Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • The Direction Of The Reformation of Our European Christian Religion

    0. There are only three possible methods of human coercion, and three possible institutions of human organization, and three sets of elites in the perpetuation of those institutions – and the order that civilizations develop those three institutions determine our civilizational differences. 0.1 Those three methods, institutions, and elites, are Force, The Military, and the State and Politicians,  Remuneration, markets, Finance, the Law and Judges, and Inclusion(or exclusion), Faith, the Academy-Church, and intellectuals-Priests. The fourth institution has no power of coercion, and that is marriage, family, and vocation. 0.2 One can develop at least the following sequences: … strong military > state > moderate religion(or philosophy) > and weak law as did China or strong military > state > medium-law > and weak religion (?) as did the late romans or strong military > law > medium state > and weak religion as did continental Europeans – unable to resist religious invasion. or strong military > law >  medium religion(or philosophy) > and weak state (as anarchists dream) or strong military > religion > medium law > and weak state as did India – unable to unify or resist invasion or strong military > strong religion > weak state > and weak law as did Muslims – having to retain tribalism or weak military > strong religion > religious law > failed state as did the Jews – having to depend on  hosts. 1. Institutional religions function as quasi-governments, and either take over the state (Islam), undermine it (Judaism), compete with it (Catholicism), work with it (Orthodoxy), or Abandon it (Protestantism).

    STATE <- Islam <- Judaism <- Catholicism <- Orthodoxy -> Protestantism ->  FOLK -> Buddhism -> Stoicism -> Epicureanism -> SECULAR 2. Institutional religions resist evolution and reform. Protestant religion continuously reforms by creating a market for sects, that for all intents and purposes, provide messaging for about every half standard of deviation in IQ and class – but with the same underlying set of ideas.

    Baptist >Pentecostal >Mormon>Holiness >United >Presbyterian >Protestant >Catholic >Lutheran >Methodist >Agnostic >Athiest >Anglican (catholic being the middle) 3. So at the very least, American evangelical protestant churches have fully abandoned institutions, abandoned the highly experimental religions of the reformation, and have restored Christianity to what we call a folk religion, meaning, self-perpetuating without the need for formal institutions, or political power. 3.1 The evangelicals accomplish de-institutionalization with a greater reliance on superstition, the bible, and the talent of individual preachers- and at least in the more popular churches appears to be migrating to the use of Jesus and the bible such that it performs the same function as cognitive behavioral therapy – in other words – it is the optimum direction for therapeutic religion of the self, providing personal mindfulness which is the first function of religion. It isn’t the optimum direction for social religion whose role is local community binding, or for civic (meaning state) religion whose role is indoctrination, education, and preparation for participation in the state. 3.2 The catholic church, ever fighting against classical empirical and rational thought, all but abandoned the bible, for dogma, principally through the first counter-reformation against Classical thought by Augustine, and the second counter-reformation against the classical restoration by Acquinas – although it could not compete with the combination of the empirical revolution, literacy, the reformation. As a result, it’s less reliant on revelation and superstition. 3.3 The premise is that Catholicism is ‘good’ for you, society, and state. And because of its sophisticated training in ideals and concepts, the Catholic church functioned until the 1950’s as a civic religion. (the founders were wrong not to state that the umbrella of Protestantism was as the state religion.) 3.4 Orthodoxy is nationalistic and produces adherence and faith, including support for the state and functions as social religion. And Orthodoxy maintains its influence and is less threatened by modernity, by not being in conflict with the state, retaining an emphasis on tradition, the family, faith, and the soul. 4. The Catholic Church merged Semitic Christian supernatural with and European classical Aryan rational thought, culminating with the dogma, doctrine, vast literary history, Catechism, Catholic encyclopedia – and much of the doctrine is an imitation of European legal structure from the premise of charity instead of natural law’s reciprocity. This similarity to European law is helpful in understanding why protestants were constitutionalists and secularists have had a harder time against relativism-  they have neither catholic nor juridical training in law that is the foundation of western origins. 4.1. The Catholic church had the opportunity to reform multiple times and spawned a history of different movements including sects, Augustinian Synthesis, Monastic movement, Classical Restoration’s Scholasticism, Literacy, the protestant reformation. 5. But the institution itself like any bureaucracy dependent on income streams failed. They failed the natural law restoration, the empirical restoration, the Darwinian revolution, and the Romantic revolution. And tragically failed completely under Vatican Two – choosing the worst of all available options. They failed because they were organized NOT to adapt. 6. An separate institutional church, like the Orthodox, and especially if it has its own income stream (taxes, tithes), serves to limit demands on the state, and lets the Church specialize in education, indoctrination, self, family, society – and lets the state to specialize in via negativa force and dispute resolution. 7. This separation of powers facilitates excellence in both masculine paternal state at national and federal scale, neutral law at commercial scale, and feminine maternal church at personal, familial, and social scale. 8. The Church re-developed natural law, and the Middle Class maintained the common law as natural law, and the state created monarchy as judge of last resort, and houses markets of commons. This produced a legalistic framework across the entirety of the civilization. 8.1 And Jefferson restored Jesus’ teaching in the Jefferson Bible to one of deism and moral philosophy. He restored Jesus’ teaching to the means of tolerating the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws – by the continuous extension of reciprocal love. Not as a war against european people, but as a means of empowering European people to find joy in the tragedy of our continuous stressful evolution into the hands of the gods, by obeying the laws of the universe. 9. Then the French Secular Catholic Authoritarian Literary revolution, the German Secular Catholic Rationalist revolution, and unfortunately, the Jewish anti-European Secular Pseudoscientific revolution – alienated and overwhelmed the church causing retrenchment in superstition. 10. And the Jewish (Marxist, neo-Marxist, pomo, feminist, PC, Woke, Anti-Whiteness, White replacement, White Genocide movement) has been successful at creating a religion of conflict and hate and undermining to replace Christian religion of love and construction. 10.1 Europeans think in terms of control by competition, but the Jews (like women) think in terms of undermining. It’s hard for us to step into their shoes because fundamentally they avoid all responsibility and accountability and always preserve plausible deniability. So it’s less about power and more about tearing civilization down. Where Europeans eliminated authority by meritocracy in production, they eliminated authority by undermining host civilizations. That this is illogical never occurs to them. 14/15/16. Because there is no difference between the Jewish usurpation of Jesus’ teachings into ‘Churchianity’ and incrementally destroying roman civilization, institutions, law, education, culture, arts, aesthetics, and killing teachers and philosophers, and creating the dark ages of ignorance and superstition. 16.2 And they repeated the same warfare against civilization in their usurpation of science and converting it to pseudoscience (Marxist, neo-Marxist, pomo, feminist, PC, Woke, Anti-Whiteness, White replacement, White Genocide movement) and deliberately marching through our churches, our education, our media, and our academy, and state, and using them all as a pulpit of hatred of European civilization, because we alone discovered the true words of the gods: in the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. 11. To reform our natural religion and tradition for the age of science – where we KNOW the laws of nature, the universe, and the universe’s god – requires we understand it in those terms. We have those terms: the natural law of reciprocity, and universal Christian love to tolerate those laws. 12/13. So it is quite possible to reconstruct a ‘church’ meaning school, academy, intelligentsia, and restore our high trust, our universal Christian love, our high-quality commons, with the same underlying structure (natural law, Christian love) just as Protestantism provided sects for different social and economic classes, whether feminine empathic and spiritual, or masculine, political, and practical, and to restore civilization to previous highs free of Jewish instigation of hatred, undermining, and destruction. 13.1 We can create a reformation of Christian Religion, teaching personal spiritual faith for those who desire it and teaching reason with European history,  the natural law, and Christian ethics for those who desire it, and we can embody in our laws, the natural law, the Christian ethics, and restore the unification of our church, education, and academy, for all of us, whether faithful and theological or philosophical and scientific – and defend against these hostile peoples forever. 17/18. And if anything, or anyone, it is Europeans who then are chosen by god or the gods, and speak the ideals, language, and rules, of god or the gods, and while the Jews created dark ages and deceits, and the Muslims more bloodshed than the plagues, Europeans almost single-handedly dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, the tyranny of scoundrels, warriors, and priests, and the vicissitudes of nature all but hostile to advanced life. 19/20. We control our destinies and this earth because of Europeans. Europeans and Europeans almost exclusively produced the primacy of man (Indo Europeans), reason, law, naturalism, and realism (Mediterraneans), and the empirical, agrarian, commercial, financial, industrial, first and second scientific revolution, and the medical and technological revolutions(Atlantics). And we are ushering in the genetic and sentient revolutions. Not because we are always first, but we are the most adaptive, so we are always the FASTEST. 21. So what people, what culture, what ethics, provide the evidence of following the words of god or gods, not the lies of men claiming they are the words of god? What is the basis of our European civilization, and our anglo-American-germanic-European culture? 22. We know: Discovering, adapting to, and applying the laws of nature and nature’s god, to ourselves, by reciprocal insurance of self-determination, by sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, jury, monarchy, parliament, faith, and people. 23. Maximizing at all times the computation of the mind of God. And in doing so, evolving ourselves into the hands of God. So that we may make this life, this earth, others, and this universe into the heaven we imagine.

