Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • What Do Quora’s Right-wing-oriented Members Think About Anarcho-capitalism?

    The Anarcho Capitalist Research Program (Mises -> Rothbard -> Rothbardians -> Hoppe, and arguably, myself) was interesting in that we completed the Locke/Smith/Hume/Adams/Jefferson attempt to reduce all social science to a single language of property rights, and therefore to natural law (the natural law of reciprocity). This reduction of human behavior to a common, empirical language of perfect commensurability and decidability allowed us to produce a formal logic of cooperation (ethics and politics).

    And in retrospect it’s fairly obvious that the only empirical social science has always been Tort (common law of property), and economics is merely an extension of Tort law to the measurement of externalities, and scale. So, the AC program completed the Anglo Enlightenment, The Roman-Stoic Research Program, and The Aristotelian Enlightenment. Or I would argue, it completed the western philosophical program of Sovereignty by Reciprocity, to which the only answer is rule of law under the natural law of reciprocity, which of necessity produces markets in everything – from association to rule.

    However, the difference between Anarcho Capitalist and Western Upper class Sovereignty, Middle Class Liberty, and Working Class Freedom programs is expressible as the limit to reciprocity. In Anarcho capitalism that reciprocity was inherited from the needs of diasporic pastoralists (middle easterners), and not from landed agrarians (westerners). Pastoralists respect only private property and do not invest in the commons. Whereas landed people respect all investments of all kinds, regardless of their means of production, and compete by the production of commons (hence why old europe is a vast open air museum).

    So while the western Sovereign model of total prohibition on any imposition of costs of any kind, against investments of any kind – at least those that would produce an incentive for retaliation and therefore ‘disharmony’ – can produce a prosperous high trust western civilization with multipliers using the production of commons of all kinds, the middle eastern (Semitic) model of limited prohibition on the imposition of costs against physical property and total avoidance of payment for commons, and maximization of parasitism upon those commons, cannot produce a polity that can survive competition for territory, population, and trade.

    So in that sense, the anarcho capitalist program succeeded in producing a formal logic of cooperation (ethics, law, and politics) but it failed to define the minimum criteria for the production of a survivable polity.

    It’s profoundly ironic that a philosophical system placing highest emphasis on the market, and that would create the formal logic of cooperation, would itself, not question whether a polity constructed under that system of thought, using a pastoralist scope of ethics, would survive in the market for polities, (none has, nor can). And worse, that one expressing the empirical findings of law over millennia would be argued in Rousseau’s vision of man (Roussea/ Kant/ Postmodernists), Kant’s Rationalism (Kant / Marx / Postmodernists), and Jewish diasporic Ethics (Mises/Rothbard/Popper) – instead of Anglo vision of man (Rational), Anglo empiricism(Scientific), Anglo ethics(Reciprocal).

    Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom, and Subsidy(insurance) are possible only under the total, incremental, suppression of parasitism – the total prohibition on imposition of costs upon the investments of others, of all kinds. And there is no other means of doing so than the common law of reciprocity, we know as tort, extended to the insurance of restitution and punishment for all impositions of costs upon all investments of others.

    So, I have moved quite firmly ‘to the right’ in the sense that the “Right” refers to the group evolutionary strategy we call “Aristocracy”, and aristocracy to the production of Sovereignty, Liberty, Freedom, and Subsidy, through the organized use of violence to impose incremental suppression of all forms of parasitism (cost impositions), through the competition we call ‘debate’ in the form we call ‘jury’ using the means of decidability we call ‘reciprocity’ and the empirical measurement of the imposition of costs against any and all investment in converted opportunities: “property”.

    And I have moved to the right because there is no logical or empirical means of doing otherwise, yet carrying the pretense of one’s ethics as ‘moral’.

    Cheers

    https://www.quora.com/What-do-Quoras-right-wing-oriented-members-think-about-anarcho-capitalism

  • Why Do Most Americans Hate Anchovies?

    We still have laws on the books in some regions that a woman can reject a man from her bed if he has eaten anchovies. (really).

