Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Sense Making

    Under P-Law, proposing or advocating the use of the state (legislation) for irreciprocity, is a crime – a third-degree treason. Women are not rational, reciprocal, or loyal creatures. They are driven by extreme intolerance for uncertainty and as such drive civs to collapse.

    -Curt, you bring up an unresolved dilemma for me: Would it not be more accurate to say “pure feminine sensemaking” is not rational, reciprocal or loyal?-WalterIII

    “Sense-making”  like “True For Me” is relative (a subset) like metaphysics, and “Rationality”, like “True“(testifiable), is absolute (a complete set) like Physics. This is a problem with ambiguity of the term ‘rational’ dependent on context. Their behavior is rational – for women(subset). It is not rational for a polity(set). We face a similar problem with philosophy: Personal, Social (interpersonal), Political(scale), or scientific (complete) philosophy? This is why I work on disambiguation so that we know what ‘general rule’ we are talking about. Unfortunately “rationality(capacity), rational(subset), rational(set), rationalism(method) and Logic and Logical” are conflated – just as ‘truth’ is.

  • Sense Making

    Under P-Law, proposing or advocating the use of the state (legislation) for irreciprocity, is a crime – a third-degree treason. Women are not rational, reciprocal, or loyal creatures. They are driven by extreme intolerance for uncertainty and as such drive civs to collapse.

    -Curt, you bring up an unresolved dilemma for me: Would it not be more accurate to say “pure feminine sensemaking” is not rational, reciprocal or loyal?-WalterIII

    “Sense-making”  like “True For Me” is relative (a subset) like metaphysics, and “Rationality”, like “True“(testifiable), is absolute (a complete set) like Physics. This is a problem with ambiguity of the term ‘rational’ dependent on context. Their behavior is rational – for women(subset). It is not rational for a polity(set). We face a similar problem with philosophy: Personal, Social (interpersonal), Political(scale), or scientific (complete) philosophy? This is why I work on disambiguation so that we know what ‘general rule’ we are talking about. Unfortunately “rationality(capacity), rational(subset), rational(set), rationalism(method) and Logic and Logical” are conflated – just as ‘truth’ is.

  • Of Course Gab Will Attract Taboo Conversations

    If you have a free speech platform it will tend to attract taboo discussions that can’t be had otherwise. And yes, Jewish thought leadership is largely behind the postwar destruction of western civilization, and there is a long literature on the subject, and it’s almost entirely true. Is it a conspiracy? Like all political movements, it’s a conspiracy of common interest, perpetuating the Jewish group strategy, pursued with excellence and diligence by elites, which is what has caused their (entirely justified) persecution across time. That (warfare) strategy is the use of undermining using social construction, of false promise, baiting into hazard, under plausible deniability, escaping warranty and liability. It is the only group that has institutionalized the female group evolutionary strategy. Given that it’s the female strategy – and entirely biological – then the question is whether Jewish group strategy is by design, by cultural evolution, or by genetic adaptation or all of the above. And it is likely all of the above. We are unaware of the uniqueness of western civilization. So we don’t defend it. My work explains the success of the west compared to all the rest, and why we are vulnerable to the Jewish method of warfare by the female strategy of undermining, by the social construction of false promise of freedom from the logical, physical, behavioral, cooperative, and evolutionary laws of the universe. And I and others have documented the evolution of this war against western civilization from within. The difference is we know how to stop it now by law rather than continuing the long tradition of exterminating them for their crimes.

