Source: Original Site Post

  • Why Hasn’t The Us Free Market Converted To Alternative Fuels If They’re So Affordable And Available?

    They aren’t affordable and they aren’t available and are universally a bad investment.

    DO THE MATH.

    Second, read on the Return on Energy Invesment.

    Return on energy is rapidly declining. Meaning that we have captured most of the low hanging fruit of the revolution in energy capture.

    The world runs on energy today the way it ran on food in the past.

    https://www.quora.com/Why-hasnt-the-US-free-market-converted-to-alternative-fuels-if-theyre-so-affordable-and-available

  • That’s A Fuzzy Language Question…. Let’s Fix It.

    —-”Since the ideological core of America is a individualistic democracy, what makes you think that a fascist movement would be more popular with the American populace? (https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Since-the-ideological-core-of-America-is-a-individualistic-democracy-what-makes-you-think-that-a-fascist-movement-would-be-more-popular-with-the-American-populace)”—- America was founded as a ‘third way’ free of both church and state, and instead for the entrepreneurial (meritocratic) individual. The original colonists recruited heavily ‘people of good character’ to create that ‘third way’ The constitution constructed rule by “The natural law of reciprocity”, and individual sovereignty (although they used the world liberty). This meant that all functions of society were organized into markets. You could perform service, with service you could earn property, with property you could earn voice. Meanwhile the court adjudicated differences entirely by property rights. This was ‘the third way’ that they were inventing. A third way not done before. Or at least, the third way that had continued from Anglo Saxon times, and was under attack during the colonial period. So it is that America was founded under rule of law. Not rule of legislation. rule of LAW. With legislation being little more than contract negotiated between the states, just as contracts were negotiated within the state, and within the polity, and between individuals. This is why those of us educated pre-marxism-postmoderism’s takeover of the school, academy, media and state during and the vietnam war, treat the constitution as ‘sacred’. Because for all intents and purposes – it is. It is ‘inviolate’. Unfortunately, beginning with the 14th amendment, then increasingly during the 20th century, the left was able to destroy rule of law, and re-implement rule-by-legislation, and then eventual restore the church, with a secular religion of postmodernism. **FASCISM/NATIONALISM VS COMMUNISM/UNIVERSALISM** Fascism, meaning **economic and cultural nationalism**, was developed to counter the spread of **global communism. ** There is very little difference between **FrankfurtSchool Marxism**, and it’s successor, **Postmodern School Political correctness** – and world communism. Just as there is very little difference between j**udaism, christianity, and islam** and **world communism**. So if you are from a good family, clan, tribe, and nation, you might choose nationalism over globalism. And if you are from a not-so-good family, clan, tribe, and nation you might choose globalism. People tend to follow the elites that promise them a competitive advantage. This is why people in homogenous societies vote by class blocks, and in heterogeneous societies they vote in racial and tribal and religious blocks: to obtain advantage via the force of government, rather than through market competition in the service of others. So Fascism is just a practical means by which KIN GROUPS (Nationalists) protect themselves from MAJORITY TYRANNY (Corporatists) by resisting universalism. Who do you want to get ahead? Well that depends upon what elites you can put into place to get your agenda ahead. Some of us are wired (like females) for the short term and experiential, and some of us are wired (like males) for the long term and capital accumulation. The strange thing is, nationalists are happy to separate and let others do as they will, but universalists are not? Why is that? The only answer CAN BE that one fears facing the reality of one’s inferiority in competition with kin groups.
  • That’s A Fuzzy Language Question…. Let’s Fix It.

