by Radu M Oleniuc
So now I am a disinformation agent.
I think those 150 bn (billion) dollars (Iran) do not belong to a terrorist state and were rightfully confiscated. Obama considered them as “seized”, and returned those to a terrorist state massively funding propaganda through various proxies (NGOs, newspapers, corrupt journalists and officials), yet I am spreading disinformation by calling this appeasement simply as it is: treason to our values and civilization by helping an adversary trying to destroy the west.
Not only that we as the western world should have not gave “their money back”, we should have bombed their oil fields to pieces and send the bill for the rest. Because those 150 billions are just a small fraction of what we spend on our defense. Not fair? Well, the next time when an Iranian ideologue trains a bunch of suicidal zealots or wants to bribe a journalist using US dollars obtained from oil and gas, he would think twice, because he would know that his oil refinery will be leveled the next day. With his GSM tower antenna as well, because his ideology belongs to the Middle Ages when electricity was not yet invented. He could start planning his attacks with goats, but without any kind of help from mobile phones or GPS. Or SWIFT system, dollars or banks. He could use rupees, rials, renminbi or whatever he wants, but if he uses dollars, then he should know that there is always this risk.
Vladimir Ilich Lenin tactic where ‘The Capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them” has to stop.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Disinformation
by Radu M Oleniuc So now I am a disinformation agent. I think those 150 bn (billion) dollars (Iran) do not belong to a terrorist state and were rightfully confiscated. Obama considered them as “seized”, and returned those to a terrorist state massively funding propaganda through various proxies (NGOs, newspapers, corrupt journalists and officials), yet I am spreading disinformation by calling this appeasement simply as it is: treason to our values and civilization by helping an adversary trying to destroy the west. Not only that we as the western world should have not gave “their money back”, we should have bombed their oil fields to pieces and send the bill for the rest. Because those 150 billions are just a small fraction of what we spend on our defense. Not fair? Well, the next time when an Iranian ideologue trains a bunch of suicidal zealots or wants to bribe a journalist using US dollars obtained from oil and gas, he would think twice, because he would know that his oil refinery will be leveled the next day. With his GSM tower antenna as well, because his ideology belongs to the Middle Ages when electricity was not yet invented. He could start planning his attacks with goats, but without any kind of help from mobile phones or GPS. Or SWIFT system, dollars or banks. He could use rupees, rials, renminbi or whatever he wants, but if he uses dollars, then he should know that there is always this risk. Vladimir Ilich Lenin tactic where ‘The Capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them” has to stop. -
Propertarianism Recovers and Transfigures the Founding Myths of Indo-European Culture
by Daniel Gurpide —“Since Propertarianism recovers and transfigures the founding myths of Indo-European culture, when it comes to specifying its particular tenets such features as the following might be listed: an eminently aristocratic conception of the human individual; the importance of honour (‘shame’ rather than ‘sin’); a heroic attitude towards life’s challenges; the exaltation and sacralisation of the world, beauty, the body, strength, and health; the rejection of any ‘worlds beyond’; and the inseparability of morality and aesthetics. The highest value for an Aryan ethics undoubtedly lies not in a form of ‘justice’ whose purpose is essentially interpreted as flattening the social order in the name of equality, but in all that may allow man to surpass himself. Since to consider the implications of life’s basic framework as unjust would be palpably absurd, such classic antitheses as noble vs. base, courageous vs. cowardly, honourable vs. dishonourable, beautiful vs. deformed, sick vs. healthy come to replace the antitheses operative in a morality based on the concept of sin: good vs. evil, humble vs. vainglorious, submissive vs. proud, weak vs. arrogant, modest vs. boastful.”— Daniel Gurpide (genius)
-
Propertarianism Recovers and Transfigures the Founding Myths of Indo-European Culture
by Daniel Gurpide —“Since Propertarianism recovers and transfigures the founding myths of Indo-European culture, when it comes to specifying its particular tenets such features as the following might be listed: an eminently aristocratic conception of the human individual; the importance of honour (‘shame’ rather than ‘sin’); a heroic attitude towards life’s challenges; the exaltation and sacralisation of the world, beauty, the body, strength, and health; the rejection of any ‘worlds beyond’; and the inseparability of morality and aesthetics. The highest value for an Aryan ethics undoubtedly lies not in a form of ‘justice’ whose purpose is essentially interpreted as flattening the social order in the name of equality, but in all that may allow man to surpass himself. Since to consider the implications of life’s basic framework as unjust would be palpably absurd, such classic antitheses as noble vs. base, courageous vs. cowardly, honourable vs. dishonourable, beautiful vs. deformed, sick vs. healthy come to replace the antitheses operative in a morality based on the concept of sin: good vs. evil, humble vs. vainglorious, submissive vs. proud, weak vs. arrogant, modest vs. boastful.”— Daniel Gurpide (genius)
-
Peter Theil: Universities Are as Corrupt as The Catholic Church 500 Years Ago
