Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • @hatt610 John mark said why he left. He left just like I did. Becuase you are a

    @hatt610 John mark said why he left. He left just like I did. Becuase you are a lost cause. It was his idea to try to turn you idiots into a political force. It was his movement. He made it popular. My work was intellectual and niche. you are dumb, angry, stupid macho, or superstitoius cowardly christians unable to show up, shut up, follow directions, and not take the left’s bait. Worse, you will pile on those who don’t vent your pubescent rage despite it justifying state expansion. We have to be gandhi until we can viking. and we can only go viking if we show up, shut up, don’t take the bait, get control of teh discourse, state rational and possible demands, let them be rejected, and from that position of political high ground let loose the dogs of war. (If any dogs of war show up).

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-22 14:41:36 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105775424925204861

  • @hatt610 Again. You were wrong. That is the necessary strategy. If I had (and I

    @hatt610 Again. You were wrong. That is the necessary strategy. If I had (and I could have) told the guys to fight or fire, we would have been swamped, imprisoned, and put away for life. You’re always wrong.

    You watched us brilliantly demonstrate how to handle the left’s activists so that we can direct everyone’s attention against the state and financial sector.

    We didn’t have bad press. We didn’t go to jail. Eveyrone had fun. Everyone went home. Because we made a POLITICAL movement.

    You morons destroyed it. If you watched that video and thought we should take the bait – the bait the left intentionally creates – then you are why you fail.

    We were successful.

    You idiots cancelled us.

    You are why you fail.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-22 14:37:31 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105775408867281392

  • @brantdanger I agreed with you until the last sentence. That sentence means you

    @brantdanger I agreed with you until the last sentence. That sentence means you want symbolism to amelioriate feelings of victimization desipite that it leads to your failure – instead of bearing the emotional and psychological costs of political warfare until we obtain victory. If you want your cheap thrills you will lose because it is those cheap emotional thrills that the left baits you into violence that gives the state permission to oppress you.

    The left can ‘enjoy’ its conflict because its expression of conflict justifies the state that oppresses you and me and the rest of the right. Democratic movements have allowed the conversion of the state from the suppression, disciplining and indoctrination, of the people who are bad in the interests of the people who are good so that discipline, duty, and productivity and absence of threat or conflict, and the commons that result from that mixture.

    Parasites make hosts act in ways that are bad for the host. We are the host,. they are the. parasites. do not let theh parasites make you act in ways that are bad for you. Do your duty. Use your Discipline. Bear the emotional cost of their baiting you into hazard. bear the cost of showing up in large numbers. bear the cost of staying in the field for a few months, and reap an immediate, extraordinary, windfall of restorationn of self determination, by our norms, traditions, institutions.

    Learn that I was right. That you are wrong. And that the only path to victory is not taking the bait. When you read Alinsky’s instructions to the left you will learn that all they are doing is baiting you into defeat and they are far better at it.

    Why? They do not need to feel in control. They are happy to follow the herd. You must feel that you understand, and are in control, or you won’t show up., and when you do show up you allow them to bait your ego into failure.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-22 14:34:24 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105775396572601407

