Source: Original Site Post

  • @MichaelHudson @Afterrthought Leave psychosis to your fellow psychotics. Never s

    @MichaelHudson@Afterrthought Leave psychosis to your fellow psychotics. Never speak to me in lies again.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-30 16:24:57 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105979674449291802

  • Yes, Jewish thought leadership is largely behind the postwar destruction of west

    Yes, Jewish thought leadership is largely behind the postwar destruction of western civilization, and there is a long literature on the subject, and it’s almost entirely true.

    Is it s conspiracy? Lke all political movements it’s a conspiracy of common interest, perpetuating the Jewish group strategy, pursued with excellence and diligence by elites, which is what has caused their (entirely justified) persecution across time.

    That (warfare) strategy is the use of undermining using social construction, of false promise, baiting into hazard, punder plausible deniability, escaping warranty and liability.

    It is the only group that has institutionalized the female group evolutinary strategy.

    Given that it’s the female strategy – and entirely biological – then the question is whether jewish group strategy is by design, by cultural evolution, or by genetic adaptation or all of the above. And it is likely all of the above.

    We are unaware of the uniqueness of western civilization. So we don’t defend it.

    My work explains the success of the west compared to all the rest, and why we are vulnerable to the jewsh method of warfare by the female strategy ofu ndermining, by the social constuction of false promise of freedom from the logical, physical, behavioral, cooperative, and evolutionary laws of the universe.

    And I and others have documented the evolution of this war against western civlization from within.

    The difference is we know how to stop it now by law rather than continuing the long tradition of exterminating them for their crimes.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-30 12:16:09 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105978696170297122

  • Lo there, Do you hear? Lo there, Do you see? Lo there, Do you see our fathers an

    Lo there, Do you hear? Lo there, Do you see?
    Lo there, Do you see our fathers and our mothers?
    Lo there, Do you see our brothers and our sisters?
    Lo there, Do you see the line of our people – back to the beginning?
    Lo there, They do call to you
    They bid you take your place among them
    At a feast, In the green fields, Beneath the oak trees
    In the halls of valhalla (heavens)
    Where they shall not mourn but rejoice
    For those that have died [(in glory, in peace, in suffering)]
    Where the [brave(male), strong, good(female)] may live forever


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-30 03:34:18 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105976644128723674