    Americans are fussy about what they consider ‘peasant’ food.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-do-most-Americans-hate-anchovies

  • Should The United States Start Charging Other Countries For Protection?

    We already do. By providing the “Petro-Dollar” and “Reserve Currency” (look them up), the USA creates demand for US currency and US debt, and then deflates that debt away through inflating the dollar – and american citizens obtain nearly everything in the world at a discount. This is how the USA ‘taxed’ the world for our protection, and that is precisely why the Europeans, Russians, Iranians, and Chinese want to both control oil, and replace the dominance of the dollar as the world reserve currency and as the world medium of petroleum exchange.

    For all intents and purposes, the world runs on American Law, American Dollars, and American Trade Routes. Which is the value of a huge military: obtaining discounts on trade.

    https://www.quora.com/Should-the-United-States-start-charging-other-countries-for-protection

  • What Color/race Would You Have Rather Been Born? Why?

    Its pretty hard to argue against the utility of being white and germanic. Although being Japanese is about as good as it gets otherwise.

    https://www.quora.com/What-color-race-would-you-have-rather-been-born-Why

  • Are Middle Eastern People Caucasian? If So, Why Are They Perceived As Not Being White In America?

    No. Middle easterners are from a different genetic group, and have assimilated Europeans – exterminating them from the Bosphorus to India.

    Look at genes. (See lists below) Middle Easterner’s are of West Asian origins (anatolian, semitic, persian). And while the west asian branch of caucasians has reached across more of the world than europeans (until the 1400’s) Arabs appear to originate from Ethiopian/Arabian crossing (an early trade location) and are a mixture of african and west asian. This is largely because west asians (black haired swarthier) had different agrarian, pastoral needs, and much greater outgroup competition (middle east is the intersection of four continents, and nearly all the racial, sub racial, and tribal groups – hence the obvious tribalism still present in the demographics – particularly among ‘The Evil 80’s’ which the warmer climates have not been able to eliminate.

    Caucasian is the wrong term. Principally because ‘Whites’ are not of west asian origins, nor from the caucuses, but from the north and west of the black sea, while west asians have darker coloring, more cartilage, different cephalic indexes, and higher impulsivity (which I prefer to state as ‘more emotional’).

    Indo european expansion was successful across the eurasian plain, and down into west asia. However, *all those peoples were assimilated and are gone*. This is because the ‘uniqueness’ of westerners cannot survive competition with outsiders any more than east asians (Han, Korean, Japanese) can. East asians have succeeded at greater neoteny than even europeans – but from an earlier fork in the homo sapiens sapiens expansion.

    West indo europeans appear to have ‘matured’ in poland and ukraine, and then expanded eastward displacing their west asian competitors. and we can see patterns of radiation of genes in europe consisting of at least three waves a) early neolithic, agrarian, and horse-riding. The last wave (R1a-germanic-slavic) divides the prior two (I1/I2-Nordic,Southern, and R1b/Atlantic) very clearly along the european plain (where horses and cattle can be easily fed).

    We have learned a lot in the past thirty years, and it mirrors pre-war thought. Post-war this line of thought has been prosecuted – especially since 1960s and the introduction of Postmodernism from the French (once Marxism’s class warfare had failed, the marxists adopted identity warfare.)

    TRAITS: MOST GROUP DIFFERENCES ARE EXPRESSIONS OF SUCCESS OR FAILURE AT NEOTONIC SELECTION GIVEN THE PRESSURES OF WARM CLIMATES.

