Don’t kid yourself. A census is nothing more than an inventory the governors use to maximize taxes. That’s it. THere is no other purpose for it. Worse, they intentionally hide data so that we cannot make scientific statements about inferiority of people and superiority of others, and make economic arguments that justify separatism.
The state does nothing but prolong the state.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Interpersonal racism is just stupid, because one cannot judge an individual by t
Interpersonal racism is just stupid, because one cannot judge an individual by the properties of a class. Policial racism is simply empirical since by and large people vote by race, and increasingly do so, just as they demonstrate kin selection under pressure, and live, work, mate, and marry within very few degrees of kinship. Race realism is just not falling subject to postmodern pseudoscientific denialism that there are vast differences in the SIZE OF THE CLASSES and the degrees of neotonic development of the races, subraces, tribes, and clans. And that the principle problem is that some groups (west europeans and east asians have been more successful at reducing the sizes of their underclasses and increasing neotonic development of their races and subraces, tribes and clans. The principle difference between groups is largely regional differences in demand for neotonic selection, and the pressures of various forms of agrarianism or manorialism that suppressed reproductive rates of the underclasses under harsh winter conditions. Groups still act as groups and we always will. Look at india, north-africa-arabia-levant-mesopotamia, and brazil if not all of south america. Genes matter, principally because the lower classes are far more of a drag than upper and middle classes can mobilize. Every person at the bottom is six times as bad as every person at the top is valuable. STOP BEING RACIST AGAINST WHITES. PEOPLE ACT BY KIN SELECTION – period. -
Interpersonal racism is just stupid, because one cannot judge an individual by t
Interpersonal racism is just stupid, because one cannot judge an individual by the properties of a class. Policial racism is simply empirical since by and large people vote by race, and increasingly do so, just as they demonstrate kin selection under pressure, and live, work, mate, and marry within very few degrees of kinship. Race realism is just not falling subject to postmodern pseudoscientific denialism that there are vast differences in the SIZE OF THE CLASSES and the degrees of neotonic development of the races, subraces, tribes, and clans. And that the principle problem is that some groups (west europeans and east asians have been more successful at reducing the sizes of their underclasses and increasing neotonic development of their races and subraces, tribes and clans. The principle difference between groups is largely regional differences in demand for neotonic selection, and the pressures of various forms of agrarianism or manorialism that suppressed reproductive rates of the underclasses under harsh winter conditions. Groups still act as groups and we always will. Look at india, north-africa-arabia-levant-mesopotamia, and brazil if not all of south america. Genes matter, principally because the lower classes are far more of a drag than upper and middle classes can mobilize. Every person at the bottom is six times as bad as every person at the top is valuable. STOP BEING RACIST AGAINST WHITES. PEOPLE ACT BY KIN SELECTION – period. -
What Is The Basis Of Civilization, Language, Science, Religion?
