LEARNING P-LAW VS PHILOSOPHY, PSYCHOLOGY OR SOCIOLOGY
There is a difference between mythology, theology, philosophy, science, and logic – and in logic between mathematics(existence), action(operations), and words(logic of lanquage). They share a common grammar but uncommon paradigms and vocabulary – from Inflationary to deflationary.
So what I do, what we do, is operational logic of behavior where decidability is provided by tests of reciprocity and testimony – that is what law – scientific law – consists of. Scientific Law, Natural Law, and “accordance with nature” and the laws of the universe are synonyms.
And so if you have had training in ‘literary’ thought it will be almost useless in understanding P-Logic and P-Law. Because P-Law is an operational logic (like programming), uses behavioral logic from economics, and legal decidability by tests of reciprocity, and testifiability.
Max Weber warned the social sciences that all fields would eventually be reduced to some sort of calculation. P-Logic and P-Law are constructivist logics that provide calculability in the behavioral sciences (cog sci, language, psychology, sociology, ethics, law, and politics).
PUTIN’S ACCUSATION OF MUNICH “BETRAYAL” IN CONTEXT
-“In late 2019, I read an article on RT news in which Putin was arguing with the revisionist historians about WWII who wanted to change history. Putin mentioned “the Munich Betrayal,” but it was not explained what it is. Sincere question: what is the Munich Betrayal?”- A Friend
This topic requires more than a few tweets. The Munich betrayal was the appeasement of Germany by the handover of germanic Czech territory.
However, ‘betrayal’ fails to grasp that: a) containing the bolsheviks/communists was equal or more important than containing the germans/fascists. b) the people in politically Czech territory were in fact Germans, c) the post-napoleon restoration of the HRE/Germanic federation/empire. d) the same had been done to the Russians prior to the war by the English and french etc (preventing retaking Constantinople, and restoring the orthodox civ).
So moralizing events is misleading, and rearview mirror moralizing naive. The French Revolution started it, Napoleon, did the dirty deed. Think of Napoleon and France as continuing the wars of religion between feminine latin authoritarianism and masculine germanic meritocracy.
The French were the most backward country in Europe and the french revolution the most dramatic and violent. The germanic countries modernized fine. The French didn’t. They were still a ‘catholic’ country with authoritarian tendencies. (like the Russians).
the Napoleonic conquest of Europe and the ideas of the french revolution were spread by force as were Arab Islam and Jewish Communism. A counter-reaction against the wars of religion.
Betrayal presumes people are more than bots. They aren’t. They’re bots. This is an ancient dispute between people in an Atlantic to Urals spectrum, just as China had the north-south spectrum of people in their ‘warring states period’. The Chinese managed to homogenize but lost their rate of adaptation. Europeans didn’t manage to homogenize and maintained their rate of adaptation.
Our betrayal is (a) not saving the Russians from the Jewish bolsheviks, (b) not leaving the germans a path to reconstruction without totalitarianism, (c) not saving the Russians when the soviet union collapsed. (d) Anglo virtue-signaling policy is ALWAYS WRONG EVERY TIME.
And (e) Perhaps worst of all, we didn’t suppress the Jewish communist, socialist, neo-marxist, and postmodern movements in the 1950’s because we were drunk on our own virtues, the certainty of our cultural and institutional victory.
Gramsci (cultural Marxism): Leninism (authoritarian marxism) “Have to have a political party”: Lenin v1 > Stalin v2 > Mao v3 > Woke v4
THE PARTY WILL SPLIT – AND WE WILL HAVE OUR REVOLUTION We are going to have a fast physical counter-revolution, to prevent the completion of the slow 70yr institutional bolshevik-american revolution, and our vulnerability is Christian tolerance, hope, cope, and cowardice that’s endemic in the Republican Party – the party will split.
WHY EUROPEN CIVILIZATION SUCCEEDED – AND OTHERS DIDN”T
Trifunctionalism of European Cross Class Dependency 1. Military Duty and Prussian heroism 2. Commercial Reciprocity and civic virtue 3. Religious Piety and Christian charity
An army of everyone, doing their duty, with loyalty between the classes and their methods of organization.
Notes that are valuable for all.
