Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Is It U.S. Democracy That Brings About A Better Life?

    In all cases, in all eras, among all peoples, 1) an homogenous population, 2) markets, 3) rule of law (tort law, not legislation), 4) and the resulting end of corruption generates good conditions.

    A diverse population, lack of markets, rule by discretion, generate corruption, and result in bad conditions.

    https://www.quora.com/Is-it-U-S-democracy-that-brings-about-a-better-life

  • The History Of The World Wars Against White People

    THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD WARS AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE Whites have dragged humanity kicking and screaming at every turn out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, starvation, hard labor, child mortality, early death, disease, plagues, the vicissitudes of nature, and a universe hostile to complex life. GENERATION ONE When we invented heroism and created we created AGENCY, they fought us with organized religion. (Yes really, that’s the origin of authoritarian religion – the resistance to west-indo europeans.) GENERATION TWO 800BC-100 AD When we developed reason, and created enlightenment, they developed monotheism to resist us. In a very short time they destroyed the great civilizations of the ancient world. GENERATION THREE 1540-1680 When we developed empiricism, the french,germans,russians and jews developed fundamentalism, french moralism, german rationalism, russian literary counter-enlightenemnts and a tepid jewish reformation of jewish law. And they froze the re-enlightenment, gave birth to Napoleon, and destroyed the engine of european civilization’s resistance: the german princedoms. The continental enlightenment is a COUNTER REVOLUTION against the scientific revolution. (Yes, really. All of it.) Only the british remain empirical. Only the Americans created rule of law. GENERATION FOUR THe industrial revolution begins in England, where empiricism ruled because the origin of empiricism is the common law of tort among the germanic peoples. This further disrupts all civilizations. When we developed science to continue the scientific revolution, they developed marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, and islamism. And invented Pseudoscience (Marx, Freud, Boaz, Cantor, Frankfurt). And we had our World Wars. GENERATION FIVE Now that we have developed computer science and information technology, they are simply engaging in outright denial of every form of truth, trust, and merit. And we are very close to civil war. We resist their barbarism at every turn, they are thankless children.

  • The History Of The World Wars Against White People

    THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD WARS AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE Whites have dragged humanity kicking and screaming at every turn out of superstition, ignorance, poverty, starvation, hard labor, child mortality, early death, disease, plagues, the vicissitudes of nature, and a universe hostile to complex life. GENERATION ONE When we invented heroism and created we created AGENCY, they fought us with organized religion. (Yes really, that’s the origin of authoritarian religion – the resistance to west-indo europeans.) GENERATION TWO 800BC-100 AD When we developed reason, and created enlightenment, they developed monotheism to resist us. In a very short time they destroyed the great civilizations of the ancient world. GENERATION THREE 1540-1680 When we developed empiricism, the french,germans,russians and jews developed fundamentalism, french moralism, german rationalism, russian literary counter-enlightenemnts and a tepid jewish reformation of jewish law. And they froze the re-enlightenment, gave birth to Napoleon, and destroyed the engine of european civilization’s resistance: the german princedoms. The continental enlightenment is a COUNTER REVOLUTION against the scientific revolution. (Yes, really. All of it.) Only the british remain empirical. Only the Americans created rule of law. GENERATION FOUR THe industrial revolution begins in England, where empiricism ruled because the origin of empiricism is the common law of tort among the germanic peoples. This further disrupts all civilizations. When we developed science to continue the scientific revolution, they developed marxism, socialism, postmodernism, feminism, and islamism. And invented Pseudoscience (Marx, Freud, Boaz, Cantor, Frankfurt). And we had our World Wars. GENERATION FIVE Now that we have developed computer science and information technology, they are simply engaging in outright denial of every form of truth, trust, and merit. And we are very close to civil war. We resist their barbarism at every turn, they are thankless children.

  • Which Groups Tend To Be More Marginalized, Religious Or Ethnic?

    —-”Which groups tend to be more marginalized, religious or ethnic?”—-

    The correct if unpleasant answer.

