by Vivek Na Liberals use this kind of rhetoric – “no right thinking individual would say that”. Or “That doesn’t sound right” – meaning you’re committing blasphemy according to their constructed sense of right and wrong, ergo, you’re a heretic who should be metaphorically exiled or pilloried. –Curt:– You know, we ought to use that more often: “So you mean it’s blasphemous in your religion, right?”
Source: Original Site Post
-
Progressivism Is a Religion, and Truth Blasphemy
by Vivek Na Liberals use this kind of rhetoric – “no right thinking individual would say that”. Or “That doesn’t sound right” – meaning you’re committing blasphemy according to their constructed sense of right and wrong, ergo, you’re a heretic who should be metaphorically exiled or pilloried. –Curt:– You know, we ought to use that more often: “So you mean it’s blasphemous in your religion, right?”
-
New Right = Scientific Right
It drives the Left nuts that the New Right owns the scientific discourse, and that it’s now clear progressivisms, in marxist pseudoscientific, feminist pseudoscientific, and postmodern pseudo-rational forms, are just another Religion. They can’t deal with the fact that New Right = Scientific Right.
-
New Right = Scientific Right
It drives the Left nuts that the New Right owns the scientific discourse, and that it’s now clear progressivisms, in marxist pseudoscientific, feminist pseudoscientific, and postmodern pseudo-rational forms, are just another Religion. They can’t deal with the fact that New Right = Scientific Right.
-
Trump’s Grand Strategy – For Ordinary People
—-”Is there a strategic reason Trump has alienated our traditional trading partners (Europe, Canada, Mexico) while simultaneously saying Russia should be allowed back into the G7 making it the G8?”—-
OF COURSE.In Trump’s Own Words: “We’re like the piggy bank that everybody is robbing,” Trump said. “And that ends.” “The European Union is brutal to the United States and they know it,” Trump said, adding that other leaders acknowledge as much in private. “It’s like the gig is up,” he said. “They can’t believe they got away with it.” He said the size of the U.S. economy means other nations can’t win a trade war. “We win that war a thousand times out of a thousand.” EXPLANATION Keep in mind that all democratic countries have voters to appeal to so they must at least make a visible attempt at resisting changes that would eliminate trade, economic, and military privileges. So these public disputes are necessary for the service of voters even if european politicians understand that ‘the gig is up’. 1) We spent decades and vast amounts of money helping Europe recover from their civil war. But they kept on parasitically extracting from us. We have absurd trade deficits while American workers suffer from it. But when we started this battle we had a much greater share of the world income and its economy. 2) We spent a long time and vast amounts of money preventing the suicidal ideology that was communism, then socialism, and currently postmodernism, and now, in addition, Islamism. And slowly the world learned. And those that didn’t still suffer (Venezuela), and those that changed prosper (china). But when we started this battle we had a much greater share of the world income and its economy. 3) Europe virtue signals against us all the time, but when there are problems no one but Italy can supply even two planes, and when there is military action only the UK can contribute whatsoever. So we spend 4% of our (massive) GDP and they spend 1% (the same as Switzerland), and play games with us (especially France – who has always been our enemy ). Russia is a paper tiger on all but narrow paths into Moscow, and her declining nuclear inventory is all that makes her other than a third world country – she has the same sized economy as Texas and Italy. 4) Americans are sold virtue signals while the middle class has been hollowed out and the manufacturing has been hollowed out. Originally we hollowed out manufacturing in order to prevent the democratic party and unions working together to implement socialism here in the states and drag us down the same path as other socialist countries. Now we are struggling to return the money, workload, technology, and capital investment to the country. 6) Trump’s tax reform was the most important first step. His trade policy the second, And the forcible redistribution of world military costs to europeans the third. And as a consequence, the end of european virtue signaling that encourages Americas, the American academy, and the American bureaucracy, to follow the suicidal route that european countries have, but which now must abandon their postwar experiments and pay their own way independent of American subsidies. 7) The reason this is important is that we are very shortly going to go through a catastrophic demographic and economic shock that will mean the only competitive advantage between nations is the demographic distribution of the people. In other words, *every point of IQ* is the only difference in competitive ability. And this is the current threat to America, because we have already lost one point in the past twenty years, and almost the second. When five points makes the difference between wealth and relative stagnation, we cannot afford to lose demographically (immigration) or in overpopulation, or in export of wage-level jobs. TRUMP, RUSSIA, AND THE RESTORATION OF THE BALANCE OF POWERS 8) By including Russia he adds the only country with any military capacity to the discourse, and adds an other voice against one-world-government. Putin, The Slavic Countries, Italy, and now Russia, are trying to contain the french-german social democratic suicide of Europe so that it does not spread. 9) By weakening, conspiring against the people of, and invading Ukraine, Russia threw away her potential to restore the economic and population structure of the soviet union, which was necessary for Russia to remain a world power. The clock ticks. And it takes 350M to 500M people in a block to finance a world power status. 10) The sanctions do their work, and as of this year Putin has redirected expenditures from the military to the economy – which is what is necessary for Russia to unite with german against the anglos, and allow the Intermarium (West Slavics: Poland, Ukraine, Slovikia, Romania…) to evolve into a balance of powers between anglo, latin, germanic, west slavic, and east slavic (Russian ) lands – restoring ‘the States of Europe’ again. And thereby Restoring Western Civilization. 11) By forcing Europe to rearm, and eliminating ‘parasitism’ upon the United States, Trump is ending the redistribution of American wealth to post-war European states necessary for their restoration, and ending subsidy to developing nations that were a risk of ‘going communist’. Trump is ending the Marxist, Bolshevik, Trotskyist, Democratic Socialist Globalist program, which sought to create a single world government (and a communist one) out of the united nations, and instead is restoring Europe, and the international balance of powers that has been successful throughout modern history. 12) As any strategist will tell you, you never state your strategy. You merely pursue all options by which to bring it about. Simple people plan. Sophisticated people negotiate and seize every available opportunity. Trump knows exactly what he is doing.And all he has to do to achieve it is *demand fair deals*.That alone will restore the balance of powers. And end the conflict of civilizations.
