You’re kidding. By and large the military is a middle class and lower middle class redistribution system. The only problems that are ‘real’ are the tendency of these people to get married and have children before earning their pensions, or at least before passing 30.
https://www.quora.com/Why-are-the-military-members-suffering-in-the-United-States
American culture was, is and for the foreseeable future will remain, primarily commercial, and it’s easier to see pop (Marketing to the Lower classes) than it is to the middle, upper middle, upper, and top classes. Mass media serves mass markets, and mass markets means ‘underclasses’.
https://www.quora.com/Is-American-culture-predominantly-pop-culture
No. They are West Asians.
WEST ASIAN RACE
West Asian ( Armenian(R1b/J2) – Jewish(E1/J) – Greek(I2) — Southern Italians(I2) — Turk – Kurd – Iranian – Jordanian – Iraqi – Assyrian – Druze – Lebanese – Georgian – Caspian – Palestinian)
Tajik Race (Tajik – Bukhara Arab – Shugnan – Kallar – Sourashtran – Yadhava)
https://www.quora.com/Are-Kurds-from-Iraq-White-or-what-race-are-they
No. Marxism is pseudoscience and contrary to incentives and demonstrated behavior – even contrary to evolutionary necessity – and marginalist economics is both logical and empirical and corresponds to incentives and demonstrated behavior – and it’s an expression of evolutionary necessity
https://www.quora.com/Can-Marxs-labor-theory-of-value-and-marginalist-economics-be-coherently-combined-without-any-essential-loss-to-both-sides
If anyone makes any decision by any criteria other than their work history, that person is a racist, classist, cultureist, ageist, genderist.
yet work historise are marginally indifferent, and prediction of past behavior is almost always false, and the single most important factor determiing success is cultural fit among the employees, and employees must generally be from the same class as the customers that they serve – or just below them.
Ergo. It’s all just just anti-white pseudoscience – nonsense invented by the postmodernists to destroy western civilization and turn it into another underclass ghetto like the middle east, brazil, and india.
https://www.quora.com/If-a-white-person-prefers-hiring-people-from-the-middle-east-since-he-has-better-experience-with-people-from-there-is-he-racist-What-if-his-preference-is-for-people-from-sub-saharan-Africa-Or-people-from-Europe
becasue we had a civil war over it. We nearly had a civil war over immigration during the depression. We nearly had a civil war in the 60’s over it. And we’re very close to having a civil war over it today.
Why? PEOPLE VOTE BY RACE
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Americans-love-classifying-their-people-based-on-their-race-Why-dont-they-just-coexist-without-minding-ones-race-at-all
—”What is the minimum average group IQ needed before civilization can independently arise? Base your answer on an IQ test normed for today’s population.”—-
RULES:
1) Pareto always rules. 20% of the people always (and must) control 80% of the assets in order to organize a polity into voluntary (non slave/serf) production. Cities are markets are markets are formed by trade, and trade requires volition, and markets and volition make innovation possible if not only because the incentive exists.
2) Roughly speaking you need the top 20% of your population able to calculate in whatever means of calculation is available to you, in law, in accounts, in seasons, etc.
3) Empirically it appears that it’s pretty hard unless 20% is above 95 (the ability to learn by being taught without extraordinary repetition by the teacher), Above 105 to repair a system or a machine or a tool. Above 115 to learn by reading. About 122 to invent a machine or tool. A above 130 to synthesize new ideas and communicate them. Above 140 to originate an idea in the market for ideas. Although I think that limit is now approaching 150.
4) It depends greatly upon the means of economic productivity available to the population. lowest IQ’s for pastoral, higher for agrarian, higher for commercial, higher for industrial, higher for technological and assumedly higher for post technological. Worse, as technology increases the value of lower IQ’s decreases. Worse, as the distribution of technology increases, the value of lower IQ’s decreases (this is the world’s next upcoming great disaster – if it isn’t already).
5) If you can import knowledge of 140’s, 130’s 120’s into your group then you can benefit from the knoweldge and technollgy invented elsewhere.
6) what appears today, is that it is extremely difficult to modernize a country today with IQ’s under 97, and I think the real number is 105. The reason being that the window of opportunity for those countries to modernize and develop middle class (market) behaviors because of their ability to import institutions and technologies and knowledge, has passed. (I’m almost certain of it). BTW: thank the communists for destroying that window of opportunity. If your country has an aggregate IQ under 97, and certainly if it is below 90, it will be very difficult, for the simple reason that ther eis no human capital unused in relation to the available means of producing the profitability necessary to create a voluntary organization of production (market economy and a middle class to run it.)
7) as far as I know the primary competitive asset a country has going forward is a) homogeneity, b) median IQ >105, and a militia army dedicated to protecting both. That means china/korea/japan win. Europe could have but between immigration and civil war we have already (I’ve talked to the leading people about this repeatedly), lost something on the order of half to one standard deviation between 1800 and today through asymmetric reproduction. And we have lost the rest between 1965 and today through immigration.
Cheers.
Knowledge is not always pleasant.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-minimum-average-group-IQ-needed-before-civilization-can-independently-arise-Base-your-answer-on-an-IQ-test-normed-for-today’s-population
INTERESTING QUESTION WITH WHAT I BELIEVE IS A SIMPLE ANSWER
Um, it’s pretty interesting but (a) EAST Asians have succeeded in higher pedomorphism (retention of childhood features) resulting in the obvious lower sexual development in both males and females, and lower levels of testosterone. (b) east asians evolved out of an earlier branch of homo sapiens just as western europeans (‘whites’) did. and this branch has had less interference from outside genes due to the isolation of eastern asia by desert, mountain, and sea. This allows greater correction of genetic variations – at least prior to rice farming. (c) a lot of it has to do with the skin, which we have to admit, white people are at a disadvantage in compared to africans and east asians.
The optimum genetic position is to freeze maturity at the minimum point of fertility, and this appears to have been achieved in east asia.
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Asians-barely-age
For profit. Why do you think? Have you been to africa? Have you seen those cultures? Particularly the Muslim ones? They are the inverse of ours. Stealing on behalf of your family is heroic. The golden rule is not only not admired, but not known, not observed, and antithetical to survival.
People actually believe this marxist-postmodernist nonsense – it is exasperating. Look. People act rationally at all times which means they are immoral if it is profitable and they can get away with it. It’s just increasingly difficult tog et away with it because consumers are more profitable than slaves, serfs, and the poor.
The world does not run by moral sentiments, but by caloric returns – just like the rest of the universe. And it must or we would not exist.
https://www.quora.com/Why-did-a-black-man-arrest-a-fellow-black-man-put-him-in-chains-and-give-him-to-the-white-man-to-go-and-sell-across-the-ocean-in-the-18-19th-centuries