—”What is the basis of civilization, language, science, religion, race, a mixture or other circumstances, such as a specific political organization, etc.?”—- THE BEST ANSWER The answer is deceptively simple. (a) We are born with one resource to spend: **TIME**, and by early adulthood, we must produce more than we expend over a three week period, or we will die. (b) We are able to produce only so many **calories** in that time. And, alone, barely enough to survive as a gatherer. (c) We are however, capable of **cooperation**. (d) The **returns** on cooperation are not additive but multiplicative – on the order a power of five to ten per person added to the division of labor. (Really. its that much). (e) All our biological abilities: language, reason; our habitual abilities: manners, norms, and traditions; our institutions: money, law, banking, politics, religion, and even war, assist us in **cooperating** in every larger numbers. (f) and through that vast system of heartless, mindless, communication, cooperation, we produce and transform infinitely **more** calories than we could on our own. (g) for this reason, we have only one form of wealth, time, and we are not wealthier than cave men. We have only made everything **infinitely cheaper** in the only **currency** we have to spend when we are born: **time**. (h) however, we are all born **rational** actors, and act morally (do not lie, cheat, steal, or free ride) and immorally (lie, cheat, steal, and free ride) as is in our best self interest. (i) And the **velocity and scale** of cooperation is dependent upon truth telling, adhering to promise and contract, and incentives for both reward and punishment if we fail to speak the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth, adhere to promise and contract, and follow only those incentives that impose no costs upon the investments(costs) of others. (j) **Science** (Demonstrated determinism of the physical world), **Economics **(Demonstrated human Behavior) and **Tort**(Demonstrated human Conflict) are the only languages of truth that we know of. (k) Humans evolved **language** to ‘deceive’, negotiate, and speak ‘morally’, not to speak truthfully, scientifically, economically, or legally. And humans evolved to **cheat** where they have the opportunity, and continue to do so. (l) So the primary **difficulty** in history is creating language, habits, and institutions, that **assist** us in truthful, voluntary, reciprocally beneficial, cooperation while **suppressing** untruthful, involuntary, irreciprocal impositions. In the end, as inhuman as it may seem, **we are all just calculating opportunities** to work together to pursue the highest return at the lowest cost in the shortest time with the greatest degree of certainty at the lowest risk. We are calculating, and the ‘equals sign’ in that vast set of calculations is when we cooperate. We work together to increase the returns on **time**. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine -
What Is The Basis Of Civilization, Language, Science, Religion?
—”What is the basis of civilization, language, science, religion, race, a mixture or other circumstances, such as a specific political organization, etc.?”—- THE BEST ANSWER The answer is deceptively simple. (a) We are born with one resource to spend: **TIME**, and by early adulthood, we must produce more than we expend over a three week period, or we will die. (b) We are able to produce only so many **calories** in that time. And, alone, barely enough to survive as a gatherer. (c) We are however, capable of **cooperation**. (d) The **returns** on cooperation are not additive but multiplicative – on the order a power of five to ten per person added to the division of labor. (Really. its that much). (e) All our biological abilities: language, reason; our habitual abilities: manners, norms, and traditions; our institutions: money, law, banking, politics, religion, and even war, assist us in **cooperating** in every larger numbers. (f) and through that vast system of heartless, mindless, communication, cooperation, we produce and transform infinitely **more** calories than we could on our own. (g) for this reason, we have only one form of wealth, time, and we are not wealthier than cave men. We have only made everything **infinitely cheaper** in the only **currency** we have to spend when we are born: **time**. (h) however, we are all born **rational** actors, and act morally (do not lie, cheat, steal, or free ride) and immorally (lie, cheat, steal, and free ride) as is in our best self interest. (i) And the **velocity and scale** of cooperation is dependent upon truth telling, adhering to promise and contract, and incentives for both reward and punishment if we fail to speak the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth, adhere to promise and contract, and follow only those incentives that impose no costs upon the investments(costs) of others. (j) **Science** (Demonstrated determinism of the physical world), **Economics **(Demonstrated human Behavior) and **Tort**(Demonstrated human Conflict) are