  • Why The Present Conflict, and What We Can Do About It

    1. The pressures of Geographic, economic, organizing strategy (steppe herding) led proto Europeans to develop a universal, entrepreneurial (voluntary) militia (militarized society), and military reporting’. (See political economy of Sparta, Vikings and Pirates. 2. In such a political system, status was available by merit in empirical adversarial competition at high risk (raiding cattle). 3. And Europeans (uniquely) normatively institutionalized testimonial (empirical) speech (military reporting), and the resulting high ingroup trust. 4. There exist only three means of human coercion:force(military-state), reumuneration(commerce-law), and ostracization-undermining(normative society-religion): State+Law+Religion 5. The order of the development of those institutions causes all macro civilizational differences. 6. The rate of civilizational adaptation and innovation depends on the order of these institutions. 7. Europeans(uniquely) developed empirical Law of Tort(strong) > State(weak) > Religion (fail). 8. It’s the fastest evolutionary model for organizing humans that is possible, and produces the least divergence from the formal(logical), physical and logical laws of the universe. 9. This is why Fukuyama erred. And what frustrates Statists. European civ’s radical rate of evolution in bronze, iron, steel, and silicon ages, is due to continuous demand for status by discovering opportunity and by forcing the people to adapt to change. All others stagnate. 10. Tort Law continues natural selection, domestication, evolution without design or intention. European law(martial order) limited competition to cooperative market and conflict in court with judicially sanctioned Duel, Laws against Defamation, Gossips, and Shrills. 11. Political competition between many states creates a Pareto optimum of political organization (power). 12. Law (natural law of reciprocity by tort) creates a Pareto optimum of economic production. 13. Marriage creates a nash optimum between sexes in a (military) polity. 14. Males are physical superpredators(fast) and females social superpredators(slow). Limiting conflict to positive commercial market, and negative court(law) markets, was a compromise equally suppressing(domesticating) both male (violence) and female(undermining) strategies. 15. Ergo, women and men were EQUALLY domesticated by suppression of EACH of their evolutionary conflict strategies – if they affected the peace (economy, society, polity) – “Ordnung” – and especially retaliation cycles (feuds) and even more so, taxation. 16. All of these policies force behavioral adaptation (domestication) into the polity, norms, traditions, institutions, by directing dominance expression into voluntary markets (association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons production, polity production, and war.) 17. Domestication (evolutionary adaptation) under these (ancient) rules occurred by physical ostracization (a death sentence), land use ostracization (manorial), credit ostracization (socio-economic), harsh winters, and ‘genetic pacification’ by hanging (political and judicial). 18. Free speech was a controversial because they couldn’t demarcate(in court) Truth b/c of Faith(Church). They enacted under these traditions. 19. Traditions like group strategy and metaphysics are presumptions – they may not be known, articulated – and certainly not codified. 20. The evolutionary history of man consists of maximizing bodily, social, cognitive, and extended phenotype (tech) adaptation in time. That’s it. For example, IQ (g) is just a measure of cognitive adaptation in time. 21. So the extraordinary success of the European peoples in bronze, iron, coal-steel, and silicon-oil ages, is due to continuing maximization of human adaptation by minimization the difference between human behavior and the laws of the universe. 22. And Europeans disproportionately and overwhelmingly – aside from the conquest by supernatural religion in the dark ages – dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality and early death. 23. But this rapidity and its rewards for a small population on the edge of the agrarian & bronze age, comes at the cost of (a) adaptive stress. (b) market suppression of the reproduction of those demonstrably by failing in markets. (c) Christian love for masses to tolerate it. 24. Until 1950s mainstream reporters maintained military experience, discipline, duty, and testimonial speech, and full integration into what’s today called ‘Whiteness’. 25. “Whiteness” Ironically, means ‘Science”, which means not violating Tort against the Commons by warranty of ‘due diligence necessary for producing testimonial speech – free of ignorance, error, bias, loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, and deceit.” 26. Then the Frankfurt School moved into Columbia University and took advantage of (a) free speech (b) Christian tolerance, (c) the enlightenment false promise of an aristocracy of everyone, (d) the first gen. off the farm (e)a windfall economy (f)ignorance of our group strategy 27. The frankfurt school and the postmodernists, anti-male feminists, PC/Woke, anti-whiteness that followed, used the female group strategy of undermining and reputation destruction against the entirety of the western strategy, metaphysics, institutions, traditions, and norms. 28. Destroying from within what had taken five thousand years of evolution producing the proto-European, Hellenic, Roman, Germanic(HRE-Prussian), Anglo(Scandinavian)-American institutions from within just as they had undermined the roman empire, Spanish, Germans, and Russians. 29. How? By the false promise of freedom from the formal(truth), physical (scarcity), behavioral(self-interest, amorality, reciprocity, kin selection), and evolutionary(genetic load, regression to the mean, natural selection, eugenic vs dysgenic) laws of the universe. 30. They cast Europeans as oppressors, not those that freed them from those laws by adapting to those laws – the only group that didn’t fail to pass through the Great Filter of the limits of cooperation in the division of labor: continuing natural selection by markets in all life. 31. Contrary to globalist(anti-nationalist) ambitions of the females, and those who fight for the female (dysgenic, devolutionary, non-adaptive) strategy -the wealthier we become the more genetically biased the least conformity and lowest-demand for it.(Scandinavian divergence). 32/33. To restore the equilibrium between male and female strategies; to reverse demographic degeneration; and to have an honest conversation about whether we continue our conflict or return to the European and founder tradition of small competing states under a weak federation we would need to:

    a) Restore defamation – and under untestifiabilty and falsehood rather than harm. b) Require all commercial speech to the public in matters public meet requirements for testimony (Testifiability). c) Grant protection to political identity and political speech (as with religion). 34. And end the age of industrialized lying that consists in the postwar pseudoscientific religion of freedom from the formal, phsyical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws and the promise that there is any alternative to rule of law, and markets – especially markets for the production of commons: what we call republican, democratic, or participatory government. 35. And restore our traditional limit of conflict to truthful reciprocal speech in the production of exchanges in an association, cooperation, reproduction, production (goods services and information), commons (goods, services, information), and polities – the market for exchanges in the production of commons between the sexes, clans, classes, and yes, races. 35. And restore our traditional limit of conflict to truthful reciprocal speech in the production of exchanges in an association, cooperation, reproduction, production (goods services and information), commons (goods, services, information), and polities … 36. Because government serves as the market for exchanges in the production of commons between the sexes, clans, classes, and yes, races. 37. And without that market, and truthful reciprocal exchanges within it, all we do is resort to lies, false promises, gossiping and undermining – until we must eventually resort to violence. And, while there are many who fear it, there are enough who revel in the opportunity. 38. I should perhaps mention, that all mass media distributes mythos. Myths train the subconscious by suggestion(involuntary) – not declaration (voluntary), not open to self-audit. A mythos contains a narrative. That narrative contains a strategy. That strategy implies a paradigm. 39. That paradigm either is consistent with the laws of the universe – or it is not. As such, there are seditious myths and supportive myths. There are criminal myths and virtuous myths. 39.Without knowing the laws of the universe we can not regulate and reform a group’s strategy. Without knowing the European group’s strategy as a system of weights and measures for myths, one cannot regulate myths. Without knowing the system of weights and measures for truthful testimonial speech we cannot regulate speech. But we know each of them. 40 . There is only one condition under which the laws of the universe, the strategy and mythos, and truthful testifiable speech are consistent and coherent.  And that’s called the germanic languages, the formal logics (math-identity, verbal-sets, operational-sequences), the physical laws (determinism, scarcity, entropy), … 41. … behavioral “natural” laws, and evolutionary laws (mutation, recombination, genetic load, regression to the mean, neotenic evolution, reproductive sortition, limited rotation, natural selection, and success or failure in the defeat of the red queen) … 41. … given our vast differences in distributions in sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, within and without of clans, classes, and races, given our demonstrated physical, social, cognitive, and extended phenotypical differences in appearance, behavior, and consequences. 41. 43. And given our different rates and depths of maturity (neoteny), distribution of sex differences in evaluation and cognition, distribution of consciousness, and distribution of intelligence. And perhaps importantly, the distribution of those talents within any group in which we can obtain an identity (membership) and the advantages and disadvantages therefrom. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine    

  • Why The Present Conflict, and What We Can Do About It

    1. The pressures of Geographic, economic, organizing strategy (steppe herding) led proto Europeans to develop a universal, entrepreneurial (voluntary) militia (militarized society), and military reporting’. (See political economy of Sparta, Vikings and Pirates. 2. In such a political system, status was available by merit in empirical adversarial competition at high risk (raiding cattle). 3. And Europeans (uniquely) normatively institutionalized testimonial (empirical) speech (military reporting), and the resulting high ingroup trust. 4. There exist only three means of human coercion:force(military-state), reumuneration(commerce-law), and ostracization-undermining(normative society-religion): State+Law+Religion 5. The order of the development of those institutions causes all macro civilizational differences. 6. The rate of civilizational adaptation and innovation depends on the order of these institutions. 7. Europeans(uniquely) developed empirical Law of Tort(strong) > State(weak) > Religion (fail). 8. It’s the fastest evolutionary model for organizing humans that is possible, and produces the least divergence from the formal(logical), physical and logical laws of the universe. 9. This is why Fukuyama erred. And what frustrates Statists. European civ’s radical rate of evolution in bronze, iron, steel, and silicon ages, is due to continuous demand for status by discovering opportunity and by forcing the people to adapt to change. All others stagnate. 10. Tort Law continues natural selection, domestication, evolution without design or intention. European law(martial order) limited competition to cooperative market and conflict in court with judicially sanctioned Duel, Laws against Defamation, Gossips, and Shrills. 11. Political competition between many states creates a Pareto optimum of political organization (power). 12. Law (natural law of reciprocity by tort) creates a Pareto optimum of economic production. 13. Marriage creates a nash optimum between sexes in a (military) polity. 14. Males are physical superpredators(fast) and females social superpredators(slow). Limiting conflict to positive commercial market, and negative court(law) markets, was a compromise equally suppressing(domesticating) both male (violence) and female(undermining) strategies. 15. Ergo, women and men were EQUALLY domesticated by suppression of EACH of their evolutionary conflict strategies – if they affected the peace (economy, society, polity) – “Ordnung” – and especially retaliation cycles (feuds) and even more so, taxation. 16. All of these policies force behavioral adaptation (domestication) into the polity, norms, traditions, institutions, by directing dominance expression into voluntary markets (association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons production, polity production, and war.) 17. Domestication (evolutionary adaptation) under these (ancient) rules occurred by physical ostracization (a death sentence), land use ostracization (manorial), credit ostracization (socio-economic), harsh winters, and ‘genetic pacification’ by hanging (political and judicial). 18. Free speech was a controversial because they couldn’t demarcate(in court) Truth b/c of Faith(Church). They enacted under these traditions. 19. Traditions like group strategy and metaphysics are presumptions – they may not be known, articulated – and certainly not codified. 20. The evolutionary history of man consists of maximizing bodily, social, cognitive, and extended phenotype (tech) adaptation in time. That’s it. For example, IQ (g) is just a measure of cognitive adaptation in time. 21. So the extraordinary success of the European peoples in bronze, iron, coal-steel, and silicon-oil ages, is due to continuing maximization of human adaptation by minimization the difference between human behavior and the laws of the universe. 22. And Europeans disproportionately and overwhelmingly – aside from the conquest by supernatural religion in the dark ages – dragged mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality and early death. 23. But this rapidity and its rewards for a small population on the edge of the agrarian & bronze age, comes at the cost of (a) adaptive stress. (b) market suppression of the reproduction of those demonstrably by failing in markets. (c) Christian love for masses to tolerate it. 24. Until 1950s mainstream reporters maintained military experience, discipline, duty, and testimonial speech, and full integration into what’s today called ‘Whiteness’. 25. “Whiteness” Ironically, means ‘Science”, which means not violating Tort against the Commons by warranty of ‘due diligence necessary for producing testimonial speech – free of ignorance, error, bias, loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, and deceit.” 26. Then the Frankfurt School moved into Columbia University and took advantage of (a) free speech (b) Christian tolerance, (c) the enlightenment false promise of an aristocracy of everyone, (d) the first gen. off the farm (e)a windfall economy (f)ignorance of our group strategy 27. The frankfurt school and the postmodernists, anti-male feminists, PC/Woke, anti-whiteness that followed, used the female group strategy of undermining and reputation destruction against the entirety of the western strategy, metaphysics, institutions, traditions, and norms. 28. Destroying from within what had taken five thousand years of evolution producing the proto-European, Hellenic, Roman, Germanic(HRE-Prussian), Anglo(Scandinavian)-American institutions from within just as they had undermined the roman empire, Spanish, Germans, and Russians. 29. How? By the false promise of freedom from the formal(truth), physical (scarcity), behavioral(self-interest, amorality, reciprocity, kin selection), and evolutionary(genetic load, regression to the mean, natural selection, eugenic vs dysgenic) laws of the universe. 30. They cast Europeans as oppressors, not those that freed them from those laws by adapting to those laws – the only group that didn’t fail to pass through the Great Filter of the limits of cooperation in the division of labor: continuing natural selection by markets in all life. 31. Contrary to globalist(anti-nationalist) ambitions of the females, and those who fight for the female (dysgenic, devolutionary, non-adaptive) strategy -the wealthier we become the more genetically biased the least conformity and lowest-demand for it.(Scandinavian divergence). 32/33. To restore the equilibrium between male and female strategies; to reverse demographic degeneration; and to have an honest conversation about whether we continue our conflict or return to the European and founder tradition of small competing states under a weak federation we would need to:

    a) Restore defamation – and under untestifiabilty and falsehood rather than harm. b) Require all commercial speech to the public in matters public meet requirements for testimony (Testifiability). c) Grant protection to political identity and political speech (as with religion). 34. And end the age of industrialized lying that consists in the postwar pseudoscientific religion of freedom from the formal, phsyical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws and the promise that there is any alternative to rule of law, and markets – especially markets for the production of commons: what we call republican, democratic, or participatory government. 35. And restore our traditional limit of conflict to truthful reciprocal speech in the production of exchanges in an association, cooperation, reproduction, production (goods services and information), commons (goods, services, information), and polities – the market for exchanges in the production of commons between the sexes, clans, classes, and yes, races. 35. And restore our traditional limit of conflict to truthful reciprocal speech in the production of exchanges in an association, cooperation, reproduction, production (goods services and information), commons (goods, services, information), and polities … 36. Because government serves as the market for exchanges in the production of commons between the sexes, clans, classes, and yes, races. 37. And without that market, and truthful reciprocal exchanges within it, all we do is resort to lies, false promises, gossiping and undermining – until we must eventually resort to violence. And, while there are many who fear it, there are enough who revel in the opportunity. 38. I should perhaps mention, that all mass media distributes mythos. Myths train the subconscious by suggestion(involuntary) – not declaration (voluntary), not open to self-audit. A mythos contains a narrative. That narrative contains a strategy. That strategy implies a paradigm. 39. That paradigm either is consistent with the laws of the universe – or it is not. As such, there are seditious myths and supportive myths. There are criminal myths and virtuous myths. 39.Without knowing the laws of the universe we can not regulate and reform a group’s strategy. Without knowing the European group’s strategy as a system of weights and measures for myths, one cannot regulate myths. Without knowing the system of weights and measures for truthful testimonial speech we cannot regulate speech. But we know each of them. 40 . There is only one condition under which the laws of the universe, the strategy and mythos, and truthful testifiable speech are consistent and coherent.  And that’s called the germanic languages, the formal logics (math-identity, verbal-sets, operational-sequences), the physical laws (determinism, scarcity, entropy), … 41. … behavioral “natural” laws, and evolutionary laws (mutation, recombination, genetic load, regression to the mean, neotenic evolution, reproductive sortition, limited rotation, natural selection, and success or failure in the defeat of the red queen) … 41. … given our vast differences in distributions in sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, within and without of clans, classes, and races, given our demonstrated physical, social, cognitive, and extended phenotypical differences in appearance, behavior, and consequences. 41. 43. And given our different rates and depths of maturity (neoteny), distribution of sex differences in evaluation and cognition, distribution of consciousness, and distribution of intelligence. And perhaps importantly, the distribution of those talents within any group in which we can obtain an identity (membership) and the advantages and disadvantages therefrom. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine    

  • @masondindu Apparently manly sweat and intelligence are two things you lack. 😉

    @masondindu Apparently manly sweat and intelligence are two things you lack. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-21 05:26:08 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105592046796176122

  • Notes on a speech by Yual Harari

    “We limit ourselves to Property(Permission) and Range(Duty,Responsibility)” “Fictions or Narratives create a paradigm (system of measurement) of property(permission) and range(duty), creating a system of cooperative rules” “Human rights are a fiction” … that’s not really true. Those Human rights that are Natural Rights are an extension of life and phenotype. They are in fact a universal paradigm and measure. We can separate out natural rights (true) from fantasies (false). “everybody believes in money” not really true. everyoe believes in acquisition and money is the most frictionless resource for use in acqusition. “Money has no objective value”. That’s not really true. Money has no resource (commodity) value that can be directly consumed without exchange for a resoucre(commodity) that can be consumed or transformed. What does Liberalism mean: “Individualsm”… No. its self determination. the philosophy and strategy of aristoracy, and the west promised everyone the opporutnity to join it – because the west has been eugenic for its entire history. So no, it’s not individualistic. It’s rapid evolution by rapid meritocratic adaptation – and equal suppression of reproduction. It’s not liberty (permission) but self determination (reciprocity0. We believed our own promise of an aristocracy of everyone was made possible by the industrial ervolution. It wasn’t. We opened the franchise without completing the project of an aristocracy of everyone. No he doesn’t understand liberal politics. Instead if forces continuous empirical adaptation for forcing thepeople to make choices, and gain the benefits or consequences. OMG this guy is a liar or an idiot. No the highest authority is’t the customer, it’s that making erros forces changethroughut the polity. It’s continuing natural selection.  Note how he keeps making use of the word authority – showing he does not understand it. OMG he talks about duchamp. But duchamp was forcing the jewish marxist revolt against western aesthetic. that’s not liberlism. That’s jewish marxists attack on western aesthetics. Ethics: the priest determines ethics – as an authority. No that individualism judgement of aesthetics was jewish marxist introduction, not a ueropean one. “Edcaton”… the student is the highest authority. No. we are forcng them to  adapt to the laws of the universe. “Human rights a religion” No. human rights were invented to constrain postwar states to self improvement in order to prevent another world war. “China has little to offer the world” – no only jews try to offer the world with idoelogy and religion. The europeans try to EVOLVE the world materially. There are only two elites and jews are only elites because of european tolerance. “Islam has no alternative to liberalism.” No. There is no evidence that islam cannot go through a protestant reformation as they develop a middle class. I could do it. THey can do it. they have to have the NEED to do it.  