    1. All groups that cannot, do not, or slowly integrate and compete are marginalized (disciplined). And furthermore, they should be, until they integrate so thoroughly that the marginalization (discipline for non conformity) does not exist, because the cost of their integration does not exist.
    2. Groups disrespect(discipline, outcast, or boycott,) competition with (against) their traditions, norms, status, and laws. And there is good reason to do so: they are paying a high cost of integrating underdeveloped peoples – without any benefit of doing so.
    3. Any group that is marginalized (disciplined, disrespected, outcast, boycotted) must have a reason for invading (moving to) a society that disciplines them. The question is, if the traditions, institutions, norms, status signals, and laws, are more desirable in the culture that they are invading, then therefore the traditions, institutions, norms, and status signals that they bring with them are de-facto ‘bad’.
    4. So, when in Rome do as Romans do, or do not go to Rome.
    5. Ergo, it depends on whether the invader (disciplined, marginalized) group is genetically problematic (ethnic) because they have an larger undomesticated under, working, or middle class, that forces the host group to bear the costs of their lack of genetic domestication – or whether they are cultural competitors (religious) that forces the host group to bear the cost of training the underdeveloped norms and traditions. Or whether they are commercial competitors, which most groups seem to tolerate as a benefit at the cost of some status signal loss. Or whether they are institutional competitors, bringing with them a competing law. Or whether they are military competitors, which all groups despise.
    6. It is possible to force all of the above costs on a host people: Genetic, Cultural, Commercial, Institutional(law), and Military.

    That’s the answer. Groups are marginalized (disrespected, disciplined, outcast, boycotted) because they should be.

    So the groups that are more marginalized (disciplined) than the others are the groups that are most costly to integrate.

    And therefore “the most costly groups are those with the greatest cumulative set of costs: in the combination of genetic, cultural, commercial, institutional, and military.

    (NOTE: Ergo why Islam is so costly and so universally resisted. It’s dysgenic, culturally primitive, low trust, commercially weak, imposes competing laws, is intellectually regressive and entirely anti-intellectual, and was spread entirely by violence, at the cost of destroying the four great civilizations of the ancient world, as well, as costing 500M deaths. Islam has a simple strategy which is to breed at the bottom – the inverse of the great civilizations: far west and far east.)

    https://www.quora.com/Which-groups-tend-to-be-more-marginalized-religious-or-ethnic

  • Which Groups Tend To Be More Marginalized, Religious Or Ethnic?

    —-”Which groups tend to be more marginalized, religious or ethnic?”—-

    The correct if unpleasant answer.

    1. All groups that cannot, do not, or slowly integrate and compete are marginalized (disciplined). And furthermore, they should be, until they integrate so thoroughly that the marginalization (discipline for non conformity) does not exist, because the cost of their integration does not exist.
    2. Groups disrespect(discipline, outcast, or boycott,) competition with (against) their traditions, norms, status, and laws. And there is good reason to do so: they are paying a high cost of integrating underdeveloped peoples – without any benefit of doing so.
    3. Any group that is marginalized (disciplined, disrespected, outcast, boycotted) must have a reason for invading (moving to) a society that disciplines them. The question is, if the traditions, institutions, norms, status signals, and laws, are more desirable in the culture that they are invading, then therefore the traditions, institutions, norms, and status signals that they bring with them are de-facto ‘bad’.
    4. So, when in Rome do as Romans do, or do not go to Rome.
    5. Ergo, it depends on whether the invader (disciplined, marginalized) group is genetically problematic (ethnic) because they have an larger undomesticated under, working, or middle class, that forces the host group to bear the costs of their lack of genetic domestication – or whether they are cultural competitors (religious) that forces the host group to bear the cost of training the underdeveloped norms and traditions. Or whether they are commercial competitors, which most groups seem to tolerate as a benefit at the cost of some status signal loss. Or whether they are institutional competitors, bringing with them a competing law. Or whether they are military competitors, which all groups despise.
    6. It is possible to force all of the above costs on a host people: Genetic, Cultural, Commercial, Institutional(law), and Military.

    That’s the answer. Groups are marginalized (disrespected, disciplined, outcast, boycotted) because they should be.

    So the groups that are more marginalized (disciplined) than the others are the groups that are most costly to integrate.

    And therefore “the most costly groups are those with the greatest cumulative set of costs: in the combination of genetic, cultural, commercial, institutional, and military.

    (NOTE: Ergo why Islam is so costly and so universally resisted. It’s dysgenic, culturally primitive, low trust, commercially weak, imposes competing laws, is intellectually regressive and entirely anti-intellectual, and was spread entirely by violence, at the cost of destroying the four great civilizations of the ancient world, as well, as costing 500M deaths. Islam has a simple strategy which is to breed at the bottom – the inverse of the great civilizations: far west and far east.)

    https://www.quora.com/Which-groups-tend-to-be-more-marginalized-religious-or-ethnic

  • “The New Testament Was A Copy Paste Operation”

