https://propertarianinstitute.com/2017/06/09/the-oath-of-transcendent-man/
Source: Original Site Post
-
‘Nonsense, a competent shooter can shoot as fast with a 45 as with a 9.”— ^ Bu
—‘Nonsense, a competent shooter can shoot as fast with a 45 as with a 9.”— ^ But you just made my point didn’t you? 380 > 9 > 40 > 45 > 10 Average person’s rate of fire will decrease with scale (even the top competitive shooters cannot overcome the rate of fire without extraordinary effort – it’s all on video. go watch it.) My point is pretty tediously scientific: Lower recoil, higher rate of fire, more rounds near target, vs higher recoil lower rate of fire, but rounds on target. Smaller people smaller caliber. larger stronger people higher caliber heavier gun. I can empty a 45 on three targets because I was trained to to do it. But the FBI can’t get their agents to do it. (Probably too many women failing and too many accountants now with weak hands.). I was taught mozambique drills (with plastic dummy rounds loaded randomly by the instructor ) … for what seemed like forever, and it’s still the only thing I still practice. I still see 9mm as a subgun round and if you look at rates of fire over the past 200 years, then we are effectively teaching people to fire 9mm’s in gunfights as 200rpm subguns instead of how we taught people through about 1980 – which was to hit what you shot at with every shot. Look at training videos and movies over the past century. Look at stance changes since the civil war. Effectively, the 9mm mag dump is more accurate and faster than a SMG. This was an accidental innovation (transformation) of the marketplace over the past few decades (since the 80’s). The 9mm has much better penetration through substances (particularly glass), than slower or fatter calibres. It is actually deadly out to fairly long distances (which is why I favor 45’s and rifled-shotgun slugs in urban environments). Hence why the market is questioning the SMG space, and increasingly the black gun (and in the future with 6mm) is replacing the smg market. (although I suspect the mp5 to remain in service for quite a while because of its fitness for vehicles.). Sorry man but I’m a supernerd and I notice these things. 😉 Effectively the 9mm pistol market has filled the smg space. -
‘Nonsense, a competent shooter can shoot as fast with a 45 as with a 9.”— ^ Bu
—‘Nonsense, a competent shooter can shoot as fast with a 45 as with a 9.”— ^ But you just made my point didn’t you? 380 > 9 > 40 > 45 > 10 Average person’s rate of fire will decrease with scale (even the top competitive shooters cannot overcome the rate of fire without extraordinary effort – it’s all on video. go watch it.) My point is pretty tediously scientific: Lower recoil, higher rate of fire, more rounds near target, vs higher recoil lower rate of fire, but rounds on target. Smaller people smaller caliber. larger stronger people higher caliber heavier gun. I can empty a 45 on three targets because I was trained to to do it. But the FBI can’t get their agents to do it. (Probably too many women failing and too many accountants now with weak hands.). I was taught mozambique drills (with plastic dummy rounds loaded randomly by the instructor ) … for what seemed like forever, and it’s still the only thing I still practice. I still see 9mm as a subgun round and if you look at rates of fire over the past 200 years, then we are effectively teaching people to fire 9mm’s in gunfights as 200rpm subguns instead of how we taught people through about 1980 – which was to hit what you shot at with every shot. Look at training videos and movies over the past century. Look at stance changes since the civil war. Effectively, the 9mm mag dump is more accurate and faster than a SMG. This was an accidental innovation (transformation) of the marketplace over the past few decades (since the 80’s). The 9mm has much better penetration through substances (particularly glass), than slower or fatter calibres. It is actually deadly out to fairly long distances (which is why I favor 45’s and rifled-shotgun slugs in urban environments). Hence why the market is questioning the SMG space, and increasingly the black gun (and in the future with 6mm) is replacing the smg market. (although I suspect the mp5 to remain in service for quite a while because of its fitness for vehicles.). Sorry man but I’m a supernerd and I notice these things. 😉 Effectively the 9mm pistol market has filled the smg space. -
The Privilege Of False Belief (Fantasy Worlds)
I think the point is, whether your display, words, and deeds impose costs upon those who do not carry such falsehoods. We are currently wealthy enough that we can tolerate many falsehoods. We are currently wealthy enought hat we can tolerate much dysgenia. The question arises when we are no longer wealthy enough to tolerate falsehoods and dysgenia. 😉 -
The Privilege Of False Belief (Fantasy Worlds)
I think the point is, whether your display, words, and deeds impose costs upon those who do not carry such falsehoods. We are currently wealthy enough that we can tolerate many falsehoods. We are currently wealthy enought hat we can tolerate much dysgenia. The question arises when we are no longer wealthy enough to tolerate falsehoods and dysgenia. 😉 -
The purvey of the court in the production of its procedures is necessary for the