  • Notes on a speech by Yual Harari

    “We limit ourselves to Property(Permission) and Range(Duty,Responsibility)” “Fictions or Narratives create a paradigm (system of measurement) of property(permission) and range(duty), creating a system of cooperative rules” “Human rights are a fiction” … that’s not really true. Those Human rights that are Natural Rights are an extension of life and phenotype. They are in fact a universal paradigm and measure. We can separate out natural rights (true) from fantasies (false). “everybody believes in money” not really true. everyoe believes in acquisition and money is the most frictionless resource for use in acqusition. “Money has no objective value”. That’s not really true. Money has no resource (commodity) value that can be directly consumed without exchange for a resoucre(commodity) that can be consumed or transformed. What does Liberalism mean: “Individualsm”… No. its self determination. the philosophy and strategy of aristoracy, and the west promised everyone the opporutnity to join it – because the west has been eugenic for its entire history. So no, it’s not individualistic. It’s rapid evolution by rapid meritocratic adaptation – and equal suppression of reproduction. It’s not liberty (permission) but self determination (reciprocity0. We believed our own promise of an aristocracy of everyone was made possible by the industrial ervolution. It wasn’t. We opened the franchise without completing the project of an aristocracy of everyone. No he doesn’t understand liberal politics. Instead if forces continuous empirical adaptation for forcing thepeople to make choices, and gain the benefits or consequences. OMG this guy is a liar or an idiot. No the highest authority is’t the customer, it’s that making erros forces changethroughut the polity. It’s continuing natural selection.  Note how he keeps making use of the word authority – showing he does not understand it. OMG he talks about duchamp. But duchamp was forcing the jewish marxist revolt against western aesthetic. that’s not liberlism. That’s jewish marxists attack on western aesthetics. Ethics: the priest determines ethics – as an authority. No that individualism judgement of aesthetics was jewish marxist introduction, not a ueropean one. “Edcaton”… the student is the highest authority. No. we are forcng them to  adapt to the laws of the universe. “Human rights a religion” No. human rights were invented to constrain postwar states to self improvement in order to prevent another world war. “China has little to offer the world” – no only jews try to offer the world with idoelogy and religion. The europeans try to EVOLVE the world materially. There are only two elites and jews are only elites because of european tolerance. “Islam has no alternative to liberalism.” No. There is no evidence that islam cannot go through a protestant reformation as they develop a middle class. I could do it. THey can do it. they have to have the NEED to do it.  

  • Quotes of the Day

    Quotes of the Day

    TESTIMONY ON P-LAW
     
    It’s not set(ideal, verbal) logic of inference, but operation(real, operational) logic of possibility. It takes a very long time to grasp that P-law is to life sciences what physics is to physical sciences. The depth of P-Law is awe-inspiring. Because just as it’s difficult to write a proof in math, it’s equally difficult to write a proof in P-law. P-law=Math of Action.
     
    -“Here’s what helped me initially understand P law and how it mirrors Natural law: it’s in human nature to want cooperation, to want others to treat you fairly, to want to own property. Works the same in animal kingdom. Laws in Western civilization were based on these principles.”- TruthQuest
    SEX DIFFERENCES IN PERCEPTION OF THE RED QUEEN –“Given randomness and uncertainty throughout Universe and Nature from sub-atomic level up to the human kingdom, P Law is the calculation of operations to mirror Natural & Universal laws by bringing order, predictability, homeostasis and ADAPTATION to an entropic human ecosystem?”– In other words, we are always in a race with the red queen. I think males intuit this constant, and females CAN’T intuit it any more than males intuit the female ‘fear’. SEX DIFFERENCES IN LOGIC: Males are more adaptive (Logic: True vs False) Reason, Competitive Advantage(Adaptation), Action(production), Political. -vs- Females are less adaptive (Logic: Approve vs Disapprove) Intuition, harmony(non-adaptation), Experience(consumption), Social. Scientific = Operational: P-Law is operation(real, operational) logic of possibility. Philosophical= Verbal: Philosophical logic is set(ideal, verbal) logic of inference. SCIENTIFIC LOGIC: THE TERNARY TRUTH TABLE V1 Center column = Truth Hierarchy
    InsufficientTruth CandidateFalse
    1IncoherentTestifiableUntestifiable(F)
    2UndecidablePossibleImpossible(F)
    3PossibleContingentInconsistent(F)
    4ContingentSufficientInsufficient(F)
    5Sufficient(T)Complete(T)Tautological(M)
    SCIENTIFIC LOGIC: THE TERNARY TRUTH TABLE V2 Center column = Truth Hierarchy
    Insufficient Truth Candidate False
    1 Incoherent Coherent Irrelevant(F)
    2 Coherent Testifiable Untestifiable(F)
    3 Undecidable Possible Impossible(F)
    4 Possible Contingent Inconsistent(F)
    5 Contingent Sufficient Insufficient(F)
    6 Sufficient(T) Complete(T) Tautological(T)
      Hypothesis Theory
    (Doolittle 2020)
    THE LOGIC OF COGNITION I write proofs from first principles. If I can’t write a proof, I can’t claim my judgments are true. If I can, then I can. This is what separates people who think they know by accident, from people who do know by discipline. Very, very, very few people work from first principles.
    Entropy measured by Math is the first principle of the constant relations of the physical sciences. Acquisition measured by operations is the first principle of the Behavioral (Natural) Sciences.
    THREE FUNDAMENTAL INSIGHTS
    Three fundamental insights from my research:
    1 – ‘They’ are far more evil than anyone expected.
    2 – Christian morality and ethics are scientifically optimum, and the Catholic Church simply failed to transition natural law from dogma.
    3 – Fascists discovered the optimum state.
    A PAINFUL TRUTH
    A painful truth: Conducting my research program in public provided more evidence that while a few exceptional thinkers pursue fundamental truths, all others only seek justification of instincts, arguments that justify them, and the power to advance them – w/o any understanding.
    THE WEST HAS ALWAYS PRACTICED SCIENCE
    The Pre-War European > Germanic > Anglo civilization was the closest to and least divergent from the law of the universe. Rule ofLaw in the West, means In Concert with And by Adaptation To the laws of the universe. The west has always practiced ‘science’. The Laws of the Universe .. The Formal, Physical, Natural(Behavior), Evolutionary Laws .. .. The Natural Law of Cooperation .. .. .. The Natural Law of Conflict Resolution(Reciprocity) .. .. .. .. The Natural Law of Tort(Property) .. .. .. .. .. The Common Law –> The US Const. LAW IS THE KING OF THE HILL (Deflationary Grammar) Logic … Math … … Algorithms … … … Recipes, Protocols … … … … Sciences … … … … … The Law (Descriptive Grammar) … … … … Narration … … … Fiction … … Fictionaisms … Deceit Fraud (Inflationary Grammar)
    CATHOLICISM
    Shifting my opinion on Catholicism a bit, in that church dogma produced what is very close to a system of natural law sufficient to unify families, clans, tribes and nations of PEASANTS to compete with the families, tribes, states of ARISTOCRACY. But the Nobility captured Church.
    ECON IS THE MOST IMPORTANT SCIENCE You know, every major prediction I’ve made that I can remember back to at least 1983, was spot on. But it doesn’t matter. Because it’s impossible to convince people to act before they can’t escape acting. Why? It’s easier.
    Gotta teach Behavioral Econ -> Micro Econ -> Political Economy. Macro is at this point, going to be irrelevant other than at the most abstract level, because the coming financial system reform, maximizing sovereign funds, is going to eliminate the noise in the system. It’s criminal. So teach behavioral econ and demographics.

    PREDICTING SIGNALS NOT NOISE There is a very great difference between predicting deterministic consequences and predicting the noise within them. If you predict changes in noise you have either inside information or you’re lucky. 😉 Read Mandlebrot’s “Misbehavior”

    SOLDIERS IN THE CAPITOL
    Kabuki theatre. If the conservatives showed with 500k to 1M people what do you think 500 soldiers are going to do? You think the military is going to open fire on citizens? You think they’ll use explosives? Artillery? It would end the government, the country, and the military.
    THE STATE FEARS THE RIGHT
    The Government is going after Right protesters because they fear them. They brought the state’s illusion of control into question. They do not go after Leftists, BLM, and Antifa because they justify the state, and because the public sector bears the fear and costs of riots.
    GLOBAL POWER SHIFTS There is no way that the current order can continue without the previous radical asymmetry of the American economy vs the rest of the world – especially between the wars and the abandonment of socialism and communism.
    They won’t act until they have to – and have political cover.