the only languages of truth that we know of. (k) Humans evolved **language** to ‘deceive’, negotiate, and speak ‘morally’, not to speak truthfully, scientifically, economically, or legally. And humans evolved to **cheat** where they have the opportunity, and continue to do so. (l) So the primary **difficulty** in history is creating language, habits, and institutions, that **assist** us in truthful, voluntary, reciprocally beneficial, cooperation while **suppressing** untruthful, involuntary, irreciprocal impositions. In the end, as inhuman as it may seem, **we are all just calculating opportunities** to work together to pursue the highest return at the lowest cost in the shortest time with the greatest degree of certainty at the lowest risk. We are calculating, and the ‘equals sign’ in that vast set of calculations is when we cooperate. We work together to increase the returns on **time**. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine -
Why Trolls Can Defeat Me. An Example From Discord Debate
(Twitter argument with someone from Discord regarding a previous argument.) Truth is truth is truth, and opinion is opinion. Sorry. I do science and truth. —“You seem to be struggling to understand my point: I don’t care about accusations against a person’s character. A remorseless Bayesian pursuit is obviously more evolutionarily sustainable. I just was wanting to see some logical consistency out of you.”—- (NOTE: he’s saying the emotional changes in state (feelings) are equivalent to thefts (imposition of costs on an individual and group’s investments). (NOTE: His criticisms of me over time have always been effectively that I’m heartless but they mean that my efforts cannot be applied to his interests and I am immune to emotional coercions. ) Again, and ad hom rather than argue the truth or falsehood of the central argument. (BTW: I’ve made multiple fortunes, and on average, in all of history it takes 10 years to produce a work of this complexity. & I’m just probably three standard deviations in IQ above you. Sorry.) (THESE TWO ARE THE ICING ON THE CAKE) —“Oh, the king of ad hom wants to now cry about it. Sorry, that’s not how war works, right, Mr. pot-bellied, girly-legged 5’4″ Aristocratic Warrior? No, what you are is an antisocial catastrophe and most in the inner circle have confessed to it. You will continue to be a nobody.”— —“And yet you have no formal training in science of any kind, let alone advanced as I do, and you get turned into a rag doll by people with actual formal training in mathematics and philosophy. What you do is maintain a tiny FB circle and spend 10 years not publishing a book.”—- (a) Oh, I missed this one. Do you mean that ridiculous fellow on Chat who tried to equate LOGIC (rules of inference) with TRUTH (consistency, correspondence, and coherence), and outright denied (over and over and over again) that logic consists of tests of constant relations? (b) and I lost my temper because of his dishonesty? ( yeah. Its possible. I have a thing about dishonest people trolling me. ) I kept trying to circumvent his trolling and force the central argument, and I let him get my goat. For certain. (c)And that’s before we get to logic’s dependence upon premises (justifications), and science (truth) isn’t but dependent on survival from criticism. So while a logical inference may be not false, it says nothing about the premises. (d)So I’m stuck in a position with a dishonest if not ignorant opponent, trolling me, denying the constitution of logic itself, conflating states of existence, equating inference with correspondence, and an audience equally ignorant. I just stayed on message: Stop denying. (d) Deal with it. Either I was right and all any and all the logics consist of deflationary (limited) grammars (rules) by which we reduce the complexity of constant relations between states, where constant relations are limited to relations of analogies to experience – or not. (e) And that there is a vast difference between consistency correspondence, coherence of premises and conclusions(science), than between premises, deductions, and inferences (logic). Find some adult who can handle that discourse. it CAN’T be false. f) No matter how pissed dishonest trolls make me. And it is quite possible to piss me off furiously by dishonest trolling. Yes. And I don’t see any reason why it shouldn’t. -
Why Trolls Can Defeat Me. An Example From Discord Debate
