wouldn’t be able to clear, and ….

    It would be really, really, really bad. If the USA shut off the world financial system alone, or the internet, that would pretty much end all opposition. $14T flows through the USA’s financial system every day. EVERY SINGLE DAY. That’s what, seven times Russia’s annual Economy? That’s the entire Chinese annual economy every two days?

    The problem very different from business or personal finances. If you or your family or your small business stop ‘spending’ the world goes on without you. But if your whole country stops spending, monetary velocity stops and everybody starts starving really,really fast. The same is true of the world. Wanna see a great depression when there are too many humans for us to go back to villages and farms to survive? Well, it will make the great depression look like an overnight flu.

    Nobody both gets to be in charge of a government, and be that stupid at the same time, because – believe it or not – there are guys like me that run the world system of production, finance, distribution, and trade, and we all understand just fine what would happen…

    https://www.quora.com/What-if-all-at-once-every-nation-on-Earth-began-to-embargo-all-trade-travel-and-financial-transactions-to-and-from-the-USA

  • Is Russia Our Enemy?

    Russia is not so much an enemy as Russia and Russians feel somewhere between a messianic and religious conviction that they must restore Orthodox civilization, and that the west has consistently prohibited their efforts – and the truth is we were wrong and the russians were right.

    Russia is paying a very high price for the Bolshevik and Soviet Eras.

    We were wrong in entering WW1. Wrong in entering WW2. Wrong not to defeat the communists in China, and wrong not to immediately include the Russians in NATO. We were right to crush Saddam Hussein but wrong to try to create a democracy, rather than let the existing peoples replace him.

    Russia merely screwed up invading Ukraine. She could have easily bought all of ukraine other than Galacia (in the west) for a song, and now she has made herself a threat again.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-Russia-our-enemy

  • Why Can’t The Us Just Obliterate The Likes Of China And Russia?

    Because we are Europeans. We are the world’s Aristocracy. We invented aristocracy. We are also, unfortunately, Christians. Meaning we play ‘extremely forgiving tit for tat’. And so we don’t do that. We civilize people instead. It’s just more profitable.

    Look. when the Great Khan was to decimate China, his advisors told him how much money he could make by taxing them rather than just robbing and killing them.

    If you’re a westerner, with the only high trust civilization on earth, making customers is simply more profitable than killing them. 3500 years ago the Indo Europeans and conquered pretty much everything from the atlantic to the source of the Yellow River, and from the arctic circle to Egypt, with the Iranians dominating the warm climates and the europeans dominating the cooler climates.

    It’s just profitable to rule.

    It’s also really hard to profit from rule when almost everyone on earth is dead and the people who are left want to kill you.

    The real question is why the west and the russians don’t get together and kill everyone else and just enjoy the rest of history together.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-cant-the-US-just-obliterate-the-likes-of-China-and-Russia