Source: Original Site Post

  • “It’s almost certain that people who have devoted themselves to self-honesty and

    —“It’s almost certain that people who have devoted themselves to self-honesty and self-observation have an above average chance of meeting with incomprehension, irritation, censorship or boredom when they try to share the data from their own minds frankly.”—
  • 1 – Start Online Courses – The purpose of online courses is to test the material

    1 – Start Online Courses – The purpose of online courses is to test the material. (2 – File Suit to as Marketing Vehicle.) 3 – Publish V1 Book. 4 – Announce pursuit of accreditation process. 5 – Graduate first class. 6 – Fundraising. 7 – Start Accreditation Process. 8 – Staff, Facilities … etc. Etc. Considering issuing a Theological Degree for obvious reasons. 1 – War: Fitness, Basic Training, Tactics, Strategy, Cunning. Warfare. 2 – Law(Rule): Natural Law, Argument, Philosophy, Politics (institutions) 3 – Governance(Economics): Accounting, Finance, Economics, History 4 – Religion(Pedagogy): Etiquette, Stoicism (Self Authoring), “Theology, Oaths and Rituals”, High Arts At some point this will be one of the most valuable degrees available.
  • 1 – Start Online Courses – The purpose of online courses is to test the material

    1 – Start Online Courses – The purpose of online courses is to test the material. (2 – File Suit to as Marketing Vehicle.) 3 – Publish V1 Book. 4 – Announce pursuit of accreditation process. 5 – Graduate first class. 6 – Fundraising. 7 – Start Accreditation Process. 8 – Staff, Facilities … etc. Etc. Considering issuing a Theological Degree for obvious reasons. 1 – War: Fitness, Basic Training, Tactics, Strategy, Cunning. Warfare. 2 – Law(Rule): Natural Law, Argument, Philosophy, Politics (institutions) 3 – Governance(Economics): Accounting, Finance, Economics, History 4 – Religion(Pedagogy): Etiquette, Stoicism (Self Authoring), “Theology, Oaths and Rituals”, High Arts At some point this will be one of the most valuable degrees available.
  • Curt Is On 30 Day Ban For His Anti-Racist Anti-Pedophile Post, And The (((Submitter))) Was A Stalker.

    From Curt: Here is the argument the post made: – Despite all the attributions of pedophilia to different groups, the truth is that all groups demonstrate it. It’s not group specific. – All asymmetry of power between the sexes is bad no matter what the age. – In general the AGE/2,+7 Rule Tests for Asymmetry. – But that rule applies where economies, knowledge, and institutions have made such limits possible. In other societies age differences are a factor of practical economics, practical retention of lands and assets, and practical survival. – Ergo we must all conduct voluntary trades. The question is always (which is my main message) whether reciprocity has been provided or not. Now, was that same message written in “language the hard right would understand?” Yes. Because you speak to people in their own language if you want to RESPECT THEM. I treat the right with RESPECT. I treat anyone who argues ratio-scientifically with me, with respect, and I treat anyone who doesn’t, with disrespect. Because the only possible means of reciprocity in debate, is RATIO-SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENT. Unfortunately, the average FB editor neither has the time nor the ability to understand anything above sixth grade level.
  • Curt Is On 30 Day Ban For His Anti-Racist Anti-Pedophile Post, And The (((Submitter))) Was A Stalker.

    From Curt: Here is the argument the post made: – Despite all the attributions of pedophilia to different groups, the truth is that all groups demonstrate it. It’s not group specific. – All asymmetry of power between the sexes is bad no matter what the age. – In general the AGE/2,+7 Rule Tests for Asymmetry. – But that rule applies where economies, knowledge, and institutions have made such limits possible. In other societies age differences are a factor of practical economics, practical retention of lands and assets, and practical survival. – Ergo we must all conduct voluntary trades. The question is always (which is my main message) whether reciprocity has been provided or not. Now, was that same message written in “language the hard right would understand?” Yes. Because you speak to people in their own language if you want to RESPECT THEM. I treat the right with RESPECT. I treat anyone who argues ratio-scientifically with me, with respect, and I treat anyone who doesn’t, with disrespect. Because the only possible means of reciprocity in debate, is RATIO-SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENT. Unfortunately, the average FB editor neither has the time nor the ability to understand anything above sixth grade level.
  • If In The Near Future India, China, And Russia Unites Together, How Long Would It Take Them To Defeat The U.s. And U.k. Together?

