Source: Original Site Post

October 29th, 2018 9:55 AM THE POSITION OF “LIBERTARIAN” LITERATURE IN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY [A]s in most enlightenment literature, [Insert libertarian book name here] presumes an environmental condition that does not exist. The enlightenment has failed. The 20th century was the end of the experiment. Man was not oppressed. He was domesticated, until he could produce a sufficient pareto distribution that made a middle class possible given the technology available. we aren’t every going to ‘…. all just get along…”, only find the safest ways of evolutionary competition. [they are] good books. But [they are] just plagued by the usual problems of the postwar ‘end of history’ movement between the anglo, french, and jewish versions of a middle class utopia. My criticism of Rawls, Nozick, Barnett (et al), is that like many in the 20th, they too readily accepted the jewish libertine separatist literature – when that tradition never created liberty because the producers could never hold territory, because they were insufficiently martial – instead of the european tripartite (aristocratic) model of earning a condition of liberty through governance of animal man – by holding the territory and creating the institutions and capital necessary to domesticate him. So the Libertines “libertarians” produced works advocating Roving Preacher ‘liberty’ and the ‘Bazaar ethics of travelling merchants’ instead of the entics of the territorial military, independent jurist, the domestication from slavery to serfdom to freemen to citizen to peer, and the production of metal and capital rather than rent seeking and privatization of the commons.) Just as we fought hard to survive the french german, and russian counter-empirical revolutions (enlightenments), and their ‘centuries’, the “jewish century” is over (having done more than all previous counter-revolutions combined). Marxism, Socialism, “Libertinism”, Neo-conservatism, “Jewish Austrianism”, Freudian and Boazian Pseudoscience, Frankfurt “critique” (undermining), french-jewish postmodernism (outright lying by reality by chanting), Propaganda by Pilpul and Critique, Globalism, and all universalisms (monopolies) of authoritarians have failed, with the balance of powers, nationalism, truth, and science replacing the century of fraud. The question is whether we will regroup and defend ourselves against the restoration of the 1500 years of islamic conquest, as we have regrouped against the french, german, russian, and jewish revolts against modernity. It seems like the intellectual vanguard to undermine the west (the french and the jews), the political vanguard to undermine the west (the puritans and the french and the jews) and the islamic military and demographic masses to destroy, (restoration of the islamic conquest) is just repeating in the current world, the same process that occurred in the ancient – and gave us the Abrahamic Dark Ages of Ignorance. Without women voters we would never be here. Because like the ancient world, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam were spread to the women and the underclasses who are most susceptible to false promise (‘salvation’), pilpul (sophism), and critique (straw manning). But despite women voters it appears that the world is revolting against the jewish century false promises, pilpul (sophisms), critique (straw manning), and the industrialization of undermining through media (gossip and reputation destruction. Anglo 1600’s, French 1700’s, German middle 1800 to early 1900’s, Russian – Jewish Late 1800-early-1900’s – jewish postwar to present – Islamic late 1900s to present. one empirica and one scientific enlightenment, offset by french, german, russian-jewish-chinese, western-jewish, and now Islamic counter-enlightenments. in retrospect it’s amazing that (a) we fell for it a second time, and (b) still survived it.