-
Trump’s Grand Strategy – For Ordinary People
—-”Is there a strategic reason Trump has alienated our traditional trading partners (Europe, Canada, Mexico) while simultaneously saying Russia should be allowed back into the G7 making it the G8?”—-
OF COURSE.In Trump’s Own Words: “We’re like the piggy bank that everybody is robbing,” Trump said. “And that ends.” “The European Union is brutal to the United States and they know it,” Trump said, adding that other leaders acknowledge as much in private. “It’s like the gig is up,” he said. “They can’t believe they got away with it.” He said the size of the U.S. economy means other nations can’t win a trade war. “We win that war a thousand times out of a thousand.” EXPLANATION Keep in mind that all democratic countries have voters to appeal to so they must at least make a visible attempt at resisting changes that would eliminate trade, economic, and military privileges. So these public disputes are necessary for the service of voters even if european politicians understand that ‘the gig is up’. 1) We spent decades and vast amounts of money helping Europe recover from their civil war. But they kept on parasitically extracting from us. We have absurd trade deficits while American workers suffer from it. But when we started this battle we had a much greater share of the world income and its economy. 2) We spent a long time and vast amounts of money preventing the suicidal ideology that was communism, then socialism, and currently postmodernism, and now, in addition, Islamism. And slowly the world learned. And those that didn’t still suffer (Venezuela), and those that changed prosper (china). But when we started this battle we had a much greater share of the world income and its economy. 3) Europe virtue signals against us all the time, but when there are problems no one but Italy can supply even two planes, and when there is military action only the UK can contribute whatsoever. So we spend 4% of our (massive) GDP and they spend 1% (the same as Switzerland), and play games with us (especially France – who has always been our enemy ). Russia is a paper tiger on all but narrow paths into Moscow, and her declining nuclear inventory is all that makes her other than a third world country – she has the same sized economy as Texas and Italy. 4) Americans are sold virtue signals while the middle class has been hollowed out and the manufacturing has been hollowed out. Originally we hollowed out manufacturing in order to prevent the democratic party and unions working together to implement socialism here in the states and drag us down the same path as other socialist countries. Now we are struggling to return the money, workload, technology, and capital investment to the country. 6) Trump’s tax reform was the most important first step. His trade policy the second, And the forcible redistribution of world military costs to europeans the third. And as a consequence, the end of european virtue signaling that encourages Americas, the American academy, and the American bureaucracy, to follow the suicidal route that european countries have, but which now must abandon their postwar experiments and pay their own way independent of American subsidies. 7) The reason this is important is that we are very shortly going to go through a catastrophic demographic and economic shock that will mean the only competitive advantage between nations is the demographic distribution of the people. In other words, *every point of IQ* is the only difference in competitive ability. And this is the current threat to America, because we have already lost one point in the past twenty years, and almost the second. When five points makes the difference between wealth and relative stagnation, we cannot afford to lose demographically (immigration) or in overpopulation, or in export of wage-level jobs. TRUMP, RUSSIA, AND THE RESTORATION OF THE BALANCE OF POWERS 8) By including Russia he adds the only country with any military capacity to the discourse, and adds an other voice against one-world-government. Putin, The Slavic Countries, Italy, and now Russia, are trying to contain the french-german social democratic suicide of Europe so that it does not spread. 9) By weakening, conspiring against the people of, and invading Ukraine, Russia threw away her potential to restore the economic and population structure of the soviet union, which was necessary for Russia to remain a world power. The clock ticks. And it takes 350M to 500M people in a block to finance a world power status. 10) The sanctions do their work, and as of this year Putin has redirected expenditures from the military to the economy – which is what is necessary for Russia to unite with german against the anglos, and allow the Intermarium (West Slavics: Poland, Ukraine, Slovikia, Romania…) to evolve into a balance of powers between anglo, latin, germanic, west slavic, and east slavic (Russian ) lands – restoring ‘the States of Europe’ again. And thereby Restoring Western Civilization. 11) By forcing Europe to rearm, and eliminating ‘parasitism’ upon the United States, Trump is ending the redistribution of American wealth to post-war European states necessary for their restoration, and ending subsidy to developing nations that were a risk of ‘going communist’. Trump is ending the Marxist, Bolshevik, Trotskyist, Democratic Socialist Globalist program, which sought to create a single world government (and a communist one) out of the united nations, and instead is restoring Europe, and the international balance of powers that has been successful throughout modern history. 12) As any strategist will tell you, you never state your strategy. You merely pursue all options by which to bring it about. Simple people plan. Sophisticated people negotiate and seize every available opportunity. Trump knows exactly what he is doing.And all he has to do to achieve it is *demand fair deals*.That alone will restore the balance of powers. And end the conflict of civilizations.