    ITS TRUTH-BEFORE-FACE –“Bit off topic question Mr Doolittle. Did you coin a term something like “putting face above truth” (I paraphrase) ?If so I think it’s similar to my term – lawyering.Trying to *appear* correct rather than actually *being* correct…happens often in debates.”– You’re looking for “Truth before Face vs Face before Truth, vs Face regardless of Truth”. ie: west, asia, islam Lawyering is a good vernacular term for “the rhetorical pretense of knowledge not demonstrated” Fraud by Suggestion not yet fraud by omission or declaration.

    PUTIN
    Putin has made only two mistakes in his entire tenure, and both are because of his lack of understanding of western trust. He didn’t take the case for NATO membership, or for the Don River valley and black sea-port to the American people – he would have won both. (See Israel)
    “The Muslim conquest of India is the bloodiest story in history”-Will Durant Yep. As bad as the Mesoamericans were – and they were bad – nothing compares to the work of Islam bloody Islam. And no. Amerindians were brutal vile primitive people who only slightly better. Q: “What stopped the Hindus fighting back effectively and what was the Islamic competitive advantage?” Mobile Raiders whose resources are directed to horse and arms can profit by plunder, looting, slaving, destroying and conquest, because they are always superior to landed defenders whose resources must instead be devoted to defensive, static, production. Q: “How did Slavic states like Novgorod survive and turn the tide against the Turkic & Mongol hordes, what did they do right compared to the Hindus?” They didn’t. They endured while mongols failed to create a state bureaucracy and formal institutions – instead focusing on extractions – and took advantage of deterministic weakness for rapid aggressive expansion. This remains the Russian strategy today: suffer, wait, sprint.
    JEFFERSON The founders were trying to escape the parasitism of both church and state, and didn’t want to repeat the same. The federation (not country) left almost everything to the States. The rush for the western expansion, war over it, created the central government they feared.
    Jefferson was supporting the rise of the meritocratic middle class, and existing the parasitic church and state. And he wanted to escape what we would call today peasants, but he called people of low character. Re: Tax Rebellions And so? The reality was that the crown was no longer paying for defense, and the federal govt had no money, and these people were evading necessary taxes. It’s not like today when we’re complaining about absurd uncontrolled spending and debt. It was a simple economic necessity. (And liberalism – middle-class rule, that escaped the parasitic burden of church and aristocracy-state, has nothing to do with today’s Left which seeks to RESTORE that parasitism by peasantry(immigrants), academy (church) and state (bureaucracy). (BTW: Conflating is lying) A WELCOME APOLOGY   Thank you. Means a lot to me. But the problem remains. Nazis and Christians did the damage to us – not the left or the mainstream. It ended our reach. So like I said the conservative crab bucket makes any organized resistance, rebellion or revolution to save ourselves impossible. –“I believe you’re 100% right, but to be devil’s advocate for a sec… Not to bust your balls or anything, but if you had put up a more dramatic verbal match with the BLM guy, it may have been the key. Being quick on your feet, like Tommy Robinson”– Everyone was wrong. Because I made it impossible to bait us into fail. Symbolism is for chicks and children. Men either follow strategy and tactics or they’re children. Look what the left does: the bait into ‘moments’ that they can misrepresent. Don’t do it. Gandhi until Vikings.
  • Quotes of the Day

    Quotes of the Day

    TESTIMONY ON P-LAW
     
    It’s not set(ideal, verbal) logic of inference, but operation(real, operational) logic of possibility. It takes a very long time to grasp that P-law is to life sciences what physics is to physical sciences. The depth of P-Law is awe-inspiring. Because just as it’s difficult to write a proof in math, it’s equally difficult to write a proof in P-law. P-law=Math of Action.
     
    -“Here’s what helped me initially understand P law and how it mirrors Natural law: it’s in human nature to want cooperation, to want others to treat you fairly, to want to own property. Works the same in animal kingdom. Laws in Western civilization were based on these principles.”- TruthQuest
    SEX DIFFERENCES IN PERCEPTION OF THE RED QUEEN –“Given randomness and uncertainty throughout Universe and Nature from sub-atomic level up to the human kingdom, P Law is the calculation of operations to mirror Natural & Universal laws by bringing order, predictability, homeostasis and ADAPTATION to an entropic human ecosystem?”– In other words, we are always in a race with the red queen. I think males intuit this constant, and females CAN’T intuit it any more than males intuit the female ‘fear’. SEX DIFFERENCES IN LOGIC: Males are more adaptive (Logic: True vs False) Reason, Competitive Advantage(Adaptation), Action(production), Political. -vs- Females are less adaptive (Logic: Approve vs Disapprove) Intuition, harmony(non-adaptation), Experience(consumption), Social. Scientific = Operational: P-Law is operation(real, operational) logic of possibility. Philosophical= Verbal: Philosophical logic is set(ideal, verbal) logic of inference. SCIENTIFIC LOGIC: THE TERNARY TRUTH TABLE V1 Center column = Truth Hierarchy
    InsufficientTruth CandidateFalse
    1IncoherentTestifiableUntestifiable(F)
    2UndecidablePossibleImpossible(F)
    3PossibleContingentInconsistent(F)
    4ContingentSufficientInsufficient(F)
    5Sufficient(T)Complete(T)Tautological(M)
    SCIENTIFIC LOGIC: THE TERNARY TRUTH TABLE V2 Center column = Truth Hierarchy
    Insufficient Truth Candidate False
    1 Incoherent Coherent Irrelevant(F)
    2 Coherent Testifiable Untestifiable(F)
    3 Undecidable Possible Impossible(F)
    4 Possible Contingent Inconsistent(F)
    5 Contingent Sufficient Insufficient(F)
    6 Sufficient(T) Complete(T) Tautological(T)
      Hypothesis Theory
    (Doolittle 2020)
    THE LOGIC OF COGNITION I write proofs from first principles. If I can’t write a proof, I can’t claim my judgments are true. If I can, then I can. This is what separates people who think they know by accident, from people who do know by discipline. Very, very, very few people work from first principles.
    Entropy measured by Math is the first principle of the constant relations of the physical sciences. Acquisition measured by operations is the first principle of the Behavioral (Natural) Sciences.
    THREE FUNDAMENTAL INSIGHTS
    Three fundamental insights from my research:
    1 – ‘They’ are far more evil than anyone expected.
    2 – Christian morality and ethics are scientifically optimum, and the Catholic Church simply failed to transition natural law from dogma.
    3 – Fascists discovered the optimum state.
    A PAINFUL TRUTH
    A painful truth: Conducting my research program in public provided more evidence that while a few exceptional thinkers pursue fundamental truths, all others only seek justification of instincts, arguments that justify them, and the power to advance them – w/o any understanding.
    THE WEST HAS ALWAYS PRACTICED SCIENCE
    The Pre-War European > Germanic > Anglo civilization was the closest to and least divergent from the law of the universe. Rule ofLaw in the West, means In Concert with And by Adaptation To the laws of the universe. The west has always practiced ‘science’. The Laws of the Universe .. The Formal, Physical, Natural(Behavior), Evolutionary Laws .. .. The Natural Law of Cooperation .. .. .. The Natural Law of Conflict Resolution(Reciprocity) .. .. .. .. The Natural Law of Tort(Property) .. .. .. .. .. The Common Law –> The US Const. LAW IS THE KING OF THE HILL (Deflationary Grammar) Logic … Math … … Algorithms … … … Recipes, Protocols … … … … Sciences … … … … … The Law (Descriptive Grammar) … … … … Narration … … … Fiction … … Fictionaisms … Deceit Fraud (Inflationary Grammar)
    CATHOLICISM
    Shifting my opinion on Catholicism a bit, in that church dogma produced what is very close to a system of natural law sufficient to unify families, clans, tribes and nations of PEASANTS to compete with the families, tribes, states of ARISTOCRACY. But the Nobility captured Church.
    ECON IS THE MOST IMPORTANT SCIENCE You know, every major prediction I’ve made that I can remember back to at least 1983, was spot on. But it doesn’t matter. Because it’s impossible to convince people to act before they can’t escape acting. Why? It’s easier.
    Gotta teach Behavioral Econ -> Micro Econ -> Political Economy. Macro is at this point, going to be irrelevant other than at the most abstract level, because the coming financial system reform, maximizing sovereign funds, is going to eliminate the noise in the system. It’s criminal. So teach behavioral econ and demographics.