  • Comments on “What does conservatism stand for these days? Academic Agent explains.” with Paul Gottfried.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhMriteR6r0 (A) European civilization uses Self Determination by individual Sovereignty under common rule of law – not individualism. In fact, Europan civilization relies on ‘Commons-ism’ and the direction of dominance expression to the production of commons. (B) European civilization has a 5000-year record of military reporting, testimonial truth, and truth before face in the commons; meritocratic aristocratic egalitarianism; and the resulting markets in everything including trifunctional elites (military, judicial, and religious). (C) Groups do act together, it’s called cooperation: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons production, polity production, state production, and most importantly the production of war. So yes, people do act in concert. “Man Must Act” is a meaningless trope with no inferential or deductive value. (As many others have argued before me). Why? Man must act to do what? (Acquire, preserve, defend). It is the same as non-aggression … against what? Against imposition of costs. Against imposition of costs against demonstrated interests. What does man demonstrate an interest in? The natural (life), the private; that of family, kin, and kith; interest in commons, in institutions, in norms, traditions, and values that capitalize the commons at the cost of suppression of impulse and at the cost of the reproduction of the unfit for those markets. And, Rothbard, seeking an authoritarian middle-class monopoly, is no different from Marx, seeking a working-class authoritarian monopoly. That’s no different from the Jewish (Trotsky) Neoconservatism seeking an authoritarian upper and upper-middle-class monopoly. Everything they do is in search of a universalist, authoritarian monopoly. And Europe only survived the catholic church’s success at authoritarianism and ‘mythicism’ (lying) using the Abrahamic method of false promise baiting into hazard. It seems never to occur to anyone that European civ is eugenic and meritocratic market and hierarchical and European institutions (participatory) with European rule of law (contractualism) maintaining natural selection causing the common people to adapt to the incremental discovery, adaptation to, and application of the laws of the universe. The jews practice the antithesis, in mythicism, parasitism, baiting into hazard, and authoritarianism necessary to continue ‘not producing, adapting, or evolving’. (D) Regarding Marx vs Locke and man as needing a society: This is again, more mythologizing justifying universalism. Jews live in a ‘society’ – one that has only recently in history converted to monogamy vs serial relationships. That society is dependent upon a host polity providing state, defense, and labor (commons), while simultaneously profiting from the undermining of those commons. Europeans instead lived in families and clans, and through rule of law, commons-ism, and individual sovereignty, suppressed sufficient parasitism that the only high trust civ in the world (at least north of the Hajnal Line) evolved, and repeated the greek and roman aristocratic models of a ‘middle-class rule’. (E) The conservatives understand that the intentional organized, Jewish undermining of western civilization by the oft and openly stated “destruction of the means of cultural production”, and the rapid expansion of parasitic industries: gambling, pornography, entertainment, media, insurance, consumer finance, undermining of rule of law, undermining of eugenic and evolutionary government – destroying the informational, cultural, and institutional commons, that made western commons-ism possible. (F) We have born the cost of the French secular catholic authoritarian counter-revolution against anglo-germanic empirical self-determination, rule of law, sovereignty, and common-ism that destroyed the greater German civilization. We have born the cost of the German Kantian secular-religious counter-revolution against empiricism and self-determination, and we and the Russians have born the cost of Jewish counter-revolution against empiricism. And we are still paying the cost of the Jewish pseudoscientific revolution across the entire intellectual spectrum” Freud, Boaz, Lewontin, Gould, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Krugman, Stiglitz, Samuelson, Picketty, Goolsbee, Sayer, Rez, Kelsey, Hart, Wittgenstein, Kripke, cantor, Bohr, and hundreds of others – all of the Jewish counter-revolution is to deny the laws of the universe: The formal (logical, truthful) physical (scarcity), natural (amorality, reciprocity, kin preference, sex, class, race, differences), evolutionary (mutation, load, natural selection, defeat of the red queen). They hate Western civilization because our success was dependent on continuing natural selection determined by productivity and suppression of imposition of costs on the commons because the jews exist by parasitism upon the commons. The jews created Judaism, Christianity, and Islam and the art of Abrahamic lying, which is as advanced a system of deceit as Aristotelian empiricism is of truth. The simple version is that the Jewish counter-revolution against darwin spencer Nietzsche et all, was a threat to their parasitic economy, society, and culture, and they have by design invaded, failed at selling their ideas, undermined our institutions, and immigrated by circumvention of our laws and our traditions, bringing about the second Bolshevik revolution and the second fall of Europe(Rome) to their lies. Do they know what they are doing? DO women know what they are doing? Some do and the rest follow. Conservatism (European traditional reciprocal grant of and insurance of self-determination by self-determined means, limiting reproduction those who do not export the costs of their reproduction onto the commons. Conservatives can’t win by selling we can only win by defense. We can defend by force directly as our ancestors have, or defend by improving our law to making the strategy tactics and methods Jewish undermining of civilization illegal, and teaching how to identify the Jewish means of Abrahamic baiting into hazard, by suggestion, deceit, and fraud, using false promise of evasion of the laws of the universe, advanced by sophistry (pilpul) and defended by undermining (critique), canceling, and denial. And this is relatively easy. Paul is one of the best of the Jewish revolt against western civilization, but he is in the end an enemy of our civilization. The idea of ‘minding your own business, and producing, and contributing to the commons, under via-negativa rule of law, rather than engaging in political persuasion is a genetic disposition of his tribe. TRUTH TEST: If you can’t write a constitution that can function as an operating system for your civilization, federation, state, and locality that is an improvement on the federal constitution and the federal code then you don’t know what the F—k you’re talking about. It’s extremely difficult. It exposes the failings of your thinking. It demonstrates the exclusivity of the thought of the founders. And with Scalia dead, I’m pretty sure there are maybe three to five of us living that can do that.