    Russia can defeat any army in the world on land as long as they can do it quickly. But russia is a very poor country with a fairly small population, and vast territories.

    China is and will always be easy to starve to death with nothing more than normal submarines. They know this. Which is why they have ‘stolen’ the south china sea: strategic necessity. China’s only options are economic and nuclear. She may eventually win dominance by economic means, since her market is a monopoly, while the western civilization’s market is fragmented into many pieces. However, if the western civilization’s market united into a monopoly china would return to practical weakness. Remember china remains, and will remain, for a very long time, a poor country per person. It is kind of hard to imagine india and america going to war, we have no reason to. It is more likely that india and china will go to war and india will depend on america.

    The threat to america is the unification of germany, eastern europe, and russia, against the united states.

    Frankly, as an american, I would prefer that outcome, and that we could have our own national government instead of running an empire at the expense of our peoples.

    https://www.quora.com/If-in-the-near-future-India-China-and-Russia-unites-together-how-long-would-it-take-them-to-defeat-the-U-S-and-U-K-together

  • If In The Near Future India, China, And Russia Unites Together, How Long Would It Take Them To Defeat The U.s. And U.k. Together?

    Russia can defeat any army in the world on land as long as they can do it quickly. But russia is a very poor country with a fairly small population, and vast territories.

    China is and will always be easy to starve to death with nothing more than normal submarines. They know this. Which is why they have ‘stolen’ the south china sea: strategic necessity. China’s only options are economic and nuclear. She may eventually win dominance by economic means, since her market is a monopoly, while the western civilization’s market is fragmented into many pieces. However, if the western civilization’s market united into a monopoly china would return to practical weakness. Remember china remains, and will remain, for a very long time, a poor country per person. It is kind of hard to imagine india and america going to war, we have no reason to. It is more likely that india and china will go to war and india will depend on america.

    The threat to america is the unification of germany, eastern europe, and russia, against the united states.

    Frankly, as an american, I would prefer that outcome, and that we could have our own national government instead of running an empire at the expense of our peoples.

    https://www.quora.com/If-in-the-near-future-India-China-and-Russia-unites-together-how-long-would-it-take-them-to-defeat-the-U-S-and-U-K-together

  • The open source market already designed a car. It looks like a 68 camaro, meets

    The open source market already designed a car. It looks like a 68 camaro, meets a baja trophy truck. (Rally fighter) The independent market is already building desirable custom cars for under 100k. (Rhino XT) The problem is building a desirable car design under 30k. The reality is that most of us want variations in use, styling, and interior. But your average Jeep Wrangler body provides a pretty open platform for anything you can imagine – sort of like the VW Beetle did way back in the day….
  • The open source market already designed a car. It looks like a 68 camaro, meets

    The open source market already designed a car. It looks like a 68 camaro, meets a baja trophy truck. (Rally fighter) The independent market is already building desirable custom cars for under 100k. (Rhino XT) The problem is building a desirable car design under 30k. The reality is that most of us want variations in use, styling, and interior. But your average Jeep Wrangler body provides a pretty open platform for anything you can imagine – sort of like the VW Beetle did way back in the day….
  • Anarchists vs Libertarians vs Sovereigntarians I think we agree on what constitu

    Anarchists vs Libertarians vs Sovereigntarians I think we agree on what constitutes aggression. I think we disagree about the scope of property against one can aggress, and the responsibilities we bear for the Commons.