Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • @TonyKrvaric (Only for the fundamentalists, and only in america, and only in ame

    @TonyKrvaric (Only for the fundamentalists, and only in america, and only in america among the minority, and only in america among the minority who are being defeated by the three enemies: anti-european judaism, anti-european jewish marxism-pomo-pc/wok, anti-european islam. All of you reject modernity. We know why. That doesn’t matter. You’re being exterminated. Because in practice, you’re just whining little girls demanding ‘real men’ protect you. And there aren’t any.)

    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-20 23:04:02 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105924620597178211

  • Boost of @Afterrthought Arthur against Dragon Arta against Drūg Order against Tr

    Boost of @Afterrthought Arthur against Dragon
    Arta against Drūg
    Order against Trick

    where “trick” is the ancient word for fraud and deception, but embodies the cosmic principle antagonistic to order that is readily embodied by monsters such as dragons and draugr, which are chaos agents and undead.

    Arthur and the 12 knights of the round table symbolize the cosmic order of the sun and the 12 zodiac. @curtd@AshaLogos@StJ

    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-20 12:50:27 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105922261385874361

  • @Tayai @PatriotRevenant I need to discover how I can add value there

    @Tayai@PatriotRevenant I need to discover how I can add value there.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-19 13:44:59 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105916760001101391

  • FASHION INDUSTRY AS AN EXAMPLE OF AESTHETIC FRAUD

    FASHION INDUSTRY AS AN EXAMPLE OF AESTHETIC FRAUD

    FASHION INDUSTRY AS AN EXAMPLE OF AESTHETIC FRAUD

    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-19 13:42:58 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105916752102584717

  • Fashion Industry As An Example of Aesthetic Fraud

    “Fashion” outside of the top houses (which everyone knows: Gucci, RL, and the 20 or so others ) is presently a refuge of dysfunctionality – where they can hide under the pretense of skill and talent, and virtue signal like the rest of the neo-marxist movement: The cult of anti-beauty. When urbanites are desperate for unearned attention. When shallow novelty is their only means of achieving it. When ugly is the only remaining novelty. Because investment in beauty rather than novelty means you conform to excellence. But you are unable to compete by excellence. Either one produces innovations and adaptations that increase craftsmanship, aesthetics, and content or not. The rest is a measure of the ignorance of the public just like pseudoscience, sophistry, and supernaturalism: “Snake oil aesthetics”. There is a very great difference between student, amateur, craftsmanly, and high art (art proper). And the difference between good art and bad art is rather obvious. Novelty does not art make. Art is no more subjective than any other discipline. You either understand it or not, and can distinguish truth, adaptation, and innovation in craftsmanship, design, content(meaning) from fraud – or you can’t. The fact that you can be ‘sold’ fraud in art is no more surprising than that you can be sold any other fraud. Until now I hadn’t disambiguated “display” in “Reciprocity in display, word, and deed” as one of the principle means of fraud (physical: magic > pseudoscience, verbal: sophistry > idealism, aesthetic:(Undue Praise > Critique), and imaginary: Occult > Supernaturalism(theology). But it’s interesting that I can’t think of established terms for fraud by aesthetics – so perhaps that’s an interesting insight: that Female > Jewish > Marxist > Neo-Marxist Undue-Praise(Fraud) > Critique(Undermining), is one of the insights I hadn’t counted on. This is crushing to the continuing marxist-pomo-pc/woke – anti-civilization – Anti-White movement. No criminal practicing any form of previously tolerated fraud will accept and tolerate that they are cast as criminals. (BTW: The philosophy of art was my first philosophical subject matter back in the late 70’s. It’s the first discipline to which I applied disambiguation down to the first causes: investment.)

  • Fashion Industry As An Example of Aesthetic Fraud

    “Fashion” outside of the top houses (which everyone knows: Gucci, RL, and the 20 or so others ) is presently a refuge of dysfunctionality – where they can hide under the pretense of skill and talent, and virtue signal like the rest of the neo-marxist movement: The cult of anti-beauty. When urbanites are desperate for unearned attention. When shallow novelty is their only means of achieving it. When ugly is the only remaining novelty. Because investment in beauty rather than novelty means you conform to excellence. But you are unable to compete by excellence. Either one produces innovations and adaptations that increase craftsmanship, aesthetics, and content or not. The rest is a measure of the ignorance of the public just like pseudoscience, sophistry, and supernaturalism: “Snake oil aesthetics”. There is a very great difference between student, amateur, craftsmanly, and high art (art proper). And the difference between good art and bad art is rather obvious. Novelty does not art make. Art is no more subjective than any other discipline. You either understand it or not, and can distinguish truth, adaptation, and innovation in craftsmanship, design, content(meaning) from fraud – or you can’t. The fact that you can be ‘sold’ fraud in art is no more surprising than that you can be sold any other fraud. Until now I hadn’t disambiguated “display” in “Reciprocity in display, word, and deed” as one of the principle means of fraud (physical: magic > pseudoscience, verbal: sophistry > idealism, aesthetic:(Undue Praise > Critique), and imaginary: Occult > Supernaturalism(theology). But it’s interesting that I can’t think of established terms for fraud by aesthetics – so perhaps that’s an interesting insight: that Female > Jewish > Marxist > Neo-Marxist Undue-Praise(Fraud) > Critique(Undermining), is one of the insights I hadn’t counted on. This is crushing to the continuing marxist-pomo-pc/woke – anti-civilization – Anti-White movement. No criminal practicing any form of previously tolerated fraud will accept and tolerate that they are cast as criminals. (BTW: The philosophy of art was my first philosophical subject matter back in the late 70’s. It’s the first discipline to which I applied disambiguation down to the first causes: investment.)