-
Jayman’s HBD Reading List
Start with (key reading):
Top of the list: Pinker, Steven (2002). The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. Viking. Harris, Judith Rich (1998). The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do. Free Press. Revised and Updated edition, 2009. Harris, Judith Rich (2006). No Two Alike: Human Nature and Human Individuality. W.W. Norton. Cochran, Gregory & Harpending, Henry (2009). The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution. Basic Books. Frost, Peter (2011). Human nature or human natures?Futures, 43, 740–748. Clark, Gregory (2014). The Son Also Rises: Surnames and the History of Social Mobility. Princeton University Press.
On biological sex differences:
A video of a debate between Steven Pinker and Elizabeth Spelke – Edge: THE SCIENCE OF GENDER AND SCIENCE (2005) The video from the above site has been removed, but can be found here. The above text contains a transcript of the debate and each presenter’s slides.
This discussion/review of sex differences by Larry Cahill (2014): Equal ≠ The Same: Sex Differences in the Human Brain Indeed, see much of the rest of Cahill’s work on this. Ingalhalikar, Madhura, et al. (2013). Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain, PNAS 2013 Cahill, Larry (2006). Why sex matters for neuroscience, Nature Reviews Neuroscience | AOP, published online 10 May 2006. Ruigrok, Amber N.V.; Salimi-Khorshidi, Gholamreza; Lai, Meng-Chuan; Baron-Cohen, Simon; Lombardo, Michael V.; Tait, Roger J.; and Suckling, John (2014). A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 39, 34-50. Schmitt, David P. (2003). Universal Sex Differences in the Desire for Sexual Variety: Tests From 52 Nations, 6 Continents, and 13 Islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 85–104. Schmitt, David P. et al. (2012). A Reexamination of Sex Differences in Sexuality: New Studies Reveal Old Truths. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2), 135–139.Schmitt, David P. (2013). When Is a Sex Difference Real? | Psychology Today Browne, Kingsley R. (2013). Biological Sex Differences in the Workplace: Reports of the End of Men are Greatly Exaggerated (As Are Claims of Women’s Continued Inequality). Boston University Law Review, Forthcoming. Wayne State University Law School Research Paper No. 2013-04. Borkenau, P., Hřebíčková, M., Kuppens, P., Realo, A. and Allik, J. (2013), Sex Differences in Variability in Personality: A Study in Four Samples. Journal of Personality, 81, 49–60. This video interview with Kay Hymowitz, The Plight of the Alpha Female: Also this article by Kay Hymowitz (2013): Think Again: Working Women – By Kay Hymowitz – Foreign Policy Sommers, Christina Hoff (2013). Lessons from a feminist paradise on Equal Pay Day – Society and Culture – AEI Sommers, Christina Hoff (2013). What ‘Lean In’ Misunderstands About Gender Differences – The Atlantic Lemos, Gina C.; Abad, Francisco J.; Almeida, Leandro S.; and Colom, Robert (2013). Sex differences on g and non-g intellectual performance reveal potential sources of STEM discrepancies. Intelligence 41(1), 11-18. (2011) Sex differences in the Brain: Fact or Fiction?: A video lecture by Margaret M. McCarthy that goes into great depth about the evidence for human and non-human animal sex differences in the brain and behavior (see starting at 28:09 for humans). And of course, Harald Eia’s Brainwash episode on gender.On the reality of IQ:
This talk by Steve Hsu: Also see these blog posts by Steve Hsu: Information Processing: Horsepower matters; psychometrics works (2009) Information Processing: Do advanced education and a challenging career make you smarter? (2009) Information Processing: Life impacts of personality and intelligence (2014) More on the predictive validity of IQ, see this essay: Murray, Charles (1997). IQ and economic success. The Public Interest, Summer 1997, 21-35 On the central importance of g to many aspects of life: Gottfredson, Linda S. (1997). “Why g matters: The Complexity of Everyday Life.” Intelligence 24On the science of behavioral genetics:
See these key papers on behavioral genetics:Bouchard, Thomas. J. and McGue, Matt (2003), Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. J. Neurobiol., 54: 4–45.Bouchard, Thomas J. (2004), Genetic Influence on Human Psychological Traits A survey. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4): 148-151 Bouchard, Thomas J. (2008). Genes and Human Psychological Traits. In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence, and Stephen Stich (Eds.), The Innate Mind, Volume 3: Foundations and the Future (69-89). Oxford University Press. See this key defense against popular criticisms of behavioral genetics and a review of the evidence underlying the solidity of its methods: Barnes, J.C.; Wright, John Paul; Boutwell, Brian B.; Schwartz, Joseph A.; Connoly, Eric J.; Nedelec, Joseph L.; and Beaver, Kevin M. (2014), Demonstrating the Validity of Twin Research in Criminology. Criminology. Steger, Michael F.; Hicks, Brian M.; Kashdan, Todd B.; Krueger, Robert F.; Bouchard Jr., Thomas J. (2007). Genetic and environmental influences on the positive traits of the values in action classification, and biometric covariance with normal personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(3), 524-539. On the impact of genetics on IQ: Plomin, Robert and Deary, Ian J. (2014) Genetics and intelligence differences: five special findings. Molecular Psychiatry advance online publication 16 September 2014 (2013) The Genetics of Intelligence « Meng Hu’s Blog On the genetic contributions to economic success, including the role of IQ, and the lack of effects of the family environment on such (i.e., parents): Essays on genetic variation and economic behavior – Cesarini, D. A. (2010). Essays on genetic variation and economic behavior. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from DSpace@MIT. (http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/57897). Hyytinen, Ari; Ilmakunnas, Pekka; Johansson, Edvard; and Toivanen, Otto (2013). Heritability of Lifetime Income. Helsinki Center of Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 364Visscher PM, Medland SE, Ferreira MAR, Morley KI, Zhu G, et al. (2006) Assumption-Free Estimation of Heritability from Genome-Wide Identity-by-Descent Sharing between Full Siblings. PLoS Genet 2(3): e41. Davies, G., Tenesa, A., Payton, A., Yang, J., Harris, S. E., Liewald, D., … Deary, I. J. (2011). Genome-wide association studies establish that human intelligence is highly heritable and polygenic. Molecular Psychiatry, 16(10), 996–1005.Plomin, Robert et al. (2013). Common DNA Markers Can Account for More Than Half of the Genetic Influence on Cognitive Abilities. Psychological Science, April 2013, 24(4) 562-568.
