SUN TZU’S ART OF WAR A WORK OF AGENCY (worth repeating) [T]here is only one book in world literature that is an equal to the western canon, and that is the art of war – although the european works of Machiavelli, are more advanced, the universal applicability of the first of all does it best. It is an essay in the amoral (not immoral). We spend so much time in moral mind, we leave ourselves open to defeat. So,he retrains us to think objectively rather than morally. It is not a book about war. It is a book by which we restore agency, lost in the training of our norms. Machiavelli provides the same advice more directly in The Prince and his Art of War: morality has no place in war or its preparation. The norms ‘untrain us’ to succeed in war. Hece all men must be trained in both war of the amoral, and commerce and cooperation of the moral. (Said this sometime in the past few days and thought it needed repeating that these books are not on war. They are on restoring that which we are untrained in civil orders, and must be if we are to survive competitors.)
Source: Original Site Post
-
Short Course: Does Might Make Right (or Rights)?
–“DOES MIGHT MAKE RIGHT? (IT MAKES RIGHTS)”–
—“Hello Mr. Doolittle, what if might doesn’t make right? Any thoughts or previous writings?”— A Friend
“Wrongs Exist. Right Is That Which Is Not Wrong.” propertarianism.com/2018/01/23/wrongs-exist-right-is-that-which-is-not-wrong/ Might makes rights. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2018/08/07/might-makes-rights/ “Might Makes Right By Righting Wrongs: A Declaration” propertarianism.com/2016/11/02/might-makes-right-by-righting-wrongs-a-declaration/ “Violence and Virtue vs Morality and Fraud” propertarianism.com/2011/03/04/violence-and-virtue-vs-morality-and-fraud/ “The Virtue Of Violence” propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/the-virtue-of-violence/ “The Necessity, Virtue And Morality Of Organized Violence” propertarianism.com/2013/09/07/6480/ “Liberty And Violence” propertarianism.com/2012/03/01/liberty-and-violence/ “Violence Is A Beautiful Word” propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/violence-is-a-beautiful-word/
-
“CURT: PLEASE DEFINE ‘DEFLATIONARY GRAMMAR’?”– Search and ye shall find: proper
–“CURT: PLEASE DEFINE ‘DEFLATIONARY GRAMMAR’?”– Search and ye shall find: propertarianism.com/2018/03/16/11386/
-
Do You Know The Difference?
Religion Vs Ideology Vs Philosophy Vs Logic Vs Mathematics Vs Science A RELIGION consists of any set of ideas of justification which require belief in, testimony to, or action according to, one or more falsehoods as a cost of inclusion and use. AN IDEOLOGY consist of any set of ideas that agitate, motivate, or inspire achievement of political ends under majoritarian (monopoly) democracy. An ideology need not be internally consistent externally correspondent, or existentially possible. It need only motivate individuals to act in furtherance of policy. A PHILOSOPHY consists of any set of internally consistent ideas of decidability which justify pursuit of personal preferences or group goods. A LOGIC consists of any deflationary grammar of decidability that assists in the falsification by competition of one or more constant relations between states. (Note that one proves nothing logically other than internal consistency, because all premises of external correspondence are forever contingent.) MATHEMATICS consists of a deflationary grammar of decidability consisting of competition between positional names under the preservation of ratios providing a single axis of decidability: position – but in N dimensions; thereby providing commensurability between any set of positional relations of any number of dimensions. A SCIENCE consists of any set of ideas that provide decidability independent of personal preference or group goods, by the systematic elimination of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalism, and deceit, by the use of measurement and record of actions â demonstrations versus words. NATURAL LAW of RECIPROCITY (Tort), was produced scientifically (empirically) by trial and error, through the resolution of disputes across personal preferences, group goods, norms, traditions, and intuitions, cumulating always and everywhere that decidability is provided by property, and property consists in the demonstrated investment of human action or inaction anything whether genetic, material, behavioral, or informational.
-
Defending Hayek
[T]here is so much “shyte” written about Hayek that it’s impossible to defend him against the cabbages of sophism. Look, Hayek in the sensory order, in the Knowledge Problem, in the Pricing System’s solution to the Knowledge Problem, can only be understood as he finally understood it, as a question of the Law, and the LAW as the institutional means of preserving the exceptionalism of western civilization. We do not submit to the market, we submit to the law, and we do so because it is, as in all cases, the means by which we provide no incentive to others to fail to submit to the law. The fact that we finally had power of the purse sufficient to interfere in the economy merely required hayek to expand it. Fortunately for me, and unfortunately for hayek, I was born after Turing (and chomsky) and Hayek before. So Hayek’s work can be completed in a method he could sense in the Sensory Order but not develop into the Science of Law he finally understood was the NEGATIVE means by which we produce positive ends. Popper got partway there. Hayek got partway there. Turing got partway there. Chomsky took turing and added a little bit more. But it was too late to prevent the 20th century’s consumption of the accumulated capital of western civilization.
-
Sun Tzu’s Art of War a Work of Agency
SUN TZU’S ART OF WAR A WORK OF AGENCY (worth repeating) [T]here is only one book in world literature that is an equal to the western canon, and that is the art of war – although the european works of Machiavelli, are more advanced, the universal applicability of the first of all does it best. It is an essay in the amoral (not immoral). We spend so much time in moral mind, we leave ourselves open to defeat. So,he retrains us to think objectively rather than morally. It is not a book about war. It is a book by which we restore agency, lost in the training of our norms. Machiavelli provides the same advice more directly in The Prince and his Art of War: morality has no place in war or its preparation. The norms ‘untrain us’ to succeed in war. Hece all men must be trained in both war of the amoral, and commerce and cooperation of the moral. (Said this sometime in the past few days and thought it needed repeating that these books are not on war. They are on restoring that which we are untrained in civil orders, and must be if we are to survive competitors.)
