Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • Man: Known as In Self Deceptions or Known as In Demonstrated Actions (truth)?

    October 21st, 2018 1:36 PM MAN: KNOWN AS IN SELF DECEPTIONS OR KNOWN AS IN DEMONSTRATED ACTIONS (TRUTH)?

    —“If Propertarianism is grounded solely on science and not religion, then on what basis is Man (with a great M) known?”—Josef Kalinin

    Joseph : I can’t decompose that question. Man ‘is’, (exists as) that which he has demonstrated by his history. the stories (sedations) we tell ourselves at any point in history, merely serve to ameliorate our instincts (largely status) in relation to our resources (physical, emotional, mental) budges, and existential resources in all their forms – from physical things to relationships to knowledge. So are you asking “What is man?”, or “What methods of sedation (self medication) has man used through history?” Propertarianism ‘accounts for’ (takes account of): Math, Logic, Science (Physics-Chemistry-Biology, Psychology, Law, Economics, History, Literature, Philosophy, Religion, The Occult, the Fictionalisms, and Methods of Deceit. What it most takes account of, and no others do, is the transition of our understanding, knowledge and instrumentation from human scale to pre (supra/below) and post (super/above) human scale. And as such at humans scale (Morality, Instructions, arithmetic(construction),confirmation) we speak in justifications (Via-Positivas) because we can directly apprehend such constant relations, where at below and above human scale (Law, Science, Mathematics(deduction), Falsification) we speak in falsifications (Via-Negativas) because we cannot directly perceive those constant relations with our senses. The world wars (Anglo/Balance and Russian/Expansion Screw Ups) interrupted the darwinian-mengerian-specerian-maxwellian-poincarian-nietzschiean-romanticist revolution. And the 20th century in social science was lost, as the cult-of-dysgenic-socialism found itself in a christ figure versus a darwinian evil of eugenic-national-socialism, which allowed the suppression of the second scientific revolution (in germany). But beginning in the 1990’s science has (slowly) rescued us such that without immigration we would have corrected the problem already.

  • Answering Criticisms

    On Curt’s Rules of Discourse

    “The Teaching Law on Social Media Is Like Teaching in A Locker Room”

    Criticisms of Curt

    Well, you know, teaching in a locker room requries certain chops.

    Criticisms of Propertarianism

    “There Are Some. You Aren’t Making Them. But They’re Not Of The Work”

    Criticism of Open Discourse on Revolt

    “All Revolutions are Suspect in Prospect but Deterministic in Retrospect.”“The Surest Means of Preventing People From Stumbling into Civil War Is To Make them Certain They Are Doing It, And That You Have A Solution To Prevent it.”

    • Why No Secrecy?
    • Why Talk of Revolt, Revolution, Civil War?
    • How Revolutions Are Made
    • The Biggest Army in The World? Us.
    • The Hierarchy of Warfare

    Approach to Other Conservatives

    “Men Form Packs, Wear Uniforms of their Packs, and Choose Leaders of their Packs that Share Their Paradigms and Interests.  Packs must work together not coalesce into a herd, It won’t happen.”

    • Visions of The Future
    • Thoughts on Others
    • Our Packs Must Work Together Toward Shared Ends
    • The Languages of Male Packs
    • Fearful Conservatives – Understand Yourselves
    • Intolerance – We Don”t Need You if You’re Costly
    • Any Good Arguments for Supremacy?

    Criticism of Others

    “Mises, Rothbard, Hoppe, Yarvin, and Hayek and yes, Doolittle all tried to solve the problem of social sciences under rule of law versus rule by men. They just did so dragging their cultural means of persuasion, and reasoning with them. The difference is that Anglo empiricism and its scientific method is simply the operation of the court of tort applied outside the courtroom. I knew they were all close but failing. It was a hard problem made harder by their backgrounds.”“It is rarely valuable to criticize others except to learn by doing so. They aren’t interested. The best you can do is counteract whatever harm they’re doing.”David Friedman ( David is the least bad of the jewish libertarians. But at some point someone asked me to do a treatment and I did. It was so embarrassing I had to stop after ten pages. )

    • asdfasdfasdf

    Jordan Peterson (“Peterson has probably run his course but done well doing so. My principal criticism is that he retains devotion to parable and mysticism. In his business of therapy this means of suggestion is an appeal to an authority that serves his purposes of reprogramming the patient without cognitive resistance.  That is problematic but tolerable. What’s not tolerable is his conflation of Useful Wisdom with Truth.”)

    • asdasdfasdf

    Stefan Molyneux  (“I don’t really criticize Stefan, it’s more that I want him to complete his journey on the one hand and stop reinforcing silly libertarian NAP nonsense on the other.”)

    • fasdfasdf

    Nassim Taleb (“Taleb and I work on a similar problem from two ends of the spectrum of that problem, and we have similarly intolerant personalities. However, his attempt to discredit IQ as a means of defending immigration into Europe by his people was something I couldn’t pass on.”)