Trzaskowski, Maciej; Harlaar, Nicole; Arden, Rosalind; Krapohl, Eva; Rimfeld, Kaili; McMillan, Andrew; Dale, Philip S.; and Plomin, Robert. (2013) Genetic influence on family socioeconomic status and children’s intelligence. Intelligence, 42, 83-86. Verweij, K. J. H., Yang, J., Lahti, J., Veijola, J., Hintsanen, M., Pulkki-Råback, L., … Zietsch, B. P. (2012). Maintenance of genetic variation in human personality: Testing evolutionary models by estimating heritability due to common causal variants and investigating the effect of distant inbreeding. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution, 66(10), 3238–3251. Also see this wonderful and comprehensive review of the heritability of brain structure and the relationship between this structure and IQ: Strike, Lachlan T.; Couvy-Duchesne, Baptiste; Hansell, Narelle K.; Cuellar-Partida, Gabriel; Medland, Sarah E.; and Wright, Margaret J. (2015) Genetics and Brain Morphology, Neuropsychology Review, March, 14, 2015. And of course, my own blog posts on the matter: All Human Behavioral Traits are Heritable Taming the “Tiger Mom” and Tackling the Parenting Myth Environmental Hereditarianism The Son Becomes The Father More Behavioral Genetic Facts As well as Harald Eia’s Brainwash episode “The Parental Effect”On the reality of race:
These five key blog posts by Steve Hsu: (2008) Information Processing: “No scientific basis for race” (2008) Information Processing: Human genetic variation, Fst and Lewontin’s fallacy in pictures (2012) Information Processing: Rare variants and human genetic diversity (2013) Information Processing: Learning can hurt (2014) Information Processing: What’s New Since Montagu? These papers describing some of the genetic processes used, particularly principal component analysis (PCA): Price, Alkes L.; Reich, David (2006). Population Structure and Eigenanalysis. PLOS Genetics. McVean, Gil (2009). A Genealogical Interpretation of Principal Components Analysis. PLOS: Genetics. These blog posts by Peter Frost: (2011) Evo and Proud: Apples, oranges, and genes (2012) Evo and Proud: Trans-species polymorphisms As well as these two by Greg Cochran: (2012) Lewontin’s argument | West Hunter (2014) Phenotypes vs genetic statistics | West Hunter And this post by Razib Khan:(2013) Why race as a biological construct matters | Gene Expression
This video of racial differences in newborn behavior: Cross-Cultural Differences in Newborn Behavior Discussed in Freedman, Daniel G. (1979). Human Sociobiology: A Holistic Approach. Free Press. Also see: Kagan, Jerome, & Snidman, Nancy C. (2004). The long shadow of temperament. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. And also see my own blog post: How Much Hard Evidence Do You Need? And of course, Harald Eia’s Brainwash episode on Race.On racial differences in IQ and their global impact:
Rushton, J. Philippe and Jensen, Arthur R. (2010). Race and IQ: A Theory-Based Review of the Research in Richard Nisbett’s Intelligence and How to Get It. The Open Psychology Journal, 3, 9-35. On the effect of poverty and socioeconomic status on IQ (there isn’t one) and said explanations for racial gaps, this blog post: (2013) The Unsilenced Science: Black Suits, Gowns, & Skin: SAT Scores by Income, Education, & Race Rushton, J. Philippe & Jensen, Arthur R. (2010). The rise and fall of the Flynn Effect as a reason to expect a narrowing of the Black-White IQ gap. Intelligence, 38, 213-219 Nijenhuis, J., & van der Flier, H. (2013). Is the Flynn effect on g?: A meta-analysis, Intelligence Nijenhuisa, Jan te; Jongeneel-Grimenb, Birthe; & Armstrong, Elijah L. (2015). Are adoption gains on the g factor? A meta-analysis, Personality and Individual Differences 73, 50-60. Gottfredson, Linda S. (2007). Shattering Logic to Explain the Flynn Effect. Cato Unbound. Lynn, Richard and Tatu Vanhanen. (2002). IQ and the Wealth of Nations. Praeger/Greenwood. Lynn, Richard (2008). The Global Bell Curve: Race, IQ, and Inequality Worldwide. Washington Summit Publishers. Lynn, Richard and Tatu Vanhanen, (2012). Intelligence: A Unifying Construct for the Social Sciences. Also see this blog post by Jason Malloy (2006): Gene Expression: A World of Difference: Richard Lynn Maps World Intelligence Also see the ongoing discussion over at Human Varieties Also these posts by La Griffe du Lion: (2002) The Smart Fraction Theory of IQ and the Wealth of Nations (2004) Smart Fraction Theory II: Why Asians Lag Rindermann, Heiner (2007). The g-factor of international cognitive ability comparisons: the homogeneity of results in PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS and IQ-tests across nations. European Journal of Personality 21, 667-706. Rindermann, Heiner; Sailer, Michael; and Thompson, James (2009). The impact of smart fractions, cognitive ability of politicians and average competences of peoples on social development. Talent Development & Excellence 1 (1), 3-25. Christainsen, Gregory B (2013). IQ and the wealth of nations: How much reverse causality?Intelligence 41, 688-698.On the evolution of modern advanced civilized peoples:
Clark, Gregory (2007). A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World. Princeton University Press. Frost, Peter (2008). Sexual selection and human geographic variation, Special Issue: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the NorthEastern Evolutionary Psychology Society. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2(4),169-191 Frost, Peter (2010). The Roman State and genetic pacification, Evolutionary Psychology, 8(3), 376-389. Frost, Peter and Harpending, Henry (2015). Western Europe, State Formation, and Genetic Pacification, Evolutionary Psychology, 13(1), 230-243. Harpending, Henry (2012). Genetics and the Historical Decline of Violence? | West Hunter Frost, Peter (2013). Evo and Proud: Making Europeans kinder, gentler Frost, Peter (2013). Evo and Proud: Where do those tensions come from? Unz, Ron (2013). How Social Darwinism Made Modern China | The American Conservative Cochran, Gregory; Hardy, Jason; & Harpending, Henry (2006). Natural History of Ashkenazi Intelligence. Journal of Biosocial Science 38, 1-35 Also see these blog posts by Peter Frost (2013): East Asia’s Farewell to Alms Does the Clark-Unz model apply to Japan and Korea? Final thoughts on the Clark-Unz model Fischer, David Hackett (1989). Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways in America. Oxford University Press Woodard, Colin (2011). American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America. Viking Adult. And of course, the work of HBD Chick: start here | hbd* chick clannishness defined | hbd* chick big summary post on the hajnal line | hbd* chick the middle ages « hbd* chick (2011) year-end summary, 2011 | hbd* chick outbreeding, self-control and lethal violence | hbd* chick 2012 top ten | hbd* chick historic european homicide rates … and the hajnal line | hbd* chick medieval manorialism’s selection pressures | hbd chick In addition to my own summaries of her work: An HBD Summary of the Foundations of Modern Civilization How Inbred are Europeans? And about the regional “cultures” of North America (for example, liberal New England vs. the conservative Deep South), see my series on the matter: A Tentative Ranking of the Clannishness of the “Founding Fathers” Sound Familiar? The Cavaliers Flags of the American Nations Maps of the American Nations Rural White Liberals – a Key to Understanding the Political Divide More Maps of the American NationsOn genetic load:
First, be sure to see these blog posts by Greg Cochran on West Hunter (2012): Typos Get Smart More thoughts on genetic load The genetics of stupidity The Golden Age Also: Keller, Matthew C., & Miller, Geoffery (2006). Resolving the paradox of common, harmful, heritable mental disorders: Which evolutionary genetic models work best? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 285-452.On the economic impact of demographic changes (particularly immigration and the Baby Boom in the United States):
Blog posts by Peter Turchin (2013): The End of Prosperity: Why Did Real Wages Stop Growing in the 1970s? Cutting through the Thicket of Economic Forces (Why Real Wages Stopped Growing II) A Proxy for Non-Market Forces (Why Real Wages Stopped Growing III) Putting It All Together (Why Real Wages Stopped Growing IV) More on Labor Supply (Why Real Wages Stopped Growing V) This post by Dennis Mangan (2012): Spot the Correlation: Wealth vs. ImmigrationOn racial and ethnic strife, the pull of genetic similarity, and challenges presented by “diversity”:
Putnam, Robert D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century — The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137-174
Also, on that note, see this ranking of the most peaceful U.S. states, in which, Maine (see HBD Chick here) consistently tops out at #1!
United States Peace Index « Vision of Humanity
Krupp, D.B., Debruine, L.M., Jones, B.C., and Lalumiere, M.L. (2012) Kin recognition: evidence that humans can perceive both positive and negative relatedness. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25 (8). pp. 1472-1478.