    “Europeans” share continuous, and difficult-to-evolve traits that west asians do not.
    a) lower testosterone levels (and lower impulsivity)
    b) greater neoteny (slower sexual maturity)
    c) greater pedomorphism (retention of aquiline/childhood traits)
    d) lighter coloring (skin and hair – less ‘swarthy’)
    e) greater cephalic index (probably due to greater neoteny)
    (f) lower ‘clannishness’ from birth. (really. from the day they’re born.)
    (g) (I am not sure about this yet) Possibly higher rates of sociopathy (purely rational actors, and free of governing impulse). There is too much overlap in the (scarce and questionable) literature to separate biological sociopathy (lack of empathy) which is evident in brain structure, and various anti-social behaviors. In whites, the autism spectrum appears more common, and without comorbidity, whereas in non-whites it appears comorbid with other (birth) mental defects. This could be caused by nothing other than northern european whites have been exceptionally successful not only at neoteny, but at ‘ridding the population’ of the underclass through winters, starvation, manorialism, disease, war – and extremely aggressive hanging for over 1000 years. So I suspect that these statistics are merley demographic (class), and that the positive results of class (lower emotionality and impulse, higher influence of reason) just express themselves to a higher degree in whites (sociopathy, non-comorbid autism, lower testosterone, more aquiline features).

    GENETIC AND CULTURAL GROUPS (RACES, SUBRACES, TRIBES) COMPARING EUROPEAN AND MIDDLE EASTERN

    1)EUROPEANS (‘UKRAINIANS’) (NORTH BRANCH) (
    ……..FINN/UGRIC/URALIC (N)
    ……..SCANDINAVIAN (I1)
    ……..SLAVIC (R1a)
    ……..GERMANIC (R1b)
    ……..ATLANTIC (CELTIC)(R1b)
    ……..BASQUE (R1b+)
    ……..SOUTHERN EUROPEANS ( I2 ‘proto-europeans’)
    …………….Sardinians
    …………….Moldovans,
    …………….Romanians,
    …………….Bulgarians,
    …………….Serbians,
    …………….Bosnians,
    …………….Croatians

    2) IRANIANS (SOUTH BRANCH)
    ……..IRANIAN
    …………….Armenians(R1b/J2)
    …………….Jews (E1/J)
    …………….Greeks and Southern Italians (I2)
    …………….Kurds
    …………….Iranians (J2)
    …………….Jordanians
    …………….Iraqis
    …………….Assyrians
    …………….Druze
    …………….Lebanese
    …………….Georgians
    …………….Caspians
    …………….Palestinians
    ……TURKIC (Displaced from China)
    …………….Turks
    ……TAJIK
    …………….Tajik
    …………….Bukhara Arab
    …………….Shugnan
    …………….Kallar
    …………….Sourashtran
    …………….Yadhava

    ……IRANIAN AFRICAN (ARAB / SEMITIC) (J1)
    …………….Kuwaiti*
    …………….Arabian (Saudi – Yemeni – Bedouin)*
    …………….Egyptian
    ……IRANIAN NORTH AFRICAN
    …………….North African Race (Moroccan – Libyan – Tunisian – Canarian)
    …………….Berber Race*** (Berber)
    …………….Algerian Race (Algerian)

    3) INDO IRANIAN (DRAVIDIAN/IRANIAN?) (EAST BRANCH)
    ……INDO-IRANIAN
    …………….Kalash***
    …………….West Asian/East Iranian
    …………………………..Pashtun
    …………………………..Brahui
    …………………………..Balochi
    …………………………..Makrani
    …………………………..Sindhi
    …………….West Himalayan
    …………………………..Hunza
    …………………………..Bartangi
    …………………………..Roma
    …………….Himalayan***
    …………………………..Gurkha
    …………………………..Tharu
    …………………………..Ladakhi
    …………….North Indian**
    …………………………..Punjabi
    …………………………..Central Indic
    …………………………..Punjabi Brahmin
    …………………………..Rajput
    …………………………..Vania Soni
    …………………………..Mumbai Brahmin
    …………………………..Jat
    …………………………..Kerala Brahmin
    …………………………..Koli
    …………….Karnet-Uttar Pradesh Brahmin***
    …………………………..Karnet
    …………………………..Uttar Pradesh Brahmin

