Source: Original Site Post

  • Identity By Constant Relations In Time. Time And Relations

    Without Time, we cannot speak of constant relations, because we cannot perceive either constant relations or changes in state that would falsify those freely associated relations. IDENTITY: Identity consists of some set of marginally indifferent constant relations that persists over some period of time. CATEGORIES Categories: Marginal differences in state of constant relations in Time. STATE State: constant relations in time when those relations might differ. SUBTRACTION OF THE TIME DIMENSION For example, numbers consist of names of positions, which by virtue or order maintain constant relations. We then manipulate accounts (balances, expressions, variables) by maintaining ratios (constant relations) and call that process ‘mathematics’. We generally perform this set of ratio-transformations in a particular sequence, always trying to simplify or rearrange. But what we rarely consider is that most mathematics ignores time – which is its chief benefit to us outside of commensurability. A UNIVERSE OF INFORMATION GIVEN NAMES OF SETS OF CONSTANT RELATIONS The universe as information consisting of a hierarchy of relations rather than objects.
  • by William L. Benge When the state claims rights to a person’s agency, it is an

    by William L. Benge When the state claims rights to a person’s agency, it is an egregious offense against the commons – because first, it is untruthful and damages the informational commons; and second, the presumption doubles it’s trouble to create an even greater crime of staking a false claim on life-property (one’s means of agency); and third, stakes a claim upon agency itself. When should this go unanswered? From here, natural law insists on prosecution: doors get kicked in and guillotine blades get sharpened. Oh yeah. Their presumption won’t be repeated anytime soon. Funny how memory works like that.
  • by William L. Benge When the state claims rights to a person’s agency, it is an

    by William L. Benge When the state claims rights to a person’s agency, it is an egregious offense against the commons – because first, it is untruthful and damages the informational commons; and second, the presumption doubles it’s trouble to create an even greater crime of staking a false claim on life-property (one’s means of agency); and third, stakes a claim upon agency itself. When should this go unanswered? From here, natural law insists on prosecution: doors get kicked in and guillotine blades get sharpened. Oh yeah. Their presumption won’t be repeated anytime soon. Funny how memory works like that.
  • Actions As Constant Relations

    (important concept) Identity Consists of a set of Constant Relations (Properties) – all the way up from the senses and all the way down from our ideas. Identity is discovered by free association, followed by elimination of non-constant relations. (falsification) Commensurability can be produced by use of a third reference that renders more than one referent measurable by another. (money, length, space, volume, current). Numbers consist of nothing more than names of positions and as such can refer to any constant positional relation, and as such we achieve scale independence. And as such numbers allow us to produce commensurability of most if not all phenomenon. All complex phenomenon consists of multiple, and often very dense causal relations and produce semi-constant intermediary relations. And we put our primary effort into determining which of those relations both direct and intermediary contribute to the production of changes in state and which of them do not. Humans possess marginally indifferent senses, emotions, and physical capabilities – at least in the sense that we differ in amplitude rather than existence. And for this reason we can imitate (act), sympathize (think), and empathize (feel) one another’s actions, thoughts, and emotions sufficiently to cooperate on means and ends. But it rarely occurs to us that while we cannot equate our valuations and therefore emotions, and we cannot equate our understanding unless reduced to a series of simple decidable propositions, we CAN equate actions, the five senses, and simple logical vs illogical relations. And as such, we CAN equate any statements represented as a series of actions that change state. In other words, just as prices consist of money and numbers, and those prices create create commensurability between goods, so can our perceptions and actions produce statements that provide commensurability regardless of our knowledge, understanding, and ability. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine
  • Actions As Constant Relations

    (important concept) Identity Consists of a set of Constant Relations (Properties) – all the way up from the senses and all the way down from our ideas. Identity is discovered by free association, followed by elimination of non-constant relations. (falsification) Commensurability can be produced by use of a third reference that renders more than one referent measurable by another. (money, length, space, volume, current). Numbers consist of nothing more than names of positions and as such can refer to any constant positional relation, and as such we achieve scale independence. And as such numbers allow us to produce commensurability of most if not all phenomenon. All complex phenomenon consists of multiple, and often very dense causal relations and produce semi-constant intermediary relations. And we put our primary effort into determining which of those relations both direct and intermediary contribute to the production of changes in state and which of them do not. Humans possess marginally indifferent senses, emotions, and physical capabilities – at least in the sense that we differ in amplitude rather than existence. And for this reason we can imitate (act), sympathize (think), and empathize (feel) one another’s actions, thoughts, and emotions sufficiently to cooperate on means and ends. But it rarely occurs to us that while we cannot equate our valuations and therefore emotions, and we cannot equate our understanding unless reduced to a series of simple decidable propositions, we CAN equate actions, the five senses, and simple logical vs illogical relations. And as such, we CAN equate any statements represented as a series of actions that change state. In other words, just as prices consist of money and numbers, and those prices create create commensurability between goods, so can our perceptions and actions produce statements that provide commensurability regardless of our knowledge, understanding, and ability. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev Ukraine
  • No More Monopoly Government And Economics

    Aesthetic and generational returns for the aristocracy. Investment returns for the bourgeoise. Discounts for the laymen.
  • No More Monopoly Government And Economics

    Aesthetic and generational returns for the aristocracy. Investment returns for the bourgeoise. Discounts for the laymen.
  • The only decidable good is demonstrated voluntary reciprocity

    The only decidable good is demonstrated voluntary reciprocity.
  • The only decidable good is demonstrated voluntary reciprocity

    The only decidable good is demonstrated voluntary reciprocity.
  • Cooperation < Non-cooperation < Predation

    COOPERATION < NON-COOPERATION < PREDATION Cooperation is only valuable if it is more valuable than non cooperation. Non cooperation is only valuable if it is more valuable than predation. If cooperation is no longer valuable then non-cooperation must be possible. If the state or some other organization prohibits non-cooperation, then predation is preferable to forced interaction, and forced cooperation. After all. That is what slavery means.