Oath(Contract) > Reciprocity > Sovereignty > Natural Law > Violence > Markets > Non Parasitic Order. You must make an oath to produce reciprocity; if you produce reciprocity you will as a consequence produce sovereignty; if you produce sovereignty, decisions are only decidable by natural law, and only enforceable by violence – the sum total of which results in markets, and because of markets, the result is a non-parasitic order.
Source: Original Site Post
-
It Begins with The Oath
Oath(Contract) > Reciprocity > Sovereignty > Natural Law > Violence > Markets > Non Parasitic Order. You must make an oath to produce reciprocity; if you produce reciprocity you will as a consequence produce sovereignty; if you produce sovereignty, decisions are only decidable by natural law, and only enforceable by violence – the sum total of which results in markets, and because of markets, the result is a non-parasitic order.
-
The Problem of Symbolic Existence
THE PROBLEM OF SYMBOLIC EXISTENCE Or to quote my long time friend Frank Lovell, Knowledge of unicorns exists, even if unicorns do not exist. And even this statement depends upon how we demarcate between Knowledge with Information. We actually don’t have a vocabulary for existence as idea or information other than ‘symbol’. And symbol is often confused with ‘glyph’. So, assuming we demarcate symbol and glyph unicorns exist only symbolically while horses exist existentially. So for existence we have grammars: || platonic < symbolic < constructive(operational) <- descriptive(existential) -> analogistic > literary > and fictional(isms) ||
-
The Problem of Symbolic Existence
THE PROBLEM OF SYMBOLIC EXISTENCE Or to quote my long time friend Frank Lovell, Knowledge of unicorns exists, even if unicorns do not exist. And even this statement depends upon how we demarcate between Knowledge with Information. We actually don’t have a vocabulary for existence as idea or information other than ‘symbol’. And symbol is often confused with ‘glyph’. So, assuming we demarcate symbol and glyph unicorns exist only symbolically while horses exist existentially. So for existence we have grammars: || platonic < symbolic < constructive(operational) <- descriptive(existential) -> analogistic > literary > and fictional(isms) ||
-
Rousseau And Foucault Were Sexual Deviants
Rousseau and Foucault were “Sexual Deviants” and french culture anti-masculine for historic anti-german reasons. Their philosophical bias, the pre-christian venus cult, the revolution’s revolt against white men in church and state, have created a conformist, feminine, hostile, anti-western civilization – at least in paris and in the intelligentsia. Meanwhile the population remains largely german in intuition. The british less so , the nordics less so, the germans less so the poles less so, and the russians least of all.
-
Rousseau And Foucault Were Sexual Deviants
Rousseau and Foucault were “Sexual Deviants” and french culture anti-masculine for historic anti-german reasons. Their philosophical bias, the pre-christian venus cult, the revolution’s revolt against white men in church and state, have created a conformist, feminine, hostile, anti-western civilization – at least in paris and in the intelligentsia. Meanwhile the population remains largely german in intuition. The british less so , the nordics less so, the germans less so the poles less so, and the russians least of all.
-
Social Media Politics = Pillow Talk (Honesty)
Replying to @JonHaidt DEMOCRACY = MONOPOLY 1) Markets allow competing groups to collaborate on means, even if they pursue opposing ends. Classical Houses of classes create a market. Democracy creates a monopoly by eliminating the market for commons between the classes, and forcing conflict into the informational commons. COSMOPOLITANISM = POLITICAL COMMUNISM 2) Cosmopolitanism(political communism) has failed everywhere its tried, just as has economic communism(socialism), and commons communism (libertarianism).Yet people pursue heterogeneous polities despite only homogenous polities exiting poverty, corruption, low trust, and tribalism. SOCIAL MEDIA IS AS ACCURATE AS PILLOW TALK 3) BTW: As far as I know, (a) we over-report compromise, and over-demonstrate on conflict. (b) we self-report more honestly online than in person. (c) We most accurately self-report in conflict (from a position of physical safety.) IOW: social media = “political pillow talk”.
-
Social Media Politics = Pillow Talk (Honesty)
Replying to @JonHaidt DEMOCRACY = MONOPOLY 1) Markets allow competing groups to collaborate on means, even if they pursue opposing ends. Classical Houses of classes create a market. Democracy creates a monopoly by eliminating the market for commons between the classes, and forcing conflict into the informational commons. COSMOPOLITANISM = POLITICAL COMMUNISM 2) Cosmopolitanism(political communism) has failed everywhere its tried, just as has economic communism(socialism), and commons communism (libertarianism).Yet people pursue heterogeneous polities despite only homogenous polities exiting poverty, corruption, low trust, and tribalism. SOCIAL MEDIA IS AS ACCURATE AS PILLOW TALK 3) BTW: As far as I know, (a) we over-report compromise, and over-demonstrate on conflict. (b) we self-report more honestly online than in person. (c) We most accurately self-report in conflict (from a position of physical safety.) IOW: social media = “political pillow talk”.
-
Commercial production will evolve to reflect the greatest demand.
No, you don’t understand. Commercial production will evolve to reflect the greatest demand. The aristocracy, the burghers, the craftsmen, the labor, the women, the underclass. It’s just that (a) people are no longer aspiring to consume in imitation of aristocracy, (b) people are no longer trying to aspire to, and consume in imitation of the middle class, (c) and instead are consuming as is the majority, the underclasses, who are, at present, signaling consumption by deformity rather than conformity. We call it individualism. It is. It’s just the only signaling available to them by consumption, rather than production or achievement.
-
Commercial production will evolve to reflect the greatest demand.
No, you don’t understand. Commercial production will evolve to reflect the greatest demand. The aristocracy, the burghers, the craftsmen, the labor, the women, the underclass. It’s just that (a) people are no longer aspiring to consume in imitation of aristocracy, (b) people are no longer trying to aspire to, and consume in imitation of the middle class, (c) and instead are consuming as is the majority, the underclasses, who are, at present, signaling consumption by deformity rather than conformity. We call it individualism. It is. It’s just the only signaling available to them by consumption, rather than production or achievement.