—“I could be off base on this, but are your referring specifically to various forms of Jewish mysticism and Jews themselves? (medieval Kabbalah, Neo-Hassidism, etc..). Or the influence of Abrahamic traditions (starting with Jews) in general?”— Via Twitter
1) I am referring to a conflationary grammar and semantics, that we call ‘fictionalism’, that appears to have originated in Pilpul, and when exposed to greek rationalism, evolved into Rabbinical Judaism>Christianity>Islam>and the French, German, and Jewish counter-enlightenments.
2) Jewish law retained Pilpul (The verbal equivalent of numerology, and astrology applied to theology). While (thankfully) western law retained empiricism (Tort). Over time, the Lawyers cum philosophers saved us where the theologians cum philosophers failed.
3) Pilpul (Abrahamism) is necessary to preserve (a) the intertemporal falsehood of divine authority in the face of adaptive circumstances, and (b) the polylogism of Jewish poly ethical (unethical) law. While western law is empirically consistent with progressive fines.
4) The only difference between Abrahamism (Pilpul>Judaism> Christianity>Islam>Marxism>Socialism> Postmodernism > Feminism is just the transformation from supernatural and theological to pseudoscientific and pseudo rational: destroy aristocracy and meritocracy by fictionalism.
5) Jewish group evolutionary strategy consists of institutionalizing the (Pastoral) female group evolutionary strategy: Equalitarianism against the (Territorial) male group evolutionary strategy: Aristocracy. Feminine Dysgenic vs Masculine Eugenic.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Intolerance is the highest virtue – because it means you are willing to pay the
Intolerance is the highest virtue – because it means you are willing to pay the cost of defending the informational, normative, and institutional commons. -
Intolerance is the highest virtue – because it means you are willing to pay the
Intolerance is the highest virtue – because it means you are willing to pay the cost of defending the informational, normative, and institutional commons. -
The origin of sovereignty, liberty, freedom, insurance, and subsidy is VIOLENCE
The origin of sovereignty, liberty, freedom, insurance, and subsidy is VIOLENCE to determine that order. -
The origin of sovereignty, liberty, freedom, insurance, and subsidy is VIOLENCE
The origin of sovereignty, liberty, freedom, insurance, and subsidy is VIOLENCE to determine that order. -
We Are The Chosen
We are the people chosen by the gods to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, child mortality, early death, the whims of tyranny of the vicissitudes of nature. (((They))) created the Abrahamic Dark Age that lasted a thousand years. Not because we claim it. But because we DEMONSTRATE it. -
We Are The Chosen
We are the people chosen by the gods to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, child mortality, early death, the whims of tyranny of the vicissitudes of nature. (((They))) created the Abrahamic Dark Age that lasted a thousand years. Not because we claim it. But because we DEMONSTRATE it. -
Rabbits are expendable. Chickens are expendable, Cats are expendable. Dogs are e
Rabbits are expendable. Chickens are expendable, Cats are expendable. Dogs are expendable. Humans are also expendable, but we do not want people who would expire humans among us. We talk via-positive about the victim, but the reason is to limit via-negative the predator. We cannot cooperate with a dog. It is sentient, borderline conscious, and certainly not rational. And therefore it cannot possess or make use of ‘rights’. So while we would not people among us who cause suffering to animals, and while we would not want our dogs to suffer, that is a question of constraining in-group behavior, not out-group defense. -
Rabbits are expendable. Chickens are expendable, Cats are expendable. Dogs are e
Rabbits are expendable. Chickens are expendable, Cats are expendable. Dogs are expendable. Humans are also expendable, but we do not want people who would expire humans among us. We talk via-positive about the victim, but the reason is to limit via-negative the predator. We cannot cooperate with a dog. It is sentient, borderline conscious, and certainly not rational. And therefore it cannot possess or make use of ‘rights’. So while we would not people among us who cause suffering to animals, and while we would not want our dogs to suffer, that is a question of constraining in-group behavior, not out-group defense. -
Muslims: “Behead those who insult us!” *Kills innocent people on the streets* Le
Muslims: “Behead those who insult us!” *Kills innocent people on the streets* Leftists: “Kill fascists! Punch Nazis!” *Assaults people on the streets* Right-Wingers: “It’s OK to be White.” *Hosts a rally. Gives a speech* Media: “Right-Wing extremism is our greatest threat.” -Blair Cottrell (Aus.)