On Killing Defectors…
(a) Killing defectors is defensive measure against further defection
(b) Not killing imprisoned defectors is merely preserving an asset for future exchange.
(c) Trading defectors you will later kill is simply buying the exchange for free.
(d) Letting people have false hope and live in fear is more valuable than rapidly executing them.
I detest conspiracy theories. People act according to rational incentives.
However, Seth Rich and Skripal hold a remote possibility of implicating Russian involvement at a time when we are sensitive to (endemic) russian, chinese, jewish, manipulation of our polity. The jewish are most successful at political interference. The chinese most successful at technological theft. The Russian most successful at undermining power in general.
Russian, Jewish, Chinese, and American involvement in intelligence gathering and shaming by publication of undesirable information is endemic, and has been since the advent of the soviets.The soviets mastered propaganda from the French, then competed with the fascists for supremacy. Americans being anglo were late to develop the technique since we have a high trust society and these kinds of actions were resisted.
As far as I know – and I am fairly certain of this – the collusion story is just that – an excuse to cover the failings of the democratic party in putting forward such an undesirable candidate in a time of divisiveness.
Intelligence work on the american side is tediously boring really. The russians on the other hand use disaffected intellectuals (particularly on the left) to do their work for them at pennies on our dollar. And they always have done so. Americans are rather overt about our interference.
Wikileaks has done us a profound favor and I only wish them a future even brighter.
Source: Original Site Post
-
No. Euphemisms Obscure Cause And Solution
We aren’t living in ‘parallel societies’ we are living in a EMPIRE just like every other empire in history, and this particular empire has vastly outlived its usefulness. Revolt.Separate.Diversify.Specialize.Compete.Innovate.Prosper. The answer is simple. We are wealthy enough to afford to express our differing reproductive strategies – strategies in which we can signal our fitness for that strategy optimally. There exist only three methods of coercion? masculine violence, and hierarchy, neutral exchange and meritocracy, and feminine disapproval, shaming, ridicule, and rallying and equality. The political spectrum reflects these reproductive strategies. (conservative masculine concentration of capital, libertarian exchange-neutral production of capital, and progressive redistributive communal consumption of capital. The only solution by which each obtains his optimum interest is by the production of commons best negotiated in his interests. Ergo – revolte, separate, diversity, specialize, compete, innovate, and prosper. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine. -
No. Euphemisms Obscure Cause And Solution
We aren’t living in ‘parallel societies’ we are living in a EMPIRE just like every other empire in history, and this particular empire has vastly outlived its usefulness. Revolt.Separate.Diversify.Specialize.Compete.Innovate.Prosper. The answer is simple. We are wealthy enough to afford to express our differing reproductive strategies – strategies in which we can signal our fitness for that strategy optimally. There exist only three methods of coercion? masculine violence, and hierarchy, neutral exchange and meritocracy, and feminine disapproval, shaming, ridicule, and rallying and equality. The political spectrum reflects these reproductive strategies. (conservative masculine concentration of capital, libertarian exchange-neutral production of capital, and progressive redistributive communal consumption of capital. The only solution by which each obtains his optimum interest is by the production of commons best negotiated in his interests. Ergo – revolte, separate, diversity, specialize, compete, innovate, and prosper. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine. -
“…naturalistic fallacy…”— I don’t commit naturalistic fallacies – which st
—“…naturalistic fallacy…”— I don’t commit naturalistic fallacies – which states that we must do something because it is present in nature. I simply describe what we do, as evidence we already mirror natural processes. The only moral rule is reciprocity (do not unto others). The pretense-of-kinship fallacy, is that we are obligated to redistribution and cooperation, rather than ‘cooperation is only valuable until it is not. you aren’t my associate, my friend, my kin, my people, and therefore you are only valuable to me as a trading partner and then only so if you are a productive trading partner. Otherwise you are just a competitor for resources. And I always have the choice of avoidance of your parasitism, trade, or predation upon you. And your argument is that you should be able to parasitically extract from me and mine. That is all you are doing. Pretense of kinship or partner, when you are merely seeking rents (parasitism). Your argument is testable. Sorry. It just is. All human argument is reducible to some transfer. -
“…naturalistic fallacy…”— I don’t commit naturalistic fallacies – which st
—“…naturalistic fallacy…”— I don’t commit naturalistic fallacies – which states that we must do something because it is present in nature. I simply describe what we do, as evidence we already mirror natural processes. The only moral rule is reciprocity (do not unto others). The pretense-of-kinship fallacy, is that we are obligated to redistribution and cooperation, rather than ‘cooperation is only valuable until it is not. you aren’t my associate, my friend, my kin, my people, and therefore you are only valuable to me as a trading partner and then only so if you are a productive trading partner. Otherwise you are just a competitor for resources. And I always have the choice of avoidance of your parasitism, trade, or predation upon you. And your argument is that you should be able to parasitically extract from me and mine. That is all you are doing. Pretense of kinship or partner, when you are merely seeking rents (parasitism). Your argument is testable. Sorry. It just is. All human argument is reducible to some transfer. -
Excerpt from a Jordan Peterson interview on Australian Radio. This is more evide
