Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • ‘WHITE’ SUPERIORITY IS A FACT (Here Is Why) White superiority is a fact. White s

    ‘WHITE’ SUPERIORITY IS A FACT (Here Is Why)

    White superiority is a fact. White supremacy is a code word for dragging mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, poverty starvation and disease. So we must separate so that dysgenic left and eugenic right can go our separate ways. 😉

    -“Curt, European civilization has contributed greatly. But did you know that other cultures have too?”-@factandrumor

    What kind of fallacy are you trying to make use of by asking that question?

    -“Which fallacy?”-

    So you don’t know which fallacy you’re making use of?

    -“Dude, if you can’t state your accusation clearly, then you don’t have one. So state it or move on.”-

    a) a variation on the false equivalency fallacy, suggesting that because other civilizations produced innovations that they are quantitatively or qualitatively competitively causal.
    b) variation on GSRRM fallacy of denial by implied ad hom.
    c) variation on NAXALT fallacy.

    The reason for the west’s disproportional success is the normative institutionalization of truth-before-face, martial reporting, testimonial speech under realism, naturalism, and operationalism. Combining sovereignty, reciprocity, and markets in law produced hyper adaptation.

    No other people solved, normalized, or institutionalized truth-before-face – let alone, realism, naturalism, operationalism, and adversarialism. Every other civilization sought not to discover and adapt to but to evade the formal, physical, behavioral, evolutionary laws.

    That’s why Europeans discovered all but one or two percent of all innovations in history.

    Other peoples can adopt ‘whiteness’ – meaning the european scientific civilizational order – if they (a) equally impose rule of law, (b) equally limit the reproduction of the underclasses until (c) they produce equivalent to a 100+ IQ (Neoteny) distribution and a majority genetic, cultural, and economic middle class.

    There is a reason they can’t or dont: the false promise of democracy prohibits it.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-18 13:26:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105752479910496127

  • @Afterrthought @ramzpaul @TheZBlog (that’s quotable. well done.)

    @Afterrthought@ramzpaul@TheZBlog (that’s quotable. well done.)

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-18 02:31:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105749906348693766

  • TRAINING THE ANIMAL HUMAN FOR SOCIALIZATION UNDER TRIFUNCTIONALISM The Military

    TRAINING THE ANIMAL HUMAN FOR SOCIALIZATION UNDER TRIFUNCTIONALISM

    The Military trains through action and cooperation producing the extremes of agency in a condition of aggression. Religion trains by repetition and socialization in a condition of non-aggression producing the extreme of piety (humility). The Law teaches you truthful, reciprocally beneficial competition for opportunities brought about by our proximity and division of labor. Together, all three produce cooperation, conscientiousness, agency, and mindfulness, in the individual regardless of natural ability.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-17 16:25:14 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105747520860317680

  • @Epictetus @tomfcreo (well done)

    @Epictetus@tomfcreo (well done)

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-17 16:20:35 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105747502594002165

  • ARE THERE ANY (WHITE) EUROPEAN MALES LEFT? The only thing that demarcates wester

    ARE THERE ANY (WHITE) EUROPEAN MALES LEFT?

    The only thing that demarcates western civ from all others is the militia – the Army of every single man – with the faith serving to limit their militarism to the political and isolating social and familial affairs.
    Faith is regulator not cause. The militia, the army, is cause.

    If they went to military school, and were taught military fitness, military, discipline, overcame their infantilism, and learned military history, basic economics, and war then they would be europeans.

    This is what I mean by purity spiraling. I don’t believe white males are european. They are wearing the identity of ‘stolen valor’ – as if they served in the military, when they are just children wearing identity-costumes of european aristocracy they have not earned.

    They aren’t european. Only the aristocracy ever was.

    So when Christians pretend they have value and like women should be courted I laugh at their ‘stolen valor’. If you need more than Kin, Country, Nation and Tradition, such that you put regulatory faith before competitive war then you’re the enemy’s acolyte – not European.

    -“Thought about this more today. Possibly the most blackpilled observation you’ve published.”-Tom Creo @tomfcreo

    Only by bringing imagination into correspondence with reality do we deprive the weak of the pretense of capability, conviction, morality, honor, or status that masks their cowardice, laziness, and absence of virtue such they are left with no choice but to earn them by action.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-17 13:45:30 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105746892780480027

  • Is Economics A Science? No. But it Can Be – By Converting from Via Positiva to Via Negativa.