(Twitter argument with someone from Discord regarding a previous argument.) Truth is truth is truth, and opinion is opinion. Sorry. I do science and truth. —“You seem to be struggling to understand my point: I don’t care about accusations against a person’s character. A remorseless Bayesian pursuit is obviously more evolutionarily sustainable. I just was wanting to see some logical consistency out of you.”—- (NOTE: he’s saying the emotional changes in state (feelings) are equivalent to thefts (imposition of costs on an individual and group’s investments). (NOTE: His criticisms of me over time have always been effectively that I’m heartless but they mean that my efforts cannot be applied to his interests and I am immune to emotional coercions. ) Again, and ad hom rather than argue the truth or falsehood of the central argument. (BTW: I’ve made multiple fortunes, and on average, in all of history it takes 10 years to produce a work of this complexity. & I’m just probably three standard deviations in IQ above you. Sorry.) (THESE TWO ARE THE ICING ON THE CAKE) —“Oh, the king of ad hom wants to now cry about it. Sorry, that’s not how war works, right, Mr. pot-bellied, girly-legged 5’4″ Aristocratic Warrior? No, what you are is an antisocial catastrophe and most in the inner circle have confessed to it. You will continue to be a nobody.”— —“And yet you have no formal training in science of any kind, let alone advanced as I do, and you get turned into a rag doll by people with actual formal training in mathematics and philosophy. What you do is maintain a tiny FB circle and spend 10 years not publishing a book.”—- (a) Oh, I missed this one. Do you mean that ridiculous fellow on Chat who tried to equate LOGIC (rules of inference) with TRUTH (consistency, correspondence, and coherence), and outright denied (over and over and over again) that logic consists of tests of constant relations? (b) and I lost my temper because of his dishonesty? ( yeah. Its possible. I have a thing about dishonest people trolling me. ) I kept trying to circumvent his trolling and force the central argument, and I let him get my goat. For certain. (c)And that’s before we get to logic’s dependence upon premises (justifications), and science (truth) isn’t but dependent on survival from criticism. So while a logical inference may be not false, it says nothing about the premises. (d)So I’m stuck in a position with a dishonest if not ignorant opponent, trolling me, denying the constitution of logic itself, conflating states of existence, equating inference with correspondence, and an audience equally ignorant. I just stayed on message: Stop denying. (d) Deal with it. Either I was right and all any and all the logics consist of deflationary (limited) grammars (rules) by which we reduce the complexity of constant relations between states, where constant relations are limited to relations of analogies to experience – or not. (e) And that there is a vast difference between consistency correspondence, coherence of premises and conclusions(science), than between premises, deductions, and inferences (logic). Find some adult who can handle that discourse. it CAN’T be false. f) No matter how pissed dishonest trolls make me. And it is quite possible to piss me off furiously by dishonest trolling. Yes. And I don’t see any reason why it shouldn’t. -
One psychopath that I was friendly with did more damage to propertarianism than
One psychopath that I was friendly with did more damage to propertarianism than I could have imagined. This is one of the reasons I’ve been more close with it. Many people want cults and cliques. I want my work. My health continues to limit my ambitions. But the work goes on. I am, like anyone else, in this era of change, as desirous of like minds. But in the choice between preservation of relationships with like minds, and pursuit of the truth, I always and everywhere choose the truth. It’s as it must be. -
One psychopath that I was friendly with did more damage to propertarianism than
One psychopath that I was friendly with did more damage to propertarianism than I could have imagined. This is one of the reasons I’ve been more close with it. Many people want cults and cliques. I want my work. My health continues to limit my ambitions. But the work goes on. I am, like anyone else, in this era of change, as desirous of like minds. But in the choice between preservation of relationships with like minds, and pursuit of the truth, I always and everywhere choose the truth. It’s as it must be. -
—“Can Someone Put This In Common Language?”—
—“CAN SOMEONE PUT THIS IN COMMON LANGUAGE?”— Replying to @jordanticus @sapinker (a) We spend a lot of money on anti-terrorism (the islamic counter-revolution against modernity, which is the latest iteration of the Ashkenazi counter-revolution (marx, freud, boaz, cantor), and the German( Kant, Hegel, etc), French v1(Rousseau) and v2 (Derrida et all). Replying to @jordanticus @sapinker (b) Very few people are killed by terrorists. (ie: “6 people”). (c) we have many diseases (actually there are only ten that account for almost all deaths, and they are deaths of accumulated cellular damage). And we might cure those diseases instead with money spent on terror. Replying to @jordanticus @sapinker (d) but the cost disease is slow and does not interfere with the world, economic, political, social, and familial ‘velocity of cooperation’ (stuff we do). While the cost of terrorism and its ability to spread is very high (civilizational). Replying to @jordanticus @sapinker (e) We can easily see the costs of the plagues and major diseases. What has it cost us to cure Abrahamism? And its successors, Marxism, Postmodernism, leaving the compromise social democracy? The SEEN and the UNSEEN.