Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • –“Q: What Kind Of Monster Are You?”—

    –“Q: WHAT KIND OF MONSTER ARE YOU?”— Given the opportunity I would make Stalin and Mao look like Father Christmas and Krampus. Noose, pike, guillotine, and pyre. And let the gods sort them out. 😉 (not really, but the shock value in context was priceless).

  • Accusations Of Racism

    All accusations of racism are just forms of gossip and shaming in order to obscure pursuit of political power without earning it through market means. Disapproval, shaming, gossiping, rallying, protesting, and propagandism are means by which the inadequate attempt to reduce the superior sexual, social, economic, and political market value of their superiors. It’s the industrialization through media of politics of pubescent girls, employed by infantile minds unable to ascend into the responsibilities of adulthood.

  • Accusations Of Racism

    All accusations of racism are just forms of gossip and shaming in order to obscure pursuit of political power without earning it through market means. Disapproval, shaming, gossiping, rallying, protesting, and propagandism are means by which the inadequate attempt to reduce the superior sexual, social, economic, and political market value of their superiors. It’s the industrialization through media of politics of pubescent girls, employed by infantile minds unable to ascend into the responsibilities of adulthood.

  • —“Why Do People Take An Interest In Racism?”—

    —“WHY DO PEOPLE TAKE AN INTEREST IN RACISM?”— Because race, subrace, tribe, and class are meaningful and successful means of identifying kin, and the vast majority of us associate with, work with, vote with, reproduce with, kin, because the problem of signaling, trusting, risk and cost of doing so is lower than that of non-kin – and the outliers (15%) are at the extremes where their sexual-social-economic market value is vastly lower, or vastly higher than the mean of their kin group. And it’s good for each to do so. Diversity (Miscegenation) is extremely bad for genes except on the margins (low sexual and social market value). Because they cannot easily be corrected through ingroup selection. All accusations of racism are just forms of gossip and shaming in order to obscure pursuit of political power without earning it through market means. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • —“Why Do People Take An Interest In Racism?”—

    —“WHY DO PEOPLE TAKE AN INTEREST IN RACISM?”— Because race, subrace, tribe, and class are meaningful and successful means of identifying kin, and the vast majority of us associate with, work with, vote with, reproduce with, kin, because the problem of signaling, trusting, risk and cost of doing so is lower than that of non-kin – and the outliers (15%) are at the extremes where their sexual-social-economic market value is vastly lower, or vastly higher than the mean of their kin group. And it’s good for each to do so. Diversity (Miscegenation) is extremely bad for genes except on the margins (low sexual and social market value). Because they cannot easily be corrected through ingroup selection. All accusations of racism are just forms of gossip and shaming in order to obscure pursuit of political power without earning it through market means. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Again, The Liar’s Paradox Isn’t A Paradox

    The term is “The Liar’s Paradox”, and its variants. Arthur Prior does a weak job of correctly explaining why it isn’t a paradox. I’ll explain why it’s not a paradox in detail if anyone is interested. The Liar’s Paradox illustrates the difference between math, logic, reason, and science, and difference between platonism vs operationalism, and the difference between well formed and malformed statements in colloquial grammar, ordinary language grammar, vs deflationary grammars. Or stated differently, the grammatical structure of the statement relies on ordinary language grammar, while the question refers to formal, legal,or logical grammar. For example, you can draw the square root of two, you can apply the square root of two in calculation or construction, but you cannot calculate it itself. And for the same reason.

  • Again, The Liar’s Paradox Isn’t A Paradox

    The term is “The Liar’s Paradox”, and its variants. Arthur Prior does a weak job of correctly explaining why it isn’t a paradox. I’ll explain why it’s not a paradox in detail if anyone is interested. The Liar’s Paradox illustrates the difference between math, logic, reason, and science, and difference between platonism vs operationalism, and the difference between well formed and malformed statements in colloquial grammar, ordinary language grammar, vs deflationary grammars. Or stated differently, the grammatical structure of the statement relies on ordinary language grammar, while the question refers to formal, legal,or logical grammar. For example, you can draw the square root of two, you can apply the square root of two in calculation or construction, but you cannot calculate it itself. And for the same reason.

  • Do Japanese Have Caucasian Blood?

    No, although it is somewhat interesting that the Turks were from northern china, originally, and that there are some similarities between Turkish and Japanese language.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-Japanese-have-caucasian-blood

  • Did Products And Home Appliances Last More In The Soviet Union Than In The Capitalistic World?

    Great posts. The decline in durability of goods, and the replacement of durability with signals goods. I’ll put it in economic terms:

    Markets, like Democracy, when combined with cheap consumer credit, produce ever cheaper results with ever higher signal value, until they drive out all quality and durability. This is a universal law of economics. So the problem is not so much capitalism or markets, but cheap consumer credit. (really).

    Soviet Military goods were produced to be cheap, durable, and easy to use, and easy to repair, but not necessarily comfortable. The consumer goods followed this design strategy. And when you are trying to rapidly modernize a ‘backward’ economy, it’s actually a fantastic strategy.

    The only problem I see is that it was fairly obvious fairly early, that correcting a backward economy is *all* that centralization can do, and that changing from near-non-existent industrialism, to industrialism can in fact be done, but the change from industrial production to markets and incentives is eventually necessary.

    The soviets did some good things too. I still prefer Ukrainian and Russian culture to my own

    https://www.quora.com/Did-products-and-home-appliances-last-more-in-the-Soviet-Union-than-in-the-capitalistic-world

  • Could You Outline The Differences Between Marxism And Communism?

    Technically speaking,

    1) communism consists of equidistribution of goods, services, and labor by purely voluntary means. Communism is achieved through socialism.

    2) socialism is the stage under which the state (priests) centralizes all production, distribution, and trade (cooperation), until it is no longer necessary (heaven) and people merely consume what they need and produce what they need, because they are finally of good character for some reason (they are in heaven).

    Socialism destroys private property, the capacity to produce incentives, and the capacity to produce prices, and as such the ability to organize invention, production, distribution, and trade – and worse it’s dysgenic.

    Social democracy evolved when we understood that it was not possible to control production distribution and trade, but instead, for the state to maximize takings to the point where people continued to work. Economists have tried to calculate this number forever, but they believe in a homogenous population it might be between 50% and 70%. (I think that’s dependent upon a very ignorant populace with very extraordinary wealth that is only possible in periods of global circumstances that allow windfalls (like postwar western civ). ).

    Classical liberalism evolved when we understood that we were wealthy enough due to increasing trade, to prevent the rent seeking of the landed nobility, and to institutionalize the church’s traditional responsibilities by centralizing taxation rather than splitting taxes between the church and the state.

    Anarchism evolved when we understood that other than rule of law, and constitutional monarchy, all roads lead to despotism, corruption, and poverty.

    What we didn’t expect was that it would lead to our genocide.

    SPECTRUM:
    Communism – no property -no possibility

    Socialism – no property – virtual slavery- and centralization of production of commons.

    Social democracy – property but no retention of profits – and central production of commons.

    Classical liberalism – property and retention of profits and very limited central production of commons .

    Anarchism = property and retention of profits but no commons, and no state – an impossibility.

    https://www.quora.com/Could-you-outline-the-differences-between-Marxism-and-Communism