    ……INDO-IRANIAN-DRAVIDIAN
    …………….South Indian**
    …………………………..Munda
    …………………………..Bhil
    …………………………..Maratha
    …………………………..Rajbanshi
    …………………………..Oraon
    …………………………..Parji
    …………………………..Kolami-Naiki
    …………………………..Chenchu Reddi
    …………………………..Konda
    …………………………..Kolya
    …………………………..West Bengal Brahmin
    …………………………..Parsi
    …………………………..Gond
    …………….South Dravidian***
    …………………………..Sinhalese
    …………………………..Lambada
    …………………………..Irula
    …………………………..Izhava
    …………………………..Kurumba
    …………………………..Nayar
    …………………………..Toda
    …………………………..Kota
    …………………………..Malayaraya
    …………………………..Tamil
    …………….Kerala Kadar***
    …………………………..Kerala Kadar

    TOTAL CURRENT UNDERSTANDING OF RACES, SUBRACES AND TRIBES.

    (for those that find these things interesting)

    ==============================
    ======Caucasian Macro Race======
    ==============================

    (Northern Branch of Indo-European Migration)

    ==Northwestern European Races / North Sea and Rivers(R1b/I1) ==
    Atlantic, Celtic, Geramanic (R1b),
    Nordic (Swedish, Norwegian)(I1)

    ===Slavic Race/Baltic/Dniepr/European Plain(R1a) ===
    West Slavic, South Slavic, East Slavic

    === Uralic / Finno-Ugric Race (N) ===
    Finn, Estonian, Latvia, Lithuania, (Russia/Moscovy)
    Norwegian-Swedish Saami Race*** (Norwegian Saami – Swedish Saami)
    Finnish Saami Race** (Finnish Saami)

    === Basque Race ===
    Basque Race (Basque) (R1b1+Heavy non-european Admixture)

    ===Southern Proto Europeans (I2)===
    Sardinian Race** (Sardinian)
    Moldovans,Romanians,Bulgarians,Serbians,

    Bosnians, Croatians (et al)

    ======================
    West Asian Major Race
    ======================

    ===”Iranian” Race(West Asian)***===
    Iranian Race ( Armenian(R1b/J2) – Jewish(E1/J) – Greek(I2) — Southern Italians(I2) — Turk – Kurd – Iranian – Jordanian – Iraqi – Assyrian – Druze – Lebanese – Georgian – Caspian – Palestinian)
    Tajik Race (Tajik – Bukhara Arab – Shugnan – Kallar – Sourashtran – Yadhava)

    === Arab (Semitic / Iranian-African?) Race===
    (J) (Kuwait, and southern peninsula)
    Kuwaiti Race* (Kuwaiti)
    Arabian Race (Saudi – Yemeni – Bedouin)*
    Egyptian Race (Egyptian)

    ===North African===
    North African Race (Moroccan – Libyan – Tunisian – Canarian)
    Berber Race*** (Berber)
    Algerian Race (Algerian)

    ===Indo Iranian Major Race***===
    Kalash Race*** (Kalash)
    West Asian Race/East Iranian Race (Pashtun – Brahui – Balochi – Makrani – Sindhi )
    West Himalayan Race (Hunza – Bartangi – Roma)
    Himalayan Race*** (Gurkha – Tharu – Ladakhi)

    North Indian Race** (Punjabi – Central Indic – Punjabi Brahmin – Rajput – Vania Soni – Mumbai Brahmin – Jat – Kerala Brahmin – Koli)
    Karnet-Uttar Pradesh Brahmin Race*** (Karnet – Uttar Pradesh Brahmin)

    South Indian Race** (Munda – Bhil – Maratha – Rajbanshi – Oraon – Parji – Kolami-Naiki – Chenchu Reddi – Konda – Kolya – West Bengal Brahmin – Parsi – Gond)

    South Dravidian Race*** (Sinhalese – Lambada – Irula – Izhava – Kurumba – Nayar – Toda – Kota – Malayaraya – Tamil)

    Kerala Kadar Race*** (Kerala Kadar)

    ==============================
    ======Asian Macro Race======
    ==============================

