Curt Doolittle

Source: Original Site Post

  • The History of Extrajudicial Punishment

    October 23rd, 2018 2:57 PM THE HISTORY OF EXTRAJUDICIAL PUNISHMENT https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynching#History The French Revolution Popularized The Practice (Really)

    —“Every society has had forms of extrajudicial punishments, including murder. The legal and cultural antecedents of American lynching were carried across the Atlantic by migrants from the British Isles to colonial North America. Collective violence was a familiar aspect of the early modern Anglo-American legal landscape. Group violence in the British Atlantic was usually nonlethal in intention and result. In the seventeenth century, in the context of political turmoil in England and unsettled social and political conditions in the American colonies, there arose rebellions and riots that took multiple lives.”—

    In Anglo Saxon Culture, The MILITIA solved problems of enemies of the people. Judicial Resolution of disputes was meant to resolve conflicts between members of the polity in order to prevent retaliation cycles (feuds). The “Politicization” of extra-judicial punishment was a product of the French Revolution and then spread to the Antebellum era in the states.

  • A Hard Concept to Internalize: Via-Negativa Lying

    October 23rd, 2018 10:08 AM A HARD CONCEPT TO INTERNALIZE: VIA-NEGATIVA LYING [S]cience and Law are via-negativa disciplines. We know truth by eliminating what is false. We know legal, ethical, moral, and good, by eliminating what is irreciprocal, unethical, immoral, criminal, and bad. Science is the means by which we perform due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, suggestion, fictionalism, and deceit – leaving only truth candidates remaining. So, when we say someone is LYING it does not require that they via-positiva relied upon intent. Instead, we require via-negativa, that we take involuntary responsibility for performing due diligence against spreading a falsehood suggestion or deceit. So via-negativa, someone is lying if they distribute a falsehood suggestion or deceit, regardless of whether they intend to. This is a higher standard of suppression of falsehood – one that is necessary to prevent the spread of falsehoods. Because we have been defeated once by the falsehood of monotheism, and the same people are trying to defeat us with mono-classism, and monopoly. We are the only people to create a market between classes and ideas, and everyone else produced a monopoly equalitarianism, or a monopoly hierarchy, rather than the markets that have made our successes possible. People always resist paying the costs of incremental increases in suppression of opportunity for free riding, conspiracy, deception, fraud, theft and violence, just as they resist paying all costs of creating and maintaining the commons: physical, normative, and informational. That does not mean that we are always and everywhere paying those costs in exchange for the most valuable commons we can produce: good information, truthful speech, the trust, economic velocity, and innovation that results from it. Because the only way a small, high-individual-investment, superior population can compete is by producing the economy necessary to pay for the superior technological means ( and arms) by which to compensate for their numbers. Cheers. Curt Doolittle The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • My Very Simple Scientific Technique and What I Have Learned from Religion

    October 23rd, 2018 6:54 AM MY VERY SIMPLE SCIENTIFIC TECHNIQUE AND WHAT I HAVE LEARNED FROM RELIGION [R]eligion is, surprisingly, the ‘hard problem’ of social science. Every other problem I have set out to solve (understand) has been trivial by comparison. Truth took me a year. The grammars took me less than six months. And those are very hard problems. Religion was much harder. I use a very simple (scientific) technique, that long-term followers know well, which is to attack a problem, causing other people to defend it, until I understand their incentives. This is a better method of research than reading what other authors opine (make excuses for or against.) I am trying to understand (better than I do now) why the the demand for the God (bad) and Jesus (good) mythos’ (they are different) persists among some people and groups and not others. I have begun to understand it better than I did. I understand (easily) why certain classes demand it. I have begun to understand the different weights different cultures attach to it. And I am ‘testing’ whether (I think correctly) it is simply a failure to provide mindfulness by non-nonsense means (and why governments would resist teaching a non-nonsense method of mindfulness). Mostly what I have come to understand, is that people are ignorant of the available options and their intuitions have been so successfully trained by the one they already hold, that they cannot imagine training their intuitions by any other means. So (a) man needs mindfulness, and (b) and man needs mindfulness to different degrees, and (c) the mindfulness is dependent a bit on genetics of mindfulness (males less than females in general, and females more in general), (d) personality needs, (e) class circumstances, (f) cultural-political circumstances – all of which generate (or do not generate) demand for mindfulness. Now, that mindfulness can be provided by the Hindu Means (literary immersion), the three abrahamic monotheistic means (organized indoctrination) of low(islam), working(christian), and middle (jewish) religion; the buddhist means (training); the rather ‘new age/european’ (philosophy-as-religion-substitute) means; the shinto and ritual means (ritual); or by cognitive-behavioral education that we call ‘Stoicism’ for context. And there is a great deal to lean just from the ORDER of those methods of training: how much infrastructure is needed to preserve the ‘illusion’ of the mythos vs argument vs ritual vs education. And how much ‘ability’ given the means of training (immersion in hinduism through individual education in stoicism). But this is just a matter of WEALTH sufficient to pay for the means of TRAINING vs a given period of time: ie: producing the mass illusions of the ancient religions required an informational vulnerability (absence of knowledge and alternatives) that existed only in the past – and no longer does. So if one wants to produce a religion that is not made of lies, it is entirely possible to do so – with a total absence of religious parables. And instead, a reliance on parables of history, and training in the virtues. Christianity has a very simple set of underlying principles that are constituted in only four statements. Islam and judaism can also be, but to do so is horrifying. Christianity’s four statements are quite simple and will in general produce consequent goods. There is just no need to lie to people and train them to be vulnerable to lies, and train priests to lie, and politicians to lie by the same means in order to teach those four rules. No more lies by judaism, devolves into christianity, devolves into islam, evolves into marxism, postmodernism, feminism. No more lies. People need “imaginary friends, parents, leaders” for very well underst reasons: they have been failed by those around them, to provide positive socialization and training by existential means. We are able to teach truthful speech (science) and there is no reason we cannot provide positive socialization and training (mindfulness) by equally truthful means. Convergence on the Truth: continuous correspondence between reality perception cognition recollection description negotiation, and advocacy. Affections. -Curt

