Love women. Do not debate women. Never debate women over preference or good, only possible or impossible. Women cannot tolerate refutation of their emotions. This is what deprives them of agency. They cannot tolerate being at fault in the minds of others – only when they fault themselves. Women’s “Intuitions (impulses)” are almost unbearable, and without training (Stoicism, Buddhism, Religion) they cannot cope with them, and if they can cope with them, they cannot still cope with the confusion created by the inability to trust those emotions and continuously fight them with reason. So this is the origin feminism, the success of postmodernism, and the female affinity for socialism and marxism, and female interest in literary rather than scientific thought: They are constantly seeking excuses not to discipline their impulses. Men must constantly suppress ours or danger will result in the near term. The problem is that if we don’t suppress women’s danger results in the long term. Every woman is pandora, and we are the guardians of the box.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Intelligence and Political Affiliation: Scale Causes Regression To The Mean
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-average-intelligence-average-IQ-test-scores-any-calculated-metric-of-the-average-American-conservative/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=54709e6f&srid=u4Qv ALL THREE OF THESE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE (And obvious.) 1) Libertarians(7%) are smarter than Liberals(25%). 2) Republicans(26%) are smarter than Democrats(29%). 3) Liberals(25%) are smarter than Conservatives(36%). Why? Increases in size of groups regresses to the mean. (Again, obvious). Smaller groups of educated people will test higher than larger groups. PROBLEMS WITH ALL SUCH MEASUREMENTS 1) People, but men in particular, do not mature (in IQ) until 22 (at least). 2) We have no test of adult IQ, only children. 3) We tend to use SAT scores as a proxy for IQ. (Good but subset) 4) We tend to use degrees as a proxy for IQ. (Bad proxy) 5) We cannot match SAT and Degrees to Political Preference. 6) We can only survey REPORTED Political Affiliation with REPORTED degree. 7) The vast majority of degrees are (a) ‘nonsense’ degrees (gut courses) and of those the vast majority are (b) by women. 8) The vast majority of advanced degrees are equally nonsense degrees (education, etc). And a disproportionate number of men do not pursue degrees since the trades do not require them. 9) The gender gap is large and ever increasing. Meaning white marrieds, and males against unmarried women of all groups and minorities (who are no longer minorities). THE REAL ANSWER IS NOT INTELLIGENCE BUT GENDER As far as I know the distributions are relatively normal As far as I know gender is a better predictor than intelligence. As far as I know the country is entirely red by men’s vote and almost entirely blue by women’s vote. For this reason also: democrats and liberals dominate mental illness. For this reason also: democrats and liberals report lower happiness. May 19, 2018 9:42pm -
Intelligence and Political Affiliation: Scale Causes Regression To The Mean
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-average-intelligence-average-IQ-test-scores-any-calculated-metric-of-the-average-American-conservative/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=54709e6f&srid=u4Qv ALL THREE OF THESE STATEMENTS ARE TRUE (And obvious.) 1) Libertarians(7%) are smarter than Liberals(25%). 2) Republicans(26%) are smarter than Democrats(29%). 3) Liberals(25%) are smarter than Conservatives(36%). Why? Increases in size of groups regresses to the mean. (Again, obvious). Smaller groups of educated people will test higher than larger groups. PROBLEMS WITH ALL SUCH MEASUREMENTS 1) People, but men in particular, do not mature (in IQ) until 22 (at least). 2) We have no test of adult IQ, only children. 3) We tend to use SAT scores as a proxy for IQ. (Good but subset) 4) We tend to use degrees as a proxy for IQ. (Bad proxy) 5) We cannot match SAT and Degrees to Political Preference. 6) We can only survey REPORTED Political Affiliation with REPORTED degree. 7) The vast majority of degrees are (a) ‘nonsense’ degrees (gut courses) and of those the vast majority are (b) by women. 8) The vast majority of advanced degrees are equally nonsense degrees (education, etc). And a disproportionate number of men do not pursue degrees since the trades do not require them. 9) The gender gap is large and ever increasing. Meaning white marrieds, and males against unmarried women of all groups and minorities (who are no longer minorities). THE REAL ANSWER IS NOT INTELLIGENCE BUT GENDER As far as I know the distributions are relatively normal As far as I know gender is a better predictor than intelligence. As far as I know the country is entirely red by men’s vote and almost entirely blue by women’s vote. For this reason also: democrats and liberals dominate mental illness. For this reason also: democrats and liberals report lower happiness. May 19, 2018 9:42pm -
Monogamy Is Eugenic, Not Polygamy.
