Source: Original Site Post

  • Every Kin Group Seeks Supremacism

    EVERY KIN GROUP’S CONSERVATIVES(MALES) ADVOCATE SUPREMACISM
     
    (a) White Supremacism – like Jewish supremacism, Russian Supremacism, Muslim Supremacism, Hindu Supremacism, Chinese Supremacism, and Japanese supremacism, is a demonstration of kin selection. However white supremacism is by our intellectual, scientific, technological, normative, social, and political rates achievement in both the ancient and modern worlds, and our lack of similar rapid advancement in the Abrahamic Dark Age.
     
    (b) We have known that man has continuously whitened in the northern climates for years – just as he has continuously darkened in african climes.
     
    (c) We have known for years the process of ‘whitening’ began 20k years ago – and has been reversing since white people internlinked the world through rapid transportation during the age of sail.
     
    (d) We have known for the past few years that the Yamna expansion did not integrate but replaced prior generations of proto europeans with modern european-indo-iranians.
     
    (e) we are discovering through genetic analysis that our superiority is biological: we have succeeded at greater pedomorphic evolution by variation in endocrine expression during in utero, ex utero, and later development, and the lifelong expressions of that pedomorphism – which is why we have lower testosterone, are more tolerant, less clannish, and are the highest trust people on earth, and the only people to develop a high trust, territorial, capital intensive, commons-intensive, civilization. Period.
     
    And all kin groups, whether tribe, nation, or race, seek their superiority as an expression of evolutionary necessity –
    without which groups would not identify opportunities to exploit and evolve to seize them.
     
    The Marxist-postmodern pseudo-scientific century is over. Man is no different from any other animal in that breeds express genetic traits. And all we see between abrahamic and western arguments, is the scientific western male evolutionary, and the rhetorical female devolutionary expressions of those genes.
     
    What has happened is that while it has taken seventy years of hard work, despite active suppression of academic research SCIENCE has proven us right, and we are armed with that science. And that is the reason we are winning.
     
    Because western man originated science, and remains scientific if for no other reason than his origins are technological: expansion through the combination of horse, wheel, bronze, language, and truthful (empirical) testimony.
     
    No More Dark Ages. The First Abrahamic equalitarian counter-enlightenment caused a thousand year dark age and so far 500M lives.
     
    The Second Abrahamic Egalitarian Counter-Enlightenment begins with Rousseau, to Kant and the Continental School, to Marx, Freud, Boaz, Cantor, and the Frankfurt School, and back to the french for the Postmodern and Feminist School – with nothing but Counter-evidence, Counter-history, Counter-Truth, Counter-Reason, and outright propagandism and lying.
     
    We will succeed at defeating the Second Abrahamic Dark Age, in its marxist-communist pseudoscientific, postmodern-equalitarian pseudo-rational, and Islamic theological (magical) school.
     
    We will do so by demonstrating our SUPERIORITY in Truth, Reason, Science, Technology, Law, Institutions, Norms, and traditions. Because in the end our tradition is truth and correspondence with reality – and that, and our genes, are our competitive advantage. An advantage unequalled among the tribes, nations, and races.
     
    Curt Doolittle,
    The Propertarian Institute,
    Kiev Ukraine
  • (You have to make a relationship through exchange. The problem is finding two pe

    (You have to make a relationship through exchange. The problem is finding two people who have something to exchange with the other. Like trade, that makes more than existed otherwise, a relationship makes both of you more than you were otherwise.)
  • (You have to make a relationship through exchange. The problem is finding two pe

    (You have to make a relationship through exchange. The problem is finding two people who have something to exchange with the other. Like trade, that makes more than existed otherwise, a relationship makes both of you more than you were otherwise.)
  • Correct. About 20k for morphology, and about 5-8k for skin and hair, and about 4

    Correct. About 20k for morphology, and about 5-8k for skin and hair, and about 4-5000 for the most recent expansion, with Poland-Ukraine-russians being the least outbred, except for northern russians who have a significant finnic (western polar) component. Studying East asians is extremely interesting – parallels are unmistakable. If a civilization (race, subrace, tribes) went thru the meatgrinder of ice age hunter gathering and winter farming, they lost their underclasses. If they went thru manorialism they are left with only middle classes. Downward redistribution of reproduction in both far east and far west.
  • Correct. About 20k for morphology, and about 5-8k for skin and hair, and about 4

    Correct. About 20k for morphology, and about 5-8k for skin and hair, and about 4-5000 for the most recent expansion, with Poland-Ukraine-russians being the least outbred, except for northern russians who have a significant finnic (western polar) component. Studying East asians is extremely interesting – parallels are unmistakable. If a civilization (race, subrace, tribes) went thru the meatgrinder of ice age hunter gathering and winter farming, they lost their underclasses. If they went thru manorialism they are left with only middle classes. Downward redistribution of reproduction in both far east and far west.
  • Quarterly Reminder.