    I could give a similar lecture that would reduce economics to a science, and my claims would be obvious, and obviously true, and they would terrify the audience. In large part, economics is a pseudoscience that tries to circumvent the laws of the universe just as do philosophy and religion, when the underlying science is rather simple: The demographic composition and distribution of a people, the institutional sequence and time necessary to produce rule of law of natural law, by the incremental suppression of irreciprocity, resulting in the highest trust, least friction in an economy at whatever of level of effort (work hours) the population prefers in exchange for its standard of living (consumption). What’s the problem? markets perform natural selection if they can suppress reproduction of the unfit for markets, and democratic politics suppress natural selection until the population’s abilty to maintain pace with competitors eliminates the possibility of redistributions by investments in commons. In other words, the only long-term variable that maintains competitive advantage is human capital and the single most important human capital is the combination of intelligence and conscientiousness both of which are the result of neotenic evolution by natural selection for cooperation in increasingly complex markets. Or in simple form: economic science is and always will be limited to the measurement of the success of institutions in producing human capital by adherence to the logical, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws of the universe by the implementation of rule of law, markets, and meritocratic reproduction. Now try to sell that inescapable scientific law of the universe under democracy, the entire function of which appears to be to use fiat credit to evade the laws of the universe, and return us to Malthusian limits. That’s the science. So like I said, what we call positive economics is an attempt to cheat mother nature and it’s just never going to happen. The only economic science is like the law, negative: eliminating what we should NOT do.

  • Is Economics A Science? No. But it Can Be – By Converting from Via Positiva to Via Negativa.

    I could give a similar lecture that would reduce economics to a science, and my claims would be obvious, and obviously true, and they would terrify the audience. In large part, economics is a pseudoscience that tries to circumvent the laws of the universe just as do philosophy and religion, when the underlying science is rather simple: The demographic composition and distribution of a people, the institutional sequence and time necessary to produce rule of law of natural law, by the incremental suppression of irreciprocity, resulting in the highest trust, least friction in an economy at whatever of level of effort (work hours) the population prefers in exchange for its standard of living (consumption). What’s the problem? markets perform natural selection if they can suppress reproduction of the unfit for markets, and democratic politics suppress natural selection until the population’s abilty to maintain pace with competitors eliminates the possibility of redistributions by investments in commons. In other words, the only long-term variable that maintains competitive advantage is human capital and the single most important human capital is the combination of intelligence and conscientiousness both of which are the result of neotenic evolution by natural selection for cooperation in increasingly complex markets. Or in simple form: economic science is and always will be limited to the measurement of the success of institutions in producing human capital by adherence to the logical, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws of the universe by the implementation of rule of law, markets, and meritocratic reproduction. Now try to sell that inescapable scientific law of the universe under democracy, the entire function of which appears to be to use fiat credit to evade the laws of the universe, and return us to Malthusian limits. That’s the science. So like I said, what we call positive economics is an attempt to cheat mother nature and it’s just never going to happen. The only economic science is like the law, negative: eliminating what we should NOT do.

  • Defining Conservatism In Scientific Terms

    CONSERVATISM UNDERSTOOD

    1. A conservative questions the overestimation of reason, and above all questions consensus. Conservatism is familial, stoic, pragmatic, and empirical. In other words risk averse to capital.

    2. As a means of questioning, a conservative requires reciprocity (tort): american < british < anglo saxon < germanic < european < norther indo european in law. That law evolved from the oath (tell the truth, never steal, never flee, in combat).

    3. A Conservative requires ‘empirical’ results – and where empirical fails, the ‘traditional’ is adequate, since traditional survived empirical tests in competition in reality.

    4. A Conservative accumulates genetic, cultural, normative, institutional, physical, and territorial capital – attempting to pass on to future generations of his family, more than he himself inherited.

    5. Conservatism is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy that increases accumulated capital through intergenerational transfer, using intergeneration lending, in order to produce increasingly ‘noble’ families.

    6. Ergo successful individuals in the market for craftsmanship, successful purchase of the franchise through military service, successful individuals in the market for marriage and child rearing, successful individuals in the market for industry, successful families in the market for noble (intergenerational) families.

    7. In other words, conservatism(aristocracy) is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy. And while bipartite manorialism was practiced from 700, and aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year after 1000, and an attempt to escape church-state nobility, and create an entrepreneurial nobility (meritocracy), succeeded by 1600, there was a great reaction to the english revolution, and a greater reaction to the french revolution. Thus while Locke,smith,hume,adams, and jefferson promised an aristocracy available to everyone, Burke, after the french revolution, and germans after that, recognized that the peasantry was even worse at rule (see russia) than the nobility.

    The problem with today’s conservatism is that darwin and spencer were famous before the war, after the second world war, conservatism and eugenics were effectively banned from discourse, academy, and science.

    As such conservatives never (until perhaps 2000) restored empirical discourse to conservatism, because eugenics are antithetical to the experiment with democracy. This changed incrementally beginning in 76, through the 80s, and aggressively since 2000, and more aggressively since 2008.

    1 – Soveriengty requires reciprocity

    2 – Reciprocity requires rule of law (tort), jury(thang, senate, house of lords, supreme court), and an independent judiciary.

    3 – Rule of law forces markets, since it incrementally suppresses each innovation in parasitism.

    4 – Markets cause hierarchies, because they are necessary to voluntarily organize production.

    5 – Markets are eugenic, because they are empirical means of testing industry and impulse.

    6 – But they make possible liberty for those with property, freedom for those who labor, and subsidy for those who impose no costs on sovereignty, liberty, freedom, or property.**

    DOMESTICATION Man domesticated the human animal after he had learned to domesticate the non-human animal. And he did so by the same means. And the result in both domestication of the human and non human animal is the same: eugenics.