Also see
Also see this much more comprehensive list of research supporting human biodiversity here: Human BioDiversity Reading List: http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com/ -
Jayman’s HBD Reading List
Start with (key reading):
Top of the list: Pinker, Steven (2002). The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. Viking. Harris, Judith Rich (1998). The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do. Free Press. Revised and Updated edition, 2009. Harris, Judith Rich (2006). No Two Alike: Human Nature and Human Individuality. W.W. Norton. Cochran, Gregory & Harpending, Henry (2009). The 10,000 Year Explosion: How Civilization Accelerated Human Evolution. Basic Books. Frost, Peter (2011). Human nature or human natures?Futures, 43, 740–748. Clark, Gregory (2014). The Son Also Rises: Surnames and the History of Social Mobility. Princeton University Press.
On biological sex differences:
A video of a debate between Steven Pinker and Elizabeth Spelke – Edge: THE SCIENCE OF GENDER AND SCIENCE (2005) The video from the above site has been removed, but can be found here. The above text contains a transcript of the debate and each presenter’s slides.
This discussion/review of sex differences by Larry Cahill (2014): Equal ≠ The Same: Sex Differences in the Human Brain Indeed, see much of the rest of Cahill’s work on this. Ingalhalikar, Madhura, et al. (2013). Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain, PNAS 2013 Cahill, Larry (2006). Why sex matters for neuroscience, Nature Reviews Neuroscience | AOP, published online 10 May 2006. Ruigrok, Amber N.V.; Salimi-Khorshidi, Gholamreza; Lai, Meng-Chuan; Baron-Cohen, Simon; Lombardo, Michael V.; Tait, Roger J.; and Suckling, John (2014). A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 39, 34-50. Schmitt, David P. (2003). Universal Sex Differences in the Desire for Sexual Variety: Tests From 52 Nations, 6 Continents, and 13 Islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 85–104. Schmitt, David P. et al. (2012). A Reexamination of Sex Differences in Sexuality: New Studies Reveal Old Truths. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2), 135–139.Schmitt, David P. (2013). When Is a Sex Difference Real? | Psychology Today Browne, Kingsley R. (2013). Biological Sex Differences in the Workplace: Reports of the End of Men are Greatly Exaggerated (As Are Claims of Women’s Continued Inequality). Boston University Law Review, Forthcoming. Wayne State University Law School Research Paper No. 2013-04. Borkenau, P., Hřebíčková, M., Kuppens, P., Realo, A. and Allik, J. (2013), Sex Differences in Variability in Personality: A Study in Four Samples. Journal of Personality, 81, 49–60. This video interview with Kay Hymowitz, The Plight of the Alpha Female: Also this article by Kay Hymowitz (2013): Think Again: Working Women – By Kay Hymowitz – Foreign Policy Sommers, Christina Hoff (2013). Lessons from a feminist paradise on Equal Pay Day – Society and Culture – AEI Sommers, Christina Hoff (2013). What ‘Lean In’ Misunderstands About Gender Differences – The Atlantic Lemos, Gina C.; Abad, Francisco J.; Almeida, Leandro S.; and Colom, Robert (2013). Sex differences on g and non-g intellectual performance reveal potential sources of STEM discrepancies. Intelligence 41(1), 11-18. (2011) Sex differences in the Brain: Fact or Fiction?: A video lecture by Margaret M. McCarthy that goes into great depth about the evidence for human and non-human animal sex differences in the brain and behavior (see starting at 28:09 for humans). And of course, Harald Eia’s Brainwash episode on gender.On the reality of IQ:
This talk by Steve Hsu: Also see these blog posts by Steve Hsu: Information Processing: Horsepower matters; psychometrics works (2009) Information Processing: Do advanced education and a challenging career make you smarter? (2009) Information Processing: Life impacts of personality and intelligence (2014) More on the predictive validity of IQ, see this essay: Murray, Charles (1997). IQ and economic success. The Public Interest, Summer 1997, 21-35 On the central importance of g to many aspects of life: Gottfredson, Linda S. (1997). “Why g matters: The Complexity of Everyday Life.” Intelligence 24On the science of behavioral genetics:
See these key papers on behavioral genetics:Bouchard, Thomas. J. and McGue, Matt (2003), Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. J. Neurobiol., 54: 4–45.Bouchard, Thomas J. (2004), Genetic Influence on Human Psychological Traits A survey. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4): 148-151 Bouchard, Thomas J. (2008). Genes and Human Psychological Traits. In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence, and Stephen Stich (Eds.), The Innate Mind, Volume 3: Foundations and the Future (69-89). Oxford University Press. See this key defense against popular criticisms of behavioral genetics and a review of the evidence underlying the solidity of its methods: Barnes, J.C.; Wright, John Paul; Boutwell, Brian B.; Schwartz, Joseph A.; Connoly, Eric J.; Nedelec, Joseph L.; and Beaver, Kevin M. (2014), Demonstrating the Validity of Twin Research in Criminology. Criminology. Steger, Michael F.; Hicks, Brian M.; Kashdan, Todd B.; Krueger, Robert F.; Bouchard Jr., Thomas J. (2007). Genetic and environmental influences on the positive traits of the values in action classification, and biometric covariance with normal personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(3), 524-539. On the impact of genetics on IQ: Plomin, Robert and Deary, Ian J. (2014) Genetics and intelligence differences: five special findings. Molecular Psychiatry advance online publication 16 September 2014 (2013) The Genetics of Intelligence « Meng Hu’s Blog On the genetic contributions to economic success, including the role of IQ, and the lack of effects of the family environment on such (i.e., parents): Essays on genetic variation and economic behavior – Cesarini, D. A. (2010). Essays on genetic variation and economic behavior. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from DSpace@MIT. (http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/57897). Hyytinen, Ari; Ilmakunnas, Pekka; Johansson, Edvard; and Toivanen, Otto (2013). Heritability of Lifetime Income. Helsinki Center of Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 364Visscher PM, Medland SE, Ferreira MAR, Morley KI, Zhu G, et al. (2006) Assumption-Free Estimation of Heritability from Genome-Wide Identity-by-Descent Sharing between Full Siblings. PLoS Genet 2(3): e41. Davies, G., Tenesa, A., Payton, A., Yang, J., Harris, S. E., Liewald, D., … Deary, I. J. (2011). Genome-wide association studies establish that human intelligence is highly heritable and polygenic. Molecular Psychiatry, 16(10), 996–1005.Plomin, Robert et al. (2013). Common DNA Markers Can Account for More Than Half of the Genetic Influence on Cognitive Abilities. Psychological Science, April 2013, 24(4) 562-568.
