Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • There is only one route out of the great deceits

    I know, you are the kind of person who wants a supernatural, secular, or scientific religion. The law says that any religion that is not false, parasitic, predatory, or devolutionary, is a good religion. The problem is you think that religion requires falsehoods, because you have been immersed in an ocean of ‘forgivable, convenient,’ falsehoods. But that’s only because you haven’t researched the religions that aren’t false, and tried to develop a religion that likewise isn’t false. And the reason you must, is that the only means of eliminating bad religions is falsehood, parasitism, predation, and devolution. And if you preserve those falsehoods and ‘bads’ for your own you license the ‘bads’ of others. There is only one route out of the great deceits, of Abrahamic Pilpul and Critique: truth, sovereignty, reciprocity, markets, and as a consequence, transcendence.

  • There is only one route out of the great deceits

    I know, you are the kind of person who wants a supernatural, secular, or scientific religion. The law says that any religion that is not false, parasitic, predatory, or devolutionary, is a good religion. The problem is you think that religion requires falsehoods, because you have been immersed in an ocean of ‘forgivable, convenient,’ falsehoods. But that’s only because you haven’t researched the religions that aren’t false, and tried to develop a religion that likewise isn’t false. And the reason you must, is that the only means of eliminating bad religions is falsehood, parasitism, predation, and devolution. And if you preserve those falsehoods and ‘bads’ for your own you license the ‘bads’ of others. There is only one route out of the great deceits, of Abrahamic Pilpul and Critique: truth, sovereignty, reciprocity, markets, and as a consequence, transcendence.

  • Sophisms: Will to Power and Non Aggression

    The will to power and the non aggression principle, are both incomplete sentences for a reason: to sound profound without actually being profound. The will to power of or over what? Non aggression against what? Unless you answer those questions both propositions are just sophisms. They require substitution on the part of the individual. And as such tell us nothing other than whatever it is we already presume. AGENCY, SOVEREIGNTY, AUTONOMY, …. with what resources?

  • Sophisms: Will to Power and Non Aggression

    The will to power and the non aggression principle, are both incomplete sentences for a reason: to sound profound without actually being profound. The will to power of or over what? Non aggression against what? Unless you answer those questions both propositions are just sophisms. They require substitution on the part of the individual. And as such tell us nothing other than whatever it is we already presume. AGENCY, SOVEREIGNTY, AUTONOMY, …. with what resources?

  • The Law Allows Us to Create Religions that Are Not False

    —“Humans really don’t live day to day in the “conscious” “rational” mode, you know this but it seems you unconsciously push against this fact.”— SG Simmons  Because religions are relativistic and truth absolute. As such in matters of conflict, the truth and the law, supercede religion – for the simple reason that they do in fact supercede it. For some reason it is inconceivable to people that we can create religions (as the stoics tried to, as buddha tried to, and the japanese do) that are in fact, not false. But this is why I have to work on this problem so hard. And why law is so important. So that we can end the undecidability of religions and produce one that is decidable.

  • The Law Allows Us to Create Religions that Are Not False

    —“Humans really don’t live day to day in the “conscious” “rational” mode, you know this but it seems you unconsciously push against this fact.”— SG Simmons  Because religions are relativistic and truth absolute. As such in matters of conflict, the truth and the law, supercede religion – for the simple reason that they do in fact supercede it. For some reason it is inconceivable to people that we can create religions (as the stoics tried to, as buddha tried to, and the japanese do) that are in fact, not false. But this is why I have to work on this problem so hard. And why law is so important. So that we can end the undecidability of religions and produce one that is decidable.

  • The Secret to Listening to Women

    I’ve written about the problem of men learning to listen to women for years now, and it seems like one of those things that we ought to be taught as a general man-rule. The trick to listening to women is listening 10% and thinking about something else 90% rather than asking a woman to distill her thoughts down to the 10% of facts that matter. Worse, we don’t get all the signaling involved between women – it doesn’t exist – so the entire point of communication may in fact be nothing other than the transfer of signals. Unfortunately there is no course in ‘woman speak’ for men to take. Even if it’s the most valuable course we could take. I just listen. And ask questions. The hard part is learning NOT TO TRY TO SOLVE A PROBLEM. Just listen. I think the problem occurs when women ask men to experience their emotions the way another woman does, when they share experiences. This forces men to lie – to pretend either that they understand them, or that they feel them, or that they even can feel them. What I’ve found is that if a woman explains how she felt I can undrestand it. But describing the circumstance itself does not help me understand it. Finally, to just show that I understand, and usually that her feelings were justified. The hard part is not trying to inquire or solve the problem but just show you understand, accept, and let her express (exit, expend, exhaust) her emotions. It’s different with staff. Some women need to be taught that when talking to men, it’s JUST THE FACTS, and WHAT DO YOU WANT ME TO DO?. Otherwise the woman is using my much shallower emotional reservoir and clouding my judgement. Most people by a large margin prefer male bosses for the simple reason that we don’t get involved in the emotional stuff. But it’s actually because we don’t even see it, hear it, or understand it. And if we do, we consider it childish and it makes us angry. The trick for men with women is always patience. 😉 Which is in fact, the trick with all human beings. Patience is the under appreciated and misunderstood. Why? ‘Cause it’s costly

  • The Secret to Listening to Women

    I’ve written about the problem of men learning to listen to women for years now, and it seems like one of those things that we ought to be taught as a general man-rule. The trick to listening to women is listening 10% and thinking about something else 90% rather than asking a woman to distill her thoughts down to the 10% of facts that matter. Worse, we don’t get all the signaling involved between women – it doesn’t exist – so the entire point of communication may in fact be nothing other than the transfer of signals. Unfortunately there is no course in ‘woman speak’ for men to take. Even if it’s the most valuable course we could take. I just listen. And ask questions. The hard part is learning NOT TO TRY TO SOLVE A PROBLEM. Just listen. I think the problem occurs when women ask men to experience their emotions the way another woman does, when they share experiences. This forces men to lie – to pretend either that they understand them, or that they feel them, or that they even can feel them. What I’ve found is that if a woman explains how she felt I can undrestand it. But describing the circumstance itself does not help me understand it. Finally, to just show that I understand, and usually that her feelings were justified. The hard part is not trying to inquire or solve the problem but just show you understand, accept, and let her express (exit, expend, exhaust) her emotions. It’s different with staff. Some women need to be taught that when talking to men, it’s JUST THE FACTS, and WHAT DO YOU WANT ME TO DO?. Otherwise the woman is using my much shallower emotional reservoir and clouding my judgement. Most people by a large margin prefer male bosses for the simple reason that we don’t get involved in the emotional stuff. But it’s actually because we don’t even see it, hear it, or understand it. And if we do, we consider it childish and it makes us angry. The trick for men with women is always patience. 😉 Which is in fact, the trick with all human beings. Patience is the under appreciated and misunderstood. Why? ‘Cause it’s costly

  • The West’s Strategy

    THE WEST’S UNIQUE STRATEGY: TRUTH, DUTY, SOVEREIGNTY, RECIPROCITY AND MARKETS IN EVERYTHING. Trump is demanding truth, duty, sovereignty, reciprocity and markets in everything. The outcome of simply constructing only fair deals produces western civilization. And the balance of powers.

  • The West’s Strategy

    THE WEST’S UNIQUE STRATEGY: TRUTH, DUTY, SOVEREIGNTY, RECIPROCITY AND MARKETS IN EVERYTHING. Trump is demanding truth, duty, sovereignty, reciprocity and markets in everything. The outcome of simply constructing only fair deals produces western civilization. And the balance of powers.