    PREDICTING SIGNALS NOT NOISE There is a very great difference between predicting deterministic consequences and predicting the noise within them. If you predict changes in noise you have either inside information or you’re lucky. 😉 Read Mandlebrot’s “Misbehavior”

    SOLDIERS IN THE CAPITOL
    Kabuki theatre. If the conservatives showed with 500k to 1M people what do you think 500 soldiers are going to do? You think the military is going to open fire on citizens? You think they’ll use explosives? Artillery? It would end the government, the country, and the military.
    THE STATE FEARS THE RIGHT
    The Government is going after Right protesters because they fear them. They brought the state’s illusion of control into question. They do not go after Leftists, BLM, and Antifa because they justify the state, and because the public sector bears the fear and costs of riots.
    GLOBAL POWER SHIFTS There is no way that the current order can continue without the previous radical asymmetry of the American economy vs the rest of the world – especially between the wars and the abandonment of socialism and communism.
    They won’t act until they have to – and have political cover.

    ITS TRUTH-BEFORE-FACE –“Bit off topic question Mr Doolittle. Did you coin a term something like “putting face above truth” (I paraphrase) ?If so I think it’s similar to my term – lawyering.Trying to *appear* correct rather than actually *being* correct…happens often in debates.”– You’re looking for “Truth before Face vs Face before Truth, vs Face regardless of Truth”. ie: west, asia, islam Lawyering is a good vernacular term for “the rhetorical pretense of knowledge not demonstrated” Fraud by Suggestion not yet fraud by omission or declaration.

    PUTIN
    Putin has made only two mistakes in his entire tenure, and both are because of his lack of understanding of western trust. He didn’t take the case for NATO membership, or for the Don River valley and black sea-port to the American people – he would have won both. (See Israel)
    “The Muslim conquest of India is the bloodiest story in history”-Will Durant Yep. As bad as the Mesoamericans were – and they were bad – nothing compares to the work of Islam bloody Islam. And no. Amerindians were brutal vile primitive people who only slightly better. Q: “What stopped the Hindus fighting back effectively and what was the Islamic competitive advantage?” Mobile Raiders whose resources are directed to horse and arms can profit by plunder, looting, slaving, destroying and conquest, because they are always superior to landed defenders whose resources must instead be devoted to defensive, static, production. Q: “How did Slavic states like Novgorod survive and turn the tide against the Turkic & Mongol hordes, what did they do right compared to the Hindus?” They didn’t. They endured while mongols failed to create a state bureaucracy and formal institutions – instead focusing on extractions – and took advantage of deterministic weakness for rapid aggressive expansion. This remains the Russian strategy today: suffer, wait, sprint.
    JEFFERSON The founders were trying to escape the parasitism of both church and state, and didn’t want to repeat the same. The federation (not country) left almost everything to the States. The rush for the western expansion, war over it, created the central government they feared.
    Jefferson was supporting the rise of the meritocratic middle class, and existing the parasitic church and state. And he wanted to escape what we would call today peasants, but he called people of low character. Re: Tax Rebellions And so? The reality was that the crown was no longer paying for defense, and the federal govt had no money, and these people were evading necessary taxes. It’s not like today when we’re complaining about absurd uncontrolled spending and debt. It was a simple economic necessity. (And liberalism – middle-class rule, that escaped the parasitic burden of church and aristocracy-state, has nothing to do with today’s Left which seeks to RESTORE that parasitism by peasantry(immigrants), academy (church) and state (bureaucracy). (BTW: Conflating is lying) A WELCOME APOLOGY   Thank you. Means a lot to me. But the problem remains. Nazis and Christians did the damage to us – not the left or the mainstream. It ended our reach. So like I said the conservative crab bucket makes any organized resistance, rebellion or revolution to save ourselves impossible. –“I believe you’re 100% right, but to be devil’s advocate for a sec… Not to bust your balls or anything, but if you had put up a more dramatic verbal match with the BLM guy, it may have been the key. Being quick on your feet, like Tommy Robinson”– Everyone was wrong. Because I made it impossible to bait us into fail. Symbolism is for chicks and children. Men either follow strategy and tactics or they’re children. Look what the left does: the bait into ‘moments’ that they can misrepresent. Don’t do it. Gandhi until Vikings.
  • HOW DID THEY EXTERMINATE YOU?

    HOW DID THEY EXTERMINATE YOU?

    HOW DID THEY EXTERMINATE YOU?

    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-19 21:54:17 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105584607695581874

  • The Choice: The Indefensibility of the War Against Western Civilization

    Some argue that cultural Marxism is a silly term, but I think it works well. It describes a leveling desire that is no longer primarily interested in class, but it demographic groups. It sees society as a battle between races, sexes, and sexualities for power. – Bo Weingard