    —-”Since the ideological core of America is a individualistic democracy, what makes you think that a fascist movement would be more popular with the American populace? (https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Since-the-ideological-core-of-America-is-a-individualistic-democracy-what-makes-you-think-that-a-fascist-movement-would-be-more-popular-with-the-American-populace)”—- America was founded as a ‘third way’ free of both church and state, and instead for the entrepreneurial (meritocratic) individual. The original colonists recruited heavily ‘people of good character’ to create that ‘third way’ The constitution constructed rule by “The natural law of reciprocity”, and individual sovereignty (although they used the world liberty). This meant that all functions of society were organized into markets. You could perform service, with service you could earn property, with property you could earn voice. Meanwhile the court adjudicated differences entirely by property rights. This was ‘the third way’ that they were inventing. A third way not done before. Or at least, the third way that had continued from Anglo Saxon times, and was under attack during the colonial period. So it is that America was founded under rule of law. Not rule of legislation. rule of LAW. With legislation being little more than contract negotiated between the states, just as contracts were negotiated within the state, and within the polity, and between individuals. This is why those of us educated pre-marxism-postmoderism’s takeover of the school, academy, media and state during and the vietnam war, treat the constitution as ‘sacred’. Because for all intents and purposes – it is. It is ‘inviolate’. Unfortunately, beginning with the 14th amendment, then increasingly during the 20th century, the left was able to destroy rule of law, and re-implement rule-by-legislation, and then eventual restore the church, with a secular religion of postmodernism. **FASCISM/NATIONALISM VS COMMUNISM/UNIVERSALISM** Fascism, meaning **economic and cultural nationalism**, was developed to counter the spread of **global communism. ** There is very little difference between **FrankfurtSchool Marxism**, and it’s successor, **Postmodern School Political correctness** – and world communism. Just as there is very little difference between j**udaism, christianity, and islam** and **world communism**. So if you are from a good family, clan, tribe, and nation, you might choose nationalism over globalism. And if you are from a not-so-good family, clan, tribe, and nation you might choose globalism. People tend to follow the elites that promise them a competitive advantage. This is why people in homogenous societies vote by class blocks, and in heterogeneous societies they vote in racial and tribal and religious blocks: to obtain advantage via the force of government, rather than through market competition in the service of others. So Fascism is just a practical means by which KIN GROUPS (Nationalists) protect themselves from MAJORITY TYRANNY (Corporatists) by resisting universalism. Who do you want to get ahead? Well that depends upon what elites you can put into place to get your agenda ahead. Some of us are wired (like females) for the short term and experiential, and some of us are wired (like males) for the long term and capital accumulation. The strange thing is, nationalists are happy to separate and let others do as they will, but universalists are not? Why is that? The only answer CAN BE that one fears facing the reality of one’s inferiority in competition with kin groups.
  • You Want Some Very Unpleasant And Uncomfortable Truths?

    —-”What are the “worst” traits of Democrats and of Republicans if there are such?”— LIBERALS lie constantly, because that is the purpose of marxism, socialism, and postmodernism – falsehood by gossip (reality by chanting). They have to lie, because their entire purpose is theft. So they employ shaming, rallying, pseudorealism, pseudoscience (Marx, Boaz, Freud) and pseudo rationalism (the french postmodernists). And they shout down and suppress the truth (that’s what political correctness means : ‘denial’. They seek to destroy markets, because markets are meritocratic. CONSERVATIVES can’t tell the truth – because conservatism is a eugenic group strategy. It’s antithetical to democratic polities. Conservatism is purely empirical. Purely market. Purely meritocratic. So they talk around the truth and are prisoners of ‘traditional moral language’. Why? Liberalism is the feminine reproductive strategy and dysgenic, and conservatism is the masculine reproductive strategy and eugenic. There is a very good reason why western people evolved so much faster than all the rest despite being farther behind. Less femininity. More competition. More disruption of the status quo. Less sentimentality. More truth and reason. More technology. More science. Why? Women gossip and undermine, everywhere, all the time. Constantly. It’s been illegal for women to gossip, shame and rally (they’re called ‘scolds’) for most of western history. Yet, all they do when given the opportunity is gossip everyone to the bottom. What percent of media personnel do anything other than gossip? And who pays for advertising containing gossip? And who spends money because of that advertising gossip? That’s the lesson of having women the voting pool. Liberals are female minds demonstrating female behavior, for female ends, because of female reproductive strategies. Yep. Do the research. That’s the answer. The greatest crime in history was letting pandora out of the box.
  • You Want Some Very Unpleasant And Uncomfortable Truths?

    —-”What are the “worst” traits of Democrats and of Republicans if there are such?”— LIBERALS lie constantly, because that is the purpose of marxism, socialism, and postmodernism – falsehood by gossip (reality by chanting). They have to lie, because their entire purpose is theft. So they employ shaming, rallying, pseudorealism, pseudoscience (Marx, Boaz, Freud) and pseudo rationalism (the french postmodernists). And they shout down and suppress the truth (that’s what political correctness means : ‘denial’. They seek to destroy markets, because markets are meritocratic. CONSERVATIVES can’t tell the truth – because conservatism is a eugenic group strategy. It’s antithetical to democratic polities. Conservatism is purely empirical. Purely market. Purely meritocratic. So they talk around the truth and are prisoners of ‘traditional moral language’. Why? Liberalism is the feminine reproductive strategy and dysgenic, and conservatism is the masculine reproductive strategy and eugenic. There is a very good reason why western people evolved so much faster than all the rest despite being farther behind. Less femininity. More competition. More disruption of the status quo. Less sentimentality. More truth and reason. More technology. More science. Why? Women gossip and undermine, everywhere, all the time. Constantly. It’s been illegal for women to gossip, shame and rally (they’re called ‘scolds’) for most of western history. Yet, all they do when given the opportunity is gossip everyone to the bottom. What percent of media personnel do anything other than gossip? And who pays for advertising containing gossip? And who spends money because of that advertising gossip? That’s the lesson of having women the voting pool. Liberals are female minds demonstrating female behavior, for female ends, because of female reproductive strategies. Yep. Do the research. That’s the answer. The greatest crime in history was letting pandora out of the box.
  • If We Define Human By Agency, The Sjw’s Are Just Partially Domesticated Animals.

