Women (mothers, wives, girlfriends) serve as the human drug of preference and there is a shortage of their attention.
Source: Original Site Post
-
I don’t like ‘mystical experience’ because while we use that name, as far as I k
I don’t like ‘mystical experience’ because while we use that name, as far as I know, the serotonin-2a receptor provides ‘rewards’ for discovery of new combinatory pathways. In other words, “identification of opportunity”. And the mystical experience is the result of the purely self induced ‘undiscovered valley”. -
I don’t like ‘mystical experience’ because while we use that name, as far as I k
I don’t like ‘mystical experience’ because while we use that name, as far as I know, the serotonin-2a receptor provides ‘rewards’ for discovery of new combinatory pathways. In other words, “identification of opportunity”. And the mystical experience is the result of the purely self induced ‘undiscovered valley”. -
America: The Land Of Drugging Yourself.
If america is a ‘good’ culture, why then do we have illegal drug problems, why do we drug our children to keep them in school, why are 40% of women on drugs, why are opiates such a problem (and why is pain), and why are almost all our senior citizens drugged? 1) women (mothers, wives, girlfriends) serve as the human drug of preference and there is a shortage of their attention. 2) Americans are oppressively lonely because of the left’s destruction of the family. 3) Under-Socialization because of ‘diversity’ and ‘school’. 3) Weight from bad diets causes cumulative pain (slow death). 4) Lack of movement and exercise. if you are in the upper middle class or higher minority then it’s all well and good, because you aren’t fat, have lots of friends with shared values, are married, have a family, and get some exercise. Otherwise you ‘die slowly’ while ‘drugging’ yourself with entertainment (television etc), sedating foods, alcohol, drugs, and possessions. The fact that things feel good tells you nothing about whether they ARE in fact good. Many terribly bad things feel good. There are no shortcuts to fresh food, walking for an hour a day, quiet sleep, the security and mindfulness of family, the cheap and enduring entertainment of friends with shared values, and a sufficient nest egg so that you can tolerate a year or more of ‘being unproductive’ (unemployed). The problem is, that each of those demands (the purchase and preparation of fresh food, an hour of walking, 8 hours of solid sleep, a family, friends, and a nest egg, require a great deal of time, attention, shared values – and we have traded the time of women in the production of THOSE goods, for the redistribution of reproduction to the competitors and the dysgenic underclasses, the poverty of men in old age, and the ‘drugging’ of people to compensate for it. The value of increasing productivity was important during the era of transition from subsistence existence and limited mass production to consumer capitalism (consumption) and extraordinary mass production. But we have made that transition and the apparent ‘goods’ of the 19th century have been maximized (obviously) and there is no longer any value to increases in production or productivity. Thats an empirical statement given the demand for drugs in our civilization versus others. Continual culling of the lower classes through suppression of their reproduction, and increases in redistribution to remaining kin will restore the balance that was made possible by the rise of europeans in the ancient and modern worlds. I love my people. And BAD PEOPLE with GOOD INTENTIONS have caused the infantilization of our civilization’s classes most dependent upon ‘beneficial norms’. -
America: The Land Of Drugging Yourself.
If america is a ‘good’ culture, why then do we have illegal drug problems, why do we drug our children to keep them in school, why are 40% of women on drugs, why are opiates such a problem (and why is pain), and why are almost all our senior citizens drugged? 1) women (mothers, wives, girlfriends) serve as the human drug of preference and there is a shortage of their attention. 2) Americans are oppressively lonely because of the left’s destruction of the family. 3) Under-Socialization because of ‘diversity’ and ‘school’. 3) Weight from bad diets causes cumulative pain (slow death). 4) Lack of movement and exercise. if you are in the upper middle class or higher minority then it’s all well and good, because you aren’t fat, have lots of friends with shared values, are married, have a family, and get some exercise. Otherwise you ‘die slowly’ while ‘drugging’ yourself with entertainment (television etc), sedating foods, alcohol, drugs, and possessions. The fact that things feel good tells you nothing about whether they ARE in fact good. Many terribly bad things feel good. There are no shortcuts to fresh food, walking for an hour a day, quiet sleep, the security and mindfulness of family, the cheap and enduring entertainment of friends with shared values, and a sufficient nest egg so that you can tolerate a year or more of ‘being unproductive’ (unemployed). The problem is, that each of those demands (the purchase and preparation of fresh food, an hour of walking, 8 hours of solid sleep, a family, friends, and a nest egg, require a great deal of time, attention, shared values – and we have traded the time of women in the production of THOSE goods, for the redistribution of reproduction to the competitors and the dysgenic underclasses, the poverty of men in old age, and the ‘drugging’ of people to compensate for it. The value of increasing productivity was important during the era of transition from subsistence existence and limited mass production to consumer capitalism (consumption) and extraordinary mass production. But we have made that transition and the apparent ‘goods’ of the 19th century have been maximized (obviously) and there is no longer any value to increases in production or productivity. Thats an empirical statement given the demand for drugs in our civilization versus others. Continual culling of the lower classes through suppression of their reproduction, and increases in redistribution to remaining kin will restore the balance that was made possible by the rise of europeans in the ancient and modern worlds. I love my people. And BAD PEOPLE with GOOD INTENTIONS have caused the infantilization of our civilization’s classes most dependent upon ‘beneficial norms’. -