    Um. I’m pro natural law; pro my people; pro humanity; and pro transcendence; Yes, I will dig on genetic differences, biological differences, genetic differences, cultural differences, class, gender, and racial differences. Yes I will make objective analysis of the those differences. I will work to destroy the cherished lies of every race, civilization, culture, nation, tribe, and class. And I will crush those lies with some sense of both desperation, conviction and joy. But I don’t do racism. I hate on parasitism, predation, and the use of fictionalism to justify it. But I don’t hate on people. I fault my people for not using their superiority to defend against the group evolutionary strategies of other groups. I fault my people for failing to rule and rule well. I fault my people for intellectual folly and dishonesty. I advocate nationalism, tribalism, and natural law of reciprocity and markets in everything for all human beings. And as many nations as it takes to transcend all humans through the gradual improvement of all and the gradual reduction of the underclasses that prohibit our transcendence. I don’t like hating on people. It’s not Christian and therefore not European. And not even Aryan. The beauty of christianity is that it seeks to extirpate all hatred from the human heart. And once extirpated we are free to use reason, with clear minds and clear judgement. I have no problem with war, murder, violence and destruction. i have no problem with rule, punishment, and if necessary incarceration or enslavement. I have a problem with hatred. A problem with deception. And a problem with any order other than the laws of nature, the natural law of reciprocity, and the transcendence of man. Curt Doolittle The Natural Law of Reciprocity The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
  • Quarterly Reminder.

    Um. I’m pro natural law; pro my people; pro humanity; and pro transcendence; Yes, I will dig on genetic differences, biological differences, genetic differences, cultural differences, class, gender, and racial differences. Yes I will make objective analysis of the those differences. I will work to destroy the cherished lies of every race, civilization, culture, nation, tribe, and class. And I will crush those lies with some sense of both desperation, conviction and joy. But I don’t do racism. I hate on parasitism, predation, and the use of fictionalism to justify it. But I don’t hate on people. I fault my people for not using their superiority to defend against the group evolutionary strategies of other groups. I fault my people for failing to rule and rule well. I fault my people for intellectual folly and dishonesty. I advocate nationalism, tribalism, and natural law of reciprocity and markets in everything for all human beings. And as many nations as it takes to transcend all humans through the gradual improvement of all and the gradual reduction of the underclasses that prohibit our transcendence. I don’t like hating on people. It’s not Christian and therefore not European. And not even Aryan. The beauty of christianity is that it seeks to extirpate all hatred from the human heart. And once extirpated we are free to use reason, with clear minds and clear judgement. I have no problem with war, murder, violence and destruction. i have no problem with rule, punishment, and if necessary incarceration or enslavement. I have a problem with hatred. A problem with deception. And a problem with any order other than the laws of nature, the natural law of reciprocity, and the transcendence of man. Curt Doolittle The Natural Law of Reciprocity The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
  • Let Me Repeat: I Don’t Care About Race, But Class.

    Any man who will fight with me to advance the interests of his kin, without imposing costs upon mine, and visa versa, is a brother in arms against the abrahamic underclass counter-enlightenment. Let a thousand nations bloom.
  • Let Me Repeat: I Don’t Care About Race, But Class.

    Any man who will fight with me to advance the interests of his kin, without imposing costs upon mine, and visa versa, is a brother in arms against the abrahamic underclass counter-enlightenment. Let a thousand nations bloom.
  • “Just like ‘intelligent design’ vs ‘evolution’ …. why limit yourself to just o

    —“Just like ‘intelligent design’ vs ‘evolution’ …. why limit yourself to just one?”— Tristan Roberts “Truth vs Lie, That is why.” The universe is deterministic in that it consists of invariant and therefore non-discretionary rules. Intention of any kind requires discretion. As far as I know the universe consist of a single something in different stages of excitement, the combination of which produces. One is existential (descriptive), and the other is a fiction (analogy). One is possible (permutations on frequencies), and one isimpossible (cognition would need to arise from ‘somewhere else’ other than the deterministic consequences of the universe itself. Even the periodic exterminations on the planet are the result of passing thru the higher density of the galactic median. The primary advancement in all human thought is to replace our intuition of discretion with mere determinism of constitution. But people want their comforting lies for very obvious reasons.