The purvey of the court in the production of its procedures is necessary for the simple reason that courts function via-negativa: as findings of fact in the resolution of disputes, by the single test of reciprocity. The production of commons, by council, thang, senate, or house in the production of its procedures is necessary for the simple reason that the commons is produced via-positiva: as agreements on the seizure of potential opportunities given limited resources to invest. As far as I know the criteria of decidability remains the same no matter the scale and organization of the means of arriving at a decision. We adjudicate certain measures in one court, or a series of courts, depending upon the scale of its affect. We contract for certain commons in one Thang, or many Thangs, depending upon the scale of its affect. Among the classes (martial/masculine, commercial (neutral) and familial(priestly/female), we must often vary the means of decidability in order to preserve reciprocity. In all cases we create procedures to preserve reciprocity while producing the returns of aggressive via negativa, and opportunistic via-positiva. So the constitution (the milita’s self insurance) provides the principle organizing method. ALl else is via negativa and via positiva procedure so that the reciprocity necessary for sovereignty under a universal militia insuring one another’s sovereignty, is preserved through the institutions that allow that militia to scale and thereby create the returns on their singe most important investment: reciprocity of sovereignty. (Note that I never fall into pragmatism throughout…..) -
The purvey of the court in the production of its procedures is necessary for the
The purvey of the court in the production of its procedures is necessary for the simple reason that courts function via-negativa: as findings of fact in the resolution of disputes, by the single test of reciprocity. The production of commons, by council, thang, senate, or house in the production of its procedures is necessary for the simple reason that the commons is produced via-positiva: as agreements on the seizure of potential opportunities given limited resources to invest. As far as I know the criteria of decidability remains the same no matter the scale and organization of the means of arriving at a decision. We adjudicate certain measures in one court, or a series of courts, depending upon the scale of its affect. We contract for certain commons in one Thang, or many Thangs, depending upon the scale of its affect. Among the classes (martial/masculine, commercial (neutral) and familial(priestly/female), we must often vary the means of decidability in order to preserve reciprocity. In all cases we create procedures to preserve reciprocity while producing the returns of aggressive via negativa, and opportunistic via-positiva. So the constitution (the milita’s self insurance) provides the principle organizing method. ALl else is via negativa and via positiva procedure so that the reciprocity necessary for sovereignty under a universal militia insuring one another’s sovereignty, is preserved through the institutions that allow that militia to scale and thereby create the returns on their singe most important investment: reciprocity of sovereignty. (Note that I never fall into pragmatism throughout…..) -
Why I Am An Aryan
The limitless reciprocal insurance of the sovereignty of my brothers, their kin, and their property, in my displays words and deeds. The tolerance of disruption of the status hierarchy by truth, productivity, and achievement, so that those of the greatest contribution lead by our imitation of them. The ambition that we disrupt the hierarchy of the gods, and by our excellence to join them. That I must leave the universe improved for having lived in it. That to leave the universe improved is to make a garden (heaven) of it for the generations that follow. To die a good death. To be remembered for my deeds. -
Why I Am An Aryan
The limitless reciprocal insurance of the sovereignty of my brothers, their kin, and their property, in my displays words and deeds. The tolerance of disruption of the status hierarchy by truth, productivity, and achievement, so that those of the greatest contribution lead by our imitation of them. The ambition that we disrupt the hierarchy of the gods, and by our excellence to join them. That I must leave the universe improved for having lived in it. That to leave the universe improved is to make a garden (heaven) of it for the generations that follow. To die a good death. To be remembered for my deeds. -
Why I Am A Christian
It is pretty hard to be better than a good christian for the simple reason that the path to goodness – now from catholics as well as protestants – is ‘personal (direct) works of charity’ toward those in your proximity. (and I argue that all else is just virtue signaling – a kind of fraud and the opposite of the christian mandate). The principle virtue of such a mandate is that it’s entirely empirical. It’s deeds(actions) not beliefs(self congratulations) or rituals (self insulations). There is no better theology than action in the service of others. If you can do so my charity (caretaking). If you can do so by production (trade) If you can do so by war (violence) Germanicized Christianity (as of vatican II, we are all protestants now) creates the civil society. Everything else is just virtue signaling so someone else does the work, pays the costs, or takes the risk, and you can feel good about escaping from it.