—“Monogamy is eugenic, not polygamy. That seems counterintuitive, because elite men can be much more reproductively successful under polygamy. And they are, with lower quality women, because that’s the only way elite men can have several, by mating down. So low status women are reproductively more successful under polygamy and high status women relatively less so. And the dysgenic effect for females predominates over the eugenic effect for males. Just look at societies with normative polygyny, Africa, the middle east…. In contrast, monogamous societies can institute moderately eugenic policies for men AND women under assortative mating.”=== Eli Harman
-
Monogamy Is Eugenic, Not Polygamy.
—“Monogamy is eugenic, not polygamy. That seems counterintuitive, because elite men can be much more reproductively successful under polygamy. And they are, with lower quality women, because that’s the only way elite men can have several, by mating down. So low status women are reproductively more successful under polygamy and high status women relatively less so. And the dysgenic effect for females predominates over the eugenic effect for males. Just look at societies with normative polygyny, Africa, the middle east…. In contrast, monogamous societies can institute moderately eugenic policies for men AND women under assortative mating.”=== Eli Harman
-
Love Women. but Truth, Testimony and Reason Are Male Attributes: The Feminists Are Right.
(see if I can get in trouble for this one) Around 40% of women have mental illness of some sort. And from a man’s perspective as a rational human, around double that have problems with correspondence with reality, and all but a handful are limited by social cognitive biases they cannot escape. It’s true that only about 20-30% of men are reproductively desirable, but 80% are rational. But it’s also true that 70-80% of women are (at least for some period) reproductively desirable, but 80% are not rational. Man evolves reason and evolution lets us drag women along behind us at rather great distance. In fact, women do not select for intelligence in men, but aggression. They do not wish their children to be competitive, but sociable. We focus on intelligence overmuch, when rationality determines how intelligence is demonstrated. Ask any woman a NAXALT question, whether we should pursue equality or reciprocity, whether men by and large defend women or threaten them, and what percentile their children are in – and you will find these estimates correct. Women are wonders. But war, politics, law, economics, and truth are as unique to men as childbirth is to women. My understanding is that men provide the environment, and women provide the generations. As such men think and women feel. For the simple reason that children require immediate action, and the tribe requires longer term planning. Love women as they love their children. This is the lesson of patriarchy.May 20, 2018 8:28am -
Love Women. but Truth, Testimony and Reason Are Male Attributes: The Feminists Are Right.
(see if I can get in trouble for this one) Around 40% of women have mental illness of some sort. And from a man’s perspective as a rational human, around double that have problems with correspondence with reality, and all but a handful are limited by social cognitive biases they cannot escape. It’s true that only about 20-30% of men are reproductively desirable, but 80% are rational. But it’s also true that 70-80% of women are (at least for some period) reproductively desirable, but 80% are not rational. Man evolves reason and evolution lets us drag women along behind us at rather great distance. In fact, women do not select for intelligence in men, but aggression. They do not wish their children to be competitive, but sociable. We focus on intelligence overmuch, when rationality determines how intelligence is demonstrated. Ask any woman a NAXALT question, whether we should pursue equality or reciprocity, whether men by and large defend women or threaten them, and what percentile their children are in – and you will find these estimates correct. Women are wonders. But war, politics, law, economics, and truth are as unique to men as childbirth is to women. My understanding is that men provide the environment, and women provide the generations. As such men think and women feel. For the simple reason that children require immediate action, and the tribe requires longer term planning. Love women as they love their children. This is the lesson of patriarchy.May 20, 2018 8:28am -
Paternalism Is Love
Women mature early so that they may parent their offspring. Men continue to mature much longer so that they may parent their tribe. Love women as they love their children. But truth, reason, and group persistence are as exclusively male as childbirth is female. If women’s intuition is given license the tribe will die. If men cease parenting, their tribe will die, just as certainly as if women cease parenting their children, the children will die. (see how much trouble I can get into today) May 20, 2018 8:36am
-
Paternalism Is Love
Women mature early so that they may parent their offspring. Men continue to mature much longer so that they may parent their tribe. Love women as they love their children. But truth, reason, and group persistence are as exclusively male as childbirth is female. If women’s intuition is given license the tribe will die. If men cease parenting, their tribe will die, just as certainly as if women cease parenting their children, the children will die. (see how much trouble I can get into today) May 20, 2018 8:36am
-
Natural Law on Killing
—“Punishment for killing someone does not necessarily imply they had any actual value . At the societal level the punishment is automatic.”— Edgar Braintree They are not punishing you for killing the individual, but for not getting sanction from others before doing so. In other words, they are punishing you for hubris. Getting a dozen men (jury) together to hang someone from a tree is very different from killing someone vengefully. If death is sanctioned then appeal exists, hubris, and error limited. What we seek to limit is unsanctioned deaths, without appeal, insured against hubris, and error. If you act without sanction you are a risk to the group. If you act with sanction you reduce group risk.