Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • @auroch37 We can say this as men of confidence, but then we deny that there are

    @auroch37 We can say this as men of confidence, but then we deny that there are women who lack our mindfulness, and men who are cognitively feminine. Jefferson Christianity does ‘work’ and isn’t ‘false’ per se, by treaating jesus as a sort of hippie philosopher like buddha. Catholicism teaches natural law via dogma and all but ignores the bible. So the question is would you deprive those of feminine cognition of the means of neural accomodation against neuroticism allowing them mindflness? This is the reason the problem of religoin is ‘difficult’. Some of us want masculine war heroes, some masculine war gods, some of us neutral natural law, some of us soft humanism, and some of us supernatural authoritarianism.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-08-07 02:42:00 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108779282159015266

  • THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CHRISTIANITY AND JUDAISM

    THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CHRISTIANITY AND JUDAISM

    Source date (UTC): 2022-08-06 19:45:40 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108777645048830010

  • Boost of @DrRicardoDuchesne It was in the early 80s that I started thinking that

    Boost of @DrRicardoDuchesne It was in the early 80s that I started thinking that capitalism promotes the homosexualization of society; my understanding then was simple —————- capitalism prefers men who are without families, easily drawn into consumerism. The argument, as I understand it today, is a bit more complicated. The founding principles of the US, the “ideas of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”, and the emphasis on individual rights which include freedom of markets: “naturally led people to think more carefully about the nature of the individual and gradually…to take seriously the idea of homosexual activity as a matter of personal freedom”.

    These words come from the pro-capitalist CATO Institute, which also says
    that “capitalism led to industrialization, which led to urbanization, which offered the anonymity of the city to anyone *who chafed under the strictures of the family and the village*”.

    In other words, the nature of capitalism is such that is destroys “the strictures of the family and the village [national identities]”

    CATO institute says that capitalism, not the progressive politics of the Left, has been the major force behind feminism, rights for nonwhites, and LGBT people. I would rather say that capitalism is inherently leftist and that’s why the corporate Right and the Left have converged.

    Here’s the gist of the pro-capitalist CATO argument:

    “Once capitalism created the opportunity for people to live autonomously, it unwittingly allowed LGBT people to privilege homosexual desire as a driving force in their lives…All the advances in human rights that we’ve seen in American history—abolitionism, feminism, civil rights, gay rights—stem from our founding ideas of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness The emphasis on the individual mind in the Enlightenment, the individualist nature of market capitalism, and the demand for individual rights that inspired the American Revolution naturally led people to think more carefully about the nature of the individual and gradually to recognize that the dignity of individual rights should be extended to all people….It took longer for people to take seriously the idea of homosexual activity as a matter of personal freedom and to recognize homosexuals as a group of people with rights. But the libertarians and their classical‐​liberal forebears got there first. From Adam Smith and Jeremy Bentham to the Libertarian Party and the Cato Institute (where I work), libertarians were ahead of the intellectual curve in applying the ideas of individual liberty to gay people.
    Capitalism led to industrialization, which led to urbanization, which offered the anonymity of the city to anyone who chafed under the strictures of the family and the village”
    cato.org/commentary/capitalism-not-socialism-

    Source date (UTC): 2022-08-06 01:10:40 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108789012175464823

  • @OliverWestcott (Good thinking). In the context of full accounting, we mean ‘ful

    @OliverWestcott (Good thinking). In the context of full accounting, we mean ‘full accounting by due diligence, and due diligence is only possible within the limits of the individual, resources, and context.

    In other words, (I), always refer to performative (existentially possible) rather than ideal (existentially impossible) constraints.

    This is another way of saying that if the law is sufficiently articulated, you should be able to perform due diligence according to those criteria and have some confidence that even ifyou fail, you are free of blame (even ifyou are causally responsible you are not liable.)

    Source date (UTC): 2022-07-16 03:49:14 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108654975432848996

  • 5of5 5. The Least Divergence From Nature, The Greatst Adaptation To Nature Maxim

    5of5
    5. The Least Divergence From Nature, The Greatst Adaptation To Nature
    Maximizes prosperity (cometitive advantage), choice (opportunity), the Innovative(increases in capital), and Adaptive (maneuver, change), by suppression of irreciprocity and falsehood (via-negativa), by maximization of responsibility (duty) by limiting us to via positiva adversarial (competitive, discovery, evolutionary) markets for cooperation and via-negative adversarial courts (dispute resolution) for dispute resolution, preserving our self determination, by self determined means, by reciprocal insurance, of sovereignty in demonstrated interests, and reciprocity in display word and deed, at the cost of suppression of the reproduction of those unwilling, unfit, and unable to carry that responsibility (duty).

    Source date (UTC): 2022-07-01 17:46:51 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108573334455968974

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108573322571735419

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    NOTES ON THE MEANING OF EUROPEAN > ANGLO > AMERICAN LAW (see five comments that follow)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108573322571735419

  • 4of5 The Law 1. The Natural Law (of cooperation), Natural Rights, vs Human Right