    —“I’ve been writing scripture since I was 6. I’ve read the Bible 50 times. Ive broken the books down in its Greek and Hebrew format. I’ve cross referenced every verse and I’ve come up with a story that’s so believable, the most well informed Christian or Jew wouldn’t be able to argue against it. The New Testament was a copy paste operation. They moved the verses around like magnets on a refrigerator to make a new book. That’s why it appears the entire book was written by one person. They didn’t even do that good of a job. Take all of the prophecies and show them being performed. Easy. They used Greek instead of Hebrew to cover up any mistakes a very well informed rabbi would catch. It’s hard to catch an issues when two different languages are used. It also makes fulfillment of prophecy difficult to perform. I want to perform all of the left over prophecies and complete part of the Third Testament in Hebrew/Greek. The other half I would write in your preferred operational language.”— A Friend

  • “The New Testament Was A Copy Paste Operation”

    —“I’ve been writing scripture since I was 6. I’ve read the Bible 50 times. Ive broken the books down in its Greek and Hebrew format. I’ve cross referenced every verse and I’ve come up with a story that’s so believable, the most well informed Christian or Jew wouldn’t be able to argue against it. The New Testament was a copy paste operation. They moved the verses around like magnets on a refrigerator to make a new book. That’s why it appears the entire book was written by one person. They didn’t even do that good of a job. Take all of the prophecies and show them being performed. Easy. They used Greek instead of Hebrew to cover up any mistakes a very well informed rabbi would catch. It’s hard to catch an issues when two different languages are used. It also makes fulfillment of prophecy difficult to perform. I want to perform all of the left over prophecies and complete part of the Third Testament in Hebrew/Greek. The other half I would write in your preferred operational language.”— A Friend

  • Differences in Moral Intuition

    DIFFERENCES IN MORAL INTUITION 1 – Subjective moral intuition = Personal reproductive strategy. 2 – Gender differences in moral intuition = Gender differences in reproductive strategy. 3 – Class differences in moral intuition = class differences in associative, reproductive, productive, political, and military market value. (continuous reinforcement) 4 – Group differences in moral intuition = demographic distribution (sizes) of the classes (primarily driven by the underclass). BIOLOGICAL (EVOLUTIONARY) BASIS Differences in moral intuition are demonstrably measurable in differences in brain structure and endocrine expression that vary from the female solipsistic and psychotic on one end to the male autistic and anti-social on the other. (Yes, really. See Baron Cohen). EMOTIONS ARE RESPONSES TO CHANGES IN INVENTORY Meaning, that we collect everything that we can make use of from information, narratives, to friends, to associates, to family, to children, to items, to physical goods, to territory to interests in private or collective goods, and our emotions merely reflect changes in those assets. (Yes, really). MAN IS A PURELY RATIONAL ACTOR 1 – All actions re purely in one’s self interest. 2 – Submissive moral positioning means you are open to opportunities and trusting – because you have limited value to others, and are highly dependent upon others. 3 -Dominant moral positioning means you are skeptical of opportunities and have lower trust – because you have high value to yourself or others, and are independent of others. Powerful people filter opportunities and select the best, and weak people broadcast willingness to cooperate. This is why physics, economics, and cognitive science are so important to understanding the world as it is so that we can be happy in the world as it is, by maximizing our opportunity in the world as it is. Otherwise we are continuously frustrated with ourselves, others, and the world, because we wish the universe conform to our wishes rather than adapt to the conditions of the universe so that we make best use of it. Man flocks, swarms, and schools to opportunity. Opportunities are exhausted. People defect to other opportunities. We balance our self image, status signals, emotional, intellectual, and physical costs when choosing which opportunities to pursue. Man is a very simple creature. But we can invent endless fantasies.

  • Differences in Moral Intuition

    DIFFERENCES IN MORAL INTUITION 1 – Subjective moral intuition = Personal reproductive strategy. 2 – Gender differences in moral intuition = Gender differences in reproductive strategy. 3 – Class differences in moral intuition = class differences in associative, reproductive, productive, political, and military market value. (continuous reinforcement) 4 – Group differences in moral intuition = demographic distribution (sizes) of the classes (primarily driven by the underclass). BIOLOGICAL (EVOLUTIONARY) BASIS Differences in moral intuition are demonstrably measurable in differences in brain structure and endocrine expression that vary from the female solipsistic and psychotic on one end to the male autistic and anti-social on the other. (Yes, really. See Baron Cohen). EMOTIONS ARE RESPONSES TO CHANGES IN INVENTORY Meaning, that we collect everything that we can make use of from information, narratives, to friends, to associates, to family, to children, to items, to physical goods, to territory to interests in private or collective goods, and our emotions merely reflect changes in those assets. (Yes, really). MAN IS A PURELY RATIONAL ACTOR 1 – All actions re purely in one’s self interest. 2 – Submissive moral positioning means you are open to opportunities and trusting – because you have limited value to others, and are highly dependent upon others. 3 -Dominant moral positioning means you are skeptical of opportunities and have lower trust – because you have high value to yourself or others, and are independent of others. Powerful people filter opportunities and select the best, and weak people broadcast willingness to cooperate. This is why physics, economics, and cognitive science are so important to understanding the world as it is so that we can be happy in the world as it is, by maximizing our opportunity in the world as it is. Otherwise we are continuously frustrated with ourselves, others, and the world, because we wish the universe conform to our wishes rather than adapt to the conditions of the universe so that we make best use of it. Man flocks, swarms, and schools to opportunity. Opportunities are exhausted. People defect to other opportunities. We balance our self image, status signals, emotional, intellectual, and physical costs when choosing which opportunities to pursue. Man is a very simple creature. But we can invent endless fantasies.