  • 800 Years of History in One List:

    October 23rd, 2018 6:54 PM 800 YEARS OF HISTORY IN ONE LIST: Fourth Crusade(1200) > Aristotelian Restoration(1200-1500) > Literacy (1440)> Reformation (1517-1648) > Scientific Revolution 1543-1687) > French/German/Russian Enlightenment(Counter-Revolution)(1700-1800) > Industrial Revolution (1760-1840) > Darwinian Revolution (1850-1920) > Neo-Classicism, Romanticism, Pre-Raphelites thru Nietzsche (Pagan Restoration) (1750-1900) With WW1/2 and the Jewish Counter-Enlightenment (Marx /Freud /Boas /Cantor /Frankfurt /Mises /Rand /Rothbard > French-Jewish second counter-enlightenment (postmodernists).

  • Here Is how They Destroyed Our Civilization…

    October 23rd, 2018 4:48 PM IT’S NOT JUST THE 19TH – HERE IS HOW THEY DESTROYED OUR CIVILIZATION BY DESTROYING OUR UNIQUENESS: MERITOCRATIC, HIGH TRUST NORMS, LAWS, AND INSTITUTIONS. THIS IS HOW IT WAS DONE: They: 1) increased the voting pool, then 2) used immigration, to sink the pool, then 3) used the sunk voting pool to stack the court (left), then 4) funding selected cases before the courts to overthrow the constitution by legislation from the bench – what could not be achieved by pursuading the population to vote. 5) Added women to the work force, then consumed all female generated taxes for redistribution, and forcibly redistributed middle class reproduction to the lower classes, underclasses, and third world immigrants. 6) Using forced integration (immigration act), and then forced relocation (johnson,clinton,obama), and then unregulated immigration to undermine the high trust norms developed over centuries. 7) This is before we address the financialization of the economy and the extraction of retirement and reproduction from the middle classes, or both spending down accumulated intergenerational capital, and borrowing against future production within the same (Boomer) generation. VOTING 1 – white single women are the only defectors from any group 2 – if women had never had the vote, we never would have had a liberal president 3 – women originally defended against marxism (male labor), but were converted by postmodernism (female labor) 4 – *white single women are the primary customers of the Postmodern Academy (pseudosciences and literature), Market Economy via Hyper Consumption of signals (70% of consumer spending), and Virtue Signaling (political) marketplaces. WHY IT MATTERS Without white women exclusively defecting, none of the cultural divisiveness would have occurred, and the end of western civilization as the only high trust policy outside of east asia – and the only civil society to survive. THE LEFT’S SCRIPT They followed the soviet script for moving low trust russians into baltic, eastern european and european high trust populations in order to undermine the high trust norms of europeans such that they would be obedient as Russians who had only been free of serfdom (slavery) for a generation, had no middle class, no middle class norms, and no traditions necessary for the voluntary organization of innovation, investment, production distribution and trade, thereby generating DEMAND FOR STATE CONTROL of every aspect of society. UNDERMINING THE AMENDMENTS The 14th (Federal Dominion over States) The 15th (Race color condition – eliminating segregation) The 17th (Senators by popular vote – eliminating state government power) The 19th (By Sex – eliminating the male-female compromise of the meritocracy of one family one vote ) The 24th (By Poll Tax – eliminating even the lowest contribution and and property requirements) The 26th (By 18 yrs – eliminating all life experience requirements.) UNDERSTANDING THIS LIST OF ‘LEGISLATION FROM THE BENCH IN MATTERS OF NORMS’ https://en.wikipedia.org/…/List_of_landmark_court… AND IN PARTICULAR Brown v. Board of Education (1954) “Separate is not equal” Cooper v. Aaron (1958) Holding: States cannot nullify decisions of the federal courts. Engel v. Vitale (1962) Holding: School initiated-prayer in the public school system violates the First Amendment. Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) Holding: Colleges and universities have a legitimate interest in promoting diversity. New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) Holding: In order to prove libel, a public official must show that what was said against them was made with actual malice. Zelma v. Simmons-Harris (2002) Holding: Certain school voucher programs are constitutional. UNIQUENESS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION: Who, on this earth, other than property owning western males, has the agency to preserve nomocracy (rule of law)? What evidence do we have that ANYONE ELSE has the agency to produce or preserve rule of law? NO ONE. AGENCY IS A SCARCITY AND ONLY WESTERN MAN PRODUCED IT. BECAUSE ONLY WESTERN MAN WAS REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE MERIT AND SPEAK THE TRUTH REGARDLESS OF THE COST TO THE DOMINANCE HIERARCHY.