(The church and academy that sprung from it, have master the art of profiting from the distributing of information under the promise of future good, without warranty of their claims. This is why propertarianism is necessary: to prevent profiting from goods, services, and information, that are not warrantied.) 26 Jul 2018 Technology giant Peter Thiel argued this week that American universities are as corrupt as the Catholic Church of 500 years ago. Speaking to a group of conservative students on Wednesday night, tech legend Peter Thiel compared American universities to the Catholic Church of 500 years ago. “The analogy that I’ve used is that perhaps the universities today are as corrupt as the Catholic Church was 500 years ago,” Thiel said. “If you think about the eve of the Reformation when Martin Luther posted his 95 theses on the church doors, there were all these priests that did not do very much work in much the same way that college professors and administrators are today. You had to pay these indulgences the way that you have to pay runaway tuition today.” Thiel went on to argue that American society teaches young people that the quality of their lives will be determined by their success at college. “It’s also a story of salvation,” he added. “If you get a college diploma, you will be saved. If you don’t get one, you will end up in a very bad place. We need a sort of reformation. I’ve often described the universities as the atheist church. It’s not going to reform itself from within. The reformation will come from without.” Thiel also made the case that universities simply aren’t working the way that they used to. Decades ago, a college education was the key to a vibrant and lucrative future. Now that college degrees have become the standard, more debt-carrying students find themselves without fruitful employment even once they have their diploma. “Universities are supposed to provide a one size fits all education for everybody,” Thiel said. “They are not working the way they used to. We have an education bubble in this country. There is no single thing in this country where the costs have gone up more than they have gone up in education for the last 40 or 50 years.” “It’s like the opposite of technology,” he finished. “With technology, you do more with less. With education, we are doing less and less but spending more and more every year.” You can watch Thiel’s remarks below. -
Peter Theil: Universities Are as Corrupt as The Catholic Church 500 Years Ago
(The church and academy that sprung from it, have master the art of profiting from the distributing of information under the promise of future good, without warranty of their claims. This is why propertarianism is necessary: to prevent profiting from goods, services, and information, that are not warrantied.) 26 Jul 2018 Technology giant Peter Thiel argued this week that American universities are as corrupt as the Catholic Church of 500 years ago. Speaking to a group of conservative students on Wednesday night, tech legend Peter Thiel compared American universities to the Catholic Church of 500 years ago. “The analogy that I’ve used is that perhaps the universities today are as corrupt as the Catholic Church was 500 years ago,” Thiel said. “If you think about the eve of the Reformation when Martin Luther posted his 95 theses on the church doors, there were all these priests that did not do very much work in much the same way that college professors and administrators are today. You had to pay these indulgences the way that you have to pay runaway tuition today.” Thiel went on to argue that American society teaches young people that the quality of their lives will be determined by their success at college. “It’s also a story of salvation,” he added. “If you get a college diploma, you will be saved. If you don’t get one, you will end up in a very bad place. We need a sort of reformation. I’ve often described the universities as the atheist church. It’s not going to reform itself from within. The reformation will come from without.” Thiel also made the case that universities simply aren’t working the way that they used to. Decades ago, a college education was the key to a vibrant and lucrative future. Now that college degrees have become the standard, more debt-carrying students find themselves without fruitful employment even once they have their diploma. “Universities are supposed to provide a one size fits all education for everybody,” Thiel said. “They are not working the way they used to. We have an education bubble in this country. There is no single thing in this country where the costs have gone up more than they have gone up in education for the last 40 or 50 years.” “It’s like the opposite of technology,” he finished. “With technology, you do more with less. With education, we are doing less and less but spending more and more every year.” You can watch Thiel’s remarks below. -
Psychologism
Psychologism is a feminine means of disapproval and shaming – an ad hominem to circumvent arguments. Note that they addresses not the truth or falsehood but demonstrate the usual lack of agency by simply disapproving – as if their sexual, social, and political market value had any value other than the empirical confirmation of their lack of intelligence, agency, and argument – thats before we consider intellectual honesty. Although, admittedly, they have a gender-biased lack of agency, without which one cannot possess intellectual honesty. We are no longer so dependent upon one another and as such separation of those who lack agency from those of us who do is simply in our personal, social, reproductive, kin, and civilizational interests.
-
Psychologism
Psychologism is a feminine means of disapproval and shaming – an ad hominem to circumvent arguments. Note that they addresses not the truth or falsehood but demonstrate the usual lack of agency by simply disapproving – as if their sexual, social, and political market value had any value other than the empirical confirmation of their lack of intelligence, agency, and argument – thats before we consider intellectual honesty. Although, admittedly, they have a gender-biased lack of agency, without which one cannot possess intellectual honesty. We are no longer so dependent upon one another and as such separation of those who lack agency from those of us who do is simply in our personal, social, reproductive, kin, and civilizational interests.
-
Mark Facebook – Mistake of Doubling Down
Everyone doubles down. It’s the opposite of what you should do. Facebook (Mark) should have taken the opposite route: taken the position that it is impossible to monitor speech on this scale and that FB is at this point a necessary piece of world infrastructure similar to the other communication platforms and that they cannot possibly audit the content. and that countries must develop laws for regulating their own citizens on the platform as they do on all other platforms. FB would then regulate where advertising displays without regulating the content on the platform. Dum dum dum.
-
Mark Facebook – Mistake of Doubling Down
Everyone doubles down. It’s the opposite of what you should do. Facebook (Mark) should have taken the opposite route: taken the position that it is impossible to monitor speech on this scale and that FB is at this point a necessary piece of world infrastructure similar to the other communication platforms and that they cannot possibly audit the content. and that countries must develop laws for regulating their own citizens on the platform as they do on all other platforms. FB would then regulate where advertising displays without regulating the content on the platform. Dum dum dum.