  • Of Course Gab Will Attract Taboo Conversations

    If you have a free speech platform it will tend to attract taboo discussions that can’t be had otherwise. And yes, Jewish thought leadership is largely behind the postwar destruction of western civilization, and there is a long literature on the subject, and it’s almost entirely true. Is it a conspiracy? Like all political movements, it’s a conspiracy of common interest, perpetuating the Jewish group strategy, pursued with excellence and diligence by elites, which is what has caused their (entirely justified) persecution across time. That (warfare) strategy is the use of undermining using social construction, of false promise, baiting into hazard, under plausible deniability, escaping warranty and liability. It is the only group that has institutionalized the female group evolutionary strategy. Given that it’s the female strategy – and entirely biological – then the question is whether Jewish group strategy is by design, by cultural evolution, or by genetic adaptation or all of the above. And it is likely all of the above. We are unaware of the uniqueness of western civilization. So we don’t defend it. My work explains the success of the west compared to all the rest, and why we are vulnerable to the Jewish method of warfare by the female strategy of undermining, by the social construction of false promise of freedom from the logical, physical, behavioral, cooperative, and evolutionary laws of the universe. And I and others have documented the evolution of this war against western civilization from within. The difference is we know how to stop it now by law rather than continuing the long tradition of exterminating them for their crimes.

  • Under P-Law, proposing or advocating the use of the state (legislation) for irre

    Under P-Law, proposing or advocating the use of the state (legislation) for irreciprocity, is a crime – a third-degree treason.

    Women are not rational, reciprocal, or loyal creatures. They are driven by extreme intolerance for uncertainty and as such drive civs to collapse.

    -Curt, you bring up an unresolved dilemma for me: Would it not be more accurate to say “pure feminine sensemaking” is not rational, reciprocal or loyal?-WalterIII

    “Sense-making” is relative (a subset) like metaphysics, and rationality is absolute (a complete set) like physics. This is a problem with ambiguity of the term ‘rational’ dependent on context. Their behavior is rational – for women(subset). It is not rational for a polity(set).

    We face a similar problem with philosophy: Personal, Social (interpersonal), Political(scale), or scientific (complete) philosophy?

    This is why I work on disambiguation so that we know what ‘general rule’ we are talking about. Unfortunately “rationality(capacity), rational(subset), rational(set), rationalism(method) and Logic and Logical” are conflated – just as ‘truth’ is.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-11 15:34:50 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105871893527054988

  • If you have a free speech platform it will tend to attract taboo discussions tha

    If you have a free speech platform it will tend to attract taboo discussions that can’t be had otherwise.

    And yes, Jewish thought leadership is largely behind the postwar destruction of western civilization, and there is a long literature on the subject, and it’s almost entirely true. Is it a conspiracy? Like all political movements, it’s a conspiracy of common interest, perpetuating the Jewish group strategy, pursued with excellence and diligence by elites, which is what has caused their (entirely justified) persecution across time. That (warfare) strategy is the use of undermining using social construction, of false promise, baiting into hazard, under plausible deniability, escaping warranty and liability. It is the only group that has institutionalized the female group evolutionary strategy. Given that it’s the female strategy – and entirely biological – then the question is whether Jewish group strategy is by design, by cultural evolution, or by genetic adaptation, or all of the above. And it is likely all of the above. We are unaware of the uniqueness of western civilization. So we don’t defend it. My work explains the success of the west compared to all the rest, and why we are vulnerable to the Jewish method of warfare by the female strategy of undermining, by the social construction of false promise of freedom from the logical, physical, behavioral, cooperative, and evolutionary laws of the universe. And I and others have documented the evolution of this war against western civilization from within. The difference is we know how to stop it now by law rather than continuing the long tradition of exterminating them for their crimes.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-11 14:33:12 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105871651172726907

  • @PrettyPepper @NationalFile @FuriousFolly if you have a free speech platform it

    @PrettyPepper@NationalFile

    @FuriousFolly if you have a free speech platform it will tend to attract taboo discussions that can’t behad otherwise.