    ===Northeast Asian Major Race*===
    Japanese-Korean Race (Japanese – Korean)
    Southern Japanese Race (Honshu Kinki – Kyushu)
    Ryukyuan Race (Okinawans)
    Ainu Race*** (Ainu)
    Gilyak Race** (Gilyak)
    Northern Chinese Race (Northern Han – Qiang – Manchu – Hui – Yunnan Han)
    Oroqen Race (Oroqen)
    Sherpa-Yakut Race (Sherpa – Yakut)
    Nepalese Race (Nepali – Newari)
    Mongolian Race (Mongolian – Inner Mongolian – Buryat – Kazakh)
    Northern Turkic Race*** (Dolgan – Altai – Shor – Tofalar – Uighur – Chelkan – Soyot – Kumandin Teleut – Hazara)
    Central Asian Race (Kirghiz – Karalkalpak – Uzbek – Turkmen)
    Tuva Race (Tuva)
    Tungus Race (Even – Evenki – Russian Saami)
    Siberian Race
    Beringian Race** (Chukchi – Aleut – Siberian Eskimo)
    Paleosiberian Race (Koryak – Itelmen)
    Reindeer Chukchi Race (Reindeer Chukchi)
    General Tibetan Race (Tibetan – Lisu – Nu – Tujia – Akha – Burmese – Yizu)
    Mizo Race (Mizo)
    Bhutanese Race (Bhutanese Buddhist)
    Siberian Uralic Race (Nentsy – Samoyed – Ket – Mansi – Khanty)
    Nganasan Race (Nganasan)
    Uralic Race (Komi – Mari)
    North American Eskimo Race (Inuit)

    ==Amerindian Major Race*==
    Northern Na-Dene Race
    Northwestern American Amerindian Race
    Northern Amerind Race
    Central Amerind Race
    Southern Amerind Race
    Ge Amerindian Race (Ge Language Group)
    Tucanoan Amerindian Race (Tucanoan Language Group)
    Nootka Amerindian Race (Nuuchahnulth – Makah)
    Fuegian Amerindian Race (Ona – Yaghan – Kaweskar – Aonikenk – Alacaluf)

    ===Southeast Asian Major Race*===
    Southern Chinese Race (Dong – Henan Han – Yi – She – Punu – Naxi)
    Hmong-Mien Race (Chinese Hmong – Thai Hmong – Mien)
    Li-Khmer Race (Li – Khmer)
    Southeast China Race (Hakka – Min Nan – Singapore Chinese – Thai Chinese – Cantonese Han)
    South China Sea Race (Tagalog – Ilocano – Visayan – Ami Taiwanese Aborigine – Guangdong Han)
    Manobo Race (Manobo)
    Philippines Negrito Race (Aeta – Agta – Palau Micronesian)
    Mangyan-Ati Race (Iraya – Ati)
    Mamanwa Philippines Negrito Race (Mamanwa)
    Tai Race (Thai – Tai Lue – Tai Kern – Tai Yong – Tai Yuan – Lao – Lahu – Aini – Shan – Dai – Muong – Buyei)
    Vietnamese Race (Vietnamese – Deang – Jinuo – Blang)
    Mlabri Race** (Mlabri)
    Htin Race (Htin)
    Kachin Race (Kachin – Karen – Va – Nung – Lu – Lawa)
    General Taiwanese Aborigine Race (Ayatal – Bunun – Yami)
    Island SE Asian Race (Paiwan Taiwanese Aborigine – Sea Dayak – Sumatran – Balinese)
    Bidayuh Race** (Jagoi)
    Indonesian Race (Sulawesi – Borneo – Lesser Sunda – Sarawak – Javanese)
    Mentawi Race (Mentawi)
    Toraja Race (Toraja)
    Lesser Sunda Race (Kambera – Lembata – Lamaholot – Manggarai)
    Malay Race (Malaysia Malay – Singapore Malay)
    Proto-Malay Race** (Temuan)
    Austroasiatic Race (Mon – Zhuang – She – Ho – Lyngngam)
    Nongtrai Race (Nongtrai)
    Santhal-Naga Race (Santhal – Naga – Munda – Kurmi – Sudra)
    Meghalaya Race (War Jantia – Bhoi – Maram – War Khasi – Kynriam – Nishi – Pnar – Bai)
    Senoi Race (Senoi)
    Shompen Race (Shompen)
    Garo Race (Garo)
    NE Indian Indo-European Race (Mahishya – Bagdi – Gaud – Tanti – Lodha)
    Indian Tibeto-Burman Race (Apatani – Nishi – Adi – Tripuri – Jamatia – Mog – Chakma)
    Semang Malay Negrito Race*** (Semang – Jehai – Kensui)

