October 19th, 2018 7:04 PM YES, YOU CAN GO FULL FASH … [Y]ou can go from classical liberal to libertarian to reactionary to full FASH. You can. I know. I did.…. And not cause of some silly boyhood attraction to symbolism, or want of power. But because it’s the logical conclusion of the study of political economy: Nationalist, Mixed Economy, Zero Tolerance, Rule of Law. It’s the optimum group strategy, polity, economy, and system of decidability. The zero tolerance thing is easy once you have rule of law of reciprocity. There isn’t any argument possible against it other than right to defecate in the community gene pool. and you know, sorry. No. You don’t get to soil the gene pool.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Hmm… A relationship column I can do.
October 19th, 2018 5:28 PM
—“I’d pay good money to read your sex column.”— Kevin Wu
[I] don’t think so. A relationship column I can do. Sex I don’t think I’m anything special at all, or any one to listen to, other than I know how to talk about it, and I’ve had a bunch of relationships. I have friends who go through model-quality-women like snowplows on the highway in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. That’s not me. I like fit nerdy girls and I’m monogamous by nature and preference. 😉 I was raised in the “joy of sex” generation of get high and relax through it all – which like everything else in the sixties and seventies was nonsense. Had to learn the hard way. Everything you need to understand about sex can be encapsulated in one quote from one woman of outsized experience: “The dumb, young, athletic ones are better because they think less, follow instinct more and are closer to gorillas – they get the job done. Everything else is romance, and build up.” Feel your way thru sex using your entire sensory system and hers – don’t think it. That’s what they do. Women are not projects, objects, or prey. They are partners in family, and friends with benefits. You win them indirectly by being valuable and interesting, and making them feel safe to ‘feel’. Play a sport no matter how stupid to keep fit, keep some man friends either recreational or business, and make sure her friends are jealous of how you take care of her. Be a Prince to her friends, a gentleman with her, and a gorilla in the bedroom, and finish her first. The first time you score, exhaust her completely. That’s it. The rest is being friends. Don’t try to understand women. They aren’t men. Just love them. Say no to what you need to. Don’t disagree on preference or good, just can or cannot, will and will not. And when they treat you like a girlfriend rather than a man then come down hard on that limit. Listen and say you understand. Learn to half-listen. Dont judge. Ask a few questions when you don’t undrestand. Support her ambitions. Respect her within the limits you set. Do stuff together. Friendships are built and maintained through shared experiences. Do things with other couples to keep from making it tedious. Do stuff apart from each other so you have things to talk about. Do not get into debt or too many hours of work, or too much stress that you can’t do all of the above comfortably. Don’t get too much house or more kids than the two of you can manage. Live and work near family so that grandparents share in the kids. I could afford a 40K year child/nanny expense. Most people can’t. Grandparents are worth about that much income. My ‘thing’ is to learn what makes them look good and buy clothes for them. Other guys its doing stuff for them. This tells them constantly that she is on your mind. My wife and I talked at least once a day from the office if not more. It’s not complicated. That said, I still failed. I would have been fine and still married to that amazing woman, but two bouts of cancer and the illness between them and the contraction of the market while having a child I wasn’t ready for, just were too much for me. I’m only freaking human. We live and learn.
-
Testimonialism Is the Core Insight of Propertarianism
October 19th, 2018 3:29 PM TESTIMONIALISM IS THE CORE INSIGHT OF PROPERTARIANISM [M]ost of the work is dependent upon the completion of the scientific method, and its restatement as due diligence in the production of testimony such that one can (and by law) must, provide a warrant of due diligence for one’s speech. This allows us to extend the demand for involuntary warranty of due diligence from goods and services to information (speech) ending the industrialization of lying that we know as marxism-feminism-postmodernism of the academy-state-media complex. The this ‘checklist’ and the ‘grammars’ are a substantial innovation, and they are unfortunately a bit harder to grasp and internalize than acquisitionism (psychology restated as desire to acquire property in toto), and propertarianism (ethics restated as voluntary transfer of property). The rest, (operational law, rule of law, and perfect government) are not that complicated.
-
Rawls (left) vs Doolittle (right)
October 19th, 2018 3:13 PM RAWLS (LEFT) VS DOOLITTLE (RIGHT)Rawls:The Beggars Veil of Ignorance: We should treat others as though we could be swapped at birth! Result? Recursive Dysgenic Parasitism and demographic, institutional, cultural, and economic collapse. Doolittle:The Warrior’s Chainsaw of Knowledge: Why should me and my kin, having a history of superior choices, not enslave you and take your stuff (or worse)? Result? Eugenic Evolution by Fully informed, productive, warrantied, voluntary exchange, free of imposition upon others by externality.