    4of5
    The Law
    1. The Natural Law (of cooperation), Natural Rights, vs Human Rights.
    Reciprocal Insurance, Self Determination, by Suppression of power and authority, by sovereignty in Demonstrated Interest, by by Reciprocity in display word and deed, limiting us to voluntary markets for cooperation (list) and voluntary market for the resolution of disputes (court), at the cost of suppression of the reproduction of those unable or unwilling to bear the above responsibilities.
    2. Rule of Law: …. (natural, universal,prohibition on authority)
    3. The Common Law: That which many polities have empirically discovered in common.
    4. Trifunctionalism: independent Religion(jury, pedagogy), Judiciary(and jury, cooperation), Legislature(jury, appropriations), Executive (cabinet, generals, king, monarchy, – operations).
    5. The State: The assets of the corporation we call a polity.
    6. The King (or monarchy): the judge of last resort, and above the law in restoration of the rule of law.
    7. Houses for the Classes (responsibility)
    8. Concurrent Democracy
    9. Enfranchisement by Capacity for Responsibility (Wildman(barbarian), slave, serf, freeman, citizen, sovereign).
    10. Leading to the productin of commons, that reduce costs for all , especially famlies, leading to higher standard of living, by higher trust, higher cooperative velocity, at lower transaction costs, lower opportunity costs, and lower material costs – despite the higher pedagogial, psychological, emotional costs.
    11. The purpose of our law is to continue the european group evolutionary strategy that demonstrated evolutionary velocity during the bronze, iron, and steel ages – despite the semitic dark ages – that maximizes our standard of living by increasing our capture of energy, comparative advantage, prosperity and choice, lifting the classes out of ignorance,superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, diseases, suffering, tyranny, and the vicissitudes of a nature all but hostile to life in a universe that is by and large a vast irradiated wasteland – fulfilling the european presumption that we are gods in the making not subjects of tyrants gods or the universe.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-07-01 17:45:09 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108573327792888956

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108573322571735419

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    NOTES ON THE MEANING OF EUROPEAN > ANGLO > AMERICAN LAW (see five comments that follow)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108573322571735419

  • 3of5 European Group Strategy 1. Wagons, Chariots, Sea People, Pirates, Vikings,

    3of5
    European Group Strategy
    1. Wagons, Chariots, Sea People, Pirates, Vikings, Navies – contractual entreneurial warfare, sovereignty, reciprocity, democracy, hierarchy, technology AND maneuver, ooda loop, adaptability: maximum evolutionary computation by the elimination of impediments to trial, error, innovation, and adaptation. The Via-Negativa, instead of the Via Positiva.
    2. Trifunctionalism. Religion, Military (state), and Law(neutral). The european order is fundamentally military (every able bodied man in the militia).
    3. The Greeks, THe Romans, The Germanics, Atlantics, The English, The Americans, and the Anglosophere. Athens-sparta-Rome, vs England-Germany-America.
    4. The consistency of the european group evolutionary strategy over 5000 years – in law. Not in religion, not in philosophy, not in literature. But by intergenerational transfer of metaphysical assumptions about the world and man’s relation to it and one another.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-07-01 17:44:53 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108573326755402356

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108573322571735419

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    NOTES ON THE MEANING OF EUROPEAN > ANGLO > AMERICAN LAW (see five comments that follow)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108573322571735419

  • 2of5 The First Principles of the Universe 1. Pressure -> Entropy(Decay, Die), or

    2of5
    The First Principles of the Universe
    1. Pressure -> Entropy(Decay, Die), or Accumulate (Persist, live)
    Persist -> Acquire -> “Combine(cooperate)-> CALCULATE EVOLUTION
    2. Acquire (life) – must aquire energy, transform it (work) and capture some percentage of it by doing so.
    3. Cooperate (people) -> (organelles, cells, sex, advanced life, mammals, people.)
    4. Cooperative Choices -Evade, Cooperate, Conflict
    5. Organize (markets)
    6. Influence -> persuade -> coerce
    7. Institutions of Influence Social(Religion) Economic (trade, contract) Political(state, military), with court somewhere between that triangle.
    8. Institutional Order of Development
    9. What causes group strategy – geography, food, class relations, tech
    10. Contents of Group evolutinary strategy – -> Culture -> Metaphysics
    11. Civilizational Differences in order of development.
    12. Rate of evolutionary compuation, competitive advantage, wealth(choices available to the hierarch of the classes) quality of life, dependent upon it.

    Source date (UTC): 2022-07-01 17:44:34 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108573325460389862

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108573322571735419

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    NOTES ON THE MEANING OF EUROPEAN > ANGLO > AMERICAN LAW (see five comments that follow)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108573322571735419

  • 1 of 5 The Laws of Nature 1. There is but one law of nature: Defeat Entropy By A

    1 of 5
    The Laws of Nature
    1. There is but one law of nature: Defeat Entropy By Accumulation, By Acquisition, By “Cooperation”. In other words “Evolve”.
    2. We have discovered four laws of nature:
    … a) The physical (initial, input, or before state),
    … b) The behavioral (the action, or during state),
    … c) The evolutionary (consequential, or after state),
    … d) and the Formal or Logical Laws we use to describe them (continuous recursive disambiguation into an unambigous subsequent stable relation, using description of a sequence of names of states, properties, and operations).
    3. So the universe operates by a simple rule, a simple grammar, of names, properties, operations, stable relations (agreements, truth)

    Source date (UTC): 2022-07-01 17:44:21 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108573324654284095

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108573322571735419

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    NOTES ON THE MEANING OF EUROPEAN > ANGLO > AMERICAN LAW (see five comments that follow)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108573322571735419

  • NOTES ON THE MEANING OF EUROPEAN > ANGLO > AMERICAN LAW (see five comments that

    NOTES ON THE MEANING OF EUROPEAN > ANGLO > AMERICAN LAW
    (see five comments that follow)

    Source date (UTC): 2022-07-01 17:43:49 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/108573322571735419