  • Thoughts: Yes, The Left is Parasitic

    Hi, this is curt doolittle, I thought I’d talk a little bit about the left’s parasitism. ANALOGY: Gad Saad’s new book is the Parasitic Mind.  I have an entirely appropriate man-crush on Saad because he practices masculinity as an art form, particularly suited to intellectuals. And he’s a master of it, as well as a master communicator and intellectual in his field. And his use of the analogy of parasitism is correct: Yes, taking zombie fungus as an example, an intuitionistic organism (wasp) needs biochemical neurological reorganization because it’s not conscious. But humans are conscious, meaning self-auditing, and we achieve the same neurological reorganization by informational INCENTIVES. We adapt by information more so than evolutionary or biological mutation. That’s why we’re hyper-adaptive to the laws of the universe. That’s what it means to be an intelligent species: to adapt quickly by information and cognitive change, rather than slowly by biological evolution. But a parasitic biochemical process or a parasitic informational process is indifferent – both product informational changes to the underlying organization of the life form’s behavior. PARASITISM: The left is parasitic and devolutionary and all leftism consists of continuous lying, producing social construction, to claim european civilization is ‘oppressive’ for discovery, adaptation to, and application of the laws of the universe, despite that the entire reason for european asymmetric success in turning the universe to our advantage is due to our discovery, adaptation, and application of those laws – and paying the cost in reproductive, psychological, and emotional discipline necessary to do so, resulting largely in persisting those logical (formal), physical, behavioral(cooperative), and evolutionary (natural selection) laws of the universe and converting the gains for having done so into a superior demographic distribution with lower rates of genetic load, higher cooperative incentive, lower clannishness, lower aggression, lower crime, higher trust, and higher economic, social, political evolutionary velocity. So yes, the left is parasitic. Equality in the absence of demonstrated merit (evolutionary fitness) is a claim on those demonstrating merit *in the current state of informational, technological, economic, social, political, military, and strategic market conditions. *. The entire purpose of the left is to use the temporary windfall of the industrial revolution to claim that we are no longer bound by Maxwell and Malthus (physical), Menger and Spencer (social), Gobineau and Darwin (evolutionary) laws, and the necessity of heroism (Nietzche) and exhaustion of kinship love (Christianity) to suffer the tragedy (Nietzche) of it. The entire pseudoscientific movement whether in Boaz, Freud, Gould’s behavioral, Marxist (marx lenin trotsky et al) social and economic, neo-marxist(frankfurt) anti-cultural institutions, Pomo anti-truth and reason, Steinem anti-family Anti-Male feminist, PC/Woke (social deconstruction of truth), anti-colonialism(industrialization), anti-whiteness (science and testimonial truth), anti-white, white-replacement, white-genocide movement is an inversion of religion. Instead of anthropomorphizing the universe in a love of a god, the left’s pseudoscientific thought is an exercise in anthropomorphization by attacking western people, their knowledge, their cultural institutions, their formal institutions, and their entire civilization – and their race – as a proxy for hating the laws of nature and nature’s god. They hate European civilization as a proxy for hating the universe, and if there is one, hating god for the long history of poor decisions by themselves and their ancestors. And instead of continuing the tradition of conformity to those laws through integration and discipline, and the exhaustion of Christian love to tolerate it, they think they can ‘cheat mother nature’ – and in doing so they are bringing about the third dark age using the same technique that brought about the second: false promise of freedom from those laws.

  • Thoughts: Yes, The Left is Parasitic

    Hi, this is curt doolittle, I thought I’d talk a little bit about the left’s parasitism. ANALOGY: Gad Saad’s new book is the Parasitic Mind.  I have an entirely appropriate man-crush on Saad because he practices masculinity as an art form, particularly suited to intellectuals. And he’s a master of it, as well as a master communicator and intellectual in his field. And his use of the analogy of parasitism is correct: Yes, taking zombie fungus as an example, an intuitionistic organism (wasp) needs biochemical neurological reorganization because it’s not conscious. But humans are conscious, meaning self-auditing, and we achieve the same neurological reorganization by informational INCENTIVES. We adapt by information more so than evolutionary or biological mutation. That’s why we’re hyper-adaptive to the laws of the universe. That’s what it means to be an intelligent species: to adapt quickly by information and cognitive change, rather than slowly by biological evolution. But a parasitic biochemical process or a parasitic informational process is indifferent – both product informational changes to the underlying organization of the life form’s behavior. PARASITISM: The left is parasitic and devolutionary and all leftism consists of continuous lying, producing social construction, to claim european civilization is ‘oppressive’ for discovery, adaptation to, and application of the laws of the universe, despite that the entire reason for european asymmetric success in turning the universe to our advantage is due to our discovery, adaptation, and application of those laws – and paying the cost in reproductive, psychological, and emotional discipline necessary to do so, resulting largely in persisting those logical (formal), physical, behavioral(cooperative), and evolutionary (natural selection) laws of the universe and converting the gains for having done so into a superior demographic distribution with lower rates of genetic load, higher cooperative incentive, lower clannishness, lower aggression, lower crime, higher trust, and higher economic, social, political evolutionary velocity. So yes, the left is parasitic. Equality in the absence of demonstrated merit (evolutionary fitness) is a claim on those demonstrating merit *in the current state of informational, technological, economic, social, political, military, and strategic market conditions. *. The entire purpose of the left is to use the temporary windfall of the industrial revolution to claim that we are no longer bound by Maxwell and Malthus (physical), Menger and Spencer (social), Gobineau and Darwin (evolutionary) laws, and the necessity of heroism (Nietzche) and exhaustion of kinship love (Christianity) to suffer the tragedy (Nietzche) of it. The entire pseudoscientific movement whether in Boaz, Freud, Gould’s behavioral, Marxist (marx lenin trotsky et al) social and economic, neo-marxist(frankfurt) anti-cultural institutions, Pomo anti-truth and reason, Steinem anti-family Anti-Male feminist, PC/Woke (social deconstruction of truth), anti-colonialism(industrialization), anti-whiteness (science and testimonial truth), anti-white, white-replacement, white-genocide movement is an inversion of religion. Instead of anthropomorphizing the universe in a love of a god, the left’s pseudoscientific thought is an exercise in anthropomorphization by attacking western people, their knowledge, their cultural institutions, their formal institutions, and their entire civilization – and their race – as a proxy for hating the laws of nature and nature’s god. They hate European civilization as a proxy for hating the universe, and if there is one, hating god for the long history of poor decisions by themselves and their ancestors. And instead of continuing the tradition of conformity to those laws through integration and discipline, and the exhaustion of Christian love to tolerate it, they think they can ‘cheat mother nature’ – and in doing so they are bringing about the third dark age using the same technique that brought about the second: false promise of freedom from those laws.

