Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Joseph Ross shares last year’s post on education

    Joseph Ross shares last year’s post on education.

  • The Doolittle Policy Spreads: Quality.

    —“And, as I have adopted the Curt Doolittle high quality policy of blocking people who lie, slander, and refuse to stay on topic and debate with facts, you are blocked.”— Al Freeman

  • The Doolittle Policy Spreads: Quality.

    —“And, as I have adopted the Curt Doolittle high quality policy of blocking people who lie, slander, and refuse to stay on topic and debate with facts, you are blocked.”— Al Freeman

  • Men In Prison And Women In Asylums

    There is a reason prisons are dominated by men, and asylums were dominated by women: that distribution reflects how men and women express anti-social behavior. (Institutionalizing female insanity as a norm.)

  • Men In Prison And Women In Asylums

    There is a reason prisons are dominated by men, and asylums were dominated by women: that distribution reflects how men and women express anti-social behavior. (Institutionalizing female insanity as a norm.)

  • I appreciate the new tech. Really. But, a 1911 is an extension of my body. Why?

    I appreciate the new tech. Really. But, a 1911 is an extension of my body. Why? I trained with it. It’s nothing but form and function. It’s a craftsman’s tool. It’s thin, points naturally, is long enough for sight picture, it’s ‘condition’ is visible. It’s single action – and always ‘hot’. It has a perfect trigger that can be tuned even more. It’s heavy enough to absorb the recoil of a fat, heavy, round. And makes it a big messy hole without passing thru the target or obstacles. My kick is this: |SERIES|: Fist > knife > pistol(single) > revolver > semi auto > smg >auto carbine > auto battle rifle > machine gun > heavy machine gun. In other words, we are always having the wrong argument: a pistol is a gun to get a gun, a duelling weapon, or an assassination weapon like the knife. And if you watch how we train 9mm, we train 9mm to mimic an SMG. The minimum small arm is a machine pistol with 30 rounds. So, why not just use an smg/machine pistol?

  • I appreciate the new tech. Really. But, a 1911 is an extension of my body. Why?

    I appreciate the new tech. Really. But, a 1911 is an extension of my body. Why? I trained with it. It’s nothing but form and function. It’s a craftsman’s tool. It’s thin, points naturally, is long enough for sight picture, it’s ‘condition’ is visible. It’s single action – and always ‘hot’. It has a perfect trigger that can be tuned even more. It’s heavy enough to absorb the recoil of a fat, heavy, round. And makes it a big messy hole without passing thru the target or obstacles. My kick is this: |SERIES|: Fist > knife > pistol(single) > revolver > semi auto > smg >auto carbine > auto battle rifle > machine gun > heavy machine gun. In other words, we are always having the wrong argument: a pistol is a gun to get a gun, a duelling weapon, or an assassination weapon like the knife. And if you watch how we train 9mm, we train 9mm to mimic an SMG. The minimum small arm is a machine pistol with 30 rounds. So, why not just use an smg/machine pistol?

  • You sometimes speak of jews having “inverted sexual dimorphisms”. Could you elab

    You sometimes speak of jews having “inverted sexual dimorphisms”. Could you elaborate on that or maybe provide some sources? From my experience it’s certainly fair to say that jews have reduced sexual dimorphisms, e.g. jewish women are more assertive than aryan women, but not more assertive than jewish men. On a scale of manliness it might look like that: |—-W—-M—-| …for jews |–W——–M–| …for aryans So the span is smaller but (as I see it) not inverted. Another possible source of variation is translation: |—W—-M—–| …for jews |–W——–M–| …for aryans The span probably affects sex relations. A less submissive woman probably means more infighting. On a social scale that might explain the rise of feminism after emancipation (jewesses rebelling against gentile males unable to handle them).

  • You sometimes speak of jews having “inverted sexual dimorphisms”. Could you elab

    You sometimes speak of jews having “inverted sexual dimorphisms”. Could you elaborate on that or maybe provide some sources? From my experience it’s certainly fair to say that jews have reduced sexual dimorphisms, e.g. jewish women are more assertive than aryan women, but not more assertive than jewish men. On a scale of manliness it might look like that: |—-W—-M—-| …for jews |–W——–M–| …for aryans So the span is smaller but (as I see it) not inverted. Another possible source of variation is translation: |—W—-M—–| …for jews |–W——–M–| …for aryans The span probably affects sex relations. A less submissive woman probably means more infighting. On a social scale that might explain the rise of feminism after emancipation (jewesses rebelling against gentile males unable to handle them).

  • Deb Roy discusses how insights gained from big data and machine learning can hel

    Deb Roy discusses how insights gained from big data and machine learning can help us monitor the social impact of new technologies.