1. The primary political problems that arise from of ALL attempts at admixture (heterogeneous polities) meaning EMPIRES are:
… (a) The conflation of differences in genetics (not much), versus the difference in genetic load and therefore distribution (large). And the hard numbers of 85IQ, 105IQ and 125IQ in relation to the stage of development and the necessity of power law in state and law, Pareto in economics, and nash in end results. These are immutable laws of human cooperation. ie: the black, brown, and South-Eurasian will continuously face challenges vs white European and yellow northeast Asians will hold an advantages because of those differences – assuming rates of dysgenic reproduction stabilize. Race differences are true in the aggregate, and stereotypes are correct at the racial scale, even if classes are roughly compatible, and irrelevant at the individual scale.
… (b) However, groups practice ingroup preference (except we super nerds) in all walks of life: friendships, social groups, sexual relations and marriage, neighborhood, employment, and political bias, because the advantages of doing so within-group because of ingroup trust are greater than the alternatives.
… (c) And because of these differences in social value, we are unable to use traditional, normative, differences in manners, ethics, morals, traditions, and informal institutions to ‘regulate’ one another. This creates conflict.
… (d) To make matters worse, aesthetics, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, and informal institutions must satisfy the median of the group. This creates conflict.
… (e) To make matters worse, group differences in aesthetics, manners, ethics morals, traditions, and informal institutions vary widely in truth-vs-face, and trust-vs-trustworthiness, and loyalty (absorbing intertemporal losses) and devotion (absorbing temporal costs).
2. The primary difference between races that causes conflict in social, economic, and as a consequence, political spheres is:
… (a) Like it or not neoteny is an expression of natural selection (within limits) and races form a hierarchy of differences in sexual, social, economic, and political market value that cannot be altered and is universal even among groups of color.
… (b) Differences in rate and depth of maturity cause significant differences in childhood and young adult self-regulation, and particularly aggression, sensitivity to dominance competition, and as a result, violence. Asymmetry in the size of the black and brown underclasses (relatively unemployable) and increased sensitivity produce a negative feedback loop that is universal whenever groups of different degrees of development come into contact.
… (c) Parity among elite classes dependent on self ascertainment of information and self-generation of opportunity vs dependence on others for the ascertainment of information and the absence of self-generation of opportunity.
… (d) Forcible integration, especially in education and neighborhoods is the most failed program in American political history – deprived the communities of elite formation, financial formation, normative formation, and given vast difference in family formation and durability, and rates of sexual maturity.
… (e) White ‘underclasses’ which have historically been a problem for the same reasons, who were less English or German, and more Scotts Irish, have been lost once again to the brown communities. manners, ethics, morals, and aesthetics.
… (f) The subsequent technological revolutions have not followed the Industrial in delivering benefit to all. The industrial revolution beneficially shifted human capital (labor) into multipliers. The technological revolution was asymmetrically beneficial. The financialization revolution was asymmetrically beneficial. The automation revolution appears to be devastating for labor. And the Americans (Europeans) can no longer maintain forced reciprocity in international finance, production, distribution, and trade. This means the restoration of civilizational costs of policing trade routes, restoration of imperial (civilizational) competition for trade routes, and very likely a drop in the American standard of living to European levels (they’re much, much, poorer than we are) at a period where we have immigrated vast demographic numbers who (i) will be unemployable, and (ii) and vast parts of the world will be unable to feed themselves. (Every single one of us that works with demographics and the convergence of various cycles predicted this era.)
3. There are at least five isolation and speciation events in our history. Each of these events favored increases in self-domestication (north Eurasia) vs pressure for rapid maturity in a difficult disease gradient (Africa). This has led to the remaining incompatibility of different groups.
Speciation Events:
… (a) East African rift valley and the coastal migration, (60-70Kybp)
… (b) The dry Persian Gulf and the Eurasian expansion, (60-50Kybp)
… (c) The Tibetan Plateau and Asia (50-40Kybp)
… (d) Europe and North Eurasia (ANE), (25Kybp)
Followed by:
… (e) The post-glacial counterclockwise rotation in Eurasia creating amero-Siberians, European-ancestral-north eurasians (after 24kybp)
… (f) The agrarian (Anatolian) re-hybridization events in Anatolia-Europe, the middle east, India and China, (10kybp)
… (g) The steppe expansion event from Ukraine-Russia (black sea) spreading from Spain to China (5kybp)
… (h) The age of sail (current) hybridization event (.5kybp).