  • 800 Years of History in One List:

    October 23rd, 2018 6:54 PM 800 YEARS OF HISTORY IN ONE LIST: Fourth Crusade(1200) > Aristotelian Restoration(1200-1500) > Literacy (1440)> Reformation (1517-1648) > Scientific Revolution 1543-1687) > French/German/Russian Enlightenment(Counter-Revolution)(1700-1800) > Industrial Revolution (1760-1840) > Darwinian Revolution (1850-1920) > Neo-Classicism, Romanticism, Pre-Raphelites thru Nietzsche (Pagan Restoration) (1750-1900) With WW1/2 and the Jewish Counter-Enlightenment (Marx /Freud /Boas /Cantor /Frankfurt /Mises /Rand /Rothbard > French-Jewish second counter-enlightenment (postmodernists).

  • Here Is how They Destroyed Our Civilization…

    October 23rd, 2018 4:48 PM IT’S NOT JUST THE 19TH – HERE IS HOW THEY DESTROYED OUR CIVILIZATION BY DESTROYING OUR UNIQUENESS: MERITOCRATIC, HIGH TRUST NORMS, LAWS, AND INSTITUTIONS. THIS IS HOW IT WAS DONE: They: 1) increased the voting pool, then 2) used immigration, to sink the pool, then 3) used the sunk voting pool to stack the court (left), then 4) funding selected cases before the courts to overthrow the constitution by legislation from the bench – what could not be achieved by pursuading the population to vote. 5) Added women to the work force, then consumed all female generated taxes for redistribution, and forcibly redistributed middle class reproduction to the lower classes, underclasses, and third world immigrants. 6) Using forced integration (immigration act), and then forced relocation (johnson,clinton,obama), and then unregulated immigration to undermine the high trust norms developed over centuries. 7) This is before we address the financialization of the economy and the extraction of retirement and reproduction from the middle classes, or both spending down accumulated intergenerational capital, and borrowing against future production within the same (Boomer) generation. VOTING 1 – white single women are the only defectors from any group 2 – if women had never had the vote, we never would have had a liberal president 3 – women originally defended against marxism (male labor), but were converted by postmodernism (female labor) 4 – *white single women are the primary customers of the Postmodern Academy (pseudosciences and literature), Market Economy via Hyper Consumption of signals (70% of consumer spending), and Virtue Signaling (political) marketplaces. WHY IT MATTERS Without white women exclusively defecting, none of the cultural divisiveness would have occurred, and the end of western civilization as the only high trust policy outside of east asia – and the only civil society to survive. THE LEFT’S SCRIPT They followed the soviet script for moving low trust russians into baltic, eastern european and european high trust populations in order to undermine the high trust norms of europeans such that they would be obedient as Russians who had only been free of serfdom (slavery) for a generation, had no middle class, no middle class norms, and no traditions necessary for the voluntary organization of innovation, investment, production distribution and trade, thereby generating DEMAND FOR STATE CONTROL of every aspect of society. UNDERMINING THE AMENDMENTS The 14th (Federal Dominion over States) The 15th (Race color condition – eliminating segregation) The 17th (Senators by popular vote – eliminating state government power) The 19th (By Sex – eliminating the male-female compromise of the meritocracy of one family one vote ) The 24th (By Poll Tax – eliminating even the lowest contribution and and property requirements) The 26th (By 18 yrs – eliminating all life experience requirements.) UNDERSTANDING THIS LIST OF ‘LEGISLATION FROM THE BENCH IN MATTERS OF NORMS’ https://en.wikipedia.org/…/List_of_landmark_court… AND IN PARTICULAR Brown v. Board of Education (1954) “Separate is not equal” Cooper v. Aaron (1958) Holding: States cannot nullify decisions of the federal courts. Engel v. Vitale (1962) Holding: School initiated-prayer in the public school system violates the First Amendment. Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) Holding: Colleges and universities have a legitimate interest in promoting diversity. New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) Holding: In order to prove libel, a public official must show that what was said against them was made with actual malice. Zelma v. Simmons-Harris (2002) Holding: Certain school voucher programs are constitutional. UNIQUENESS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION: Who, on this earth, other than property owning western males, has the agency to preserve nomocracy (rule of law)? What evidence do we have that ANYONE ELSE has the agency to produce or preserve rule of law? NO ONE. AGENCY IS A SCARCITY AND ONLY WESTERN MAN PRODUCED IT. BECAUSE ONLY WESTERN MAN WAS REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE MERIT AND SPEAK THE TRUTH REGARDLESS OF THE COST TO THE DOMINANCE HIERARCHY.