  • Comments on “What does conservatism stand for these days? Academic Agent explains.” with Paul Gottfried.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhMriteR6r0 (A) European civilization uses Self Determination by individual Sovereignty under common rule of law – not individualism. In fact, Europan civilization relies on ‘Commons-ism’ and the direction of dominance expression to the production of commons. (B) European civilization has a 5000-year record of military reporting, testimonial truth, and truth before face in the commons; meritocratic aristocratic egalitarianism; and the resulting markets in everything including trifunctional elites (military, judicial, and religious). (C) Groups do act together, it’s called cooperation: association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons production, polity production, state production, and most importantly the production of war. So yes, people do act in concert. “Man Must Act” is a meaningless trope with no inferential or deductive value. (As many others have argued before me). Why? Man must act to do what? (Acquire, preserve, defend). It is the same as non-aggression … against what? Against imposition of costs. Against imposition of costs against demonstrated interests. What does man demonstrate an interest in? The natural (life), the private; that of family, kin, and kith; interest in commons, in institutions, in norms, traditions, and values that capitalize the commons at the cost of suppression of impulse and at the cost of the reproduction of the unfit for those markets. And, Rothbard, seeking an authoritarian middle-class monopoly, is no different from Marx, seeking a working-class authoritarian monopoly. That’s no different from the Jewish (Trotsky) Neoconservatism seeking an authoritarian upper and upper-middle-class monopoly. Everything they do is in search of a universalist, authoritarian monopoly. And Europe only survived the catholic church’s success at authoritarianism and ‘mythicism’ (lying) using the Abrahamic method of false promise baiting into hazard. It seems never to occur to anyone that European civ is eugenic and meritocratic market and hierarchical and European institutions (participatory) with European rule of law (contractualism) maintaining natural selection causing the common people to adapt to the incremental discovery, adaptation to, and application of the laws of the universe. The jews practice the antithesis, in mythicism, parasitism, baiting into hazard, and authoritarianism necessary to continue ‘not producing, adapting, or evolving’. (D) Regarding Marx vs Locke and man as needing a society: This is again, more mythologizing justifying universalism. Jews live in a ‘society’ – one that has only recently in history converted to monogamy vs serial relationships. That society is dependent upon a host polity providing state, defense, and labor (commons), while simultaneously profiting from the undermining of those commons. Europeans instead lived in families and clans, and through rule of law, commons-ism, and individual sovereignty, suppressed sufficient parasitism that the only high trust civ in the world (at least north of the Hajnal Line) evolved, and repeated the greek and roman aristocratic models of a ‘middle-class rule’. (E) The conservatives understand that the intentional organized, Jewish undermining of western civilization by the oft and openly stated “destruction of the means of cultural production”, and the rapid expansion of parasitic industries: gambling, pornography, entertainment, media, insurance, consumer finance, undermining of rule of law, undermining of eugenic and evolutionary government – destroying the informational, cultural, and institutional commons, that made western commons-ism possible. (F) We have born the cost of the French secular catholic authoritarian counter-revolution against anglo-germanic empirical self-determination, rule of law, sovereignty, and common-ism that destroyed the greater German civilization. We have born the cost of the German Kantian secular-religious counter-revolution against empiricism and self-determination, and we and the Russians have born the cost of Jewish counter-revolution against empiricism. And we are still paying the cost of the Jewish pseudoscientific revolution across the entire intellectual spectrum” Freud, Boaz, Lewontin, Gould, Marx, Adorno-Fromm, Krugman, Stiglitz, Samuelson, Picketty, Goolsbee, Sayer, Rez, Kelsey, Hart, Wittgenstein, Kripke, cantor, Bohr, and hundreds of others – all of the Jewish counter-revolution is to deny the laws of the universe: The formal (logical, truthful) physical (scarcity), natural (amorality, reciprocity, kin preference, sex, class, race, differences), evolutionary (mutation, load, natural selection, defeat of the red queen). They hate Western civilization because our success was dependent on continuing natural selection determined by productivity and suppression of imposition of costs on the commons because the jews exist by parasitism upon the commons. The jews created Judaism, Christianity, and Islam and the art of Abrahamic lying, which is as advanced a system of deceit as Aristotelian empiricism is of truth. The simple version is that the Jewish counter-revolution against darwin spencer Nietzsche et all, was a threat to their parasitic economy, society, and culture, and they have by design invaded, failed at selling their ideas, undermined our institutions, and immigrated by circumvention of our laws and our traditions, bringing about the second Bolshevik revolution and the second fall of Europe(Rome) to their lies. Do they know what they are doing? DO women know what they are doing? Some do and the rest follow. Conservatism (European traditional reciprocal grant of and insurance of self-determination by self-determined means, limiting reproduction those who do not export the costs of their reproduction onto the commons. Conservatives can’t win by selling we can only win by defense. We can defend by force directly as our ancestors have, or defend by improving our law to making the strategy tactics and methods Jewish undermining of civilization illegal, and teaching how to identify the Jewish means of Abrahamic baiting into hazard, by suggestion, deceit, and fraud, using false promise of evasion of the laws of the universe, advanced by sophistry (pilpul) and defended by undermining (critique), canceling, and denial. And this is relatively easy. Paul is one of the best of the Jewish revolt against western civilization, but he is in the end an enemy of our civilization. The idea of ‘minding your own business, and producing, and contributing to the commons, under via-negativa rule of law, rather than engaging in political persuasion is a genetic disposition of his tribe. TRUTH TEST: If you can’t write a constitution that can function as an operating system for your civilization, federation, state, and locality that is an improvement on the federal constitution and the federal code then you don’t know what the F—k you’re talking about. It’s extremely difficult. It exposes the failings of your thinking. It demonstrates the exclusivity of the thought of the founders. And with Scalia dead, I’m pretty sure there are maybe three to five of us living that can do that.

