Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Do You Think Community Activism Serves A Realistic Purpose?

    The purpose of community activism – was intentionaly developed to undermine western civilization. it has served the realistic purpose of destroying the homogenous, familial, hard working culture that was america prior to 1960 and the postmodernist invasion via the university system from France.

    https://www.quora.com/Do-you-think-community-activism-serves-a-realistic-purpose

  • “You’re in a position of power in a fictional state, tasked with designing your

    —“You’re in a position of power in a fictional state, tasked with designing your own variant of the Nuremberg laws, as well as immigration policy. What’s the required vetted minimum IQ for migrants and citizens reaching the age of majority, among other requirements in maintains a viable polity?”— It depends upon two factors: a) a relative measurement: your existing median. and b) an absolute measurement: I work with the rule of thumb of approx 106 being the line of demarcation between those who can solve problems (fix machines, learn from manuals rather than instruction) and those who cannot. I don’t see any reason why you’d immigrate anyone who wasn’t a full standard deviation above your mean. In that case, i’d say 115 if the person has money and is of good character. Above 122 regardless of money. Above 130 and of good character they are going to contribute.

  • “You’re in a position of power in a fictional state, tasked with designing your

    —“You’re in a position of power in a fictional state, tasked with designing your own variant of the Nuremberg laws, as well as immigration policy. What’s the required vetted minimum IQ for migrants and citizens reaching the age of majority, among other requirements in maintains a viable polity?”— It depends upon two factors: a) a relative measurement: your existing median. and b) an absolute measurement: I work with the rule of thumb of approx 106 being the line of demarcation between those who can solve problems (fix machines, learn from manuals rather than instruction) and those who cannot. I don’t see any reason why you’d immigrate anyone who wasn’t a full standard deviation above your mean. In that case, i’d say 115 if the person has money and is of good character. Above 122 regardless of money. Above 130 and of good character they are going to contribute.

  • Untitled

    http://www.wnd.com/2018/03/fatal-delusions-of-western-man/

  • Untitled

    http://www.wnd.com/2018/03/fatal-delusions-of-western-man/

  • Women need to feel others, like men need to fire gaze. Same Need, Different Stim

    Women need to feel others, like men need to fire gaze. Same Need, Different Stimuli.

  • Women need to feel others, like men need to fire gaze. Same Need, Different Stim

    Women need to feel others, like men need to fire gaze. Same Need, Different Stimuli.

  • The Process Of Communication Ends With Disambiguation

    THE PROCESS OF COMMUNICATION ENDS WITH DISAMBIGUATION (due diligence) — “we need both fiction and science” — John Dow Well that’s the argument I make right? That we TEACH (transfer relations) and IMITATE by fictions, but that we JUDGE and DEDUCE from SCIENCE. Via positiva ‘fictions’ and via negativa ‘truth’. The problem then becomes limiting the fictions to fictions rather than fictionalism. In other words, stories (literature, myth, parable) and not pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism (which is the most … seductive because it requires the least knowledge), and pseudo-history. In other words, the grammar of continuous disambiguation (universal grammar) of any neural network (category generating hierarchy) requires that we create analogies to transfer relations (communicate) then disambiguate them as defense against fraud (and error). Language requires continuous disambiguation. But it does not end with communication -it ends with deflation, and disambiguation of that which has been communicated.

  • The Process Of Communication Ends With Disambiguation

    THE PROCESS OF COMMUNICATION ENDS WITH DISAMBIGUATION (due diligence) — “we need both fiction and science” — John Dow Well that’s the argument I make right? That we TEACH (transfer relations) and IMITATE by fictions, but that we JUDGE and DEDUCE from SCIENCE. Via positiva ‘fictions’ and via negativa ‘truth’. The problem then becomes limiting the fictions to fictions rather than fictionalism. In other words, stories (literature, myth, parable) and not pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism (which is the most … seductive because it requires the least knowledge), and pseudo-history. In other words, the grammar of continuous disambiguation (universal grammar) of any neural network (category generating hierarchy) requires that we create analogies to transfer relations (communicate) then disambiguate them as defense against fraud (and error). Language requires continuous disambiguation. But it does not end with communication -it ends with deflation, and disambiguation of that which has been communicated.

  • Untitled

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5443599/White-South-African-farmers-removed-land.html#ixzz58VXEVgp7