Math can be pursued as a language (pure mathematics) or as measurements (mathematical physics). And while we can write fantasy novels in a language, we cannot do so in measurements. Language like mathematical platonism is bounded only by imagination, while measurements must always describe the existential because all measurement requires correspondence, while language only requires meaning.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Intelligence
I think SAT’s are the best proxy we currently have in freely available data. I think they are at best useful for determining sortition for university work – in other words, they successfully fulfill their purpose. They are problematic proxies for IQ since some of us (myself included) do not really reach our biological IQ until our early twenties, and others are completed by late high school. I have very high confidence in Ravens. However, while iq traits tend to scale, in heritable IQ there is an asymmetry between Spatial and Verbal, with heritability of verbal more dependent on the mother. This is rather obvious in retrospect, and explains why some groups with high verbal performance also express higher rates of homosexuality and behavioral effeminacy.
-
Intelligence
I think SAT’s are the best proxy we currently have in freely available data. I think they are at best useful for determining sortition for university work – in other words, they successfully fulfill their purpose. They are problematic proxies for IQ since some of us (myself included) do not really reach our biological IQ until our early twenties, and others are completed by late high school. I have very high confidence in Ravens. However, while iq traits tend to scale, in heritable IQ there is an asymmetry between Spatial and Verbal, with heritability of verbal more dependent on the mother. This is rather obvious in retrospect, and explains why some groups with high verbal performance also express higher rates of homosexuality and behavioral effeminacy.
-
Pareto Principle At Work (Power Law)
THE PARETO PRINCIPLE AT WORK (A POWER LAW) by Noah J Revoy The worst 20% of the group creates 80% of the negative externalities. The worst 20% of that subgroup causes 80% of that groups negative externalities. Another way to say that is: Out of a population of 326 million people living in USA, 13 million (4%) create 64% of the harmful externalities. The best 20% of the group creates 80% of the positive externalities. The best 20% of that subgroup causes 80% of that groups positive externalities. Another way to say that is: Out of a population of 326 million people living in the USA, 13 million (4%) create 64% of the beneficial externalities. THe people at the bottom aren’t just unproductive, they’re harmful.
-
Pareto Principle At Work (Power Law)
THE PARETO PRINCIPLE AT WORK (A POWER LAW) by Noah J Revoy The worst 20% of the group creates 80% of the negative externalities. The worst 20% of that subgroup causes 80% of that groups negative externalities. Another way to say that is: Out of a population of 326 million people living in USA, 13 million (4%) create 64% of the harmful externalities. The best 20% of the group creates 80% of the positive externalities. The best 20% of that subgroup causes 80% of that groups positive externalities. Another way to say that is: Out of a population of 326 million people living in the USA, 13 million (4%) create 64% of the beneficial externalities. THe people at the bottom aren’t just unproductive, they’re harmful.
-
Power Exists, Not Rights. Rights Must Be Exchanged And Enforced With Power.
THERE EXIST NO RIGHTS Rights do not exist between peoples. Power exists. Rights are exchanged between kin for the purpose of cooperation in the pursuit of wealth and power. Everything else is just religious wishful thinking – the kind of thinking that makes people poor.
-
Power Exists, Not Rights. Rights Must Be Exchanged And Enforced With Power.
THERE EXIST NO RIGHTS Rights do not exist between peoples. Power exists. Rights are exchanged between kin for the purpose of cooperation in the pursuit of wealth and power. Everything else is just religious wishful thinking – the kind of thinking that makes people poor.