    The Correct (And Only) Answer Cultural Marxists(the Jews in the Frankfurt School), repeated their transformation of Judaism’s cultural institutionalization of the strategy of drug dealers, prostitutes, loan sharks, faith healers, and priesthoods: the false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe, in exchange for membership in a non-violent army, that together cooperates, under the plausible denial of physical non-aggression and plausible deniability of a divine religion, in mass organization of sedition, and fomenting sedition through evangelism, against informational, logical, habitual, normative, traditional, and institutional tools of organization, in a slow incremental battle against those that discover, adapt to, and apply those institutional rules. They then transformed the Jewish Group strategy from an ethnic means of warfare against the productive peoples, into Christianity, which institutionalized their method of warfare against the Roman empire and European Reason, Law, Markets, and Tolerance. And accomplished nothing but a thousand-year dark age of ignorance and parasitism by the Jews themselves and the Organized Church that they invented. Then, immediately upon their liberation from justified historical containment from and prosecution of their crimes by Europeans, they proceeded by transforming Judaism into Marxism, repeating the method of Christian sedition, by again transforming Marxism from fomenting an in-group economic battle between the GENETIC classes in a homogenous society falsely promising an alternative organization to merit (natural selection) Then, immediately upon the failure of Marxism, and the horrors it produced, they transformed marxism into the cultural marxism of the Frankfurt School to foment an ingroup-outgroup battle between races, sexes, sexualities AGAINST homogenous societies, by again falsely promising an alternative to merit (natural selection). Then upon the success of Cultural Marxism, Then they invented postmodernism .. power … lying   because truth results in the natural laws of the universe. pc, woke, explicity white political disempowerment by minority status, explicit anti-whiteness, explicit  white replacement, white genocide And just as drug dealers, prostitutes, loan sharks … they found a customer base to turn into clientelle (clientellism), a pulpit to preach from in university, media, and entertainment, and credit expansion to obscure the consequences, and that was to use the academy, media, advertising, … to remove the feedback loop, and to indoctrinate the first generation of the laboring class off the farm, and the first generation of women out of the household – both made possible by european discovery adaptation to and application of those laws… of the laws of the universe The entire history of jewish thought from boaz, marx, freud … onward is a revolt against the industrial revolution that dilute their powers of localw persuasion and parasitism, against their regional poewrs of financial parasitism upon the poor, … Reciprocity and Proportionality (Merit) = Eugenic: adversarial competition maintaining natural selection. Necessary for clan, tribe, nation, survival. -vs- Reciprocity and Equality (Non-Merit) = Dysgenic: social conformity maintaining stasis. Rise and Fall All. The Jewish group strategy has been consistent for all of their recorded history, both pre-egyptian, egyptian, mosopotamian, levantine, roman, and during the diaspora: The whole of the (Jewish) Left’s Postwar Program (Reverse Pogrom) is a revolt against Darwin and Malthus’ explanation of the success of the Western Tradition, using false-promise of freedom from scarcity, self-interest, amorality, reciprocity, kin preference, and genetic load, regression-2-mean, as a means of warfare against western civilization, that would deprive them of specialization in parasitism on the private and common by false promises of freedom from laws of nature. So it’s not cultural marxism alone, it’s Islam Judaism, Marxism, Socialism, Cultural marxism, postmodernism, anti-male feminism, science denial, pc/woke, anti-white, anti-west. Why? It’s not possible to compete given their <95 medians. It’s not possible to prey upon 105+ medians. It’s not possible to argue against this framework. You can try. You must lie, and conspire to engage in sedition, treason, warfare, culture-cide, civilization-cide, and ethnic genocide to even try. Even trying to argue against it merely licenses warfare, culture-cide, civilization-cide, and ethnocide in response. This is war. It’s total war. War against every market in western civilization: association, cooperation, production of goods, services, and information, reproduction, commons, trifunctional elites, trifunctionalism itself, polities, and warfare. It is a war against our first principle of self-determination, self-determined means, sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, and the rapid adaptivity … And we are the only fully market civilization, with the only rule of law, with the only trifunctional market between elites, with the only demand for truth-before-face, reciprocity and warranty, and the high trust innovative and adaptive prosperity and resulting harmony that results – at the cost of the preservation of natural selection by the constraint of the reproduction of the unproductive, and the Christian ethic of sacrificial care for those who natural markets, nature, and nature’s god have determined unfit to burden the rest of us by replication of their genes. Only the west practices trifunctionalism in a competition between elites mediated by our natural law of self-determination, by sovereignty reciprocity, truth, and duty. With the failure of the catholic church to … ….. While there are four visions competing in the West: The Russian Martial Masculine Paternal Orthodox Authoritarian, The French State-Church Feminine Maternal Latin Authoritarian, The Anglo-Germanic Protestant Militial Paternal Rule of Law of Markets, and the Jewish Semitic Feminine Monopoly Authoritarian. All four of these visions persist in their group strategies that are thousands of years old. The Germans have abandoned their attempts at thought leadership and the formation of elites. And the Intermarium Slavic peoples have been unable to form elites without the Poles, who have been set back seventy years by the Soviets, and infantilized by EU membership, who must finish their maturity and take that leadership for it to succeed. The Russians have group strategy, but they are lying in wait, and don’t actively compete in the discourse, because they are justifiably untrustful of the jews for their crimes against the Russian and Ukrainian people, the germans for historical reasons – despite their natural interests in a cultural and economic alliance, and even more untrustful of Americans for our ‘nativity’, spreading of decadency, and suicide that they managed to painfully escape at the cost of a century and millions of dead. As a contrast, the Chinese have chosen fascism – the ethnocentric military-industrial state, printing rather than borrowing money, markets and eugenics, not communism and the Jewish globalist financial or industrial state-run for peasants and the resulting dysgenia. The Indians maintain their ‘we are many, and kill we will them with kindness’ strategy but against China and Islam it will fail. So we will see India increasingly moving to decreased territorial, religious, and cultural, tolerance. So there are only three sets of these elites in the west vying for power: The Jewish Female Authoritarian strategy of undermining, and continuing the rapid conquest of western civilization by incentivizing race, class, sex, cultural, informational conflict – and even logical conflict, and underclass invasion – repeating the fall of Rome, and their repetition in Bolshevik revolution and terrors, and German counter-revolution against it. The Semitic Roman Catholic and French Feminine Authoritarian strategy of state dominance, bloody terrors, and socialism leading to slow conquest of Europe by Islam. Or the European, Germanic, and Anglo continuation of our ancient rule of law repeating the otherwise unimaginable success of Europeans in the Bronze Age of pre-literate Indo-European expansion, the Iron Age Greek reason Roman administration and Roman peace – that dragged mankind out into reason and failed, and the European age of sail and steel’s that dragged mankind single-handedly, kicking and screaming all the while, out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vice of oppression between human tyranny and the vicissitudes of a nature, geology, climate, solar system, and universe all but hostile to the existence of life – and is on the verge of failure. We have a choice between a future under the Jewish Muslim Semitic civilization of endemic lying, parasitism, stagnation, decline, and dysgenia – another dark age and the very real possibility of failing to pass through the Great Filter, or to continue the European Tradition and its high costs, and to transcend ourselves into the gods we imagine by continuing our long history of discovery, adaptation to, and application of, the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws of the universe, nature, and nature’s god. I have, and my organization has provided a peaceful means of settling this war between the masculine eugenic evolutionary and adaptive European elites that have been a boon to mankind, and the dysgenic devolutionary and maladaptive Semitic elites that have undermined roman elites, culture, rule of law, administration, destroyed its statues, monuments, temples, arts, letters, and knowledge, closed its schools of philosophy, exiled, or killed its teachers and philosophers, and doomed us to a dark age of superstition, ignorance, starvation, and decline. It’s principle features is to require truthful, meaning testifiable, warrantable, restitutable speech in public to the public, in matters public, and to criminalize false promise in the political sphere as we have only lightly criminalized false promise in the personal sphere – by defamation, and in the commercial sphere – by fraud. We provide analytic criteria for passing those tests that will survive in court. This will economically destroy sedition by politicians, bureaucrats, the academy, education, commentariat, media, entertainment, advertising, and marketing – and even more so in the underground sedition and parasitism of the financial sector, including the federal reserve, the ‘big banks’, Yes, western civilization is the most demanding civilization to live in, but also the one with most freedom of opportunity because of those demands. The choice is easy for those willing to pay the cost of adapting to ‘whiteness’ by full integration: our institutions merely reflect universal laws. Those that cannot are welcome to return, or separate, but may not govern or rule or engage in sedition. And those that choose to persist in the Semitic war against western civilization are the enemies of our people, of mankind, of nature, and nature’s god. And in this judgment for their crimes, neither nature or nature’s god will reserve judgment. The only choice is left to man. I choose, we choose, the laws of nature and nature’s god, the laws of Western Civilization that the enemy disparages as “whiteness”.