Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Abrahamic method of deceit is an advanced a system of lying

    Once you grasp that the Abrahamic method of deceit is as advanced a system of lying as greek math & reason are a system of truth-telling, you begin to see all political discourse as a war between European(M) truth at the cost of eugenics and Semitic(F) deception to deny eugenics.

  • Why European Civilization Succeeded – and Others Didn”t

    Why European Civilization Succeeded – and Others Didn”tTrifunctionalism of European Cross Class Dependency1. Military Duty and Prussian heroism2. Commercial Reciprocity and civic virtue3. Religious Piety and Christian charityAn army of everyone, doing their duty, with loyalty between the classes and their methods of organization.

  • Why European Civilization Succeeded – and Others Didn”t

    Why European Civilization Succeeded – and Others Didn”tTrifunctionalism of European Cross Class Dependency1. Military Duty and Prussian heroism2. Commercial Reciprocity and civic virtue3. Religious Piety and Christian charityAn army of everyone, doing their duty, with loyalty between the classes and their methods of organization.

  • The Party Will Split – and We Will Have Our Revolution

    We are going to have a fast physical counter-revolution, to prevent the completion of the slow 70yr institutional bolshevik-american revolution, and our vulnerability is Christian tolerance, hope, cope, and cowardice that’s endemic in the Republican Party – the party will split.

  • The Party Will Split – and We Will Have Our Revolution

    We are going to have a fast physical counter-revolution, to prevent the completion of the slow 70yr institutional bolshevik-american revolution, and our vulnerability is Christian tolerance, hope, cope, and cowardice that’s endemic in the Republican Party – the party will split.

  • Putin’s Accusation of Munich “Betrayal” in Context

    -“In late 2019, I read an article on RT news in which Putin was arguing with the revisionist historians about WWII who wanted to change history. Putin mentioned “the Munich Betrayal,” but it was not explained what it is. Sincere question: what is the Munich Betrayal?”- A Friend

    This topic requires more than a few tweets. The Munich betrayal was the appeasement of Germany by the handover of germanic Czech territory. However, ‘betrayal’ fails to grasp that:

    a) containing the bolsheviks/communists was equal or more important than containing the germans/fascists. b) the people in politically Czech territory were in fact Germans, c) the post-napoleon restoration of the HRE/Germanic federation/empire. d) the same had been done to the Russians prior to the war by the English and french etc (preventing retaking Constantinople, and restoring the orthodox civ). So moralizing events is misleading, and rearview mirror moralizing naive. The French Revolution started it, Napoleon, did the dirty deed. Think of Napoleon and France as continuing the wars of religion between feminine latin authoritarianism and masculine germanic meritocracy.

    1. The French were the most backward country in Europe and the french revolution the most dramatic and violent. The germanic countries modernized fine. The French didn’t. They were still a ‘catholic’ country with authoritarian tendencies. (like the Russians).
    2. the Napoleonic conquest of Europe and the ideas of the french revolution were spread by force as were Arab Islam and Jewish Communism. A counter-reaction against the wars of religion.
    3. Betrayal presumes people are more than bots. They aren’t. They’re bots. This is an ancient dispute between people in an Atlantic to Urals spectrum, just as China had the north-south spectrum of people in their ‘warring states period’. The Chinese managed to homogenize but lost their rate of adaptation. Europeans didn’t manage to homogenize and maintained their rate of adaptation.
    4. Our betrayal is (a) not saving the Russians from the Jewish bolsheviks, (b) not leaving the germans a path to reconstruction without totalitarianism, (c) not saving the Russians when the soviet union collapsed. (d) Anglo virtue-signaling policy is ALWAYS WRONG EVERY TIME.
    5. And (e) Perhaps worst of all, we didn’t suppress the Jewish communist, socialist, neo-marxist, and postmodern movements in the 1950’s because we were drunk on our own virtues, the certainty of our cultural and institutional victory.