    • adsfasdf

  • Answering Criticisms

    On Curt’s Rules of Discourse

    “The Teaching Law on Social Media Is Like Teaching in A Locker Room”

    Criticisms of Curt

    Well, you know, teaching in a locker room requries certain chops.

    Criticisms of Propertarianism

    “There Are Some. You Aren’t Making Them. But They’re Not Of The Work”

    Criticism of Open Discourse on Revolt

    “All Revolutions are Suspect in Prospect but Deterministic in Retrospect.”“The Surest Means of Preventing People From Stumbling into Civil War Is To Make them Certain They Are Doing It, And That You Have A Solution To Prevent it.”

    • Why No Secrecy?
    • Why Talk of Revolt, Revolution, Civil War?
    • How Revolutions Are Made
    • The Biggest Army in The World? Us.
    • The Hierarchy of Warfare

    Approach to Other Conservatives

    “Men Form Packs, Wear Uniforms of their Packs, and Choose Leaders of their Packs that Share Their Paradigms and Interests.  Packs must work together not coalesce into a herd, It won’t happen.”

    • Visions of The Future
    • Thoughts on Others
    • Our Packs Must Work Together Toward Shared Ends
    • The Languages of Male Packs
    • Fearful Conservatives – Understand Yourselves
    • Intolerance – We Don”t Need You if You’re Costly
    • Any Good Arguments for Supremacy?

    Criticism of Others

    “Mises, Rothbard, Hoppe, Yarvin, and Hayek and yes, Doolittle all tried to solve the problem of social sciences under rule of law versus rule by men. They just did so dragging their cultural means of persuasion, and reasoning with them. The difference is that Anglo empiricism and its scientific method is simply the operation of the court of tort applied outside the courtroom. I knew they were all close but failing. It was a hard problem made harder by their backgrounds.”“It is rarely valuable to criticize others except to learn by doing so. They aren’t interested. The best you can do is counteract whatever harm they’re doing.”David Friedman ( David is the least bad of the jewish libertarians. But at some point someone asked me to do a treatment and I did. It was so embarrassing I had to stop after ten pages. )

    • asdfasdfasdf

    Jordan Peterson (“Peterson has probably run his course but done well doing so. My principal criticism is that he retains devotion to parable and mysticism. In his business of therapy this means of suggestion is an appeal to an authority that serves his purposes of reprogramming the patient without cognitive resistance.  That is problematic but tolerable. What’s not tolerable is his conflation of Useful Wisdom with Truth.”)

    • asdasdfasdf

    Stefan Molyneux  (“I don’t really criticize Stefan, it’s more that I want him to complete his journey on the one hand and stop reinforcing silly libertarian NAP nonsense on the other.”)

    • fasdfasdf

    Nassim Taleb (“Taleb and I work on a similar problem from two ends of the spectrum of that problem, and we have similarly intolerant personalities. However, his attempt to discredit IQ as a means of defending immigration into Europe by his people was something I couldn’t pass on.”)

    • adsfasdf

  • Masculinity – The Book Collection For Gentlemen.

    October 20th, 2018 11:21 AM ONE OF MY ALBUMS: A COLLECTION I KEPT AT MY HOUSE. SECRET: Almost everything you read on manliness will teach you to be an officer and a gentleman in civilian clothes. That’s all it is. We tend to create soldiers of the state today, who are participants in the administration of combined arms. In that sense we produce few Officers and Gentlemen. We have lost our intergenerational military aristocracy as the principle origin of our political representatives. So it is increasingly difficult to imitate an aristocrat. One can still learn how to be a warrior. It is increasingly difficult to learn to be an aristocrat. For that reason we can and must restore the skill base deliberately. Um. It sells. Aristocrat Sells, Athlete sells, Musician sells, Money Sells. Sell women less (they consume) and sell men more (produce together).

  • The left is a herd (monopoly)

    October 20th, 2018 11:25 AM NPC’S AND THE RIGHT [L]ook, the left is a herd (monopoly), the right a collection of packs (market). We can’t script like NPC’s do because we have no herds. We have a thousand packs. Each pack uses its own language. That’s why NPC’s are so hysterical to us: we debate between our packs – we use different arguments values, terms. NPC’s dont. The herd follows scripts. That’s what makes it a herd.

  • Understanding Mindfulness, Class, Costs

    October 20th, 2018 10:58 AM UNDERSTANDING MINDFULNESS, CLASS, COSTS

    • Wealthy Intergenerational Families Learn and Perpetuate Mindfulness.
    • Etiquette and Habits are simply SIGNALS of MINDFULNESS.
    • Meaning you are trustworthy.
    • Because etiquette and Habits ARE COSTLY.
    • It is the WILLINGNESS TO PAY COSTS that the signal communicates.
    • It is the UNWILLINGNESS TO PAY COSTS that classlessness communicates.
    • Classical protestant families are stoic.

  • Masculinity – The Book Collection For Gentlemen.