-
Journalists Are the Principal Enemy of Civilization
October 19th, 2018 2:33 PM JOURNALISTS ARE THE PRINCIPAL ENEMY OF CIVILIZATION [B]ecause they are unaccountable. Make them accountable and journalism will all but end, and reporting will be restored. Journalists are from the bottom third of their classes, and they are primarily educated in the postmodern sophisms marxist pseudoscience, and social democratic religion. They are the only unaccountable producers of a goods, services, and information in our civilization. Every word for compensation must be testimony. That will leave only a few investigative reporters who have deep knowledge of subjects. Entertainment reporting will be limited to ‘undue praise’ and facts.
-
We Are Enough.
October 19th, 2018 2:06 PM WE ARE, THOSE OF US WITH AGENCY, MEN ENOUGH. [W]eak men need false heroes, demigods, and gods to give them the approval they fail to obtain from others due to their thoughts, words, and deeds. They need false cults to find comfort in a fantasy of those like them who equally fail. As individuals some are weak and some are strong. As a host, as the brotherhood of warriors: in war, commerce, and truth, we are one, and as one, we transform others, ourselves, mankind, this world, and the universe to whatever heaven we desire. Leave the animals behind. Become the gods we imagine.
-
Truth Is Enough.
October 19th, 2018 2:04 PM TRUTH IS ENOUGH. [W]e have a universe, nature, our ancestors, and ourselves to be thankful for. Men who have ancestors worthy of thanks (worship), have no need of false ones. Men who hold lands and render them gardens, have our ancestors and ourselves to be thankful for. Men who grasp the universe itself have the our ancestors and ourselves to be thankful for. We have ancestors that were the heroes they imagined. We are the demi-gods they imagined. And we are not yet done becoming the gods they, and we, imagine.
-
Religions Whether Occult or Secular Sell Fake Status
October 19th, 2018 2:00 PM RELIGIONS WHETHER OCCULT OR SECULAR SELL FAKE STATUS by John Mark [R]eligion sells fake status just as leftism sells fake status. Religion sells artificial good feelings – a method of lying to oneself as a method of dealing with the harshness of life – just as leftism does. NPCs seem to need these lies, or an alternative that provides them the same service: “You don’t have to think, you can feel good/more secure/optimistic about yourself and about life even if you have no reason to, and you can feel like life has a grand meaning even if it is false.” The only alternative we can offer them is a “religion” (rituals/training/symbolic reminders) of stoicism/ancestor “worship” (admiration/thanks), which requires being honest with oneself, and a fairly secure place in our pack if they can add some value and not advocate for theft. As far as I can tell, far less than half the world’s population is capable of that. Some NPCs may be able to live under our system, and we can do their thinking for them, if they can resist the urge to lie and rebel against the truth. But I am doubtful most people can handle it. Thus we must separate from those who cannot do it, and transcend apart from them, embracing our role as the world’s master class/race (including the minority of non-whites with the agency to join us) as we have been for centuries. Our attempt to lift up the world’s teeming masses by letting them immigrate and live under our law, or invading them and imposing the superficial structure of our laws, has failed. Because they are not like us. We are a minority on earth, and our strategy must reflect that. We can benefit them via our advancements, from across a high wall, and provide them with help to transcend as they request it respectfully, from across a high wall. Separate. Transcend.
-
Yes, You Can Go Full Fash …
October 19th, 2018 7:04 PM YES, YOU CAN GO FULL FASH … [Y]ou can go from classical liberal to libertarian to reactionary to full FASH. You can. I know. I did.…. And not cause of some silly boyhood attraction to symbolism, or want of power. But because it’s the logical conclusion of the study of political economy: Nationalist, Mixed Economy, Zero Tolerance, Rule of Law. It’s the optimum group strategy, polity, economy, and system of decidability. The zero tolerance thing is easy once you have rule of law of reciprocity. There isn’t any argument possible against it other than right to defecate in the community gene pool. and you know, sorry. No. You don’t get to soil the gene pool.
-
Evola vs Doolittle
October 18th, 2018 9:32 AM EVOLA VS DOOLITTLE by Ahmed Reda [W]e live in a natural world. The Mere belief in an old order and the mere feeling of how that order looks like or how it would look like in this age is not the right way to re-evolve it. Evola and Doolittle are observing the same thing, but the holes of Doolittle’s sieve are much smaller compared to those of Evola’s. If Evola and Doolittle are to observe, for example, the solar system, Evola would propose that the reason a planet orbits the sun is that its matter has some kind of tendency for orbiting or a sort of motility. But Doolittle WILL explain that the reason a planet orbits the sun is a central force which varies exactly inversely as the square distance from the center. Now what I’m aiming at is that while Evola knows exactly what he wants to impose, he lacks A THEORY, he lacks a scientific language that would’ve helped him in understanding what he intuited, and therefore he fell into many traps, one of them is the savior myth. What we need is a scientific research paper that uses measurements and organizational charts not intuitions and poetic licenses.