—-”there exists a triangular equivalence in theory of computation between fields. We have philosophy that gives us intuitionistic logic. We have mathematics that gives us category theory. Then in computer science we have type theory”—- The scope of content in those few sentences is priceless. I’m trying to think of how I can deflate it into operational (scientific) language. (ie: Whenever you use the word ‘is’ – the verb-to-be in any of its forms – you don’t understand the causal relations.) a) constant relations (intuition) b) positional relations. (categories) c) dimensional relations. (types) d) symmetric relations (symmetries, externalities, consequences) (models) e) and then repeat at the next level of hierarchy. All we are ever discussing is constant relations in some number of dimensions until we produce new identities (a) that we can define relations between (b) so that we can construct descriptions (c) so that we can model outcomes (d). “Constant relations all the way down’. Apr 15, 2018 6:21pm
Source: Original Site Post
-
Men Who Seek Saviors Neither Obtain Nor Deserve Them
Men who seek saviors neither obtain nor deserve them. It’s those who take up arms and remove all need that are saved – by themselves.
-
Men Who Seek Saviors Neither Obtain Nor Deserve Them
Men who seek saviors neither obtain nor deserve them. It’s those who take up arms and remove all need that are saved – by themselves.
-
IQ And Demand For Fluidity Of Speech
It appears that a european male needs a higher IQ than an ashkenazi to compose the same fluidity of sentences, just as it requires a male of higher IQ to speak with the fluidity of women. Just as the east asians very rarely approximate european levels of speech despite what certainly appears to be higher intelligence. I want to understand this. Meaning I want to understand if its true, or if it’s a problem of language. I know that by developing propertarianism I developed a language for speaking what I could not speak rationally without it. But retraining yourself to speak in the ‘economic transactions’ of operational propertarian speech is as hard as learning another language. I think that if we were taught this language from a young age, that we would think as much more clearly about the world (and better voice our ideas) as we did between religion and empiricism.Apr 15, 2018 9:07am -
IQ And Demand For Fluidity Of Speech
It appears that a european male needs a higher IQ than an ashkenazi to compose the same fluidity of sentences, just as it requires a male of higher IQ to speak with the fluidity of women. Just as the east asians very rarely approximate european levels of speech despite what certainly appears to be higher intelligence. I want to understand this. Meaning I want to understand if its true, or if it’s a problem of language. I know that by developing propertarianism I developed a language for speaking what I could not speak rationally without it. But retraining yourself to speak in the ‘economic transactions’ of operational propertarian speech is as hard as learning another language. I think that if we were taught this language from a young age, that we would think as much more clearly about the world (and better voice our ideas) as we did between religion and empiricism.Apr 15, 2018 9:07am -
Their Innovation On Feminine “Arguing The Person”
Men argue the point. Women argue the person. All (((They))) have done is change from arguing the person by insult or shame to arguing the person by pseudoscientific insult or shame (psychologizing). We invented truth and the immediate resolution of differences – the male strategy of the strong. (((They))) invented lying and incremental undermining – the female strategy of the weak.
-
Their Innovation On Feminine “Arguing The Person”
Men argue the point. Women argue the person. All (((They))) have done is change from arguing the person by insult or shame to arguing the person by pseudoscientific insult or shame (psychologizing). We invented truth and the immediate resolution of differences – the male strategy of the strong. (((They))) invented lying and incremental undermining – the female strategy of the weak.
-
Their Poetry, Our Arguments
The Chinese use Riddles like we use Aphorisms. The difference is due to the high context low precision of their rather primitive language. Their poetry, our arguments.
-
Their Poetry, Our Arguments
The Chinese use Riddles like we use Aphorisms. The difference is due to the high context low precision of their rather primitive language. Their poetry, our arguments.
-
End (((Their))) Influence
Russia has chosen Orthodoxy to end (((their))) influence – because they never succeeded in developing the militia order – and therefore, never rule of law. As a member of northern european civilization, I prefer to end (((their))) influence with the militia order, rule of law, and a religion of man, nature, and history. Because of the fervency of the protestant members of the church, this can only be done by persisting the church in some form, by retaining it’s assets, but expanding it’s myths, the oath, and the feast, back into the ‘grove’ where failures of diligence in the garden are immediate and obvious.