Trzaskowski, Maciej; Harlaar, Nicole; Arden, Rosalind; Krapohl, Eva; Rimfeld, Kaili; McMillan, Andrew; Dale, Philip S.; and Plomin, Robert. (2013) Genetic influence on family socioeconomic status and children’s intelligence. Intelligence, 42, 83-86. Verweij, K. J. H., Yang, J., Lahti, J., Veijola, J., Hintsanen, M., Pulkki-Råback, L., … Zietsch, B. P. (2012). Maintenance of genetic variation in human personality: Testing evolutionary models by estimating heritability due to common causal variants and investigating the effect of distant inbreeding. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution, 66(10), 3238–3251. Also see this wonderful and comprehensive review of the heritability of brain structure and the relationship between this structure and IQ: Strike, Lachlan T.; Couvy-Duchesne, Baptiste; Hansell, Narelle K.; Cuellar-Partida, Gabriel; Medland, Sarah E.; and Wright, Margaret J. (2015) Genetics and Brain Morphology, Neuropsychology Review, March, 14, 2015. And of course, my own blog posts on the matter: All Human Behavioral Traits are Heritable Taming the “Tiger Mom” and Tackling the Parenting Myth Environmental Hereditarianism The Son Becomes The Father More Behavioral Genetic Facts As well as Harald Eia’s Brainwash episode “The Parental Effect”On the reality of race:
These five key blog posts by Steve Hsu: (2008) Information Processing: “No scientific basis for race” (2008) Information Processing: Human genetic variation, Fst and Lewontin’s fallacy in pictures (2012) Information Processing: Rare variants and human genetic diversity (2013) Information Processing: Learning can hurt (2014) Information Processing: What’s New Since Montagu? These papers describing some of the genetic processes used, particularly principal component analysis (PCA): Price, Alkes L.; Reich, David (2006). Population Structure and Eigenanalysis. PLOS Genetics. McVean, Gil (2009). A Genealogical Interpretation of Principal Components Analysis. PLOS: Genetics. These blog posts by Peter Frost: (2011) Evo and Proud: Apples, oranges, and genes (2012) Evo and Proud: Trans-species polymorphisms As well as these two by Greg Cochran: (2012) Lewontin’s argument | West Hunter (2014) Phenotypes vs genetic statistics | West Hunter And this post by Razib Khan:(2013) Why race as a biological construct matters | Gene Expression
This video of racial differences in newborn behavior: Cross-Cultural Differences in Newborn Behavior Discussed in Freedman, Daniel G. (1979). Human Sociobiology: A Holistic Approach. Free Press. Also see: Kagan, Jerome, & Snidman, Nancy C. (2004). The long shadow of temperament. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. And also see my own blog post: How Much Hard Evidence Do You Need? And of course, Harald Eia’s Brainwash episode on Race.On racial differences in IQ and their global impact:
Rushton, J. Philippe and Jensen, Arthur R. (2010). Race and IQ: A Theory-Based Review of the Research in Richard Nisbett’s Intelligence and How to Get It. The Open Psychology Journal, 3, 9-35. On the effect of poverty and socioeconomic status on IQ (there isn’t one) and said explanations for racial gaps, this blog post: (2013) The Unsilenced Science: Black Suits, Gowns, & Skin: SAT Scores by Income, Education, & Race Rushton, J. Philippe & Jensen, Arthur R. (2010). The rise and fall of the Flynn Effect as a reason to expect a narrowing of the Black-White IQ gap. Intelligence, 38, 213-219 Nijenhuis, J., & van der Flier, H. (2013). Is the Flynn effect on g?: A meta-analysis, Intelligence Nijenhuisa, Jan te; Jongeneel-Grimenb, Birthe; & Armstrong, Elijah L. (2015). Are adoption gains on the g factor? A meta-analysis, Personality and Individual Differences 73, 50-60. Gottfredson, Linda S. (2007). Shattering Logic to Explain the Flynn Effect. Cato Unbound. Lynn, Richard and Tatu Vanhanen. (2002). IQ and the Wealth of Nations. Praeger/Greenwood. Lynn, Richard (2008). The Global Bell Curve: Race, IQ, and Inequality Worldwide. Washington Summit Publishers. Lynn, Richard and Tatu Vanhanen, (2012). Intelligence: A Unifying Construct for the Social Sciences. Also see this blog post by Jason Malloy (2006): Gene Expression: A World of Difference: Richard Lynn Maps World Intelligence Also see the ongoing discussion over at Human Varieties Also these posts by La Griffe du Lion: (2002) The Smart Fraction Theory of IQ and the Wealth of Nations (2004) Smart Fraction Theory II: Why Asians Lag Rindermann, Heiner (2007). The g-factor of international cognitive ability comparisons: the homogeneity of results in PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS and IQ-tests across nations. European Journal of Personality 21, 667-706. Rindermann, Heiner; Sailer, Michael; and Thompson, James (2009). The impact of smart fractions, cognitive ability of politicians and average competences of peoples on social development. Talent Development & Excellence 1 (1), 3-25. Christainsen, Gregory B (2013). IQ and the wealth of nations: How much reverse causality?Intelligence 41, 688-698.On the evolution of modern advanced civilized peoples:
Clark, Gregory (2007). A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World. Princeton University Press. Frost, Peter (2008). Sexual selection and human geographic variation, Special Issue: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the NorthEastern Evolutionary Psychology Society. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2(4),169-191 Frost, Peter (2010). The Roman State and genetic pacification, Evolutionary Psychology, 8(3), 376-389. Frost, Peter and Harpending, Henry (2015). Western Europe, State Formation, and Genetic Pacification, Evolutionary Psychology, 13(1), 230-243. Harpending, Henry (2012). Genetics and the Historical Decline of Violence? | West Hunter Frost, Peter (2013). Evo and Proud: Making Europeans kinder, gentler Frost, Peter (2013). Evo and Proud: Where do those tensions come from? Unz, Ron (2013). How Social Darwinism Made Modern China | The American Conservative Cochran, Gregory; Hardy, Jason; & Harpending, Henry (2006). Natural History of Ashkenazi Intelligence. Journal of Biosocial Science 38, 1-35 Also see these blog posts by Peter Frost (2013): East Asia’s Farewell to Alms Does the Clark-Unz model apply to Japan and Korea? Final thoughts on the Clark-Unz model Fischer, David Hackett (1989). Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways in America. Oxford University Press Woodard, Colin (2011). American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America. Viking Adult. And of course, the work of HBD Chick: start here | hbd* chick clannishness defined | hbd* chick big summary post on the hajnal line | hbd* chick the middle ages « hbd* chick (2011) year-end summary, 2011 | hbd* chick outbreeding, self-control and lethal violence | hbd* chick 2012 top ten | hbd* chick historic european homicide rates … and the hajnal line | hbd* chick medieval manorialism’s selection pressures | hbd chick In addition to my own summaries of her work: An HBD Summary of the Foundations of Modern Civilization How Inbred are Europeans? And about the regional “cultures” of North America (for example, liberal New England vs. the conservative Deep South), see my series on the matter: A Tentative Ranking of the Clannishness of the “Founding Fathers” Sound Familiar? The Cavaliers Flags of the American Nations Maps of the American Nations Rural White Liberals – a Key to Understanding the Political Divide More Maps of the American NationsOn genetic load:
First, be sure to see these blog posts by Greg Cochran on West Hunter (2012): Typos Get Smart More thoughts on genetic load The genetics of stupidity The Golden Age Also: Keller, Matthew C., & Miller, Geoffery (2006). Resolving the paradox of common, harmful, heritable mental disorders: Which evolutionary genetic models work best? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 285-452.On the economic impact of demographic changes (particularly immigration and the Baby Boom in the United States):
Blog posts by Peter Turchin (2013): The End of Prosperity: Why Did Real Wages Stop Growing in the 1970s? Cutting through the Thicket of Economic Forces (Why Real Wages Stopped Growing II) A Proxy for Non-Market Forces (Why Real Wages Stopped Growing III) Putting It All Together (Why Real Wages Stopped Growing IV) More on Labor Supply (Why Real Wages Stopped Growing V) This post by Dennis Mangan (2012): Spot the Correlation: Wealth vs. ImmigrationOn racial and ethnic strife, the pull of genetic similarity, and challenges presented by “diversity”:
Putnam, Robert D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century — The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137-174
Also, on that note, see this ranking of the most peaceful U.S. states, in which, Maine (see HBD Chick here) consistently tops out at #1!
United States Peace Index « Vision of Humanity
Krupp, D.B., Debruine, L.M., Jones, B.C., and Lalumiere, M.L. (2012) Kin recognition: evidence that humans can perceive both positive and negative relatedness. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25 (8). pp. 1472-1478.
Also see
Also see this much more comprehensive list of research supporting human biodiversity here: Human BioDiversity Reading List: http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com/ -
Family is the Enemy of the State
—“Family is enemy number one of the State”—Tomás Rodriguez Villegas People forget that the reason women have property rights was so that the church could break up the aristocratic families so that the church (state) could acquire their lands. By the French revolution, half of the land in europe was dead capital.
-
Family is the Enemy of the State
—“Family is enemy number one of the State”—Tomás Rodriguez Villegas People forget that the reason women have property rights was so that the church could break up the aristocratic families so that the church (state) could acquire their lands. By the French revolution, half of the land in europe was dead capital.