  • @Afterrthought Yes. My view is just less benevolent, as I see the jewish counter

    @Afterrthought Yes. My view is just less benevolent, as I see the jewish counter-revolution against the Indo European Heroic cults, as the first civilizational undermining, just as marxistm-neomarxisim-pomo-pc/woke is an intentional effort to undermine civilization.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-19 13:06:37 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105916609176491545

  • CREATING THE JESUS CHARACTER TO REPLACE THE HOMERIC HERO Mark, writing in Greek,

    CREATING THE JESUS CHARACTER TO REPLACE THE HOMERIC HERO

    Mark, writing in Greek, borrowed and updated stories from Moses, Elija, Josephus, and Homer (Homer is the bible of the pagans: Indo Europeans), and transvalued the stories from Homer, replacing the old pagan stories. Borrows from Mark uses sources to fabricate a new mythology.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-19 12:46:29 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105916530021645804

  • The central problems with Christianity … 1. Fictive Kinship vs Universalism ..

    The central problems with Christianity
    … 1. Fictive Kinship vs Universalism
    … 2. Supernaturalism vs Supernormalism
    … 3. Abrahamic Method of Deceit vs Testimony regardless of cost.
    … 4. Obsession with Non-Aggression, Non-Retaliation. Submission, Life Denial, Primacy of Man Denial, Systemic Ignorance, Belief-not-Action, Thoughts-not-deeds. Vs. Dominance directed to the production of commons, Reciprocity, Life celebration, Primacy of Man, Accumulating of Knowledge, adaptation to the laws of nature, achievements not ideas, deeds not words. The homogenous Christian slave, the heterogeneous wide distribution of heroes.

    PROPERTIES
    Mystery Knowledge
    Promised (unwarrantable) Reward
    Baptismal Initiation (cheap)
    (Oath)
    Communal Meal
    (Lesson)
    Producing the “Mindfulness’ of the Tribe – that we evolved for but no longer exists

    ORIGINS
    Christianity is a Jewish mystery religion.
    … 1. Cost of entry
    … 2. Secret Knowledge
    … 3. In return for an escape from the laws of the universe

    There were lots of mystery religions.
    The origin was Hellenic.
    The Hellenic origin was the Initiatic brotherhood of warriors.
    All religion is a substitute for the initiatic brotherhood of warriors.
    Jewish civ borrows from superior (dominant) civs, it does not originate.

    Jewish -> Christian Consisting of:
    1. Syncretism: combining Jewish cult diety with Zoroastrian, Egyptian and Hellenistic religion.
    2. Henotheism: one god above all the others, but not truly monotheistic.
    … into Monolatry: worshipping only one god.
    …. into Monotheism: There is only one god.
    …. by Converting: Gods into Angels
    3. Mystery religions evolved out of agrarian mystery cults.
    … Urbanized from agrarian and community to individualistic and personal (anti-alienation by Fictive (artificial) Kinship)
    4. And to expand, universalist. Cosmopolitanism = Universalism (anti-kinship)

    (There was even a Gospel of Mithras. Mithras is Achillean (surviving a trial) not Dying and Rising God.)

    Islam is a version of the very early Christian Sect.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-18 17:43:24 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105912035238251879

  • Occam: The simplest explanation is usually – but not always – the correct one Sa

    Occam: The simplest explanation is usually – but not always – the correct one
    Sagan: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
    Hitchens: What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence
    Hume: Causes must be sufficiently able to produce the effect assigned to them
    Popper: For a theory to be considered scientific, it must be possible to disprove or refute it
    Grice’s: Address what the speaker actually meant, instead of addressing the literal meaning of what they actually said
    Hanlon: Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by incompetence or stupidity
    Doolittle: If you can’t testify to it then you can’t claim it’s true.

    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-18 16:00:32 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105911630730888286