Resulting In Races or Subraces (Populations):
Generation One – Fail institutional formation
… (a) Bushmen (in SW Africa) (50’s)
… (b) Aborigines (coastal route) (60’s)
… (c) Sub-Saharan Africans (mid 60’s)
Generation Two – Succeed religious formation. Weak State formation.
… (d) North Africans and South Asians to East India (mid 80’s)
… (e) SE-Asians, (mid 80’s)
… (f) Amerindians (mid 80’s)
Generation Three – Succeed in Secular Formation of State and or Law.
… (g) Europeans (100) (loss since the industrial revolution)
… (h) NE-Asians (105)
This is roughly one to one-and-a-half standard deviations in intelligence (rate of cognitive adaptation) per human generation.
4. Because of the order of institutional development, groups vary in their ability to capture and integrate other groups – or to integrate with other groups – particularly the problem of Judaism and Islam whose institutions are hostile to host peoples. There are three methods of coercion available to man: force/defense, remuneration, and inclusion/ostracization, and these create the three sets of available institutions: Military State, Economy Law, and Family Religion.
Example Civilization
Formation
First Institution
Strong Foundation
Second Institution
Supportive to Foundation
Third Institution
Weak or Failed Foundation
India
Military
Religion
State
Law
Middle East
Religion
Religion
Law
State
Early China
Military
State
Religion (or Philosophy)
Law
Late China
Military
State
Law
Religion
Europe
Military
Law
State
Religion
Jews
Religion
Law
Religion
State
And Resulting Expansion (Colonization) Results
… (a) Europeans have always failed at every single attempt at integrating another genetic distribution, only surviving by the capture of territory and demographic decimation. From steppe, to Europe. It failed in the Levant, Mesopotamia, Persia, and India. It worked in North America until the 1960’s.
… (b) The Steppe Iranics (North Indians) could not overcome the earlier demographics groups (agrarian Iranics, and basal Eurasians), just as the Muslims couldn’t, and the English couldn’t. The present Indian government can’t. Because he who breeds always wins. The most intolerant always wins.
… (c) Islam (Arab desert or Turkic steppe) colonizes by force, invasion, and conversion – and islam wins because they don’t produce commons, they don’t produce goods, services, and information, and they breed and maximize intolerance. They destroyed every single great civilization of the ancient world and reduced them to superstition, ignorance, dysgenia, and artistic and literary ashes.
… (d) The Chinese have mastered integration by aesthetic, cultural, and institutional forcible integration. The Chinese are not communists (globalists) they are fascists (ethnocentrists).
… (e) The Ashekanzi Jews try to colonize from within and it fails every time (it’s failing right now and it’s creating a civil war in the USA.) and the resulting consequences never transform them.
5. Optimum Political Orders are Obvious. Civilization-states for lesser developed peoples, and federations of nation-states within the same civilization for more developed peoples – both of which are ethnocentric – are optimum for all peoples, because:
… (a) While demand for reciprocity remains, homogeneity provides incentives for maximization of proportionality vs minimization of proportionality.
… (b) Maximization of commons production produces no ingroup competition between classes.
… (c) Marginal indifference in demand for institutions of cultural production
… (d) Marginal indifference in demand for institutions of generational production (family, health, education)
… (e) Minimizes the demand for economic isolation (neighborhoods, schools)
… (f) Minimizes power distance.
… (g) Maximizes political accountability.
… (h) Minimizes bureaucratic self-interest
Civilizations are at different stages of state formation.
… (a) Africa is pre-core-state formation and too heterogeneous for a civilization state.
… (b) South America is Pre-core-state-formation and while hopes for brazil are declining, there are still candidates(Argentina).
… (c) China claims a long history, but has only been stable for a century at a time, and is effectively a new state but with a bureaucratic tradition as strong as the European legal and economic tradition.
… (d) India is effectively a new state.
… (e) North America is in the process of decentralization – reversing the civil war – and returning the USA to its origins as a repetition of the holy roman empire of loosely federated Germanic states.
And State Formation at present requires fairly large scale. The demands of scale force necessary political orders. City-states are forming in the USA. European Nation State’s Remain dominant. And Civilization-States appear to hold sway (China, India). Population necessary for state formation:
… 300k island protectorate (a city-state) (Iceland)
… 1-3M territorial Protectorate (Estonia)
… 4-8m for a federated state (Ireland)
… 10M for an independent but allied state (Sweden)
… 30M minimum for self-defense.