  • How Does The Austrian Theory Of Business Cycles Explain The Tulip Bubble€?

    I’ll try to give you the best answer possible today.

    1. All humans flock to opportunities, exploit opportunities, and defect from flocking to opportunities as the opportunities are exhausted and other, more preferable, opportunities emerge.
    2. In this sense, all human economies seek disequilibrium, because it is only in disequilibrium that opportunities exist (If we ever managed equality then we will all be poor.)
    3. Without credit, opportunities cannot be exploited at the lowest possible price (discount) simply because either (a) scarcity of the monetary resource, and (b) extraction of profits (premiums) and ‘Rents’ by savers.

      ( This topic is a significant point of contention, if not the central point of contention. The Right’s position [and mine] is that it’s not clear that earning money from your savings is necessary or beneficial – only that it not be deflated. The Left/Keynesians hold the position that you do not even have any right to the stored value of your savings. The l|Libertarian position is that you have a right to ‘seek rents’ as an investor using your savings. The libertarian is decidedly false since that is the means by which predatory subclasses have used high trust local norms to accumulate, centralize capital, and turn it against host peoples.)
    4. Credit (Promise of future repayment) assists in more people flocking to opportunities, exploiting those opportunities faster, but also defecting from those opportunities more slowly, and ending those opportunities not gradually but in a ‘bust’, leaving late defectors having lost their investments and unable to fulfill their promises.
    5. Therefore, the question has been, and remains, how much credit to provide at what price such that opportunities are exploited *by those able to exit* but not by people who *will not be able to exit*. While economic discourse appears difficult, this is actually the central question. The answer is relatively simple, in that if we are financing a shift from one network of specialization and trade to another, then that is reducing the unnecessary friction, or if we are creating opportunity for unskilled risk, and therefore creating a moral hazard (trap).

      (This topic is a significant point of contention, because it leaves most consumers out of the ‘lottery’ that loose credit can create, and out of the temporary consumption that loose credit creates, and produces a moral hazard for banks and credit institutions, by forcing them to lend money during booms to stay in business then creating waves of bankruptcies during the consequential corrections.)
    6. There are very few substantive questions in economics. (a) The means of calculating credit price and availability is one, (b) whether we can bypass the financial sector and provide liquidity directly to citizens(consumers) without simply having landlords and creditors absorb the profits now going to the financial sector, (c) the third is purely ethical and moral: and that is, do we return to intergenerational lending (all of human history until the keynesians), so that there is a good reason to provide income on savings, or do we continue extraction of rents through the financial system by charging the citizenry to borrow against their own production, or do we, as above, end the unnecessary distribution of credit capacity (and interest) for consumer consumption by just bypassing the financial sector altogether. Every other question in economics a derivative of these questions – or it is simply the use of economic analysis to investigate demonstrated human behavior, given that the (soft) social sciences (pseudosciences) of psychology, sociology, and political ‘science’ have failed to produce any repeatable scientific findings by means of self reporting or direct testing.

    Therefore, the Tulip Bubble is just a nice simple example that we use to illustrate how consumers can borrow money to invest in what they don’t understand and lose it.

    There are thousands of other examples, particularly in the new world, but the Tulip Bulb Bubble is more helpful because it communicates to average people that they too are vulnerable to malincentives, not just people with much more money.

    In other words, invest in what you do and know, and otherwise invest in index funds. In other words, Just as Little Red Riding Hood is a lesson to young girls who would do improper things for money are certain times, the Tulip Bulb serves as a parable for consumers – do what you know, and only what you know.

    https://www.quora.com/How-does-the-Austrian-theory-of-business-cycles-explain-the-tulip-bubble