    CONSERVATIVES Most conservatives do not write philosophy, they run businesses, or write history, economics, science, and law. (I write because I was successful enough in multiple businesses to spend my time writing full time.) Conservatives also are actively suppressed in academy and media.

    This has been true since the end of the war and teh rise of the Frankfurt School, and the Postmodern school, both of which were necessary after the failure of marxist pseudoscience. (a pseudoscience marx died knowing, since he stopped writing as soon as he read the Mengerians, and kept silent only to keep the checks coming in from Engels.)

    AUTHORS TO READ Burke, Hayek, Burnham, Sowell, Buchanan, Murray, and maybe Nietzsche. Veblen. (The essayists are nonsense) Anyone in Hoover or Heritage institutions.

    READING LIST Propertarianism’s Reading List (https://propertarianism.com/reading-list/).

    My reading list (above) contains most of the science we’ve been looking for, while the pseudosciences dominated the mid to late 20th century under the marxist-postmodernists.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.

  • Defining Conservatism In Scientific Terms

    CONSERVATISM UNDERSTOOD

    1. A conservative questions the overestimation of reason, and above all questions consensus. Conservatism is familial, stoic, pragmatic, and empirical. In other words risk averse to capital.

    2. As a means of questioning, a conservative requires reciprocity (tort): american < british < anglo saxon < germanic < european < norther indo european in law. That law evolved from the oath (tell the truth, never steal, never flee, in combat).

    3. A Conservative requires ‘empirical’ results – and where empirical fails, the ‘traditional’ is adequate, since traditional survived empirical tests in competition in reality.

    4. A Conservative accumulates genetic, cultural, normative, institutional, physical, and territorial capital – attempting to pass on to future generations of his family, more than he himself inherited.

    5. Conservatism is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy that increases accumulated capital through intergenerational transfer, using intergeneration lending, in order to produce increasingly ‘noble’ families.

    6. Ergo successful individuals in the market for craftsmanship, successful purchase of the franchise through military service, successful individuals in the market for marriage and child rearing, successful individuals in the market for industry, successful families in the market for noble (intergenerational) families.

    7. In other words, conservatism(aristocracy) is a eugenic group evolutionary strategy. And while bipartite manorialism was practiced from 700, and aggressive hanging of up to 1% of the population every year after 1000, and an attempt to escape church-state nobility, and create an entrepreneurial nobility (meritocracy), succeeded by 1600, there was a great reaction to the english revolution, and a greater reaction to the french revolution. Thus while Locke,smith,hume,adams, and jefferson promised an aristocracy available to everyone, Burke, after the french revolution, and germans after that, recognized that the peasantry was even worse at rule (see russia) than the nobility.

    The problem with today’s conservatism is that darwin and spencer were famous before the war, after the second world war, conservatism and eugenics were effectively banned from discourse, academy, and science.

    As such conservatives never (until perhaps 2000) restored empirical discourse to conservatism, because eugenics are antithetical to the experiment with democracy. This changed incrementally beginning in 76, through the 80s, and aggressively since 2000, and more aggressively since 2008.

    1 – Soveriengty requires reciprocity

    2 – Reciprocity requires rule of law (tort), jury(thang, senate, house of lords, supreme court), and an independent judiciary.

    3 – Rule of law forces markets, since it incrementally suppresses each innovation in parasitism.

    4 – Markets cause hierarchies, because they are necessary to voluntarily organize production.

    5 – Markets are eugenic, because they are empirical means of testing industry and impulse.

    6 – But they make possible liberty for those with property, freedom for those who labor, and subsidy for those who impose no costs on sovereignty, liberty, freedom, or property.**

    DOMESTICATION Man domesticated the human animal after he had learned to domesticate the non-human animal. And he did so by the same means. And the result in both domestication of the human and non human animal is the same: eugenics.

    CONSERVATIVES Most conservatives do not write philosophy, they run businesses, or write history, economics, science, and law. (I write because I was successful enough in multiple businesses to spend my time writing full time.) Conservatives also are actively suppressed in academy and media.

    This has been true since the end of the war and teh rise of the Frankfurt School, and the Postmodern school, both of which were necessary after the failure of marxist pseudoscience. (a pseudoscience marx died knowing, since he stopped writing as soon as he read the Mengerians, and kept silent only to keep the checks coming in from Engels.)

    AUTHORS TO READ Burke, Hayek, Burnham, Sowell, Buchanan, Murray, and maybe Nietzsche. Veblen. (The essayists are nonsense) Anyone in Hoover or Heritage institutions.

    READING LIST Propertarianism’s Reading List (https://propertarianism.com/reading-list/).

    My reading list (above) contains most of the science we’ve been looking for, while the pseudosciences dominated the mid to late 20th century under the marxist-postmodernists.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine.

  • ANTIFA IN CONTEXT (Gab Doesn’t Allow Long Form, so this links to our site )

    ANTIFA IN CONTEXT

    (Gab Doesn’t Allow Long Form, so this links to our site )
    propertarianinstitute.com/2021/02/17/antifa-i

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-17 03:56:07 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105744575224241599