    ===Oceanian Major Race*===
    Micronesian Race (Yap – Kanaka – Toba Batak Indonesian – Kora Batak Indonesian)
    Polynesian Race* (Tonga – Western Samoa – French Polynesia – Cook Islands)
    Melanesian Race (Fiji – Vanuatu – New Ireland – Papuan Melanesian – Nasioi – Alor Indonesian)

    ==============================
    ======Australoid Macro Race======
    ==============================

    ===Australian Major Race***===

    ===General Australian Aborigine Major Race***===
    Queensland Aborigine Race***
    Western Territory Pama-Nguyan Aborigine Race***

    ===Papuan Major Race***===
    General Papuan Race***
    Motu Papuan Race***
    Sepik-Ramu Papuan Race***

    ===Greater Andaman Islands Major Race***===
    Greater Andaman Islands Negrito Race***

    ===Onge Andaman Islands Major Race***===
    Onge Andaman Islands Negrito Race***

    ==============================
    African Macro Race
    ==============================

    ===African Major Race***===
    Tigrean Race*** (Tigrean)
    Amharic Race*** (Amharic)
    Sudanese-Barya Race*** (Sudanese – Barya)
    General Nilotic Race (Shilluk – Masai – Nuer – Dinka – Luo – Turkana – Karanojo – Mabaan)
    Funji Nilotic Race (Funji)
    Tuareg-Beja Cushitic Race*** (Tuareg – Beja)
    Nubian Race*** (Nubian)
    Wolof-Peul-Serer Race (Wolof – Peul – Serer)
    General Bantu Race (Most Bantus)
    Bedik Bantu Race (Bedik)
    West African Race (Most West Africans)
    Mbuti Pygmy Race
    Sara Nilotic-Biaka Pygmy Race (Sara – Biaka)
    San Khoisan-Somali Race*** (San – Somali)
    Khoi Khoisan Race*** (Nama – !Ora)
    Hadza Khoisan Race*** (Hadza)
    Sandawe Khoisan Race (Sandawe)

    https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Are-Middle-Eastern-people-Caucasian-If-so-why-are-they-perceived-as-not-being-white-in-America

  • Why Are White People So Much More Sociopathic-leaning (not Sociopathic) Than Asian People?

    Westerners have evolved and selected for greater detachment than others – including low context language and thought – at least in the north. And it certainly appears that this behavior predates the indo european expansion. (really). There are a number of arguments why, which all make sense but we need more research. All we know is that at present it appears to be true. My suspicion is that it was an existing trait that was reinforced by metalsmithing (the first western myth), western battle tactics, upward distribution of reproduction, and the near replacement of conquered peoples by those with such tendencies. Asian branched earlier, and westerners either later or iteratively. So asian neoteny is farther along, but possibly from earlier “version”. European neoteny is a bit less, and from a later branch. My understanding at the moment is the rather obvious: asian engineers and accountants vs white lawyers and entrepreneurs. We are quite compatible above our working classes.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-are-white-people-so-much-more-sociopathic-leaning-not-sociopathic-than-Asian-people

  • Why Are Libertarians So Quickly And Immediately Dismissed In Common Political Discourse?