  • @brantdanger John quit, and he said why he quit – because you are too f—king d

    @brantdanger John quit, and he said why he quit – because you are too f—king dumb to turn into a political movement. Youi’re just what the left claims you are. Dumb f—ks. And you’re dumb f—ks that drag the rest of the good people down with you.,

    All you had to do was show up and shut up and follow the lead, and you couldn’t do either.

    That is why you will continue to lose. Just like you have been losing. You’re the cancer that makes the right fail at every opportunity.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-22 03:58:23 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105772895667443165

  • @brantdanger No. You had to understand I was right – that the left defeats you b

    @brantdanger No. You had to understand I was right – that the left defeats you by forcing you to take the bait. We didn’t take the bait. We avoided another cville fail or a capitol riot fail. It’ was flawless. It was you idiots online who were to fking stupid to understand that our strategy was the only one possible – and you .. you … fked it up by using your schoolgirl cancel culture on us. So you f–ked up. For the reasons I said. Because you’re dumb fks.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-22 03:55:59 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105772886236995262

  • @brantdanger If only you weren’t such a dumb f—k you believe that. lol

    @brantdanger If only you weren’t such a dumb f—k you believe that. lol

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-22 03:40:56 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105772827036126798

  • The P-Law (Natural Law) Program Consists of: 1 – The completion of the scientifi

    The P-Law (Natural Law) Program Consists of:

    1 – The completion of the scientific method and all that it entails – which is a lot – and that’s why P is such a big program: it touches every discipline, and it converts almost all psychological, social, and political speech to economic expressions – which is counter-intuitive because it’s scientific where our current psychological social, moral, and political speech is only normative or in the case of psychology sociology and politics, both pseudoscientific and sophomoric.
    We call this Testimonialism (Metaphysics, Epistemology, Psychology, Ethics, Sociology, Politics)

    2 – The explanation for western success in ancient and modern worlds (adaptive velocity because of our individual sovereignty and resulting traditional law of property/tort.) And the explanation for the dark ages as well as the current attempt to repeat them that we see as undermining western civilization.
    We call this Western Group Evolutionary Strategy.

    3 – The explanation of the different systems of argument used in the different civilizations, and in particular the Abrahamic means of deceit used in the ancient world (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) and in the modern world (marxism, feminism, postmodernism, denialism/political correctness).
    We call this The Grammars (deflationary, testimonial, ordinary, fictional, and the fictionalisms)

    4 – A constitution, body of law, and attendant policies that restore the American, English, Anglo Saxon, Germanic, Western Indo-European (Aryan), constitution (contract among sovereigns) and hardens it from future undermining, by creating a legal means for the prosecution of crimes of undermining, including religious (Jewish Islamic), pseudoscientific, and sophomoric (Marx, Freud, boas, Adorno, Derrida, Friedan, and marxism, postmodernism, feminism, and denialism/political correctness), as well as the financing of undermining by prohibiting rent-seeking, privatization of commons, and socialization of losses).
    We call this a new or updated constitution.

    5 – A set of policies (Acts) under that constitution that form the most substantial political, social, economic, and financial reform since the roman era – restoring the civil society.
    We call these the reforms: the policies under the constitution

    6 – A set of Restitutions and Punishments that serve to return wealth to the American people, punish those who have engaged in undermining our people, and prevent repeats of undermining our people – or other peoples – in the future.
    We call these the Restitutions

    7 – A program of revolution and restitution of the constitution of natural law and our European strategy that we have used to drag ourselves and mankind out of ignorance, superstition, oppression, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the chaos of a nature all but hostile to our existence. And an explanation why the world is our debtor and hates us for it.
    We’ll call this the Revolution

    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-22 03:40:13 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105772824252393505

  • Is Christianity Salvageable?

