No matter how good it is, it’s no good without ammunition. And 600 rounds is the minimum you’ll need to both use, and get replacement for it. So, you need that inventory. Because you won’t have time to buy it, and the shelves will be empty when you need it. Accumulate.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Revolution: Weapons do not increase in scarcity as does ammunition.
No matter how good it is, it’s no good without ammunition. And 600 rounds is the minimum you’ll need to both use, and get replacement for it. So, you need that inventory. Because you won’t have time to buy it, and the shelves will be empty when you need it. Accumulate.
-
It’s the Lack of Orderliness.
—“Conservatives are more orderly, and therefore less likely to mix anything up, including race, sexuality etc. Liberals are more open to experience, which is often correlated with high IQ, but it’s not the high IQ that makes them less prejudiced, it’s the lack of orderliness.”—Joel Harvey
-
It’s the Lack of Orderliness.
—“Conservatives are more orderly, and therefore less likely to mix anything up, including race, sexuality etc. Liberals are more open to experience, which is often correlated with high IQ, but it’s not the high IQ that makes them less prejudiced, it’s the lack of orderliness.”—Joel Harvey
-
Hierarchy of Law
HIERARCHY OF LAW …. Natural Law (reciprocity) vs …. …. Law (findings of judges ) vs …. …. …. Legislation (commands that violate that law ) vs …. …. …. …. Regulation (prior restraint by insurer of last resort) Immigration for whatever reason violates 1) Natural Law , 2) Law, 3) Legislation, 4) Regulation Once you have violated such law *you have no rights*. Which is what violating the law means: removal of rights other than natural law (reciprocity). There are no extraordinary circumstances. That’s what rule of law means: i) non-discretion, ii) universal applicability, iii) universal standing. -
Hierarchy of Law
HIERARCHY OF LAW …. Natural Law (reciprocity) vs …. …. Law (findings of judges ) vs …. …. …. Legislation (commands that violate that law ) vs …. …. …. …. Regulation (prior restraint by insurer of last resort) Immigration for whatever reason violates 1) Natural Law , 2) Law, 3) Legislation, 4) Regulation Once you have violated such law *you have no rights*. Which is what violating the law means: removal of rights other than natural law (reciprocity). There are no extraordinary circumstances. That’s what rule of law means: i) non-discretion, ii) universal applicability, iii) universal standing. -
The Failure of Paradigms (ways of Thinking)
There is a reason the world is continuously coalescing to the vocabulary and grammars of science: and that is because of the commensurability and therefore falsificationary value of the single most parsimonious vocabulary and grammar consisting entirely of continuous relations from the very small below human scale, through to human scale, to the very large beyond human scale – the semantics of which consist of analogies to observable experience: human scale. Any idiot can come up with a paradigm that provides some sort of explanatory power, in the same way that a fairy tale, legend, or mythos provides explanatory power: by analogy. And idiots come up with new paradigms all the time, in an effort to elucidate some set of relations or other. And the they congratulate themselves on their insight and next seek to preserve that insight by justification: a forever-failing attempt to find a way for the rest of human knowledge to fit that paradigm. They over-invest. They fail. It is quite different to start with an attempt to discover the grammar and semantics of science itself, and with that ambition to correct the minor incompatibilities between the arts and sciences, thereby increasing commensurability and falsifiability across all arts and sciences – producing a universal grammar and semantics and as such rendering all human knowledge more parsimonious and synthetic.
-
The Failure of Paradigms (ways of Thinking)
There is a reason the world is continuously coalescing to the vocabulary and grammars of science: and that is because of the commensurability and therefore falsificationary value of the single most parsimonious vocabulary and grammar consisting entirely of continuous relations from the very small below human scale, through to human scale, to the very large beyond human scale – the semantics of which consist of analogies to observable experience: human scale. Any idiot can come up with a paradigm that provides some sort of explanatory power, in the same way that a fairy tale, legend, or mythos provides explanatory power: by analogy. And idiots come up with new paradigms all the time, in an effort to elucidate some set of relations or other. And the they congratulate themselves on their insight and next seek to preserve that insight by justification: a forever-failing attempt to find a way for the rest of human knowledge to fit that paradigm. They over-invest. They fail. It is quite different to start with an attempt to discover the grammar and semantics of science itself, and with that ambition to correct the minor incompatibilities between the arts and sciences, thereby increasing commensurability and falsifiability across all arts and sciences – producing a universal grammar and semantics and as such rendering all human knowledge more parsimonious and synthetic.
-
Tribes of The Right
(high openness AND high orderliness) —“It seems to me that we high-openness right-wingers (like those of us attracted to Curt), who are a subset of the high-IQ right-wingers, are trying to drag the rest of the conservatives rightward kicking & screaming. We see “outside the box” truths more readily. Thus normie conservative: “No more illegal immigration” while high-openness high-IQ right-winger: “No more 3rd world immigration, period, no more women voting, etc”.—John Mark
-
Tribes of The Right
(high openness AND high orderliness) —“It seems to me that we high-openness right-wingers (like those of us attracted to Curt), who are a subset of the high-IQ right-wingers, are trying to drag the rest of the conservatives rightward kicking & screaming. We see “outside the box” truths more readily. Thus normie conservative: “No more illegal immigration” while high-openness high-IQ right-winger: “No more 3rd world immigration, period, no more women voting, etc”.—John Mark