—“Men and women are dividing duties”— Um. Women divorce men who split duties. Women demonstrate lower sexual interest in men who split duties. Women have little need for the economic returns of a man if they can obtain child support without providing nesting, care, and sex for a man. Men are more varied than women, and while most women are desirable to SOME man, approximately a third of men are not desirable for ANY woman. This reflects ancestral rates of reproduction. Under monogamy, the best women do not need to settle and can construct a long term marriage. However, under serial marriage (or polygyny for that matter) women can mate with better genes than they can ‘afford’ due to men’s lower demands – especially when under the influence. And so we are seeing a return to the historical difference between upper class (propertied) marriages, and underclass (unpropertied) serial monogamy. The primary difficulty being that single mothers produce vast numbers of disastrous children. Why? over-investment in one or two children, and the tendency not to obtain a mate, whereas single fathers nearly always obtain a new mate, providing a better household. It’s strange but women apparently evolved to care for five or six children, and do not reach cognitive load (work that balances their sensory and intuitionistic sensitivities) until they have at least three. This is understudied but hopefully we will change that shortly.
Source: Original Site Post
-
—“Men and women are dividing duties”—
—“Men and women are dividing duties”— Um. Women divorce men who split duties. Women demonstrate lower sexual interest in men who split duties. Women have little need for the economic returns of a man if they can obtain child support without providing nesting, care, and sex for a man. Men are more varied than women, and while most women are desirable to SOME man, approximately a third of men are not desirable for ANY woman. This reflects ancestral rates of reproduction. Under monogamy, the best women do not need to settle and can construct a long term marriage. However, under serial marriage (or polygyny for that matter) women can mate with better genes than they can ‘afford’ due to men’s lower demands – especially when under the influence. And so we are seeing a return to the historical difference between upper class (propertied) marriages, and underclass (unpropertied) serial monogamy. The primary difficulty being that single mothers produce vast numbers of disastrous children. Why? over-investment in one or two children, and the tendency not to obtain a mate, whereas single fathers nearly always obtain a new mate, providing a better household. It’s strange but women apparently evolved to care for five or six children, and do not reach cognitive load (work that balances their sensory and intuitionistic sensitivities) until they have at least three. This is understudied but hopefully we will change that shortly.
-
Nope. Japanese Are Not More Collectivist
https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1027446881545318400 -
Nope. Japanese Are Not More Collectivist
https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1027446881545318400 -
Existence is Persistence.
—“Existence is Persistence. Only Natural Law persists. Gods are a educational means by which we use Fictional Archetypes to understand and implement said Natural Law in an organized society consisting of people with a distribution of understandings due to age, experience, and ability – be it Pagan aspects or wholesale icons such as the ‘Logos’ as Jesus Christ.”—@Andrew Robert
-
Existence is Persistence.
—“Existence is Persistence. Only Natural Law persists. Gods are a educational means by which we use Fictional Archetypes to understand and implement said Natural Law in an organized society consisting of people with a distribution of understandings due to age, experience, and ability – be it Pagan aspects or wholesale icons such as the ‘Logos’ as Jesus Christ.”—@Andrew Robert
-
Revolution: If They Win It Is Your Fault and Mine.
Our predecessors were optimistically tolerant of the leftist agenda to destroy western civilization, its history, its institutions of natural law, its meritocracy, its aristocracy, its norms, traditions, unique family structure, and unique values of truth, science, and law. The only reason this is possible is because our grandparents, parents, and we, ourselves, have not, until 2001, ended our tolerance of the war against our people and our civilization. There is only one solution – we pay the high price of correction now, versus the low price of continuous correction in the past. Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.
-
Revolution: If They Win It Is Your Fault and Mine.
Our predecessors were optimistically tolerant of the leftist agenda to destroy western civilization, its history, its institutions of natural law, its meritocracy, its aristocracy, its norms, traditions, unique family structure, and unique values of truth, science, and law. The only reason this is possible is because our grandparents, parents, and we, ourselves, have not, until 2001, ended our tolerance of the war against our people and our civilization. There is only one solution – we pay the high price of correction now, versus the low price of continuous correction in the past. Revolt, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.
-
Is All Knowledge Ideological?
There is knowledge that is correspondent, actionable, and predictive within reality and knowledge that is non-corresponded, actionable, and non predictive, and knowledge that is non-correspondent, inactionable, and non-predictive. And all combinations thereof. KNOWLEDGE
- Correspondent ....vs .....non correspondent (with reality) - Actionable .......vs .....in-actionable ....(by man) - Predictive .......vs .....non predictive ...(outcomes)
If one means all knowledge consists of paradigms that assist us in producing collective cooperation on the pursuit of ends, then that makes sense to me. If one means that there is more agency in non-correspondence than correspondence that is only true in the pursuit of power – which is just pursuits of rents. It’s not true if one has to hold power by it without perpetuating rents. Rulers are tediously empirical in action, even if ideological in rhetoric. They don’t have a choice.
-
Is All Knowledge Ideological?
There is knowledge that is correspondent, actionable, and predictive within reality and knowledge that is non-corresponded, actionable, and non predictive, and knowledge that is non-correspondent, inactionable, and non-predictive. And all combinations thereof. KNOWLEDGE
- Correspondent ....vs .....non correspondent (with reality) - Actionable .......vs .....in-actionable ....(by man) - Predictive .......vs .....non predictive ...(outcomes)
If one means all knowledge consists of paradigms that assist us in producing collective cooperation on the pursuit of ends, then that makes sense to me. If one means that there is more agency in non-correspondence than correspondence that is only true in the pursuit of power – which is just pursuits of rents. It’s not true if one has to hold power by it without perpetuating rents. Rulers are tediously empirical in action, even if ideological in rhetoric. They don’t have a choice.