Via Kashif Vikaas
I suppose that its not common knowledge but we were doing this back in 2006, and if you’re going to store data in manifolds (topologies) of N-dimensions of relations, then you can used various pathing algorithms and even possibly N-dimensional visibility algorithms to search content far faster than any existing technology.
This was our intention with Runcible’s technology.
It was just too early and I realized that it was billion dollar research and development effort that I am not intellectually or emotionally of Financially or physically capable of managing without multiple nervous breakdowns. lol
The problem at the time was storing data in each geometry but I think that’s teh difference between indexes and content, and that we should view geometric search engines as indexes of n-dimensional relations.
If you have some vague understanding of what I’m saying here, this is why I understood that (a) actions, and (b) vitruvian semantics, grammar and syntax (metaphysics, and (c) Property in toto, provided computational commensurability in an unclosed data store.
Why? Because for humans to understand anything it must be reduced to an analogy to experience, and as such human perception limits serve as a set of units of measure of all of reality.
Source: Original Site Post
-
The Current State Of Knowledge
Jeff Hawkins: On Intelligence (The Brain) Daniel Kahneman: Thinking, Fast and Slow (The Mind) Jonathan Haidt: The Righteous Mind (The Moral Intuition) Garett Jones: Hive Mind: How Your Nation�s IQ Matters So Much More Than Your Own William Tucker: Marriage and Civilization Francis Fukuyama: Trust (The Political Objective) Francis Fukuyama: Political order and political decay. (Comparative political orders) Emmanuel Todd: Invention of Europe (see Craig Willy’s Summary here: http://www.craigwilly.info/…/emmanuel-todds-linvention…/ ) I don’t know anyone who is better at right wing (scientific) political theory than I am. And it’s reducible to the false conflict between international jewish neoconservatism > jewish capitalism > jewish libertarianism > and french/jewish communism AND anglo nationalism under Rule Of Law by Reciprocity (mobile, scandinavian and english) in an adaptive hierarchy, and germanic nationalism under Roman Law of State and People under a formal hierarchy. In other words, the anglo scandinavian (pirate/viking) model vs the german (agrarian) model. -
The Current State Of Knowledge
Jeff Hawkins: On Intelligence (The Brain) Daniel Kahneman: Thinking, Fast and Slow (The Mind) Jonathan Haidt: The Righteous Mind (The Moral Intuition) Garett Jones: Hive Mind: How Your Nation�s IQ Matters So Much More Than Your Own William Tucker: Marriage and Civilization Francis Fukuyama: Trust (The Political Objective) Francis Fukuyama: Political order and political decay. (Comparative political orders) Emmanuel Todd: Invention of Europe (see Craig Willy’s Summary here: http://www.craigwilly.info/…/emmanuel-todds-linvention…/ ) I don’t know anyone who is better at right wing (scientific) political theory than I am. And it’s reducible to the false conflict between international jewish neoconservatism > jewish capitalism > jewish libertarianism > and french/jewish communism AND anglo nationalism under Rule Of Law by Reciprocity (mobile, scandinavian and english) in an adaptive hierarchy, and germanic nationalism under Roman Law of State and People under a formal hierarchy. In other words, the anglo scandinavian (pirate/viking) model vs the german (agrarian) model. -
The problem of philosophy is not, and never has been logic(via positiva proof) i
The problem of philosophy is not, and never has been logic(via positiva proof) it is overloading (via negativa grammar). All the supposed ‘logics’ consist of nothing more than domain and range of some dimension of perception, wherein logic (constant relations) is unavoidable. Logic consists of the attempt to preserve constant relations, and ‘proof’ tells us nothing other than within that set of dimensions constant relations ahve been preserved. However, by limiting the semantic content to human opertions we preserve constant relations. Overloading Serves Feminine (Left) Need for Consensus (False consensus bias). -
The problem of philosophy is not, and never has been logic(via positiva proof) i