-
Short Course: Does Might Make Right (or Rights)?
–“DOES MIGHT MAKE RIGHT? (IT MAKES RIGHTS)”–
—“Hello Mr. Doolittle, what if might doesn’t make right? Any thoughts or previous writings?”— A Friend
“Wrongs Exist. Right Is That Which Is Not Wrong.” propertarianism.com/2018/01/23/wrongs-exist-right-is-that-which-is-not-wrong/ Might makes rights. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2018/08/07/might-makes-rights/ “Might Makes Right By Righting Wrongs: A Declaration” propertarianism.com/2016/11/02/might-makes-right-by-righting-wrongs-a-declaration/ “Violence and Virtue vs Morality and Fraud” propertarianism.com/2011/03/04/violence-and-virtue-vs-morality-and-fraud/ “The Virtue Of Violence” propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/the-virtue-of-violence/ “The Necessity, Virtue And Morality Of Organized Violence” propertarianism.com/2013/09/07/6480/ “Liberty And Violence” propertarianism.com/2012/03/01/liberty-and-violence/ “Violence Is A Beautiful Word” propertarianism.com/2010/04/23/violence-is-a-beautiful-word/
-
Return to Our Primary Industry: Domestication
—“The Left is not attempting to win the debate. It is simply not the practical goal within the current political system. It is trying to persuade the electorate, the masses. And the Left is very efficient in the game of persuasion, which is mostly about playing the emotions of the crowd – which is mostly not rational, but is driven by irrational fears and desires. Your approach, as impeccable as it may be, is far less efficient for the given purpose.”— Igor Rogov
Correct. ergo: civil war. law. force – return to the method by which the women, the peasantry and priesthood are ruled if for no other reason than our self defense. And so we can once again profit from the domestication of the animal man. It is the most profitable industry at all. There is no reason we should have or should ever, abandon it. Domesticate animals, then plants, then men, then nature, then planets, then the universe.
-
“Curt needs to read [ insert here ]”
—“CURT NEEDS TO READ [INSERT NOVELS, ESSAYS HERE].”—
Sci Fi? I read Herbert (Both Dune, and the White Plague – which I bet you haven’t) and Heinlein, and Clarke, and Asimov, and Bova and Ellison, and Bear, Anderson, and Pohl, and NIven, and Lem and Crichton, and Lem, and Forward, and Weber, and Saberhagen, and Steakley, and le Guin and Moorcock, and Lieber, Ballard and del Ray, and Stephenson and Sterling and and Gibson and Dick, and the Anthologies, and subscribed to Galaxy, and Isaac Asimov’s Science FIction, and Creepy, Eerie, Epic, 1984, Heavy Metal Magazines, and everything in the Splatterpunk Movement, saw 2001, silent running, star wars, alien, aliens, blade runner and dune in the theaters on first run. And I played the (and wrote) the first generations of video console games, computer games, and had a Z80, a commodore 64/128, a tandy color computer (still my favorite), a heavy-to-carry compaq portable computer, an IBM PC (Original). I played Wizardry when it came out, the Bard’s Tale, Doom, Quake, Unreal, and Counter-Strike. I didn’t even touch Horror and Mystery, or Military FIction, or Spy novels in that list. I also read pretty much everything in the top 100 books of literature, the majority of the Great Books Series, (in hardcover), every encyclopedia (Britannica is best), Roget’s thesaurus, multiple dictionaries, history, science, most everything ever written in and on artificial intelligence, software design, programming, and only began to look at philosophy through the philosophy of science (popper and kuhn) which led me to Hayek, and economics, and that combination was ‘the key’ to my understanding ‘what had gone wrong’ in intellectual history during the 20th century. I only read philosophy to falsify it. My Recommended Reading List contains books and papers I have read. But only a FRACTION of them. Even today I sift through volumes of information (Mostly papers) and the odd book (almost all books in the sciences are as predictable now, as are books of fiction), as well as produce thousands of words of output myself. I process information. Yeah. I’m THAT GUY with six books under his arm, reading at every possible moment, that thinks every other person is a fucking moron, and barely domesticated (dangerous) animal (zombie, or what we call an NPC now), and that teachers and professors largely fill the function of keeping them in a corral we call the class room, and few are worth the air they breathe. The difference is I was in fights on a regular basis, back when things were ‘what boys do’ – particularly in farm towns. I am, to my knowledge, other than what I learned in art theory, self educated – entirely. School, university, library, bookstore, and the internet are simply nice places to consume information without worrying about the peasantry doing something too stupid. Unfortunately, the optimum means of protecting yourself from Zombies is to run a business, accumulate capital and revenue streams, and surround yourself with humans. This is the problem for my ‘kin’. They are not allowed to create voluntary disassociation to protect themselves from the zombies. and so unless they can earn enough money to do so they are exposed to the zombies and cannot create safe spaces we call ‘neighborhoods’ and ‘civil society’.
-
Return to Our Primary Industry: Domestication
—“The Left is not attempting to win the debate. It is simply not the practical goal within the current political system. It is trying to persuade the electorate, the masses. And the Left is very efficient in the game of persuasion, which is mostly about playing the emotions of the crowd – which is mostly not rational, but is driven by irrational fears and desires. Your approach, as impeccable as it may be, is far less efficient for the given purpose.”— Igor Rogov
Correct. ergo: civil war. law. force – return to the method by which the women, the peasantry and priesthood are ruled if for no other reason than our self defense. And so we can once again profit from the domestication of the animal man. It is the most profitable industry at all. There is no reason we should have or should ever, abandon it. Domesticate animals, then plants, then men, then nature, then planets, then the universe.