Excerpt from a Jordan Peterson interview on Australian Radio. This is more evidence to me that your philosophy and Peterson’s dovetail beautifully, I wish that you two could exchange ideas. Interviewer: “I mentioned earlier that this country follows a lot of the US trends, good and bad, we are a little bit behind”. Peterson: “Like Canada” Interviewer: “What do we need to be alert to? What do we need to be aware of? What do we need to avoid?” Peterson: “We need to… we need to be alert to the benefits of the societies that we now inhabit. We need to be grateful for their existence and know very carefully the unlikelihood of their continued success. Now, I don’t understand how we managed it. In the West we have societies where the default assumption between human beings is trust. I do not understand how we managed that… because there’s so many ways that you can be betrayed by someone especially if you don’t know them. How do you set up a society where the typical interaction between strangers is straight? How many societies in the world are like that? Like, 30? 40? Something like that. How did that ever happen? We don’t know and it’s an ongoing miracle and we should do everything we can not to disrupt it because the alternative to that generous trust, that courageous trust, which is unbelievably productive, is rule by thug, and that’s the rule of most of the world.” Interviewer: “So do you have optimism or not for the future?” Peterson: “I think that we’re in a time of extreme chaos. Things could go unbelievably well if we’re careful. There’s so many good things going on in the world right now” … “God only knows what we could accomplish if we got our act together in the next twenty years. The sky is the limit. So… BUT we’re playing very foolish games in the West, and we could bring the house down around us. So, we’ll see.” https://youtu.be/hcDKNNvUR4I?t=13m39s Eric Danelaw -
Excerpt from a Jordan Peterson interview on Australian Radio. This is more evide
Excerpt from a Jordan Peterson interview on Australian Radio. This is more evidence to me that your philosophy and Peterson’s dovetail beautifully, I wish that you two could exchange ideas. Interviewer: “I mentioned earlier that this country follows a lot of the US trends, good and bad, we are a little bit behind”. Peterson: “Like Canada” Interviewer: “What do we need to be alert to? What do we need to be aware of? What do we need to avoid?” Peterson: “We need to… we need to be alert to the benefits of the societies that we now inhabit. We need to be grateful for their existence and know very carefully the unlikelihood of their continued success. Now, I don’t understand how we managed it. In the West we have societies where the default assumption between human beings is trust. I do not understand how we managed that… because there’s so many ways that you can be betrayed by someone especially if you don’t know them. How do you set up a society where the typical interaction between strangers is straight? How many societies in the world are like that? Like, 30? 40? Something like that. How did that ever happen? We don’t know and it’s an ongoing miracle and we should do everything we can not to disrupt it because the alternative to that generous trust, that courageous trust, which is unbelievably productive, is rule by thug, and that’s the rule of most of the world.” Interviewer: “So do you have optimism or not for the future?” Peterson: “I think that we’re in a time of extreme chaos. Things could go unbelievably well if we’re careful. There’s so many good things going on in the world right now” … “God only knows what we could accomplish if we got our act together in the next twenty years. The sky is the limit. So… BUT we’re playing very foolish games in the West, and we could bring the house down around us. So, we’ll see.” https://youtu.be/hcDKNNvUR4I?t=13m39s Eric Danelaw -
“All money is someone’s debt backed by a promise to redeem the debt. When the mo
—“All money is someone’s debt backed by a promise to redeem the debt. When the money is issued by the state, then you have its vast assets backing its value and so liquidity is increased compared with individuals issuing currency. This is why the sovereign often appears on the currency.”—- Nope. credit money might be. But commodity money is a store of value already produced. That is what separates commodity money (value stored), fiduciary media (value borrowed), and credit money (value promised), and fiat money – meaning shares in the economy (future value speculated upon). You are using the term ‘money’ by cherry picking properties to suit your argument. The diagram above lists the categories of money from commodity through trade credit. Money = commodity money. Everything else is a substitute of decreasing liquidity of temporal value. -
“All money is someone’s debt backed by a promise to redeem the debt. When the mo
—“All money is someone’s debt backed by a promise to redeem the debt. When the money is issued by the state, then you have its vast assets backing its value and so liquidity is increased compared with individuals issuing currency. This is why the sovereign often appears on the currency.”—- Nope. credit money might be. But commodity money is a store of value already produced. That is what separates commodity money (value stored), fiduciary media (value borrowed), and credit money (value promised), and fiat money – meaning shares in the economy (future value speculated upon). You are using the term ‘money’ by cherry picking properties to suit your argument. The diagram above lists the categories of money from commodity through trade credit. Money = commodity money. Everything else is a substitute of decreasing liquidity of temporal value. -
Your Purpose? Let Me Tell You…
Your purpose as is the purpose of every other life form is to perpetuate your genes by the capture of differences in rates of entropy and to expend it as waste heat. That’s your purpose. You perpetuate the temporary concentration of energy as a means of producing higher returns on the concentration of energy. Our ability to think and remember evolved for very simple reasons: creatures that can empathize with intent, imitate, and cooperate without violating reciprocity, can, through the cooperateive concentration of energy on high returns, produce greater caloric capture than any other evolutionary solution the universe has yet discovered by trial and error. However, since self awareness has been a byproduct of that evolutionary innovation, and since along with that self awareness is the need to be valued by (useful to others) because otherwise we would have less incentive to cooperate and produce outsized returns – you need to find some means of surviving while at the same time either feeling not-harmful, useful if possible, and contributory if possible, and dramatically contributory if possible, because this is what status signals and fulfillment refer to. Most unsatisfied (unfulfilled) people are unwilling to or unable to admit their low potential, low value, low status, and low contribution and will not spend the effort to obtain mediocre returns suited to their abilities. hence why charity is so attractive and useful – it takes very little effort to produce outsized cooperative returns for those of even less value to others than you are. This chain of providing value to those less valuable to than you are is how the entire in-class, and cross-class, social, economic, political, and military hierarchy manages to function given that some of us are unfit, unattractive, have undesirable personalities, and are stupid, are from bad families, and bad groups – and some of us are fit, attractive, have desirable personalities, are intelligent and from good families and groups. Come to terms with your status and ability and serve those who need your service. This is why christians are so disproportionately happy and christian civilizations are so disproportionately productive: we are mercilness with producing purely empirical status signals. everyone else tries to fake them.