Centralization is achieved by suppression of local parasitism and rents, and levying taxation instead, that is used for that suppression. This drastically reduces transaction costs and associated risks, which in turn produces volume and velocity. The problem of taxation arises when it is not used for the purpose of suppressing local parasitism and rents and instead simply centralizes parasitism and rents.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Centralization
Centralization is achieved by suppression of local parasitism and rents, and levying taxation instead, that is used for that suppression. This drastically reduces transaction costs and associated risks, which in turn produces volume and velocity. The problem of taxation arises when it is not used for the purpose of suppressing local parasitism and rents and instead simply centralizes parasitism and rents.
-
Capitalism vs Socialism and Public Private Partnership
Capitalism is impossible since no group can survive competition with other groups as other than parasites without producing commons open to free riding or defection. The question is only the method for producing those commons while suppressing free riding and defection. Communism is impossible since no group can survive competition with other groups as other than predators and parasites, by producing commons to the exclusion of private property, because all are incentivized only to free ride (do as little as possible) and defect (engage in black markets and corruption). State (corporation) private (shareholder) partnerships have the best record in history, when the state provides roles of insurer and banker in exchange for returns to the commons. At present the only reason the USA is not competing successfully in the world market is a failure to produce public-private partnerships. The reason we cannot do so is because the left can seek rents on these public private partnerships both politically, economically, and socially by the use of syndicalism (unions etc). Unions are only necessary because the courts do not provide universal standing in matters of the commons – ever since the british began violating the ancestral common law of reciprocity and universal standing.
-
Capitalism vs Socialism and Public Private Partnership
Capitalism is impossible since no group can survive competition with other groups as other than parasites without producing commons open to free riding or defection. The question is only the method for producing those commons while suppressing free riding and defection. Communism is impossible since no group can survive competition with other groups as other than predators and parasites, by producing commons to the exclusion of private property, because all are incentivized only to free ride (do as little as possible) and defect (engage in black markets and corruption). State (corporation) private (shareholder) partnerships have the best record in history, when the state provides roles of insurer and banker in exchange for returns to the commons. At present the only reason the USA is not competing successfully in the world market is a failure to produce public-private partnerships. The reason we cannot do so is because the left can seek rents on these public private partnerships both politically, economically, and socially by the use of syndicalism (unions etc). Unions are only necessary because the courts do not provide universal standing in matters of the commons – ever since the british began violating the ancestral common law of reciprocity and universal standing.
-
Chomsky Heaps Undue Praise on Galileo
Interesting that Chomsky heaps undue praise on Galileo, but not Copernicus, Descartes, Newton or others. He always has an agenda. I think his agenda is anti-everything. And so he gives Galileo undue praise for his battles with the church. —“The Aristotelian scientific tradition’s primary mode of interacting with the world was through observation and searching for “natural” circumstances through reasoning. Coupled with this approach was the belief that rare events which seemed to contradict theoretical models were aberrations, telling nothing about nature as it “naturally” was. By the start of the Scientific Revolution, empiricism had already become an important component of science and natural philosophy. Prior thinkers, including the early 14th century nominalist philosopher William of Ockham, had begun the intellectual movement toward empiricism. The term British empiricism came into use to describe philosophical differences perceived between two of its founders Francis Bacon, described as EMPIRICIST, and René Descartes, who was described as a RATIONALIST. (CURT: IT BEGINS WITH DESCARTES.. EVEN BEFORE ROUSSEAU) Thomas Hobbes, George Berkeley, and David Hume were the philosophy’s primary exponents, who developed a sophisticated empirical tradition as the basis of human knowledge. An influential formulation of empiricism was John Locke’s An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689), in which he maintained that the only true knowledge that could be accessible to the human mind was that which was based on experience. He wrote that the human mind was created as a tabula rasa, a “blank tablet,” upon which sensory impressions were recorded and built up knowledge through a process of reflection.”—
-
Chomsky Heaps Undue Praise on Galileo
Interesting that Chomsky heaps undue praise on Galileo, but not Copernicus, Descartes, Newton or others. He always has an agenda. I think his agenda is anti-everything. And so he gives Galileo undue praise for his battles with the church. —“The Aristotelian scientific tradition’s primary mode of interacting with the world was through observation and searching for “natural” circumstances through reasoning. Coupled with this approach was the belief that rare events which seemed to contradict theoretical models were aberrations, telling nothing about nature as it “naturally” was. By the start of the Scientific Revolution, empiricism had already become an important component of science and natural philosophy. Prior thinkers, including the early 14th century nominalist philosopher William of Ockham, had begun the intellectual movement toward empiricism. The term British empiricism came into use to describe philosophical differences perceived between two of its founders Francis Bacon, described as EMPIRICIST, and René Descartes, who was described as a RATIONALIST. (CURT: IT BEGINS WITH DESCARTES.. EVEN BEFORE ROUSSEAU) Thomas Hobbes, George Berkeley, and David Hume were the philosophy’s primary exponents, who developed a sophisticated empirical tradition as the basis of human knowledge. An influential formulation of empiricism was John Locke’s An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689), in which he maintained that the only true knowledge that could be accessible to the human mind was that which was based on experience. He wrote that the human mind was created as a tabula rasa, a “blank tablet,” upon which sensory impressions were recorded and built up knowledge through a process of reflection.”—