    IS CHRISTIANITY SALVAGEABLE?  IMO, and I realize that this is an area of your specialty, I don’t work in ideals but in necessities, and the failure to solve the problem of heterogeneous underclasses (vs india and china) was a substantive one. He looks to me to be solving that problem regardless of the church.

    -“But is [jesus] really solving it? I understand that if you want somehow to operationalize Christianity, you would have to boil down his preaching of love to those 5 tenets and then strictly circumscribe it to the kindergarten. Is it feasible to do that today?”-Dan

    Let’s try again. Did Aristotle/Epicurus solve empiricism? No.

    1. The west developed heroic, entrepreneurial, technological, war, law, polity, and economy at the cost of natural selection paid by the unfit to compete.
    2. As they conquered, their expanding economy demanded labor (slaves, women, peasants).
    3. They expanded too rapidly exhausting their domestic HUMAN (Aryan) resources and turned their strength in concentration into a weakness in dilution.
    4. This is the problem with the fast, expansionary war and conquest model of growth (as practiced in europe)- martial war vs the slow defensive technological warfare model of growth (as practiced in china) – Total War
    5. So the problem of enfranchising (Europe) is different from the problem of indoctrinating (china). Both models are possible as long as one doesn’t exhaust the originary human capital. IOW, the rate of expansion is limited by the equilibrium between aristocracy + kin, and alien.
    6. So my argument is that Jesus discovered the cheapest possible solution to solving the problem of being subject to the (European-discovered) laws of the universe, including natural selection which has ‘selected them for removal’ – by the process of extending kinship love.
    7. The consequence of rapid evolution (european aryans) exposing natural selection (underclasses, especially among south eurasians, ~80’s), generated demand for tragedy among heterogeneous people just as it did for the Greeks (the tragedy) among homogeneous people.
    8. Which is why I argue that the jews merely copied the bible of the west(epic cycle) and in particular the tragic hero of the aristocracy(Achilles), by combining south eurasian(low iq) ancient mythos(Horus) into a tragic figure of jesus that was virtuous for suffering tragedy.
    9. (Confirming that they never invent anything they just copy it by converting it into lies.).
    10. So again, I work by searching for first causes, (what we consider first principles) and man’s history of innovation and adaptation by the satisfaction of demand.
    11. And my purpose is to destroy the system of lying, and its lies, even if those lies are entrenched, and millions or billions are addicted to them.
    12. Because if there is or are gods(the universe) and they speak to us at all (the laws of the universe), and have any plan for us at all (evolution into the hands of god) then only Europeans have identified god(s), discovered their words, applied them, to transcend man for them.
    13. The jews chose the devil(lies) and the strategy of women(stagnation), the Europeans chose the gods(truth) and the strategy of men(evolution), and the only struggle other than that is the slow Chinese or the fast European method. Or the failure of the Semites and their lies.
    14. My objective is to outlaw the lies of the Semites without outlawing the gains of extension of kinship love to kith, but not to enemies. In this way we can preserve the original insight of jesus, satisfy the devoted that they were in some way not ‘wrong’, and end semitic lying.
    15. So I think your specialty is to fight theological fire with theological fire from a position of political weakness, and mine is to fight theological fire with scientific and legal Halon from a position of political strength. So my mission is to obtain that political power.
    16. And instead of bribing people with false promises and lies, I want to ‘pay’ people with the end of the conflict, the restoration of self-determination, economic reforms that end the parasitism upon them and restore them, and exposing and defunding the enemy in every dimension.
    17. That requires a method of mandating a dialog that only the ‘threat’ seems possible to bring into being. And the right is a bunch of ignorant overconfident clown world man-boys lacking any possible empirical elite being crushed by the world’s best elite at parasitism.
    18. So the question is whether (a- the fast method) that power is obtainable given the clown world of the right (b-the medium method) the sale can be made at political pace, or (c-the slow method) we require a new religion because that fking sophistry is all the nitwits can handle without elites to boss them around.
    19. So is Christianity salvageable? That depends on the fundamentalists who are addicts, the traditionalists who only seek solutions, and the intellectuals who will tolerate any form of persisting superstition.
    20. The natural religion is debt payment to ancestors, heroes, nature, and the universe, and the celebration of our struggle to defeat that universe despite its hostility to us and all advanced life. So again, our ancient religion was heroic and evolutionary at the cost of underclasses, and Christianity was submissive and devolutionary at the cost of self-defense, innovation, and evolution.  The optimum admixture is simply reformation of our ancient religions – heathen nature, pagan ancestor and hero, and Christian care for the unfit in exchange for their constraint on reproduction.