(FB 1553099472 Timestamp) THE SUPERPOWER If Philosophy helped you in life and business, The Natural Law will be a superpower by comparison. Yes, its work. But it’s not harder than learning geometry or basic programming as far as I can tell. And other than it’s falsificationary, equilibrating, and reciprocal, rather than ‘justifiationary’ it’s a bit more intuitive. But man. Learning how to convert from justification to falsification, equilibration, and reciprocity is … well, it’s gotta be turned into a habit. And a habit requires repetition. And that means ‘lots of case studies’. Ie: writing lots of law.
Source: Original Site Post
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553102055 Timestamp) THE PRACTICAL DAILY BENEFITS OF PROPERTARIANISM –“Can you explain the value of P for others’ benefit?”– by Moritz Bierling Hehe, I’ve developed much more “oomph” in negotiations of all kind, be they romantic, professional, or otherwise With the aid of a comprehensive framework for assessing what people desire, protect, and defend (Property-in-Toto and Acquisitionism), I can easily understand where they overextend their hand (bluff) or fail to ask for everything they could get within the limits of reciprocity. I can point out benefits accruing to them from my part of the relationship they don’t account for. But perhaps most importantly of all, I can accurately assess what value my skills (and network, ideas, awarenesses) bring to the table, which translates into a confident and relaxed attitudeââone that the other party can feel and readily submits to, because they instinctively sense that “I know my shit” and “they can’t fuck with me”. Oh, and another added benefit, perhaps even greater than the above, lies in me not deceiving myself and getting blindsided by an angle I didn’t consider.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553086888 Timestamp) —“It’s been suggested by some that one reason why so many of the French today have dark hair is that the culling of the nobility was simultaneously a culling of blondes. For there was a correlation between blonde hair (i.e. Germanic and Gallic ancestry) and the nobility.”—Caduceus Mercurius France never recovered.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553099340 Timestamp) SITE UPDATE: BUG ON PURCHASING COURSE FIXED Unfortunately we cannot mix the Store and Course workflows for some reason that is beyond my comprehension. But in trying to do so we blocked course purchases. This bug is fixed. We have a request into the devs (who are slow but strangely they DO fix things we report) to repair the functionality allowing the Courses to use the ‘cart’ functionality. Doing so will allow us to issue discounts etc. At present this doesn’t seem possible. And we think it’s necessary given the financial capacity of different ‘students’.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553101370 Timestamp) YES YOU CAN USE A FAKE NAME (ALIAS) WITH THE INSTITUTE WHEN TAKING COURSES —“I want to participate in the courses, but I’m a bit concerned that putting in my real name will mean I’ll end up on some list that Antifa publishes after the Institute falls prey to hacking. Perhaps a topic worthwhile addressing on your timeline as well.”— A Friend (a) we don’t want to have to rely on dipshit aliases and user names. Just make up an alias that looks like a real name. Use it to register. (b) if we achieve accreditation then we can always change the name on issuing credits, certifications, and degrees. Ok? See…. 😉 (NOTE: this content added to site FAQ under Home > FAQ’s )
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553086843 Timestamp) Every day that goes by, I move farther from peaceful organized devolution and separation to the very opposite.
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553096070 Timestamp) NO YAHOO ADDRESSES PLEASE No, the site will not accept a Yahoo email address, or a .ru or .pl address, or a three part domain like: something,somethingelse,xyz. That is because these are the primary means by which the ‘russian bots’ spam our site, and the spam software will simply allow you to register but lock you out. FWIW: a yahoo or hotmail address is a little bit like riding the short bus to school, or wearing a pink vagina hat. OK? Grownups don’t use hotmail or yahoo. (I keep hotmail and yahoo addresses for spam magnets: throw aways.)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553099513 Timestamp) Can you imagine being in a meeting with pretty much anyone who DOESN”T know P, and negotiating or debating with them? it’s almost not fair. ALmost. … 😉
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553095303 Timestamp) IF YOU TAKE THESE COURSES LAW103 – Foundations: The Method, LAW203 – Application: Opinions, Arguments, and Law LAW213 – Reformation: Human Knowledge Reform LAW303 – Reconstruction (and Constitution) By the end of LAW203 You will be able to construct every significant moral issue of the day in rigorous form just as I posed on Pedophilia yesterday. By the end of LAW213 you will understand ‘what’s wrong’ with all the fields including education, and how to repair them. By the end of LAW303 you will be able to write a constitution for your ‘recommended’ (Preferred) form of government. If you also take HIST106 – The History of the European Peoples you will have the narrative structure to explain why. If you also take ECON103 and ECON203 you will understand economics as a social science such that it is much easier to practice NATURAL LAW. This is a METHODOLOGY. it takes a little practice but the methodology can be taught, such that you can write ‘decisions’ and ‘arguments’ in natural law. (PS: FYI: I have condensed Epistemology and Argument into a single course: Foundations: LAW103/6. This was possible because of the simplification of the method once i put the material into class form.)
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
(FB 1553099472 Timestamp) THE SUPERPOWER If Philosophy helped you in life and business, The Natural Law will be a superpower by comparison. Yes, its work. But it’s not harder than learning geometry or basic programming as far as I can tell. And other than it’s falsificationary, equilibrating, and reciprocal, rather than ‘justifiationary’ it’s a bit more intuitive. But man. Learning how to convert from justification to falsification, equilibration, and reciprocity is … well, it’s gotta be turned into a habit. And a habit requires repetition. And that means ‘lots of case studies’. Ie: writing lots of law.