… 100M for a regional power and secure self-defense.
… 500M+ for a world power.
6. Smarter populations didn’t ‘win out’. Smarter populations isolated and speciated because of greater selection pressure under climatological duress, favoring greater selection for neoteny (exchange of rate and depth of sexual maturity for increases in cognitive and social agency – self-regulation) Every population (subrace) still dominates its ancestral territorial range (other than Anatolian Turks). And this says something about the risks of hybridization (India) and the challenges of the impossibility of isolation (Africa). So smarter populations didn’t win out so much as the necessary development of technological advantages given the exhaustion of local resources, won out. The only reason Chinese don’t’ speak English, and Europeans don’t speak german is a peculiarity of European informal institutions.
7. Many groups regressed instead of progressed.
Notes that are valuable for all.
1. The primary political problems that arise from of ALL attempts at admixture (heterogeneous polities) meaning EMPIRES are:
… (a) The conflation of differences in genetics (not much), versus the difference in genetic load and therefore distribution (large). And the hard numbers of 85IQ, 105IQ and 125IQ in relation to the stage of development and the necessity of power law in state and law, Pareto in economics, and nash in end results. These are immutable laws of human cooperation. ie: the black, brown, and South-Eurasian will continuously face challenges vs white European and yellow northeast Asians will hold an advantages because of those differences – assuming rates of dysgenic reproduction stabilize. Race differences are true in the aggregate, and stereotypes are correct at the racial scale, even if classes are roughly compatible, and irrelevant at the individual scale.
… (b) However, groups practice ingroup preference (except we super nerds) in all walks of life: friendships, social groups, sexual relations and marriage, neighborhood, employment, and political bias, because the advantages of doing so within-group because of ingroup trust are greater than the alternatives.
… (c) And because of these differences in social value, we are unable to use traditional, normative, differences in manners, ethics, morals, traditions, and informal institutions to ‘regulate’ one another. This creates conflict.
… (d) To make matters worse, aesthetics, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, and informal institutions must satisfy the median of the group. This creates conflict.
… (e) To make matters worse, group differences in aesthetics, manners, ethics morals, traditions, and informal institutions vary widely in truth-vs-face, and trust-vs-trustworthiness, and loyalty (absorbing intertemporal losses) and devotion (absorbing temporal costs).
2. The primary difference between races that causes conflict in social, economic, and as a consequence, political spheres is:
… (a) Like it or not neoteny is an expression of natural selection (within limits) and races form a hierarchy of differences in sexual, social, economic, and political market value that cannot be altered and is universal even among groups of color.
… (b) Differences in rate and depth of maturity cause significant differences in childhood and young adult self-regulation, and particularly aggression, sensitivity to dominance competition, and as a result, violence. Asymmetry in the size of the black and brown underclasses (relatively unemployable) and increased sensitivity produce a negative feedback loop that is universal whenever groups of different degrees of development come into contact.
… (c) Parity among elite classes dependent on self ascertainment of information and self-generation of opportunity vs dependence on others for the ascertainment of information and the absence of self-generation of opportunity.
… (d) Forcible integration, especially in education and neighborhoods is the most failed program in American political history – deprived the communities of elite formation, financial formation, normative formation, and given vast difference in family formation and durability, and rates of sexual maturity.
… (e) White ‘underclasses’ which have historically been a problem for the same reasons, who were less English or German, and more Scotts Irish, have been lost once again to the brown communities. manners, ethics, morals, and aesthetics.
… (f) The subsequent technological revolutions have not followed the Industrial in delivering benefit to all. The industrial revolution beneficially shifted human capital (labor) into multipliers. The technological revolution was asymmetrically beneficial. The financialization revolution was asymmetrically beneficial. The automation revolution appears to be devastating for labor. And the Americans (Europeans) can no longer maintain forced reciprocity in international finance, production, distribution, and trade. This means the restoration of civilizational costs of policing trade routes, restoration of imperial (civilizational) competition for trade routes, and very likely a drop in the American standard of living to European levels (they’re much, much, poorer than we are) at a period where we have immigrated vast demographic numbers who (i) will be unemployable, and (ii) and vast parts of the world will be unable to feed themselves. (Every single one of us that works with demographics and the convergence of various cycles predicted this era.)
3. There are at least five isolation and speciation events in our history. Each of these events favored increases in self-domestication (north Eurasia) vs pressure for rapid maturity in a difficult disease gradient (Africa). This has led to the remaining incompatibility of different groups.