    Gramsci (cultural Marxism): Leninism (authoritarian marxism) “Have to have a political party”: Lenin v1 > Stalin v2 > Mao v3 > Woke v4

  • Putin’s Accusation of Munich “Betrayal” in Context

    -“In late 2019, I read an article on RT news in which Putin was arguing with the revisionist historians about WWII who wanted to change history. Putin mentioned “the Munich Betrayal,” but it was not explained what it is. Sincere question: what is the Munich Betrayal?”- A Friend

    This topic requires more than a few tweets. The Munich betrayal was the appeasement of Germany by the handover of germanic Czech territory. However, ‘betrayal’ fails to grasp that:

    a) containing the bolsheviks/communists was equal or more important than containing the germans/fascists. b) the people in politically Czech territory were in fact Germans, c) the post-napoleon restoration of the HRE/Germanic federation/empire. d) the same had been done to the Russians prior to the war by the English and french etc (preventing retaking Constantinople, and restoring the orthodox civ). So moralizing events is misleading, and rearview mirror moralizing naive. The French Revolution started it, Napoleon, did the dirty deed. Think of Napoleon and France as continuing the wars of religion between feminine latin authoritarianism and masculine germanic meritocracy.

    1. The French were the most backward country in Europe and the french revolution the most dramatic and violent. The germanic countries modernized fine. The French didn’t. They were still a ‘catholic’ country with authoritarian tendencies. (like the Russians).
    2. the Napoleonic conquest of Europe and the ideas of the french revolution were spread by force as were Arab Islam and Jewish Communism. A counter-reaction against the wars of religion.
    3. Betrayal presumes people are more than bots. They aren’t. They’re bots. This is an ancient dispute between people in an Atlantic to Urals spectrum, just as China had the north-south spectrum of people in their ‘warring states period’. The Chinese managed to homogenize but lost their rate of adaptation. Europeans didn’t manage to homogenize and maintained their rate of adaptation.
    4. Our betrayal is (a) not saving the Russians from the Jewish bolsheviks, (b) not leaving the germans a path to reconstruction without totalitarianism, (c) not saving the Russians when the soviet union collapsed. (d) Anglo virtue-signaling policy is ALWAYS WRONG EVERY TIME.
    5. And (e) Perhaps worst of all, we didn’t suppress the Jewish communist, socialist, neo-marxist, and postmodern movements in the 1950’s because we were drunk on our own virtues, the certainty of our cultural and institutional victory.

    Gramsci (cultural Marxism): Leninism (authoritarian marxism) “Have to have a political party”: Lenin v1 > Stalin v2 > Mao v3 > Woke v4

  • Learning P-Law vs Philosophy, Psychology or Sociology

    There is a difference between mythology, theology, philosophy, science, and logic – and in logic between mathematics(existence), action(operations), and words(logic of lanquage). They share a common grammar but uncommon paradigms and vocabulary – from Inflationary to deflationary. So what I do, what we do, is operational logic of behavior where decidability is provided by tests of reciprocity and testimony – that is what law – scientific law – consists of. Scientific Law, Natural Law, and “accordance with nature” and the laws of the universe are synonyms. And so if you have had training in ‘literary’ thought it will be almost useless in understanding P-Logic and P-Law. Because P-Law is an operational logic (like programming), uses behavioral logic from economics, and legal decidability by tests of reciprocity, and testifiability. Max Weber warned the social sciences that all fields would eventually be reduced to some sort of calculation. P-Logic and P-Law are constructivist logics that provide calculability in the behavioral sciences (cog sci, language, psychology, sociology, ethics, law, and politics).

  • Learning P-Law vs Philosophy, Psychology or Sociology

    There is a difference between mythology, theology, philosophy, science, and logic – and in logic between mathematics(existence), action(operations), and words(logic of lanquage). They share a common grammar but uncommon paradigms and vocabulary – from Inflationary to deflationary. So what I do, what we do, is operational logic of behavior where decidability is provided by tests of reciprocity and testimony – that is what law – scientific law – consists of. Scientific Law, Natural Law, and “accordance with nature” and the laws of the universe are synonyms. And so if you have had training in ‘literary’ thought it will be almost useless in understanding P-Logic and P-Law. Because P-Law is an operational logic (like programming), uses behavioral logic from economics, and legal decidability by tests of reciprocity, and testifiability. Max Weber warned the social sciences that all fields would eventually be reduced to some sort of calculation. P-Logic and P-Law are constructivist logics that provide calculability in the behavioral sciences (cog sci, language, psychology, sociology, ethics, law, and politics).

  • Bias Sortition

    We are all afflicted by the tendencies to (a) think we are representative of common sense (b) other people think and feel similarly to us, (c) and we associate with people who do, (d) therefore we continuously develop positive reinforcement of cognitive falsehoods.