-
Paternalism (Aryanism) Will Help You Love People Again
PATERNALISM (ARYANISM) WILL HELP YOU LOVE PEOPLE AGAIN —“The more I learn, and ‘see’ what I learn in people and in the world, I can feel arising in me a tendency to just see most other people as non self aware, selfish actors who simply act (almost deterministically) according to their incentives, within the scope that they can understand…. which usually isn’t very large. On one hand this gives a certain amount of peace, but on the other is the temptation to simply feel atomised and a bit apathetic. Is it possible to love people and love the world despite losing so many illusions about them? And if so, how would you suggest cultivating more of that emotional state?”—Rob McMullan Well, this is what I hope ‘the precious few’ achieve: the understanding that propertarianism is as revolutionary as was empiricism, and that it’s not that we CAN’t have relatively free will but that we DON’T have relatively free will, because we are just negotiating machines on behalf of our genes using incentives. So, where you say ‘pathetic’ I”ll use the term “dehumanizing” which is how the christian world reacted against the findings of science, and in particular heliocentrism and darwinism. But once you ‘adapt’ to your new understanding, you will love people like I do, and like generals love their soldiers, like kings love their people, and mothers love their children. The miracle of it all is that IT WORKS. I mean, we actually manage to evolve and live together and drag ourselves into godhood despite being nearly automatons in doing so. It’s wondrous!!! I found I had an amazing sense of power (mindfulness), and i suspect otehrs do too. the problem is you can’t go around and change the world with the knowledge all that easily. It’s got to ‘grow’ in influence. Hence why I”m so concerned not with people agreeing, but with using force to impose the law, from which they will learn by environmental pressure and incentives rather than exposition and understanding. Once you return to being an Aryan, and seeing mankind as children and us as gods, you will just love them. It’s the christian falsehood of equality that deprives you of the option of paternalism and love for fellow man.
-
Paternalism (Aryanism) Will Help You Love People Again
PATERNALISM (ARYANISM) WILL HELP YOU LOVE PEOPLE AGAIN —“The more I learn, and ‘see’ what I learn in people and in the world, I can feel arising in me a tendency to just see most other people as non self aware, selfish actors who simply act (almost deterministically) according to their incentives, within the scope that they can understand…. which usually isn’t very large. On one hand this gives a certain amount of peace, but on the other is the temptation to simply feel atomised and a bit apathetic. Is it possible to love people and love the world despite losing so many illusions about them? And if so, how would you suggest cultivating more of that emotional state?”—Rob McMullan Well, this is what I hope ‘the precious few’ achieve: the understanding that propertarianism is as revolutionary as was empiricism, and that it’s not that we CAN’t have relatively free will but that we DON’T have relatively free will, because we are just negotiating machines on behalf of our genes using incentives. So, where you say ‘pathetic’ I”ll use the term “dehumanizing” which is how the christian world reacted against the findings of science, and in particular heliocentrism and darwinism. But once you ‘adapt’ to your new understanding, you will love people like I do, and like generals love their soldiers, like kings love their people, and mothers love their children. The miracle of it all is that IT WORKS. I mean, we actually manage to evolve and live together and drag ourselves into godhood despite being nearly automatons in doing so. It’s wondrous!!! I found I had an amazing sense of power (mindfulness), and i suspect otehrs do too. the problem is you can’t go around and change the world with the knowledge all that easily. It’s got to ‘grow’ in influence. Hence why I”m so concerned not with people agreeing, but with using force to impose the law, from which they will learn by environmental pressure and incentives rather than exposition and understanding. Once you return to being an Aryan, and seeing mankind as children and us as gods, you will just love them. It’s the christian falsehood of equality that deprives you of the option of paternalism and love for fellow man.
-
Support for Natural Law
by Daniel Roland Anderson And we have a mechanism for correcting non-correspondence of the constitution with natural law: the Amendment process—which won’t work in our current demographic situation. Do you know many judges you’d trust to implement Natural Law over the plain text of the document? I don’t. When I hear a “constitutionalist” go on about Natural Law, it’s 99.9% ignorant blather. Curt is the first guy in years to use the term Natural Law in a way that doesn’t make me want to punch someone. I suspect Curt provides for decidability whereas others use Natural Law to stand in for “whatever I think is good right now.” Curt has done great things for the Common Law that many constitutionalists would throw out with the bathwater if judicial abuse of discretion. (CD: Bingo)