Speciation Events:
… (a) East African rift valley and the coastal migration, (60-70Kybp)
… (b) The dry Persian Gulf and the Eurasian expansion, (60-50Kybp)
… (c) The Tibetan Plateau and Asia (50-40Kybp)
… (d) Europe and North Eurasia (ANE), (25Kybp)
Followed by:
… (e) The post-glacial counterclockwise rotation in Eurasia creating amero-Siberians, European-ancestral-north eurasians (after 24kybp)
… (f) The agrarian (Anatolian) re-hybridization events in Anatolia-Europe, the middle east, India and China, (10kybp)
… (g) The steppe expansion event from Ukraine-Russia (black sea) spreading from Spain to China (5kybp)
… (h) The age of sail (current) hybridization event (.5kybp).
Resulting In Races or Subraces (Populations):
Generation One – Fail institutional formation
… (a) Bushmen (in SW Africa) (50’s)
… (b) Aborigines (coastal route) (60’s)
… (c) Sub-Saharan Africans (mid 60’s)
Generation Two – Succeed religious formation. Weak State formation.
… (d) North Africans and South Asians to East India (mid 80’s)
… (e) SE-Asians, (mid 80’s)
… (f) Amerindians (mid 80’s)
Generation Three – Succeed in Secular Formation of State and or Law.
… (g) Europeans (100) (loss since the industrial revolution)
… (h) NE-Asians (105)
This is roughly one to one-and-a-half standard deviations in intelligence (rate of cognitive adaptation) per human generation.
4. Because of the order of institutional development, groups vary in their ability to capture and integrate other groups – or to integrate with other groups – particularly the problem of Judaism and Islam whose institutions are hostile to host peoples. There are three methods of coercion available to man: force/defense, remuneration, and inclusion/ostracization, and these create the three sets of available institutions: Military State, Economy Law, and Family Religion.
Example Civilization
Formation
First Institution
Strong Foundation
Second Institution
Supportive to Foundation
Third Institution
Weak or Failed Foundation
India
Military
Religion
State
Law
Middle East
Religion
Religion
Law
State
Early China
Military
State
Religion (or Philosophy)
Law
Late China
Military
State
Law
Religion
Europe
Military
Law
State
Religion
Jews
Religion
Law
Religion
State
And Resulting Expansion (Colonization) Results
… (a) Europeans have always failed at every single attempt at integrating another genetic distribution, only surviving by the capture of territory and demographic decimation. From steppe, to Europe. It failed in the Levant, Mesopotamia, Persia, and India. It worked in North America until the 1960’s.
… (b) The Steppe Iranics (North Indians) could not overcome the earlier demographics groups (agrarian Iranics, and basal Eurasians), just as the Muslims couldn’t, and the English couldn’t. The present Indian government can’t. Because he who breeds always wins. The most intolerant always wins.
… (c) Islam (Arab desert or Turkic steppe) colonizes by force, invasion, and conversion – and islam wins because they don’t produce commons, they don’t produce goods, services, and information, and they breed and maximize intolerance. They destroyed every single great civilization of the ancient world and reduced them to superstition, ignorance, dysgenia, and artistic and literary ashes.
… (d) The Chinese have mastered integration by aesthetic, cultural, and institutional forcible integration. The Chinese are not communists (globalists) they are fascists (ethnocentrists).
… (e) The Ashekanzi Jews try to colonize from within and it fails every time (it’s failing right now and it’s creating a civil war in the USA.) and the resulting consequences never transform them.
5. Optimum Political Orders are Obvious. Civilization-states for lesser developed peoples, and federations of nation-states within the same civilization for more developed peoples – both of which are ethnocentric – are optimum for all peoples, because:
… (a) While demand for reciprocity remains, homogeneity provides incentives for maximization of proportionality vs minimization of proportionality.
… (b) Maximization of commons production produces no ingroup competition between classes.
… (c) Marginal indifference in demand for institutions of cultural production
… (d) Marginal indifference in demand for institutions of generational production (family, health, education)
… (e) Minimizes the demand for economic isolation (neighborhoods, schools)
… (f) Minimizes power distance.
… (g) Maximizes political accountability.
… (h) Minimizes bureaucratic self-interest
Civilizations are at different stages of state formation.