The problem of philosophy is not, and never has been logic(via positiva proof) it is overloading (via negativa grammar). All the supposed ‘logics’ consist of nothing more than domain and range of some dimension of perception, wherein logic (constant relations) is unavoidable. Logic consists of the attempt to preserve constant relations, and ‘proof’ tells us nothing other than within that set of dimensions constant relations ahve been preserved. However, by limiting the semantic content to human opertions we preserve constant relations. Overloading Serves Feminine (Left) Need for Consensus (False consensus bias). -
WORD| > |Name(Noun)| : Proper(Person > Thing > Place > Idea > Perception(sense)
|WORD| > |Name(Noun)| : Proper(Person > Thing > Place > Idea > Perception(sense) > Emotion(value)) > Common (categorical) > Compound > Pronoun > Clarifier (Determiner/Measure) > Property(adjective) > |State| State > Event > Action > Experience > Thought |Person| First > Second > Third > Abstract |Gender| Female < Neutral > Male. |Possession|- Unposessable, Possessable (‘s – “apostrophe s” in English) > Ownable > Always Owned. |Number|- Unique > Countable > Collection/Mass(not worth counting) > Uncountable. |Perception|- Concrete(observable 5 Senses) > Emotions(Feelings) > Ideas(Abstr.) Or: Perceivable > Experience-able > Imaginable Action(Verb) > Action Property(adverb) > Action Clarifier (Phrasal Verbs) > |Knowledge| Unknown > Believed > Known > Undeniable > Tautological |Ownership| Undiscovered > Unconvertible > Unconverted > “Homesteaded”(Worked) > Possessed(Fact) > Consensual Property (Agreement) > Normative Property (Habit) > Property Right (Insured by third party) > inalienable(life, memory, imagination, Emotion) |Possibility| Impossibility > Contingency(Might) > Possibility(Can) > Necessity(Shall). |Permissibility| Impermissible > Permissible(May) > Obligatory(Must). |Temporality| Always Been > Has been > is Currently > Will Be > Will Always Be. |Gain or Loss| Gain < Neutral > Loss |Decidability| Incommensurable > Undecidable > Preferable > Good > True. Relation (Preposition/Postposition) > Link (Conjunction > Copula ) > Agreement(yes-no) > Noise Words(Expletives etc.) > code-words(acronyms etc). |Speech| Word > Phrase > Clause > Sentence(Subject+Predicate=Story) > Paragraph(story) > Grammary of Science > Grammar of Narrative > Grammar of Stories(Story) > Grammar of Story > Story, all the way up. -
WORD| > |Name(Noun)| : Proper(Person > Thing > Place > Idea > Perception(sense)
|WORD| > |Name(Noun)| : Proper(Person > Thing > Place > Idea > Perception(sense) > Emotion(value)) > Common (categorical) > Compound > Pronoun > Clarifier (Determiner/Measure) > Property(adjective) > |State| State > Event > Action > Experience > Thought |Person| First > Second > Third > Abstract |Gender| Female < Neutral > Male. |Possession|- Unposessable, Possessable (‘s – “apostrophe s” in English) > Ownable > Always Owned. |Number|- Unique > Countable > Collection/Mass(not worth counting) > Uncountable. |Perception|- Concrete(observable 5 Senses) > Emotions(Feelings) > Ideas(Abstr.) Or: Perceivable > Experience-able > Imaginable Action(Verb) > Action Property(adverb) > Action Clarifier (Phrasal Verbs) > |Knowledge| Unknown > Believed > Known > Undeniable > Tautological |Ownership| Undiscovered > Unconvertible > Unconverted > “Homesteaded”(Worked) > Possessed(Fact) > Consensual Property (Agreement) > Normative Property (Habit) > Property Right (Insured by third party) > inalienable(life, memory, imagination, Emotion) |Possibility| Impossibility > Contingency(Might) > Possibility(Can) > Necessity(Shall). |Permissibility| Impermissible > Permissible(May) > Obligatory(Must). |Temporality| Always Been > Has been > is Currently > Will Be > Will Always Be. |Gain or Loss| Gain < Neutral > Loss |Decidability| Incommensurable > Undecidable > Preferable > Good > True. Relation (Preposition/Postposition) > Link (Conjunction > Copula ) > Agreement(yes-no) > Noise Words(Expletives etc.) > code-words(acronyms etc). |Speech| Word > Phrase > Clause > Sentence(Subject+Predicate=Story) > Paragraph(story) > Grammary of Science > Grammar of Narrative > Grammar of Stories(Story) > Grammar of Story > Story, all the way up. -
“Some people will never learn anything, for this reason, because they understand
—“Some people will never learn anything, for this reason, because they understand everything too soon.”— Pope -
“Some people will never learn anything, for this reason, because they understand
—“Some people will never learn anything, for this reason, because they understand everything too soon.”— Pope -
by Bill Joslin Inhibitions to human cognition follow the inverse pattern. Percep
by Bill Joslin Inhibitions to human cognition follow the inverse pattern. Perception -> generalization-> conflation -> faked commensurability — My view is that we try to reinforce paradigmatic networks bcasue it’s cheaper.