    And yes, jewish thought leadership is largely behind the postwar destruction of western civilization, and there is a long literature on the subject, and it’s almost entirely true. Is it s conspiracy? Lke all political movements it’s a conspiracy of common interest, perpetuating the Jewish group strategy, pursued with excellence and diligence by elites, which is what has caused their (entirely justified) persecution across time. That (warfare) strategy is the use of undermining using social construction, of false promise, baiting into hazard, punder plausible deniability, escaping warranty and liability. It is the only group that has institutionalized the female group evolutinary strategy. Given that it’s the female strategy – and entirely biological – then the question is whether jewish group strategy is by design, by cultural evolution, or by genetic adaptation or all of the above. And it is likely all of the above. We are unaware of the uniqueness of western civilization. So we don’t defend it. My work explains the success of the west compared to all the rest, and why we are vulnerable to the jewsh method of warfare by the female strategy ofu ndermining, by the social constuction of false promise of freedom from the logical, physical, behavioral, cooperative, and evolutionary laws of the universe. And I and others have documented the evolution of this war against western civlization from within. The difference is we know how to stop it now by law rather than continuing the long tradition of exterminating them for their crimes.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-11 14:30:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105871642097883441

  • @FuriousFolly if you have a free speech platform it will tend to attract taboo d

    @FuriousFolly if you have a free speech platform it will tend to attract taboo discussions that can’t be had otherwise.

    And yes, Jewish thought leadership is largely behind the postwar destruction of western civilization, and there is a long literature on the subject, and it’s almost entirely true. Is it s conspiracy? Like all political movements, it’s a conspiracy of common interest, perpetuating the Jewish group strategy, pursued with excellence and diligence by elites, which is what has caused their (entirely justified) persecution across time. That (warfare) strategy is the use of undermining using social construction, of false promise, baiting into hazard, under plausible deniability, escaping warranty and liability. It is the only group that has institutionalized the female group evolutionary strategy. Given that it’s the female strategy – and entirely biological – then the question is whether Jewish group strategy is by design, by cultural evolution, or by genetic adaptation, or all of the above. And it is likely all of the above. We are unaware of the uniqueness of western civilization. So we don’t defend it. My work explains the success of the west compared to all the rest, and why we are vulnerable to the Jewish method of warfare by the female strategy of undermining, by the social construction of false promise of freedom from the logical, physical, behavioral, cooperative, and evolutionary laws of the universe. And I and others have documented the evolution of this war against western civilization from within. The difference is we know how to stop it now by law rather than continuing the long tradition of exterminating them for their crimes.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-11 14:28:42 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105871633441768079

  • THE VALUE OF ART EDUCATION. 1) I was trained in art history, art theory, art cri

    THE VALUE OF ART EDUCATION.
    1) I was trained in art history, art theory, art criticism, and far less so in the craft itself. In effect my education was in the philosophy of art. I don’t think you can get a decent theory education any longer. If you can I don’t know where.

    2) So imagine sitting in a u-shaped set of desks three hours a day, critiquing (in the art sense) art from every period and movement, and being required to state a meaningful judgement and explain that judgement on each piece. (More like law school interrogation of students.)

    3) Imagine going to a review at the end of the semester and being eviscerated by the profs and more than half of the students leaving the room in tears. This was ‘adversarialism’ in art education.

    4) The value in learning to criticize art is that it’s criticizing taste, and you quickly learn that taste consists of not only your own metaphysics, the relationship you identify between yourself, the art, the venue, the context, and the polity, and your relative ignorance.

    6) So you learn about yourself, others, your people, civilizations, and all mankind through art and art criticism BEFORE you learn about economics, and politics, and norms traditions, and values. You learn through aesthetics. And in adversarial conditions where you can’t ‘cheat’.

    7) So this is probably one of the reasons why I have an easier time isolating intuition (aesthetics) with facts. I started with war, history science, and art, and only then politics, economics, and law.

    And this is the education of ARISTOCRACY: Rule. Not governance, but RULE.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-11 00:24:12 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105868312762519584

  • @stefanmolyneux Thank you Stefan. These people are trash

    @stefanmolyneux Thank you Stefan. These people are trash.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-10 21:33:40 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105867642160306438