Isn’t this a simple verbalism? Fitness (intertemporal) and Health (Temporal)? Height, Morphology, Symmetry, and shoulder, waist, hip and all other ratios provide an exceptional test of Neoteny / Pedomorphism, which indicate accurate genetic potential. Health is transitory. Skin and eyes and movement tell everything.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Beauty Does Not Indicate Health.
Isn’t this a simple verbalism? Fitness (intertemporal) and Health (Temporal)? Height, Morphology, Symmetry, and shoulder, waist, hip and all other ratios provide an exceptional test of Neoteny / Pedomorphism, which indicate accurate genetic potential. Health is transitory. Skin and eyes and movement tell everything.
-
The Aphorism and Riddle: Self Equilibrating Knowledge
An aphorism is the penultimate device for the parsimonious conveyance of knowledge. The Chinese lack the concepts and vocabulary to produce aphorisms(science) so they produce ‘riddles'(wisdom). But only the far west and the far east have produced the technique of testable statements that produce competition rather than monopoly. The despotic people have developed monopoly, analogy, monotheism and obedience rather than competition and knowledge. I gotta tell you that despite knowing this for decades the time it has taken me to come anywhere close Nietzsche is horrifying. His talent is awe inspiring. But once you understand that this is how ‘it is best done’, at least you know what to strive for.
-
The Aphorism and Riddle: Self Equilibrating Knowledge
An aphorism is the penultimate device for the parsimonious conveyance of knowledge. The Chinese lack the concepts and vocabulary to produce aphorisms(science) so they produce ‘riddles'(wisdom). But only the far west and the far east have produced the technique of testable statements that produce competition rather than monopoly. The despotic people have developed monopoly, analogy, monotheism and obedience rather than competition and knowledge. I gotta tell you that despite knowing this for decades the time it has taken me to come anywhere close Nietzsche is horrifying. His talent is awe inspiring. But once you understand that this is how ‘it is best done’, at least you know what to strive for.
-
You Aren’t Thinking Clearly
You aren’t thinking clearly. We have enough underserved men to do it. And enough incentive for them to do it. And enough moral justification to do it. We have means, motive, and opportunity. Numbers are offset by FRAGILITY.
-
You Aren’t Thinking Clearly
You aren’t thinking clearly. We have enough underserved men to do it. And enough incentive for them to do it. And enough moral justification to do it. We have means, motive, and opportunity. Numbers are offset by FRAGILITY.
-
Winning the World: Do It.
What wins in this world. Simple. 1. Internal locus of control. 2. Individual sovereignty (I own me). 3. High Agency. 4. Intolerance. 5. A refusal to seek validation. 6. A refusal to seek approval. 7. The ability to think out to 2nd and 3rd order effects. 8. The ability to understand Requisite Variety — the one with the most options wins. As soon as you are limited by your own values, beliefs and morals against an enemy that wields dual-moralism or is polymorphic and peddles lies, you lose. The church offers confessions for a reason, win and then confess. There is no value in losing or dying with “honor”. 9. The understanding that you were dead the day you were born. And you have a duty and role to play. 10. Do it.
-
Winning the World: Do It.
What wins in this world. Simple. 1. Internal locus of control. 2. Individual sovereignty (I own me). 3. High Agency. 4. Intolerance. 5. A refusal to seek validation. 6. A refusal to seek approval. 7. The ability to think out to 2nd and 3rd order effects. 8. The ability to understand Requisite Variety — the one with the most options wins. As soon as you are limited by your own values, beliefs and morals against an enemy that wields dual-moralism or is polymorphic and peddles lies, you lose. The church offers confessions for a reason, win and then confess. There is no value in losing or dying with “honor”. 9. The understanding that you were dead the day you were born. And you have a duty and role to play. 10. Do it.
-
The Two Party System Neutralizes IQ Differences
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289618300060 • In both the U.S. and Denmark intelligence failed to predict standard party choice. • This was due to opposing effects of intelligence on economic and social ideology. •Denmark’s multi-party system allows non-standard representations of party choice. •In Denmark, significant systematic intelligence differences observed between parties. Intelligence is rarely studied as a predictor of vote choice, and at first glance our data supports this neglect: In samples from the U.S. and Denmark (Ns = 1419 and 953), intelligence does not predict the standard operationalization of vote choice in which parties are placed on a single left-vs-right dimension. (Standardized coefficients predicting right-wing vote choice were 0.05 and −0.03, respectively.) However, this apparent non-effect in fact reflects approximately equal and opposite effects of intelligence on vote choice as transmitted through social and economic ideology. In both countries, higher ability predicts left-wing social and right-wing economic views. The impact of intelligence on vote choice is thus most visible in true multi-party systems like Denmark, in which parties do not simply pair similar levels of social and economic conservatism, but instead provide diverse combinations of social and economic ideology. Comparing the parties closest to representing authoritarian egalitarianism (social-right plus economic-left) and libertarianism (social-left plus economic-right), we observed a 0.9 SD intelligence gap.
-
The Two Party System Neutralizes IQ Differences
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289618300060 • In both the U.S. and Denmark intelligence failed to predict standard party choice. • This was due to opposing effects of intelligence on economic and social ideology. •Denmark’s multi-party system allows non-standard representations of party choice. •In Denmark, significant systematic intelligence differences observed between parties. Intelligence is rarely studied as a predictor of vote choice, and at first glance our data supports this neglect: In samples from the U.S. and Denmark (Ns = 1419 and 953), intelligence does not predict the standard operationalization of vote choice in which parties are placed on a single left-vs-right dimension. (Standardized coefficients predicting right-wing vote choice were 0.05 and −0.03, respectively.) However, this apparent non-effect in fact reflects approximately equal and opposite effects of intelligence on vote choice as transmitted through social and economic ideology. In both countries, higher ability predicts left-wing social and right-wing economic views. The impact of intelligence on vote choice is thus most visible in true multi-party systems like Denmark, in which parties do not simply pair similar levels of social and economic conservatism, but instead provide diverse combinations of social and economic ideology. Comparing the parties closest to representing authoritarian egalitarianism (social-right plus economic-left) and libertarianism (social-left plus economic-right), we observed a 0.9 SD intelligence gap.