  • Notice that almost all libertarians and conservatives emphasize moral contradict

    Notice that almost all libertarians and conservatives emphasize moral contradiction, to incite guilt, as a violation of fairness, and harmony – while I emphasize irreciprocity, to incentivize retaliation, as a violation of non-aggression, licensing violence for correction. See?

    1) They assume infinite value of cooperation (herd)

    2) They pretend there is an ‘us’ rather than ‘us and them’ while they at as ‘us and them.’ (herd)

    3) Yet there is no incentive to cooperate, so they are simply parasites that won’t let us separate to be free of them.

    4) As parasites they break the contract for reciprocity and license predation, conquest, and if necessary ‘displacement’ or worse.

    5) It’s time to return to speciation. Separate, Prosper, Re-Speciate.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-25 17:01:15 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105951505613421906

  • Notice that almost all libertarians and conservatives emphasize moral contradict

    Notice that almost all libertarians and conservatives emphasize moral contradiction, to incite guilt, as a violation of fairness, and harmony – while I emphasize irreciprocity, to incentivize retaliation, as a violation of non-aggression, licensing violence for correction. See?


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-25 16:57:48 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105951492066644875

  • @Afterrthought @TheZBlog There is no alternative. There is only one solution. Th

    @Afterrthought@TheZBlog There is no alternative. There is only one solution. That solution is either to imitate the founders, or to imitate the french. Either solution is possible. The problem is that conservatives and libertarians are just as much sheep as the left, twice as cowardly, and one tenth as willing to use force.

    NO MORE RIGHT WING LIES: THERE IS ONLY ONE SOLUTION.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-25 16:39:16 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105951419221543818

  • Boost of @thuletide Map of “diversity” vs map of homicide rates in US taken from

    Boost of @thuletide Map of “diversity” vs map of homicide rates in US

    taken from this gif: i.imgur.com/UEoRYdz.gif


    Source date (UTC): 2021-03-24 23:00:18 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105947696929110356