    The libertarian assessment of the nature of man is demonstrably adolescent.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-are-libertarians-so-quickly-and-immediately-dismissed-in-common-political-discourse

  • Is It Theoretically Possible To Cause The Bitcoin Crash With A Small Coordinated Group. What Steps Might They Take?

    Use periods of low volume to spike the price.
    Sell in periods of high volume purchases.
    Repeat to boost the price to extremes.
    Sell repeatedly at low volume lows to cause panic.
    Start rumors of miners or agents causing threats.
    Produce believable reports that on a given date a large government will seize certain miners and prohibit all future transaction.

    repeat until people lose interest.

    just how its done in the stock market today.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-it-theoretically-possible-to-cause-the-bitcoin-crash-with-a-small-coordinated-group-What-steps-might-they-take

  • Aren’t Conservative And Libertarian Values Generally Fairly Similar On Topics Like Taxes? I Saw A Meme On A Conservative Page With The Quote €˜how The Grinch Stole My Income, By Being Libertarian’. Why Was This?

    Conservatives intuit the family as the central unit of inter-personal, social, economic and political organization, and the pursuit of law, policy, and the production of commons toward that intergenerational (and eugenic) end. It is a tediously empirical and stoic group evolutionary strategy.

    Libertarians intuit the (adolescent) individual as the central unit of inter-personal, social, economic and political organization, and the pursuit of law, policy, and the production of commons toward that individual (and dysgenic) end. The difference being that libertarians demonstrably seek to circumvent all commons and to free ride on those commons they justify as natural under a Rousseauian vision of man’s nature, but empirically man is not rousseauian, nor hobbesian, nor lockean, put purely rational – acting as predator, parasite, competitor, ally, and kin as circumstances suit.

    Communitarians ( women, children, and the weak) intuit those lacking agency as the central unit of inter-personal, social, economic and political organization, and the pursuit of law, policy, and the production of commons toward that communal (and dysgenic) end. They have a desire or need for consensus over and above all other concerns. It is a resistance movement.

    https://www.quora.com/Aren’t-conservative-and-libertarian-values-generally-fairly-similar-on-topics-like-taxes-I-saw-a-meme-on-a-conservative-page-with-the-quote-‘How-the-Grinch-stole-my-income-by-being-libertarian’-Why-was-this

  • Curt Doolittle, Analytic Philosopher of Political Economy, Ethics, Epistemology,

    Curt Doolittle, Analytic Philosopher of Political Economy, Ethics, Epistemology, Truth. (quora objection?) THE CORRECT ANSWER While descending from two widely separated waves “generations” that moved out of Africa, Whites have succeeded in significant juvenilization (Neoteny). Asians have succeeded in far greater juvenilization(Neoteny). Asian women are the most juvenilized women on earth. To the point at which they have even gained extended lifespans by delaying the depth of and onset of sexual maturity (compare to central asians, arabs, and sub saharan africans that have NOT engaged in juvenilization.) Secondly, for reasons I am not sure I am confident in addressing, Asians distribute their fat more evenly. And thirdly, Asian IQ is slanted to our educated classes (I suspect it is a narrower distribution because of the juvenilization – and the asian predilection for killing off malcontents in large numbers). So between a ‘more immature look’, more petite look, better weight distribution, and higher average intelligence, the pool of asian women is objectively better than the pool of available white women. Conversely asian women pay a price for mongoloid facial features, and in places like eastern europe where women maintain their weight and walk a great deal, and dress well, asian women lose their advantage. That’s just how it is. (I spend an absurd amount of time on mating patterns.) That said, it’s largely asian women and white men that account for the increase in American race mixing, since the other numbers are remaining relatively stable. (relatively). This is yet another example of the fact that all human behavior can be reduced to some statement analogous to economics. Asian women are a better ‘buy’ than white women for average males. White males are often a much better buy than equivalent asian males who have their own decreased market value. Largely because asians seem to require high context culture (which I won’t go into) and whites thrive in low context cultures. (as is evident in our languages). So asian men in asia and here are at a disadvantage. cheers