Source: Original Site Post

  • Retweeted Mike Enoch πŸ‡·πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡³πŸ‡΄πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ (@mikeenochsback): Anyone feigning outrage over Trum

    Retweeted Mike Enoch πŸ‡·πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡³πŸ‡΄πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ (@mikeenochsback): Anyone feigning outrage over Trump’s “shithole” comments is a liar. No one is outraged. Everyone knows he’s right. The most intolerable thing about the present system is the constant lies. It’s run by liars that promote other liars and try to make you and me into liars too.
  • You want the scariest economic question of all? What is the cumulative cost per

    You want the scariest economic question of all? What is the cumulative cost per year of the loss of one point of median IQ? What is the aggregate return on increasing median IQ by one point per year? What is the single highest return a polity can invest in? #Trump
  • You want the scariest economic question of all? What is the cumulative cost per

    You want the scariest economic question of all? What is the cumulative cost per year of the loss of one point of median IQ? What is the aggregate return on increasing median IQ by one point per year? What is the single highest return a polity can invest in? #Trump
  • Democracy circumvents the empirical information provided by markets. It’s dysgen

    Democracy circumvents the empirical information provided by markets. It’s dysgenic, genocidal, and consumes genetic, normative, cultural, institutional capital that is the MOST EXPENSIVE capital to produce.
  • Democracy circumvents the empirical information provided by markets. It’s dysgen

    Democracy circumvents the empirical information provided by markets. It’s dysgenic, genocidal, and consumes genetic, normative, cultural, institutional capital that is the MOST EXPENSIVE capital to produce.
  • All democracy allows us to do is, for the first time, pursue our self interests

    All democracy allows us to do is, for the first time, pursue our self interests to the point we no longer pursue kin interests. It’s genocidal. Democracy is genocidal. If you don’t calculate changes in genetic, normative, institutional capital, then your calculating genocide.
  • All democracy allows us to do is, for the first time, pursue our self interests

    All democracy allows us to do is, for the first time, pursue our self interests to the point we no longer pursue kin interests. It’s genocidal. Democracy is genocidal. If you don’t calculate changes in genetic, normative, institutional capital, then your calculating genocide.
  • Why is democracy evil? Because one percent of people think, speak, and do everyt

    Why is democracy evil? Because one percent of people think, speak, and do everything of consequence. Everyone else just follows some collection of pack leaders. Look at the data. Sorry. It’s true. Monarchy, aristocracy, nobility, burgher, craftsman, laborer, mother.
  • Why is democracy evil? Because one percent of people think, speak, and do everyt

    Why is democracy evil? Because one percent of people think, speak, and do everything of consequence. Everyone else just follows some collection of pack leaders. Look at the data. Sorry. It’s true. Monarchy, aristocracy, nobility, burgher, craftsman, laborer, mother.
  • On ‘Sh__Hole Countries’

    The most expensive,scarce, irreplaceable, capital that people produce and consume is normative and intertemporal.The physical universe can be physically transformed.But people must be trained by immersion,education,competition, incentives,and law. A sh–hole is so b/c its people. Bringing money to ‘bad people’ merely feeds bad behavior. Basic economic law: anything you subsidize will increase. Bad people bringing money to worse people produces malincentives at source and destination. Bringing bad people to good people is costly. The economics of immigration is contentious only because we do not measure the changes in capital, only the change in productivity (lowering) and consumption (only maintained by increasing population). Not that you’re likely able to have this discussion with me. For the temporal and experiential *animal, consumption is an understandable measurement of ‘success’. For the intertemporal, empirical and cumulative *human, consumption without a decline in intertemporal capital is a measurement of ‘success’. The temporal and consumptive, vs intertemporal and cumulative, is the causal difference in gender, class, tribal, cultural, national group reproductive and evolutionary strategies, and is the source of our ‘moral’ perceptions, and political expressions of those perceptions. For those with the western aristocratic (meritocratic) high trust, low corruption, high investment commons, whose sentiments favor empirical rule of law over justificationary rationalism and rule by discretion, we are conscious of, concerned with, the defense of, those commons. You get what you measure.