  • Q: How Can I Learn About Propertarianism or Natural Law?

    October 22nd, 2018 11:44 AM Q: HOW CAN I LEARN ABOUT PROPERTARIANISM OR NATURAL LAW?

    —“I’m interested in learning about your stance on propertarianism. So, how do you define the natural law? It’s something I’ve been searching and curious about for some time. And how does Propertarianism relate to this? In fact, I’m curious about the whole thing to be honest”— A Friend

    1 – FIRST QUESTION: WHAT IS NATURAL LAW? What is Natural Law? Reciprocity. propertarianism.com/2018/07/13/what-is-natural-law-what-is-reciprocity/ For Christians, Natural Law in Your Context. propertarianism.com/2018/07/13/natural-law-for-christians/ Natural Law Results in Market “Fascism”. propertarianism.com/2018/07/17/natural-law-facism-market-fascism/ West Developed Natural Law To Profit From Domestication of Man (Eugenics). propertarianism.com/2018/06/27/natural-law-of-sovereign-men-domesticating-animal-man-for-peers-and-profit/ Is Natural Law a Cult? (a Cult of The Law?) (it’s a cult of sovereignty) propertarianism.com/2018/06/16/is-natural-law-a-cult/ It’s Natural Law “Fundamentalism” (“The White Law”) propertarianism.com/2018/05/13/natural-law-fundamentalism/ It’s a Cult of Sovereignty Enforced by Law propertarianism.com/2018/04/14/the-cult-of-sovereignty-natural-law/ Why I Write Natural Law and Science Not Philosophy propertarianism.com/2018/02/25/why-i-write-natural-law-science-not-philosophy-choice/ Each of those posts is pretty short. Read in order, you’ll mostly ‘get’ it. Sometimes you have to read through those posts a few times. But it’s not that hard. You will understand. 2 – SECOND QUESTION: How does propertarianism relate to natural law? It’s the application of natural law to all fields of inquiry (the scope of human knowledge). The scope of work would better be named “The Natural Law of Sovereign Men“, or just “Natural Law“. However, I solved ‘ethics’ first, and the name for that ethics is ‘propertarianism’. So we ‘stuck with propertarianism’ simply because of name recognition. The Scope of Propertarianism (or whatever you choose to call it: “Natural Law“, or “Natural Law of Sovereign Men“, or “The White Law” or the “Philosophy of Western Civilization” ): propertarianism.com/2018/06/02/the-scope-of-propertarianism-natural-law/3 – THIRD QUESTION: THE OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY: An overview of the content of Propertarianism. propertarianism.com/basic-concepts/

  • Definitions: Empathy > Sympathy > Understanding

    October 22nd, 2018 10:40 AM DEFINITIONS: EMPATHY > SYMPATHY > UNDERSTANDING I use understanding for reason, sympathy for motives and intentions, and empathy for feelings. |COMMUNICATION| Empathy(Feel/Value/reaction) > Sympathy (Intuition/Incentives/cause) > Understand (Reason/Words/Argument-Negotiation)

  • Wotan Gives Us a Hard Heart

    October 22nd, 2018 10:34 AM WOTAN GIVES US A HARD HEART

    “Wotan placed a hard heart in my breast,” is what an old Scandinavian saga says: the poet who said this caught correctly what springs straight from the soul of a proud Viking. Such a type of man is proud of the very fact that he has not been made for compassion: which is why the hero of the saga adds in warning, “If a man does not have a hard heart when young, it will never harden”. The noble and the brave who think like this are the furthest from that morality that sees the badge of morality precisely in compassion or in doing things for others or in selflessness; one’s faith in one’s self, one’s pride in one’s self, a basic animosity and irony towards selflessness belongs just as definitely to noble morality as a mild contempt and wariness towards compassionate feelings and the warm heart”— Nietzsche, from the Genealogy of Morals.