Femininity is priceless. Feminism is cancer. As long as we have equal rights bef
Femininity is priceless. Feminism is cancer. As long as we have equal rights before the law the market will calculate the optimums. -
Femininity is priceless. Feminism is cancer. As long as we have equal rights bef
Femininity is priceless. Feminism is cancer. As long as we have equal rights before the law the market will calculate the optimums. -
signaling of the serotonin-1a receptor drives contentment, whereas signaling of
signaling of the serotonin-1a receptor drives contentment, whereas signaling of the serotonin-2a receptor drives the mystical experience. -
signaling of the serotonin-1a receptor drives contentment, whereas signaling of
signaling of the serotonin-1a receptor drives contentment, whereas signaling of the serotonin-2a receptor drives the mystical experience. -
Our Original Religion
The Proto-Indo-European pantheon includes well-attested deities such as *Dyḗus Pḥatḗr, the god of the daylit skies, his daughter *Haéusōs, the goddess of the dawn, the Horse Twins, and the storm god *Perkwunos. Other probable deities include *Péh2usōn, a pastoral god, and *Seh2ul, a Sun goddess. Well-attested myths of the Proto-Indo-Europeans include a myth involving a storm god who slays a multi-headed serpent that dwells in water, a myth about the Sun and Moon riding in chariots across the sky, and a creation story involving two brothers, one of whom is sacrificed by the other in order to create the world. The Proto-Indo-Europeans may have believed that the Otherworld was guarded by some kind of watchdog and could only be reached by crossing a river. They also may have believed in some kind of world tree, bearing fruit of immortality, either guarded by or gnawed on by a serpent or dragon of some kind and tended to by three goddesses, who were believed to spin the thread of life. “Aesir-Asura correspondence” refers to the relation between æsir, an Old Norse word meaning “gods” (the plural of the singular word áss “god”) and ásuraḥ, a Sanskrit word referring to certain warlike and aggressive demons. Also related is the Avestan word ahura, found as the title of the god Ahura Mazda. The Proto-Germanic form of Old Norse áss, deduced by comparison to other Germanic languages, living and dead, is *ansuz. The plural of this Proto-Germanic word was *ansiwiz, which by regular sound changes into æsir. The word ásuraḥ can be postulated to come from Proto-Indo-Iranian *n̩suras, where *n̩su- is the zero-grade form equivalent to the Gemanic *ansu-, both from a Proto-Indo-European root *H2ensu-. In Sanskrit, ásuḥ (PIIr *n̩sus) means “vital spirit” or “life”, and is presumably related, suggesting a common meaning “spirit”. Both words describe a family of divine beings, the Æsir is the pantheon of the principal Norse gods, and Asuras are a group of Hindu deities. Each group is set up against another group of gods; the Æsir warred with the Vanir, whereas the Asuras oppose the Devas. In Norse mythology the Æsir are generally approved of (and worshipped) while the asuras have a more negative reputation in the Indian religions. However, the use of ahura to refer to the greatest god of Zoroastrianism implies that the word once had more favorable connotations. In the earlier Vedic literature also those we know of as Devas, like Indra, are called Asuras. The relationship between the Æsir and Vanir parallel the Asuras and Devas in another way; like the Æsir, the Asuras were associated in Vedic myth with human phenomena (contracts, the arts, fate), while the Vanir, like the Devas, are associated with natural phenomena (such as Njord and Freyr, associated with fertility). The Meteorological School holds that Proto-Indo-European religion was largely centered around deified natural phenomena such as the sky, the Sun, the Moon, and the dawn. This meteorological interpretation was popular among early scholars, but has lost a considerable degree of scholarly support in recent years. (I see this everywhere) The Ritual School, on the other hand, holds that Proto-Indo-European myths are best understood as stories invented to explain various rituals and religious practices. Bruce Lincoln, a member of the Ritual School, argues that the Proto-Indo-Europeans believed that every sacrifice was a reenactment of the original sacrifice performed by the founder of the human race on his twin brother. (CD: I don’t see this, I see reference to some historic conflict. ) The Functionalist School holds that Proto-Indo-European society and, consequently, their religion, was largely centered around the trifunctional system proposed by Georges Dumézil, which holds that Proto-Indo-European society was divided into three distinct social classes: farmers, warriors, and priests. (I don’t see this.) The Structuralist School, by contrast, argues that Proto-Indo-European religion was largely centered around the concept of dualistic opposition. (I see this as utter nonsense.) CD: Mindfulness requires myth(rules), ritual(costs), and feast(rewards). All peoples have rituals. All rituals justify metaphysical value judgements. Myths and rituals develop together. The feast is a universal ritual. There is some ancient event that involved brother murder. (It is possible that this is the division between east and west.) The flood occurred and was in memory. There is no reason that brother murder did not remain in memory. There is the replacement event. But for indo europeans, they were the replacers. Just as their gods replaced older gods.