-
The Male Disincentive for Social Preservation
by Lance Bean “It’s ALL Different Now.” Relationship dynamics have completely changed. But without a MARKETING CAMPAIGN, repeatedly smashing it into people’s men’s faces, NOBODY is “getting it”. And as a consequence we see a anxious, spooked, flocking of everyone’s frames creating a chaos of confusion as we seek a restoration, when the problem is that we can’t. “IT’S ALL DIFFERENT NOW”: Men and women NEED each other less with every passing moment. That fact changes the family dynamic. Technology has freed us from interdependence. Marriage WAS the alternative to prostitution. Now prostitution is criminal and marriage is passé. It used to be both genders marry young and have several kids to work the farm. Families were an asset that provided lifetime discounts and insurance, allowed for the accumulation of capital, prevented parasitism on the property and efforts of others, and prevented male on male violence. Now, it’s extremely smart for the youngest women to have a single child by several different men of high income with established careers – preferably in marriages. Her incentives are to increase her income by being a baby maker but siphoning off of men – who lose marketability to other women, lose the ability to accumulate resources, and are doomed to poverty in old age. Under those conditions, men have become indentured slaves until the child is a mid 20’s adult – and wards of the state in old age. Children in the past were considered adults at 14 or 15 and they had to work and some married. Today they infantilized by a female dominated educational system, the aggressive suppression of masculinity and male dominance play that is necessary for men to invest in family, society, and polity. To pretend that the natural order is a traditional conservative nuclear family is ridiculous: the natural order is prostitution. Prostitution was accepted as legitimate for thousands of years. ALL women were prostitutes. Men only “married” or sometimes took care of the women that had a kid by him through rape most likely. The men could organize, hunt, kill and rape. Now they are tax slaves. What does this mean? It is no longer in men’s incentive to preserve a government and social order that reduces them to serfdom, isolation, old age loneliness, and poverty.
-
The Male Disincentive for Social Preservation
by Lance Bean “It’s ALL Different Now.” Relationship dynamics have completely changed. But without a MARKETING CAMPAIGN, repeatedly smashing it into people’s men’s faces, NOBODY is “getting it”. And as a consequence we see a anxious, spooked, flocking of everyone’s frames creating a chaos of confusion as we seek a restoration, when the problem is that we can’t. “IT’S ALL DIFFERENT NOW”: Men and women NEED each other less with every passing moment. That fact changes the family dynamic. Technology has freed us from interdependence. Marriage WAS the alternative to prostitution. Now prostitution is criminal and marriage is passé. It used to be both genders marry young and have several kids to work the farm. Families were an asset that provided lifetime discounts and insurance, allowed for the accumulation of capital, prevented parasitism on the property and efforts of others, and prevented male on male violence. Now, it’s extremely smart for the youngest women to have a single child by several different men of high income with established careers – preferably in marriages. Her incentives are to increase her income by being a baby maker but siphoning off of men – who lose marketability to other women, lose the ability to accumulate resources, and are doomed to poverty in old age. Under those conditions, men have become indentured slaves until the child is a mid 20’s adult – and wards of the state in old age. Children in the past were considered adults at 14 or 15 and they had to work and some married. Today they infantilized by a female dominated educational system, the aggressive suppression of masculinity and male dominance play that is necessary for men to invest in family, society, and polity. To pretend that the natural order is a traditional conservative nuclear family is ridiculous: the natural order is prostitution. Prostitution was accepted as legitimate for thousands of years. ALL women were prostitutes. Men only “married” or sometimes took care of the women that had a kid by him through rape most likely. The men could organize, hunt, kill and rape. Now they are tax slaves. What does this mean? It is no longer in men’s incentive to preserve a government and social order that reduces them to serfdom, isolation, old age loneliness, and poverty.
-
The Natural Law of Reciprocity, is a negative, descriptive, juridical discipline
If we define philosophy (positive and literary) as the search for methods of decidability within a domain of preference, And: If we define truth (negative and descriptive) as the search for methods of decidability across all domains regardless of preference. Then: We find that positive or literary philosophy(fiction or philosophy) informs, suggests opportunities, and justifies preferences for the purpose of forming cooperation and alliances between individuals and groups. We find that negative or juridical philosophy(truth or law) decides, states limits, and discounts preferences, for the purpose of resolving conflicts between individuals and groups. The Natural Law of Reciprocity, is a negative, descriptive, juridical science, not a fictional literature.
-
The Natural Law of Reciprocity, is a negative, descriptive, juridical discipline
If we define philosophy (positive and literary) as the search for methods of decidability within a domain of preference, And: If we define truth (negative and descriptive) as the search for methods of decidability across all domains regardless of preference. Then: We find that positive or literary philosophy(fiction or philosophy) informs, suggests opportunities, and justifies preferences for the purpose of forming cooperation and alliances between individuals and groups. We find that negative or juridical philosophy(truth or law) decides, states limits, and discounts preferences, for the purpose of resolving conflicts between individuals and groups. The Natural Law of Reciprocity, is a negative, descriptive, juridical science, not a fictional literature.