    October 20th, 2018 11:21 AM ONE OF MY ALBUMS: A COLLECTION I KEPT AT MY HOUSE. SECRET: Almost everything you read on manliness will teach you to be an officer and a gentleman in civilian clothes. That’s all it is. We tend to create soldiers of the state today, who are participants in the administration of combined arms. In that sense we produce few Officers and Gentlemen. We have lost our intergenerational military aristocracy as the principle origin of our political representatives. So it is increasingly difficult to imitate an aristocrat. One can still learn how to be a warrior. It is increasingly difficult to learn to be an aristocrat. For that reason we can and must restore the skill base deliberately. Um. It sells. Aristocrat Sells, Athlete sells, Musician sells, Money Sells. Sell women less (they consume) and sell men more (produce together).

  • “How Can I Learn Why Psychology Is a Pseudoscience?”

    October 20th, 2018 10:34 AM

    —“CURT: HOW CAN I LEARN WHY PSYCHOLOGY IS A PSEUDOSCIENCE?”— A Friend

    [H]mmm…. Well, psychology(Investigation/measurement) vs freudian psychology(projection/fictionalism). Start at the beginning with Karl Popper on Freud. The read about the “Operationist” movement in psychology. Then read about “The replication crisis”. Then take note of how hard it is to find any papers that do not try to deny psychology is a pseudoscience despite the near zero replicability of findings. “The Ladies Doth Protest Too Much” is rather obvious. Data is data. Replication is replication. Psychology and sociology don’t replicate. Ergo, it’s not science. Freudian categories are outright fabrications – he just made it up. Why? We all carry our cultural baggage with us. Judaism enforces conformity with the feminine bias (entrapment/herd) and europeanism encourages exceptionalism (innovation/pack). Freud stated the jewish and feminine psychology in pseudoscientific terms, (he basically invented the concept of ‘rape culture’ that is a psychosis of the feminine mind). Nietzsche stated the european and masculine psychology casting the feminine as a catastrophe (correctly). Just as Marx was a Jewish reaction to Darwin, Freud was a Jewish reaction to Nietzsche, Frankfurt was a Jewish Reaction to Spencer et al. Jung came along and tried to correct Freud by using literary archetypes, which were free of Jewish/Feminine psychosis, and provided a normative model compared to Nietzsche’s reformation and restoration of western civilization. The war period resulted in pseudoscience through about the Regan Revolution of the 1980s, and the technological revolution and fall of the soviet and chinese empires in the 1990’s. As usual, science (empiricism, and warranty of due diligence) saved us from nonsense. Psychotherapy is a pseudoscience (talk therapy), although counseling (mentoring) is not. Cognitive behavior therapy (training) is not a pseudoscience, it is just stoicism applied correctively rather than as an ordinary universal training of the mind. Psychiatry (medication and surgery) is not a pseudoscience and it was the first strike against the pseudosciences of the Freudians. Psychology isn’t always a pseudoscience – but is mostly – because only economics provides us with good data on human behavior (demonstrated preference and bias). The fact that we cannot actually run experiments in economics is precisely the reason we have a harder time projecting, and that economic pseudoscience is largely achieved by innumeracy: cherry picking the income statement over the balance sheet in order to hide destruction of accumulated capital. Cog Sci is not really a term used any longer, but represented an attempt by a GENERATION of scholars to LEAVE the pseudoscience of psychology behind. It was made possible largely by imaging and computer imaging technology which let us examine (relatively un-intrusively) the workings of the brain. And we have made huge progress in the past twenty years in exposing psychology (projectionism) as a pseudoscience. And replaced it with subfields that study language, cognitive bias, emotions, neurology, brain structure, etc without the ‘projection’ (fantasizing) that constituted psychology. Propertarianism/Acquisitionism provide a superior means of describing behavior (incentives, biases, and actions). This is why it’s so important a vocabulary and grammar for metaphysics, psychology, social science, politics, and law. Curt

  • Understanding Mindfulness, Class, Costs

    October 20th, 2018 10:58 AM UNDERSTANDING MINDFULNESS, CLASS, COSTS

    • Wealthy Intergenerational Families Learn and Perpetuate Mindfulness.
    • Etiquette and Habits are simply SIGNALS of MINDFULNESS.
    • Meaning you are trustworthy.
    • Because etiquette and Habits ARE COSTLY.
    • It is the WILLINGNESS TO PAY COSTS that the signal communicates.
    • It is the UNWILLINGNESS TO PAY COSTS that classlessness communicates.
    • Classical protestant families are stoic.

  • Property May Be Intangible but The Costs of It Are Not

    October 20th, 2018 9:49 AM

    PROPERTY MAY BE INTANGIBLE BUT THE COSTS OF IT ARE NOT —“Intangible property exists inside the realms of both personal and group property. Intangible property exists in ideas or information which men are willing to defend, such as a man’s reputation, or the reputation of a man’s family or ancestors. These things may not be tangible in such that you can point at or identify them, but they exist as property because men are willing to defend them with violence, often times even more so than the more tangible types of property.”— Allen Freeman via Oliver Westcott