… (a) Africa is pre-core-state formation and too heterogeneous for a civilization state.
… (b) South America is Pre-core-state-formation and while hopes for brazil are declining, there are still candidates(Argentina).
… (c) China claims a long history, but has only been stable for a century at a time, and is effectively a new state but with a bureaucratic tradition as strong as the European legal and economic tradition.
… (d) India is effectively a new state.
… (e) North America is in the process of decentralization – reversing the civil war – and returning the USA to its origins as a repetition of the holy roman empire of loosely federated Germanic states.
And State Formation at present requires fairly large scale. The demands of scale force necessary political orders. City-states are forming in the USA. European Nation State’s Remain dominant. And Civilization-States appear to hold sway (China, India). Population necessary for state formation:
… 300k island protectorate (a city-state) (Iceland)
… 1-3M territorial Protectorate (Estonia)
… 4-8m for a federated state (Ireland)
… 10M for an independent but allied state (Sweden)
… 30M minimum for self-defense.
… 100M for a regional power and secure self-defense.
… 500M+ for a world power.
6. Smarter populations didn’t ‘win out’. Smarter populations isolated and speciated because of greater selection pressure under climatological duress, favoring greater selection for neoteny (exchange of rate and depth of sexual maturity for increases in cognitive and social agency – self-regulation) Every population (subrace) still dominates its ancestral territorial range (other than Anatolian Turks). And this says something about the risks of hybridization (India) and the challenges of the impossibility of isolation (Africa). So smarter populations didn’t win out so much as the necessary development of technological advantages given the exhaustion of local resources, won out. The only reason Chinese don’t’ speak English, and Europeans don’t speak german is a peculiarity of European informal institutions.
7. Many groups regressed instead of progressed.
Once you grasp that the Abrahamic method of deceit is as advanced a system of lying as greek math & reason are a system of truth-telling, you begin to see all political discourse as a war between European(M) truth at the cost of eugenics and Semitic(F) deception to deny eugenics.
Chinese developed state and harmony first, so they can conquer and assimilate tribes and subraces by slow institutional educational linguistic and cultural integration.
Europeans developed law and heroic competition. So we can innovate but not conquer and assimilate.
Likewise, the Chinese can defend culturally and militarily, while Europeans can defend militarily but not culturally.
The Semites war against culture by total war against the institutions of culture, and state and military as a byproduct. But they can’t produce states or law (or economies for that matter).
Fascism was an attempt to eliminate this vulnerability by eliminating tolerance for competition in religion, education, and culture, thereby preserving economy, state, and military – and self determiniation.
This prevents the west and far east from falling to semitic undermining of civilization.
Gramsci wasn’t inventing anything. He was merely repeating what the jews christians and muslims had done in the ancient world. Just explaining it in secular prose.
-“Seems to me the entire objective of communism (Marxist) is for Abrahamists to be in control of every institution of global influence, the masses to be impoverished (lowest common denominator), ignorant, and dependent on those institutions, and to replace the White race.”-
The reason for Marx’s hatred: European Capitalism’s organized investment in production, vs Jewish Financialism: organized investment in parasitism. Marx was fine with organized parasitism, poverty but socialized, but not with organized production and prosperous but re-socialized.
The objective of marxism was underclass (labor) rule by revolutionary overthrow of meritocracy. Lenin understood this must be done by gaining political power. Then by violence against meritocratic peoples. When the underclass failed, Gramsci demanded the destruction of culture.
As I have said since the beginning, (a) absence of our own ‘bible’ of western civ(Law) (b) tolerance for thought-competition under self-determination and trifunctionalism (c) roman failure to exterminate supernatural Christianity (d) remnants superstition, (e) make us vulnerable.
The way we easily defeat cultural marxism, postmodernism, and the White-Hate’s march through the institutions of cultural production is by stating the foundations of the culture scientifically in law as a public asset that may not be harmed. The Legal market will do the rest.
And as I have said since the beginning, my project is to produce that ‘bible’, and embed it in a constitution and use the natural incentives of markets to exterminate competition. This is possible b/c European civ (alone) fully reflects the formal, physical, natural, & evo laws.
I just didn’t expect to discover (a) that European civ was in fact just the laws of the universe applied, and (b) Jesus’ teaching as the means by which the half-humans, slaves, and serfs unfit for civilization can not only tolerate but enjoy life through saturation in reciprocal love.