    Once you realize that SJW’s are incompletely evolved humans, just as children, or domesticated animals, you stop taking them any more seriously than children, or domesticated animals. The human mind can develop in utero, during childhood, and during puberty, into a condition of agency, or we can train it into agency. But it appears that some of us are born with agency, some must only be exposed to agency, and some must be trained into agency, and some must be limited in the damage that they can create due to their lack of agency. Only then can we provide normative, cultural, and institutional agency. Because until one demonstrates self agency, that individual is not yet human. Agency is what separates us from animals. We can teach a crow, a dog, and a chimp facility with words and meaning if they are smart enough. People merely possess facility with words by birth. But just as pets must be taught facility with words, many people – SJW’s – must be taught agency: facility with body, thought, and emotion. That’s what the stoics were doing. And that is why the stoic schools were destroyed by the eastern church as a means of destroying western aristocratic civilization. SJW’s are easy to lead. They are merely domesticated animals, and not yet human. If we were still in our pre-christian ethos, we would be honest about these facts. Some human lineages, and certainly the female gender, were insufficiently domesticated.
  • If We Define Human By Agency, The Sjw’s Are Just Partially Domesticated Animals.

    Once you realize that SJW’s are incompletely evolved humans, just as children, or domesticated animals, you stop taking them any more seriously than children, or domesticated animals. The human mind can develop in utero, during childhood, and during puberty, into a condition of agency, or we can train it into agency. But it appears that some of us are born with agency, some must only be exposed to agency, and some must be trained into agency, and some must be limited in the damage that they can create due to their lack of agency. Only then can we provide normative, cultural, and institutional agency. Because until one demonstrates self agency, that individual is not yet human. Agency is what separates us from animals. We can teach a crow, a dog, and a chimp facility with words and meaning if they are smart enough. People merely possess facility with words by birth. But just as pets must be taught facility with words, many people – SJW’s – must be taught agency: facility with body, thought, and emotion. That’s what the stoics were doing. And that is why the stoic schools were destroyed by the eastern church as a means of destroying western aristocratic civilization. SJW’s are easy to lead. They are merely domesticated animals, and not yet human. If we were still in our pre-christian ethos, we would be honest about these facts. Some human lineages, and certainly the female gender, were insufficiently domesticated.
  • Beautify, very cold, very clear, very bright new year’s eve day. (I wish I was i

    Beautify, very cold, very clear, very bright new year’s eve day. (I wish I was in ukraine to celebrate it.)
  • Beautify, very cold, very clear, very bright new year’s eve day. (I wish I was i

    Beautify, very cold, very clear, very bright new year’s eve day. (I wish I was in ukraine to celebrate it.)
  • “When you use the words 1) true, and 2) truth, what do you mean by them? And 3)

    —“When you use the words 1) true, and 2) truth, what do you mean by them? And 3) is it possible for such a thing as you mean to exist?”— 0 – Identity(Tautology) Description: True(correspondent, consistent, existential, coherent) vs False (non-correspondent, inconsistent, non-existential, or incoherent) [Truth proper] 1 – Calculation: True(without error) versus false(with error) [analytic truth] [axiomatic] 2 – Deduction(induction): True (without error) versus False (with error) [ logical truth] [axiomatic] 3 – Description( identity) : that description, definition, you would give if you possessed perfect knowledge, perfect vocabular, perfect grammar, and specified perfect limits and scope. [Ideal truth] [theoretic] 4 – Narration: True(correct) versus False(incorrect). [testimonial truth] [ theoretic] 5 – Legal Judgement: Right(non-imposition) versus Wrong(imposition) [legal right and wrong] [empirical] 6 – Judgement: Right(correct) versus Wrong(incorrect) [moral right and wrong] [rational] 7 – Normative Judgement: Right(obedient) vs Wrong(disobedient) [normative right and wrong] [habitual] Truth consists of speech that preserves constant relations in any grammar of decidability that we have produced, whether categorical, algorithmic, rational, narrative, legal, moral, or normative. Truth provides DECIDABILITY independent of preference or good, or norm. All these methods are existentially possible.